A Value-Based Model for Reduction of Preventable Harm in Medical/Surgical Inpatients Thanjavur S Ravikumar, Cordelia Sharma, et al. HIMSS ME-PI Community Meeting November 5, 2010 Geisinger Health System, Wilkes-Barre, PA; LIJ Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 1 Case #1 58 yr old man following colon resection proceeds to have a massive AMI – Cardiogenic Shock Issues: *Despite young age, patient had clinical evidence of cardiac disease - risk under estimation *Post op EKG shows changes, wrong evaluation by junior resident - cognitive dissonance - co-management vs. consultation *Junior resident Senior resident Attending hierarchy - power distance Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 2 Case #2 55 yr old morbidly obese woman with sleep apnea undergoes bowel resection complicated by severe aspiration, pneumonia & respiratory arrest. Issues: * Failure to rescue * Inter-team communication/care coordination * Knowledge gap Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 3 Case #3 88 yr old female undergoes radical surgery for pelvis tumor. On POD # 2 at 6:45 PM patient developed respiratory distress and decreased oxygen saturation. Surgical rapid response called. SICU attending as well as the surgical PA and residents respond. It is quickly determined that patient requires intubation. Pt is intubated by the intensivist while plans for transfer to SICU are made. Seemingly appropriate traditional mode of care. Is this sufficient? Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 4 Effective Methods/Factors on Outcome • Multidisciplinary focus • Critical event training/simulation • Effective communication process • Physiologically based early warning systems and intervention Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 5 Hypothesis & Objectives • Building safe hospital systems to improve valuebased surgical outcomes is predicated on workflow redesign for dynamic risk stratification, coupled with “real time” mitigation of risk – Co-management model for hospitalized surgical cohort – Iterative process redesign adaptable to disparate systems – Outcome-based; cost-effective = value paradigm – Multidisciplinary teams, patient-centered – Applicability to medical/surgical adult inpatients Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 6 Perioperative Deterioration: Outcome Depends on Patient Status Compensated Stability Decompensating Pseudo Stability Physiologic Derangement - - - Lives Saved/QOL ― Disease Progression Critical Event Acute Care System Redesign: 3 Zones vs. ROI ROI / DISEASE PROGRESSION ROI In Disease Progression Management Continuum of Care Rapid Response Zones of Intervention - - - Return on Investment ― Disease Progression Code Team Continuum of Care: Program Description and Domains R & D/Education Quality CER Simulation Complications Glossary SS 360 Scoring Financials Unit Specific Costs DRG/Program Based Cost Total Cost Analysis Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Targeted Response Preventable Harm Reduction Workflow Redesign Co-management of Hospitalized Patients Intensivist/Hospitalist with Medical/Surgical Teams Multidisciplinary Rounds Acuity Stratified HAWK Rounds Real time communication Hospital Anatomy Redesign Hospitalist Led Floor-based Teams Aggregation of Patients Formation of safety net – PCU Mortality Reduction Efficiency Bed Mgmt Throughput ED, OR, ICU Impact Enabling Technologies EHR Vocera Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary Acuity Based Rounds (Hawk/Dove/ Risk Score) Discharge Planning; Transition of Care 9 Study Design and Methods Pilot SCoC 1998 A Validation SCoC 2001 B C 2001 2005 2004 PHAMIS Hospital-wide CoC Medical Center Surgery TSI SPARCS Premier 2008 Metrics & Analysis Dec 2008 Mortality, LOS, Cost, Readmission Jun 2009 D Multi-Hospital Database Nov 2009 Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Linear Regression, Chi-Sq, t-Test, Fisher, Mann-Whitney U-Test Siemens CareScience QUEST Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 10 Implementation Steps • Engagement of Stakeholders • Multidisciplinary Structure: - Floor based team building/cohorting - Restructure Hospitalist role/enhance ownership - One CoC MD – weekly rotation • Redesign Process Flow - Concurrent multidisciplinary CoC rounds in a.m. CoC morning report Hawk rounds, TOC, task assignment, TRT Real time team and external communication Creation of PCU • Tools - MDRT in Epic Vocera build out Mortality analysis, simulation FCCS training Protocols, care maps, algorithms Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 11 A Day in the Continuum 7:30PM – 7:00AM Periodic Hawk Rounds (10PM, 2AM, 6AM) AM Discharge Prep 7:00PM – 7:30PM Hospitalist Handoff Communication 21 20 19 22 “Right Care” “Right Team” 17 16 Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve 1 2 “Right Sequence” “Right Time” “Right “Right Rounding” Handoffs” 3 4 5 6 Efficient Discharges -11:00AM Reduce holding – ED and PACU Real time Communication 18 9:30AM – 7:00PM Hospitalist Patient Care & Continuum of Care Hawk Rounds 23 00 15 7 RRT & Code Calls 8 Hawk Rounding Acuity Stratified Targeted Response 14 13 12 11 9 10 Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 7:00AM – 7:30AM Hospitalist Handoff Communication 7:30AM – 8:00AM Hospitalist PreRounding on the Patient Floors 8:00AM – 9:00AM Simultaneous CoC Rounds 9:00AM – 9:30AM Hospitalist & Continuum of Care MD Hawk Huddle & Nursing Bed Huddle 12 Rounding Tool Domains Patient List History Icon&&Alerts HAWK List Provider Nursing PT / OT Pharmacy Nutrition & Care Management Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 13 Pilot SCoC: Mortality Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 14 Pilot SCoC Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 15 Pilot SCoC: Outcome Summary Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 16 Validation SCoC Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 17 Validation SCoC * * Mortality Odds Ratio Index: LIJMC vs. LIJMC - Surgery 2005 vs. 2007 1.2 1.6 Significant at 95% confidence level Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 18 Validation SCoC: LOS Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 19 Validation SCoC: Readmissions Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 20 Hospital-wide CoC: Mortality Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 21 Mortality CareScience - Confidential Information Hospital-wide CoC: Mortality Discharge Dates: 11-01-2008 thru 05-312009 Facilities: GEISINGER WYOMING VALLEY Report By: Month Date Range Total Outcome Actual Expected Deviation Cases Cases O/E Ratio Dec-2008 945 931 3.4% 3.0% 0.5% 1.16 Jan-2009 914 900 3.2% 3.0% 0.2% 1.07 Feb-2009 879 867 2.8% 2.3% 0.4% 1.18 Mar-2009 906 894 2.6% 2.7% -0.1% 0.96 Apr-2009 1,018 1,005 2.7% 2.7% 0.0% 1.00 922 914 3.0% 2.5% 0.4% 1.16 6,440 6,351 3.0% 2.8% 0.2% * 1.09 May-2009 Totals: Mortality Rate Comparison -- Geisinger Health System Discharge Dates: 06-01-2009 thru 11-30-2009 Date Range Total Outcome Actual Expected Deviation Cases Cases Jun-2009 916 898 2.7% 2.8% -0.1% 0.95 Jul-2009 999 984 2.9% Aug-2009 923 912 2.1% 2.8% 0.1% 1.04 2.5% -0.4% 0.83 Sep-2009 984 974 2.1% 2.6% -0.6% * 0.78 Oct-2009 1,045 1,033 2.1% 2.6% -0.5% 0.83 930 918 2.4% 2.6% -0.2% 0.92 5,797 5,719 2.4% 2.7% -0.3% * 0.89 Nov-2009 Totals: * Significant at 75% confidence level ** Significant at 95% confidence level Source: CareScience Quality Manager Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 22 Cost Savings Pilot SCoC • Cost saved from decreased LOS in PCU • $851,511 - $2,007,388 Validation SCoC • ALOS and direct costs by CMS surgical DRG Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 23 Summary • Hospital Care Delivery Redesign: – Real time acuity stratification and mitigation of risk • Applicability to disparate hospital systems / patient populations • Cost saving outweighs resource requirement • Limitations: – Not an RCT – Administrative data reliance – SMR: Constant risk fallacy “Differential measurement error” “Inconsistent proxy measures of risk” Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 24 ROI / DISEASE PROGRESSION Acute Care System Redesign Patient Safety Strategies Continuum of Care Rapid Response Shift to the Left Zones of Intervention - - - Return on Investment ― Disease Progression Code Team Future Initiatives • FCCS course for hospitalists/mid level providers/nurses at GWV • Education using simulation of real case scenarios • Floor based data on outcomes • Readmission analysis • Predictive modeling - Mortality analysis - Implementation of SS360 score - Development of risk stratification score for medical pts - Bio markers • DRG based protocols/algorithms Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 26 Proven Care® Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Continuum of Care Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 27 Case #1 58 yr old man with known CAD/HTN/DM/smoker undergoes elective colon resection WHAT HAPPENED 12 PM – Pt comes out of OR 1 AM – Intern evaluates pt for chest pain. Orders EKG and labs: notifies senior resident that there are no new EKG changes - pt’s pain resolves. 4 AM – Nurse calls intern for ↑ HR intern orders beta-blocker and HR ↓ 7 AM – Chief resident notes during rounds that earlier EKG had significant changes that intern missed. Cardiology consult called STAT. 8 AM – Cardiologist diagnoses massive MI. Pt becomes hypotensive 9 AM – Pt moved to ICU – deteriorates and expires from cardiac arrest. Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve WHAT CONTINUUM OF CARE COULD DO 12 PM – Pt identified as “HAWK” by risk stratification thru review of OR pts with surgical team 2 AM – Pt seen during Hawk rounds. Intern and CoC review EKG and identify new changes. Surgical chief resident and Attg called. Cardiology consulted. Cardiologist evaluates pt. Pt taken to cath lab emergently. Survives Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 29 Case #2 45 yr old morbidly obese woman develops emesis after bowel resection: Resp Ther places pt on BIPAP at night without knowledge of emesis. Pt aspirates massively due to positive pressure and expires: Knowledge gap Lack of inter team communication Solution: CoC develops simulation based scenario to demonstrate contraindication of BIPAP and incorporates in the curriculum of all stake holders Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 30 Case #3 WHAT HAPPENED POD #1 – 2 AM – Confusion fever 9 AM – O2Sat 79% 2L 02 11 AM – Weaned to RA 1 PM – Labored respirations confusion 02Sat 83%--02 Restarted 5 AM – Multiple episodes of confusion – psych consulted POD #2 3 PM – Labored respirations, CXR bilateral effusions 8 PM – Pt found unresponsive in chair. RRT called. Pt intubated, TX to SICU POD # 5 – Extubated POD # 7 – Transfer to floor POD # 7 & 8 –Continuum of Care f/u POD # 9 – D/C to Rehab Heal • Teach • Discover • Serve WHAT CONTINUUM OF CARE COULD DO POD #1 9 AM –Primary team calls Continuum of Care team - Attending/PA Pt evaluated diagnostic and Tx recommendations made and Pt triaged to appropriate setting. Hawk rounding avoids RRT call and reintubation Continuum of Care F/U after transfer from ICU or PCU to floor and available to surgical team. POD #7 D/C to Rehab/home Geisinger Health System Confidential and Proprietary 31