US Trends in Thoracic Aneurysm Repair KAREN L. WALKER MS JONATHAN J. SHUSTER PHD THOMAS M. BEAVER MD, MPH DIVISION OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY DIVISION OF BIOSTATISTICS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA Objective National practice patterns for thoracic aneurysm repair are largely unknown because the US does not have a thoracic aneurysm endovascular repair registry. The National Inpatient Sample was employed to determine the effects of the 2005 FDA approval of thoracic aneurysm endografts on the surgical management of patients with thoracic aneurysms. National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 20% stratified sample of US hospital discharges 8 million hospital discharges Can be weighted to generate national estimates Can be used to assess in-hospital complications, mortality and outcomes. Cannot be used to assess long-term outcomes. Methods Population ICD-9 codes were used to identify all thoracic aneurysm cases with endovascular repair (39.73) or Open Repair (38.45) procedure code. Exclusion criteria were applied enabling the selection of only unruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm repairs. NIS was used to generate repair rates which were adjusted for annual population estimates. Meta-analysis controlling for center was performed to compare differences in age, comorbidities, complications, and LOS for Open repair vs. TEVAR (Thoracic EndoVascular Aortic Repair) . Results: An increase in diagnosis of Thoracic aneurysms followed introduction of 16 slice CT scanners in 2003 An increased overall repair rate of thoracic aneurysms followed 2005 FDA approval of thoracic endografts (TEVAR). Increased adoption of Thoracic endograft repair may follow previous trends in Abdominal endograft repair (EVAR). TEVAR (Thoracic EndoVascular Aortic Repair) patients were older with more comorbidities, but had shorter LOS, fewer complications and decreased mortality. Diagnosis Rate of Unruptured Thoracic Aneurysms per 1,000,000 Adjusted for US Census Bureau Annual Population Estimates 25 160 140 20 120 15 100 80 10 60 40 5 20 0 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 Unruptured Thoracic Aneurysms 2004 2005 2006 Thoracic CT Scans Thoracic CT Scans Utilization per 1,000,000 Adjusted for US Census Bureau Annual Population Estimates Thoracic CT Scan Utilization and Diagnosis of Unruptured Thoracic Aneurysm Unruptured Descending Thoracic Aneurysm Repair per 1,000,000 Adjusted for US Census Bureau Annual Population Estimates, 18+ Years Trends in Unruptured Descending Thoracic Aneurysm Repair 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2000 2001 2002 Open Repair 2003 TEVAR 2004 2005 Total Repairs 2006 Trends in Abdominal Aneurysm Repair Principle Procedure per 1,000,000 (Adjusted for US Census Bureau Annual Population Estimates) 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Open Repair 2000 2001 EVAR 2002 2003 2004 Total Repairs 2005 2006 Comorbidities in 2006 Cohort: Only Those Institutions in 2006 NIS Cohort Performing Both TEVAR and Open Repair Open Repair TEVAR Relative Risk P-Value Current or Previous Smoker 12.63 % 36.37 % 0.34 0.002 Chronic Kidney Disease 2.03% 12.05% 0.16 0.004 Diabetes 5.69 % 16.85 % 0.33 0.03 Hypertension 76.18 % 78.63 % 0.96 0.72 Coronary Artery Disease 21.15 % 25.06 % 0.84 0.64 Previous Myocardial Infarction 3.65 % 6.09 % 0.60 0.51 Congestive Heart Failure 10.40 % 9.01 % 1.15 0.72 COPD 27.47 % 32.27 % 0.85 0.51 Peripheral Vascular Disease 0% 5.07 % 0 . Complications in 2006 Cohort: Only Those Institutions in 2006 NIS Cohort Performing Both TEVAR and Open Repair Open Repair TEVAR Relative Risk P-Value Cardiac Complication 7.13 % 1.21 % 5.85 0.01 Respiratory Complication 23.37 % 8.28 % 2.81 0.01 Ventilation > 96 hrs 13.41 % 1.97 % 6.78 0.01 Transfusion 32.52 % 15.77 % 2.06 0.006 Hemorrhage 7.13 % 3.45 % 2.06 0.38 Acute Renal Failure 8.35 % 3.51 % 2.37 0.13 Postoperative Stroke/TIA 3.65 % 2.65 % 1.37 0.67 Paraplegia 0.40 % 0.73 % 0.55 0.63 Peripheral Vascular Complication 2.43 % 4.60 % 0.52 0.55 Graft Problem 2.84 % 4.75 % 0.59 0.59 Mean Age and Length of Stay: Only Those Institutions in 2006 NIS Cohort Performing Both TEVAR and Open Repair Open Repair TEVAR P-value TEVAR Patients Age 61.5 69.7 <.01 OLDER LOS 9 6 <.01 Decreased LOS Mortality 9.79% 1.15% <.01 Decreased mortality Conclusions TEVAR has been rapidly adopted in the US resulting in increased treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Trends in abdominal aneurysm repair may foreshadow future trends in thoracic aneurysm repair. Despite older age and comorbidities, TEVAR had better outcomes and shorter hospital stays. Vigilant surveillance of TEVAR patients is warranted because the long-term outcomes are unknown.