Convenience Analysis of the Oregon Paint Management Pilot Program

advertisement
CONVENIENCE ANALYSIS OF THE OREGON
PAINT MANAGEMENT PILOT PROGRAM
Hedrick Strickland
Advised by Dr. Lynn Maguire and Matt Keene, US EPA
BACKGROUND
64 million gallons (10%) of the architectural
paint purchased in the US is left over
 largest component of household hazardous
waste (HHW) collection programs
 half a billion dollars per year

BACKGROUND

Product Stewardship Institute (PSI) dialogue
200 participants since December 2003
 reduce the generation of leftover paint
 increase reuse and recycling opportunities


Oregon’s Paint Product Stewardship Law
passed summer of 2009, implemented July 2010
 first manufacturer-financed program for managing
leftover architectural paint


Currently undergoing evaluation

12 critical questions
OBJECTIVE

Determine how convenient the drop-off
locations are for Oregon residents based on


travel time to access a drop-off facility,
travel distance to access a drop-off facility



Statewide
Countywide
Develop a tool to aid in selection of potential
locations
METHODS
Locations active as of
January 24, 2011

Created service areas



5, 10, and 15 miles
5, 10, and 20 minutes
Estimated the population
within each service areas
METHODS
-10 miles of roads
-6 miles within the service area
-Population = 200
SO:
-120 people within service area
METHODS

Site Selection and
Convenience Analysis
tool
1.
2.
Location-allocation
process
My convenience
analysis
LIMITATIONS

Time based service
areas

Population
distribution

Old population data
STATEWIDE RESULTS
residents
within:
5 Minutes
53%
10 Minutes
78%
20 Minutes
90%
5 Miles
71%
10 Miles
84%
15 Miles
91%
COUNTY RESULTS
COUNTY RESULTS
SITE SELECTION AND CONVENIENCE
ANALYSIS TOOL
TOOL DEMONSTRATION
TOOL DEMONSTRATION
TOOL OUTPUTS

Recommended potential locations
 single
site
 a specific number of sites
 as many sites as are required to bring a given
percentage of the population within a specified
time or distance

Summary tables
 statewide
 county
level
CONCLUSIONS
High convenience statewide, lacking in some
areas
 The most underserved residents include those
living in Gilliam, Douglas, Polk, and Lincoln
counties
 Site Selection and Convenience Analysis tool
can help ensure that future programs achieve
high convenience with limited facilities.

RECOMMENDATIONS
Plan yearly collection event in Gilliam county
 Establish collection sites in Polk, Douglas, and
Lincoln counties if funds become available
 If and when potential sites are chosen, use tool
to select the most beneficial ones or to guide
the order of activation.

THANK YOU
Lynn Maguire
 Matt Keene
 John Fay
 Lou Nadeau and others at ERG

Download