Instructional Strategies for Teaching Speaking Zolotonosha February 24, 2012 Presented by Carol Haddaway, Sr. English Language Fellow, Ukraine U.S. Department of State 1 “Speaking in a second or foreign language has often been viewed as the most demanding of the four skills.” (Bailey and Savage in Celce-Murcia, p. 103) 2 WHY? Because we must do it instantaneously and interactively with another person or people. Fluent speech contains reduced forms (what do you want?) slang (cool), idioms (hit the road running), phrasal verbs (figure out) stress, rhythm, and intonation; During the interaction with another speaker one must monitor and understand the other person, think of one’s contribution, produce it, monitoring its effect… (Lazarton, p.103) 3 Implications for Teaching Create a relaxed atmosphere Use interesting topics and stimulating activities Expose Ls to naturally pronounced speech and integrate pronunciation into your lesson Get Ls used to combining listening and speaking in real time, in natural interaction. Establish English as the main classroom language (Davies , 2000, p. 82) 4 “Talking classrooms” Create a classroom culture of speaking through the general use of English in the classroom. (Scott Thornbury in Harmer, p. 123) 5 Learners: motivate, involve, focus create expectations, introduce topic Information Gap Oral Skills Class Who are my learners? 7 Low Level Learners Build on their experience Share their expertise Use realia to keep learning as concrete as possible S1: Have you ever been to Lviv? S2: No I haven’t . Have you? S1: Yes. It’s wonderful S2: How long did you stayed? S1: One week S2: The buildings are beautiful, yes? S1: Yes, and the streets….the chocolates.. S2: Ah, have you ever been to Kyiv? 8 Non-academic learners BICS (Basic interpersonal Communication Skills) Social language – interpersonal interactions Repetitive – functional language (greetings, making requests, giving directions, sharing information). Evidence of mastery: good TL pronunciation, ease of TL social interactions, use of TL expressions Used primarily, though not exclusively in oral language – listening and speaking Takes 2-3 years to master (Jim Cummings, 1970) 9 Academic Learners CALP (Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency) Language encountered in academic situations Used primarily thought not exclusively in reading and writing Not repetitive Takes on average 7-9 years to become truly fluent Participate in learning activities such as Class participation Discussions & Presentations Interacting with peers and professors Asking and answering questions Interpersonal communication (Jim Cummings, 1970) 10 Teacher, Learners, Atmosphere Error Correction, Activities Small Groups Affective Filter 12 Balance Accuracy and Fluency Is it more important to be able to speak a language with accuracy (grammatically correct) or with fluency (communicatively correct, but not always grammatically correct)? 13 Accuracy Practice typically involves focusing only in the new language structures (e.g. comparisons) Focus on pronunciation, vocabulary, word formation, sentence formation Errors are usually dealt with immediately 14 Accuracy example L1: Is the Toyota bigger than the Chevy? L2: Yes, it is. Is the Lexus cheap than…. Teacher: Cheap…? L2: Is the Lexus cheaper than the Chevy? L3: No, it isn’t. Is the Lexus faster than the Toyota? L4: Yes, it is. Is prettier the Toyota? Teacher: Is the…….. 15 Fluency Likely to take place when speaking activities focus on meaning and its negotiation, when speaking strategies are used, and when overt correction is minimized. ) 10 Information Gap Think Pair Share Telling Stories 18 Information Gap Characteristics To exchange information Main attention is sharing information Need to communicate to reach objective Learners must ‘fill the gap’ to complete the activity/communication Why information gap activities? Allow for comprehensible input (i+1) Input should be at the right level of difficulty to promote acquisition Learners produce language – this output ‘pushes’ learners to undertake complete grammatical processing (M. Swain) Help lower students’ affective filter Sleep questionnaire One thing in common Cooperative Activity Think Pair Share 21 Think-Pair-Share How: Teacher presents a question or problem Students are given “think/wait time” and write answers (1) Students pair with a partner (2) Pair share with another pair (4) Group share their responses and ideas with another small group or with the entire class. Why: Have time to think, plan, and rehearse, with feedback Can practice before talking to whole group Question/Problem 1 Interaction is the key to improving EFL learners’ speaking ability. How do you promote this interaction in your classroom? 23 Question/Problem 2 What types of speaking activities do you normally use in your classroom? Do they serve different purposes? 24 Question/Problem 3 Your students are really shy and don’t say anything. How do you arouse in your learners a willingness and need or reason to speak? 25 26 Question/Problem 4 Your students say they can’t talk because they’ll make lots of mistakes. What do/can you do to help them overcome this fear? 27 Question/Problem 5 What are effective ways to give students feedback on their performance during oral activities? 28 Feedback and Error Correction Self – Correction Give learners the opportunity to correct themselves, helping as necessary Peer – Correction If learner cannot self-correct, invite other learners to make the correction Teacher Correction Recast, Error or Mistake, Accuracy or Fluency focus 29 Error Treatment Should errors be treated? What errors should be treated? How should they be treated? Who and When? “There is a French widow in every bedroom.” “The different city is another one in the another two.” Story telling Groups of 3 31 A successful speaking activity Learners talk a lot Student (STT) vs teacher (TTT) – wait time Participation is even discussion not dominated by a minority of talkative students Motivation is high learners are eager to speak; interested in topic Language is of an acceptable level utterances are easily comprehensible acceptable level of accuracy UR, 1991, p. 120 32 (Rivers, 1987 in Richards & Renandyn, p.208) 33 References Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by Principles. Longman Davies, P. and Pearse, E. (2000). Success in English Teaching. Oxford University Press. Farrell, T. (2006). Succeeding with English Language Learners. Corwin Press. Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Pearson Longman. Lazaraton, A. (2001). Teaching Oral Skills. In Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language 3rd Ed., edited by M. Celce-Mircia. Heinle & Heinle. Richards, J.C. & Renandya, W.A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching. Cambridge. Ur, P. (1996).. A Course in Language Teaching. Cambridge. 34 Thank you! 35