RENAL TRANSPLANTATION IN CHILDHOOD Lynne P. Yao, M.D. INOVA Fairfax Hospital for Children Fairfax, VA Overview Review basic transplantation immunology Review immunosuppressive agents used in children Review clinical renal transplantation outcomes in children Review specific complications of renal transplantation in children Review the role of the general pediatrician in the care of a child with a renal transplant Review future directions in renal transplantation Historical perspectives 1902: First experimental kidney transplantation by Emerich Ullmann 1933: First human kidney transplant by Voronoy 1950-53: First functioning human kidney transplant (2 centers) 1961: Azathioprine first used successfully 1962: First use of tissue matching to select a donor 1963: Prednisolone and Azathioprine combination produced longer graft survival 1972: Successful transplantation into a 9 month-old girl 1978: First clinical use of cyclosporine A Transplant immunology ABO group matching – Blood group mismatches result in hyperacute rejection in most cases – ABO incompatible donor protocols underway in children Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) matching Panel Reactive Antibodies (PRA) and Crossmatching Rejection – an immune response raised by the recipient against foreign (donor) alloantigens – allograft rejection is a coordinated event HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) matching HLA system is divided into 2 classes Class I: HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C – Expressed on most cell surfaces Class II: HLA-DR, HLA-DP, HLA-DQ – Expressed predominantly on antigen presenting cells HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-DR most important in clinical transplantation HLA genes located on short arm of chromosome 6 HLA antigens are inherited in a Mendelian fashion as codominant alleles Example of HLA matching HLA locus Mother Father Patient A 3/29 2/1 3/1 B DR 13/44 5/7 8/42 4/3 8/44 5/3 Result: Patient is a 3/6 antigen match with each parent (haplotype match) Haplotype matching improves graft survival because minor (unidentified) HLA loci are also matched Crossmatching Used to detect presence of preformed HLA antibodies against donor tissues Lymphocytes from donor are incubated with recipient serum, complement added, and cell lysis is detected Positive crossmatch is associated with high risk for hyperacute rejection Prevents development of hyperacute rejection Panel reactive antibodies (PRA) PRA – Used to assess likelihood of positive crossmatch – Lymphocytes from a “representative” panel of donors are incubated with serum from patient – Expressed as a percentage of panel cells showing activity – High PRA levels are associated with greater likelihood of positive crossmatch – Major risk factors for high PRA are prior blood transfusion, pregnancy, and prior transplant T lymphocyte activation from Arakelov, Lakkis, Semin. Nephrol., 20:2, 2000 CD4 and CD8 interactions CD4 and B cell interactions Other CD4 interactions Interactions mediated by CD40 costimulatory pathway (from Arakelov, Lakkis, Semin. Nephrol., 20:2, 2000) Stimulation of IL-2 production after T cell activation From Semin. Nephrol., 20:2, 2000 The “paradigms” of transplant immunosuppression The Proliferation Paradigm – drugs that prevent immune cell proliferation prevent rejection – Prednisone, Azathioprine, Mycophenolate Mofetil The Depletion Paradigm – drugs that decrease immune cell numbers prevent rejection – polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies The Cytokine Paradigm – drugs that modify cytokine production prevent rejection – Calcineurin inhibitors, Prednisone, IL-2R monoclonal antibodies need slide of cell cycle Break slide Pediatric Renal Transplantation NAPRTCS (North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study) – Voluntary, collaborative effort – 150 participating centers in US, Canada, Mexico, and Costa Rica – Registry for pediatric renal transplants since 1987 – Registry for ESRD since 1992 – Registry for chronic renal insufficiency since 1995 Characteristics of Pediatric Dialysis Patients Number Percent Gender Male 2549 56.1 Female 1997 43.9 White 2261 49.7 Black 1074 23.6 Hispanic 925 20.3 Other 286 6.3 0-1 years 568 12.5 2-5 years 467 10.3 6-12 years 1407 31.0 13-17 years 1739 38.3 >17 years 365 8.0 Race/ethnicity Age at initiation From Neu, Pediatr. Nephrol., 17:2002 DIAGNOSIS No. of Patients Percent Aplastic, hypoplastic, or dysplastic kidneys 571 15.2 Obstructive uropathy 476 12.7 Reflux nephropathy 129 3.4 Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 526 14.0 Systemic immunological disease 282 7.5 Chronic glomerulonephritis 143 3.8 Hemolytic uremic syndrome 122 3.3 Polycystic kidney disease 114 3.0 Congenital nephrotic syndrome Medullary cystic disease 88 79 2.3 2.1 MPGN Type II 75 2.0 MPGN Type I 38 1.0 Diabetic glomerulonephritis 5 0.1 Sickle cell nephropathy 14 0.4 Unknown 255 6.8 OTHER DISEASES NAPRTCS registry 1987-1999 Number Percent Total transplants 6534 100 Cadaveric donor 3328 51 Living related donor 3206 49 Primary transplant 5436 83.2 Repeat transplant 1098 16.8 Male 3556 59.7 Female 2402 40.3 Caucasian 3747 62.9 Age at transplantation Age Number Percent 0-1 333 5.1 2-5 998 15.3 6-12 2256 34.5 13-17 >18 2527 420 38.7 6.4 Cadaveric donor Living related donor Patient survival by age at primary transplantation Graft survival by bi-annual cohort Cadaveric donor Living related donor Primary graft survival by age at time of transplantation Causes of graft failure in primary transplant Number Percent Total 1399 100 Chronic rejection 437 31.2 Acute rejection 230 16.4 Vascular thrombosis 169 12.1 Death 141 10.1 Recurrence of disease 79 5.7 Primary nonfunction 36 2.6 Malignancy 17 1.2 Patient discontinued medication 50 3.6 Risk factors for chronic rejection Relative risk increase p-value Acute rejection 1.5 0.005 > 2 rejection episodes 4.1 0.006 Late initial acute rejection 2.6 < 0.001 Prior transplant 2.4 < 0.001 African-American race 2.3 < 0.001 Cadaver donor 1.5 < 0.001 Recent transplant (after 1994) 0.66 < 0.001 Time to first rejection episode Risk factors for acute rejection Characteristics Living donor Cadaver donor RR p-value RR Recipient race (black vs. nonblack) 1.34 0.07 1.37 0.004 Recipient age (< 24 months) 0.67 0.04 0.83 0.453 One mismatch vs. none 2.03 <0.001 0.93 0.597 Two mismatches vs. none 1.64 0.01 0.94 0.644 No induction therapy 1.42 0.001 1.31 0.001 p-value HLA-DR mismatch From McDonald, Amer. J. Transplan., 1:2001 Time in years Cadaveric donor Living related donor Primary graft survival by race Significant complications Growth failure Infection Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) Diabetes mellitus Growth failure Growth fails to improve after renal transplantation in several studies – Improvement in growth occurs only in the younger age groups (age 0-5 years) – Long term steroid therapy is implicated – Change to alternate day dosing of prednisone has shown to improve growth – Growth hormone improves growth – Growth hormone not associated with increased risk of rejection or significant graft – Theoretical risk of malignancy Infectious complications Bacterial – Generally more likely in early posttransplant period Viral – CMV and other Herpes viruses – CMV infections relative common and symptoms may be severe – CMV infection may increase risk of chronic rejection EBV – Infection can produce spectrum of disease Varicella – Risk significantly decreased with immunization pretransplant PTLD Malignancy associated with polyclonal expansion of B cells associated with rise in EBV titers Incidence of PTLD in pediatric renal transplants is 1.2% overall Incidence has increased slightly Increased incidence with use of tacrolimus, white race, and cadaver donor Treatment generally involves reduction in immunosuppression dose and antiviral agents Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) Occurs in small number (2.6%) of pediatric renal transplant patients Higher risk groups – African American race – Use of tacrolimus No differences based on overweight, presence of specific HLA antigens, family history, or prednisone dose Increased incidence of acute rejection in PTDM group Role of general pediatrician Growth and development Surveillance for infection Immunizations – Live virus vaccines can be given if prednisone dose is low – Influenza vaccine and pneumococcal vaccine are recommended Awareness of potential drug interactions – drugs that increase activity of CYP450 will increase metabolism of calcineurin inhibitors – Tegretol, Dilantin, INH, Phenobarbital, Rifampin – drugs that compete for metabolism by CYP450 will decrease the metabolism of calcineurin inhibitors – Cimetidine, ketoconazole, erythromycin, diltiazem Future directions Steroid withdrawal or steroid avoidance protocols Designer immunosuppression Tolerance Xenotransplantation Transplant tolerance A state where the immune system does not respond to a specific antigen: A Way to Peace Strategies to induce tolerance – CD28 and CD40L blockade – CTLA4 and FasL blockade Studies in nonhuman primates are promising No data on long term effects, or long term graft function Xenotransplantation Xenotransplantation The need: 12,000 renal transplants were performed, but 42,000 patients remained on waiting lists The solution: xenotransplantation – Major obstacles: hyperacute rejection, delayed xenograft function, and “xenoses” – Search for the suitable species Last slide Kidney allocation and distribution 1984: US Congress passes National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) NOTA provides for the establishment and operation of an Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) 1986: United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) was awarded the contract to develop OPTN US is divided into regions each with a separate Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) Washington Regional Transplant Consortium (WRTC) is the Washington metropolitan area OPO Allocation of cadaveric kidneys UNOS scoring system Time waiting Longest wait time for each ABO group 1 point Each additional year on wait list 0.5 Quality of HLA match 0 mismatch 1 B/ 1 DR mismatch 0 B/ 1 DR mismatch 2 B/ 1 DR mismatch * 7 5 2 PRA > 79% PRA with negative crossmatch 4 Pediatric recipient Age 0-11 years 11-17 years 3 2 % Graft survival Time in years Cadaveric donor Living related donor Primary graft survival by use of induction antibody Cadaveric donor Time in years Living related donor Primary graft survival by number of transfusions Prednisone First immunosuppressive agent used Several immunosuppressive effects – inhibit gene transcription of several cytokines ( IL-1, IL-2, IL6, IF-g, TNF-a) by binding to 5’ glucocorticoid response areas of DNA – produces lympholysis by direct effects on lymphocyte membrane – causes sequestration of circulating T cells – antagonizes neutrophil and monocyte chemotaxis Prednisone Side effects – Cardiovascular: hypertension – ID: infection and delayed wound healing – GI: peptic ulcer disease, pancreatitis – Endocrine: hyperglycemia, growth failure, obesity, hyperlipidemia – Ortho: osteoporosis, aseptic necrosis – Ophtho: cataracts – Derm: acne, hypertrichosis – Psych: psychosis, pseudotumor cerebri Azathioprine History – Derivative of 6-MP but can be given orally – First drug widely used for maintenance immunosuppression Immunosuppressive effects – metabolized to 6-thioinosinic acid and is incorporated into strands of DNA and RNA and causes chromosome breaks – 6-thioinosinic inhibits purine (adenine and guanine) synthesis from inosine Side effects – Hematologic: bone marrow suppression, megaloblastic anemia – Derm: alopecia – GI: hepatic dysfunction Mycophenolate Mofetil History – semi-synthetic derivative of mycophenolic acid produced by fungus Penicillium – approved by the FDA in 1995 for use in rejection prophylaxis in renal transplantation Immunosuppressive effects – irreversible inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) that converts IMP to GMP – prevents de novo synthesis of GMP from IMP. GMP is essential nucleoside for purine synthesis – lymophcytes use de novo synthesis of purines exclusively Side effects – GI: diarrhea, GI discomfort, GI bleeding (12%) – Cardiovascular: hypertension – Hematologic: leukopenia, thrombocytopenia – ID: increased risk of CMV infection (10%) – none developed PTLD Polyclonal antibodies ATGAM – Equine antilymphocyte antibody Thymoglobulin – Rabbit antilymphocyte antibody – used for induction and treatment of acute rejection Side effects – anaphylaxis: hypotension, fever, pulmonary edema, bronchospasm, diarrhea – PTLD Monoclonal antibodies OKT3 (targets CD3 receptor on T cells) Anti-IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) Ab Anti ICAM-1 Ab Anti CD40 Ab Cyclosporine A History – isolated from 2 strains of fungi imperfecti – 1200 kD, 11 amino acid hydrophobic protein Immunosuppressive effects – forms heterodimeric complex with a cytoplasmic receptor protein (cyclophilin) – This complex binds calcineurin and inhibits its phosphatase activity – also enhances TGF-b expression which inhibits IL-2 Side effects – Renal: nephrotoxicity due to renal vasoconstriction, interstitial fibrosis, denovo thrombotic microangiopathy, hypomagnesemia, type IV RTA (hyperkalemia), hyperuricemia – Cardiovascular: hypertension – GI: hepatotoxicity, cholestasis – Neuro: seizures, coma, cortical blindness, tremor, dysesthesia – Derm: hypertrichosis, gingival hyperplasia, acne Tacrolimus History – a macrolide antibiotic derived from the fungus Streptomyces tsukubaensis – first used on liver transplant recipients in 1989 Immunosuppressive effects – mechanism of action similar to cyclosporine A – forms heterodimeric complex with a cytoplasmic receptor protein (FKbinding protein) – This complex binds calcineurin and inhibits its phosphatase activity Side – – – – – – effects Renal: similar nephrotoxicity profile as cyclosporine A Endo: hyperglycemia, overt diabetes (10%) GI: anorexia, diarrhea, nausea Neuro: similar to cyclosporine A Oncologic: post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) (5-10%) ID: increased incidence of CMV infection (13%) Sirolimus History – structure very similar to tacrolimus, also a macrolide antibiotic derived from the fungus Streptomyces hydroscopicus – also known as rapamycin, named after a fungus found on the island of Rapa Nui (Easter Island) Immunosuppressive effects – binds to FK-binding protein – inhibits co-stimulatory path (CD28) translocation of transcription factor – may be synergistic with cyclosporine A and tacrolimus – no nephrotoxicity or hyperglycemia Side Effects – Heme: – Endocrine: – NO NEPHROTOXICITY