Earthquake Hazards and Seismic Design Richard P. Ray Ph.D. P.E. Direct Effects • Ground failures (instabilities) – – – – – – – – Surface faulting Vibration of soil Ground cracking Liquefaction Ground lurching Differential settlement Lateral spreading Landslides • Vibrations transmitted from the ground to the structure xt m x c k/2 xg k/2 Direct Effects xt x m k/2 c k/2 xg mx mxg cx kx 0 mx cx kx mxg Pearthquake (t ) Indirect Effects • • • • • Tsunamis Seiches Landslides Floods Fires Seismic Resistant Construction • Prevent non-structural damage from minor shaking • Prevent structural damage and minimize non structural damage in occasional moderate shaking • Avoid collapse or serious damage in rare, major ground shaking Soil Movements Wood Frame Houses Masonry Structures Concrete Structures Steel Structures Earthquake Resistant Designs • • • • • Construction and Maintenance Need for more comprehensive approach Importance of conceptual design Decrease of demands Action of the soil-structure system Good Pile Design Bridge Foundation and Supports Integral Action of All Parts Proper Building System • Building should be light • Simple, symmetric, regular • Uniform and continuous distribution of mass (m), stiffness (k), strength (σy), ductility (μ). • Avoid long spans and long cantilever • Non-structural elements – Separated completely – Tied to structure Proper Building System • Control inelastic regions • More than one defense line • Stiffness and strength of building matches stiffness and strength of foundation and Building Should Be Light Building Should Be Simple, Symmetric, and Regular Building Should Have Uniform and Continuous Distribution of Mass Stiffness Strength Ductility Retrofitting Soft Stories Non-Structural Should Be Integrated With Structural Structures Should Have the Largest Number of Defenses Building Should Have Balanced Stiffness, Strength, Ductility Between Members, Connections, Supports Construction Aspects Building Research Newer Designs