Verwijzen naar de UVRM of naar The International Bill of Human Rights??
Soevereinen van de strekking ICMN (IkClaimMijnNaam) blijven altijd maar doordrammen (zonder
veel succes) op bepaalde artikels uit de Universele Verklaring voor de Rechten van de Mens (UVRM),
de principes die in de UVRM worden aangehaald als rechten zijn geen echte rechten zolang je ze niet
voor een rechtbank kan hard maken. de rechters, rechtbanken en hoven beroepen zich veelal op het
feit dat ze niet mogen toetsen aan de UVRM, dat de UVRM geen bindend
VERDRAG/TREATY/COVENANT is en dat het geenszins rechtstreeks inwerkt in de Belgische of
Nederlandse rechtsorde... en dat is ook zo : in de VERKLARING heeft men het enkel over IDEALEN !
Zo beweren rechters en het Burgerlijk Recht in het algemeen, binnen het systeem, dat dit geen echte
rechten zijn die toekomen aan personen. (wanneer ze je niet als mens erkennen)
Het is belangrijk dat je je claims kan hard maken met onweerlegbare feiten en bewijzen !!!
Wanneer je je gaat beroepen op je claim ten aanzien van de UVRM, in je VBI, dat naar jouw zeggen
werd aanvaard door het koningshuis, omdat het niet binnen een gestelde termijn werd
geprotesteerd en/of weerlegd, dan is dit voor de rechter makkelijk van tafel te vegen omdat jouw VBI
voor hen geen bindende partij en/of overeenkomst is, aangezien ze noch ondertekend, noch
geratificeerd is door de Staat en/of het koningshuis. Jij mag dan wel willen leven in de geest van die
verklaring (UVRM), maar dat bindt de staat en/of het koningshuis er niet toe om dat ook te doen,
want voor hen is het MAAR een verklaring, een ideaal, en dus geen bindend verdrag.
( vergeet ook niet dat alle rechters trouw hebben gezworen aan de koning en dat ze middels die eed
ALTIJD partij zullen kiezen voor het koningshuis en niet jouw belangen behartigen, maar die van de
koning, ze spreken ook in ZIJN naam recht )
Als de rechter kan aantonen (in zijn/haar vonnis/uitspraak/motivering) dat hij/zij of zijn rechtscollege
binnen HET/hun Burgerlijk Rechtsysteem dit niet moeten toepassen omdat het niet de directe
inwerking geniet van een internationaal VERDRAG/TREATY or COVENANT, dan is het een maat voor
niets om dit voor een rechtbank proberen te gebruiken, en te hopen ermee succes te boeken.
Als je voor een rechtbank jezelf wil beroepen op/aanspraak wil maken op/ of claim beweert te
hebben op rechten beschreven in de UVRM, dan moet jij dat ook onomstotelijk/onweerlegbaar
kunnen BEWIJZEN, dat jij het recht hebt om (als mens) aanspraak te maken op de rechten
beschreven in de UVRM. Zoals ik in dit artikel al heb aangehaald, is het voor een rechter niet echt
moeilijk om zonder risico op wraking of blaam, jouw claim op de rechten van de UVRM van tafel te
vegen binnen zijn mogelijkheden die het Burgerlijk (personen) Recht hem/haar bieden.
Wij willen allemaal in de eerste plaats succes boeken in rechtsprocedures en deze zo kort mogelijk
houden, je wil je niet mengen in een wrakingsprocedure of verhaal op de rechter, als dat kan
vermeden worden. De (mogelijke) oplossing/uitkomst uit deze val (van het recht-systeem om de
mens aan deze UVRM-rechten te onttrekken) zit in de INTERNATIONAL BILL of HUMAN RIGHTS.
“The International Bill of Human Rights consists of the five core human rights
treaties of the United Nations
that function to advance the fundamental freedoms and to protect the basic human rights of all people. The Bill
influences the decisions and actions of Government, State and Non-State actors to make economic, social and
cultural rights a top-priority in the formation and implementation of national, regional and international policy
and law. “
The following five documents are the foundation of the International Bill of Human Rights:
1) Universal Declaration of Human Rights
2) International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
3) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
4) Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
5) Second Optional Procotol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aiming at the abolition of
the death penalty
The International Bill of Human Rights is te vinden op volgende officiële webpagina’s van de U.N.
(site of the High Commissioner of Human Rights):
-
http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/InternationalLaw.aspx
http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/FactSheet2Rev.1en.pdf
http://internationalbillofrights.org/
http://www.un-documents.net/a3r217.htm
(The appointment of Navi Pillay as U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights was approved by the General
Assembly on 28 July 2008. She took up the post on 1 September 2008. Her mandate has been renewed for
two years beginning on 1 September 2012.)
The International Bill of Human Rights (vertaald : internationaal wetsontwerp voor de mensenrechten), dat door
aanvaarding door de staten, die partij waren op het wereldcongres voor de mensenrechten te
Wenen in Juni 1993, staat als International Law bij de Verenigde Naties/United Nations en is
daarmee een COVENANT/TREATY/VERDRAG dat in artikel 3, het geheel van de artikels 4 t.e.m. 21
van de UVRM bevat.
“Article 3, the first cornerstone of the Declaration, proclaims the right to life, liberty and security of person -a
right essential to the enjoyment of all other rights. This article introduces articles 4 to 21, in which other civil
and political rights are set out, including: freedom from slavery and servitude; freedom from torture and
cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; the right to recognition everywhere as a person
before the law; the right to an effective judicial remedy; freedom from arbitrary arrest, detention or exile;
the right to a fair trial and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal; the right to be presumed
innocent until proved guilty; freedom from arbitrary interference with privacy, family, home or
correspondence; freedom of movement and residence; the right of asylum; the right to a nationality; the
right to marry and to found a family; the right to own property; freedom of thought, conscience and
religion; freedom of opinion and expression; the right to peaceful assembly and association; and the right to
take part in the government of one's country and to equal access to public service in one's country.”
How Does International Law Protect Human Rights?
International human rights law lays down obligations which States are bound to respect. By becoming parties to international treaties,
States assume obligations and duties under international law to respect, to protect and to fulfil human rights. The obligation to respect
means that States must refrain from interfering with or curtailing the enjoyment of human rights. The obligation to protect requires States
to protect individuals and groups against human rights abuses. The obligation to fulfil means that States must take positive action to
facilitate the enjoyment of basic human rights.
Through ratification of international human rights treaties, Governments undertake to put into place domestic measures and legislation
compatible with their treaty obligations and duties. The domestic legal system, therefore, provides the principal legal protection of human
rights guaranteed under international law. Where domestic legal proceedings fail to address human rights abuses, mechanisms and
procedures for individual and group complaints are available at the regional and international levels to help ensure that international
human rights standards are indeed respected, implemented, and enforced at the local level.
Bron : http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/hr_law.shtml & http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Pages/WhatareHumanRights.aspx
“Human rights entail both rights and obligations. States assume obligations and duties under international law
to respect, to protect and to fulfil human rights. The obligation to respect means that States must refrain from
interfering with or curtailing the enjoyment of human rights. The obligation to protect requires States to protect
individuals and groups against human rights abuses. The obligation to fulfil means that States must take
positive action to facilitate the enjoyment of basic human rights. At the individual level, while we are entitled
our human rights, we should also respect the human rights of others.”
Vertaling : Mensenrechten brengen zowel rechten als plichten met zich mee. Van de Staten wordt er verwacht,
plichten en verplichtingen krachtens het internationale recht te respecteren, te beschermen en de
mensenrechten te doen gelden. De verplichting tot respecteren betekent dat lidstaten zich niet mengen met
en/of het beperken van het genot van de mensenrechten. De plicht van de lidstaten bestaat eruit om individuen
en groepen te beschermen tegen schendingen van de mensenrechten. De verplichting tot respecteren en
beschermen betekent dat de lidstaten positieve actie moeten ondernemen om het genot van de fundamentele
rechten van de mens te verzekeren. Op individueel niveau, wanneer wij onze mensenrechten uitoefenen,
moeten we ook de mensenrechten van anderen respecteren.
Lidmaatschap van de Verenigde Naties brengt verplichtingen mee ten aanzien van de mensheid.
“Through ratification of international human rights treaties, Governments undertake to put into place domestic
measures and legislation compatible with their treaty obligations and duties. Where domestic legal proceedings
fail to address human rights abuses, mechanisms and procedures for individual complaints or communications
are available at the regional and international levels to help ensure that international human rights standards
are indeed respected, implemented, and enforced at the local level”
Vertaling : Door de ratificatie van internationale mensenrechtenverdragen, verbinden regeringen zich ertoe
hun binnenlandse maatregelen en wetgeving zo te plaatsen, dat deze verenigbaar is met hun
verdragsverplichtingen en plichten naar internationaal recht bepaald in het door hen aanvaarde verdrag. Waar
de binnenlandse gerechtelijke procedure faalt, en er schendingen van de mensenrechten plaatsvinden, moeten
er mechanismen en procedures voor individuele klachten of mededelingen beschikbaar zijn op regionaal en
internationaal niveau, om ervoor te zorgen dat de internationale normen inzake mensenrechten daadwerkelijk
worden gerespecteerd, geïmplementeerd en gehandhaafd op lokaal niveau.
Conclusie : De diverse internationale volkenrechterlijke verdagen en overeenkomsten, dewelke
werden onderschreven en geratificeerd door een lidstaat van de verenigde naties, bindt deze staat
ertoe om zich te vrijwaren dat misdaden tegen de menselijkheid mogelijk zijn binnen haar
organisatie, en dat mensenrechten worden geschonden.
De Belgische en Nederlandse Staat hebben The International Bill of Human Rights aanvaard en
ondertekend op het wereld congres voor de mensenrechten in Juni 1993 :
“Finally, the World Conference on Human Rights, held at Vienna in June 1993, adopted by acclamation the
Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, in which it welcomed the progress made in the codification of
human rights instruments and urged the universal ratification of human rights treaties. In addition, all
States were encouraged to avoid, as far as possible, the resort to reservations (part 1, para. 26).”
Wanneer je dus aanspraak wil maken op een recht dat is vastgelegd en/of beschreven in de UVRM,
dan moet je de rechter erop wijzen dat hij/zij middels zijn/haar functie/lidmaatschap binnen de Staat
er toe gebonden is, om de (mensen)rechten die zijn vastgelegd in The International Bill of Human
Rights te respecteren en alles moet doen binnen zijn/haar bevoegdheid, om deze dan ook te doen
gelden, binnen de organisatie waarvan hij/zij middels hun functie deel uit maken.
De ambtseed van de rechter, “ik zweer getrouwheid aan de koning, aan de grondwet en aan de
wetten van het Belgische volk” binden de rechter er ook toe, om de Bill of Human Rights te
respecteren, aangezien de rechtsorde tussen internationale en lokale wetgeving in België werd
bepaald in het “Smeerkaasarrest” :
-
“Het hoogste Belgische gerechtshof, nl. het Hof van Cassatie, aanvaardde in haar Franco-Suisse arrest
van 27 mei 1971, dat internationale normen, die België heeft onderschreven, rechtstreeks inwerken in
de Belgische rechtsorde. Dit wil zeggen dat wanneer een nationale norm strijdig is met een
internationale norm, deze laatste voorrang heeft. De internationale norm dient wel voldoende duidelijk
te zijn. Een bekend voorbeeld zijn de mensenrechtenverdragen”. Het arrest van het Hof van Cassatie
van 27 mei 1971 heeft alle internationale en supranationale regelgeving hiërarchisch boven alle
interne recht geplaatst, dus ook boven de Grondwet. Indien bijvoorbeeld een Europese Verordening
bepalingen bevat die strijdig zijn met de Belgische Grondwet, krijgt de Verordening voorrang.
Bron : DOORWERKING VAN INTERNATIONAAL RECHT VOOR DE BELGISCHE HOVEN EN
RECHTBANKEN (Jan Wouters* en Dries Van Eeckhoutte**)
In Nederland wordt de rechtsorde bepaald in art. 94 van de grondwet :
-
“Binnen het Koninkrijk geldende wettelijke voorschriften vinden geen toepassing, indien deze
toepassing niet verenigbaar is met een ieder verbindende bepalingen van verdragen en van besluiten
van volkenrechtelijke organisaties.”
Dat wil dus in het kort zeggen dat : De rechten die zijn beschreven in The International Bill of Human
Rights, die door ondertekening werden aanvaard, en daarmee dus deel uit maken van de wetten van
het volk, dat ze dientengevolge ook directe inwerking in de rechtsorde genieten, en dat de rechter ze
niet zomaar kan van tafel vegen met de instrumenten die hem ter beschikking werden gesteld
binnen het Burgerlijk (personen) Recht.
Enkele citaten/uitgangspunten van The Bill of Human Rights :
-
“Judges of the International Court of Justice have occasionally invoked principles contained in the
International Bill of Human Rights as a basis for their decisions.”
-
“National and local tribunals have frequently cited principles set out in the International Bill of Human
Rights in their decisions. Moreover, in recent years, national constitutional and legislative texts have
increasingly provided measures of legal protection for those principles; indeed, many recent national
and local laws are clearly modeled on provisions set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
and the International Covenants, which remain a beacon for all present and future efforts in the field
of human rights, both nationally and internationally.”
-
“Thus the International Bill of Human Rights represents a milestone in the history of human rights, a
veritable Magna Carta marking mankind's arrival at a vitally important phase: the conscious acquisition
of human dignity and worth.”
En dan zou ik persoonlijk ook nog even alle soevereine broeders & zusters willen attent maken op
het hierna volgende “Treaty of Universal Community Trust” dat ik in een VBI ga versturen naar het
Staatshoofd met de intentie dit als bindend te beschouwen, indien er geen protest of weerlegging
komt binnen de gestelde aanvaardbare termijn. (dat wil niet zeggen dat ik dit ook ga toepassen in
een rechtszaal of als wet beschouw die ik kan laten toepassen door een rechter binnen het systeem)
Ik vind dit gewoon een prachtige tekst (opgesteld door onze soevereine “freeman”-broeders UK) en
op deze youtube link in woord en beeld gebracht : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kYzDftJHMk
Ik voeg de originele tekst van het verdrag hieronder toe.
Namasté
~ christophe; van de familie palmans
11/02/2014
Treaty of UNIVERSAL COMMUNITY TRUST - Draft Version III
Monday May 28, 2012
PROCLAMATION of INDEPENDENCE, SOVEREIGNTY & JURISDICTION
[For the avoidance of doubt; the terms Mankind and Man include both male and female genders of our species of being.]
LET IT BE KNOWN BY ALL CONCERNED, INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES that the independence and
sovereignty of the Communities of Free Peoples who ratify the following treaty is hereby proclaimed, declared and affirmed
without equivocation, and is vested solely in the men and women of those communities, both individually and collectively,
notwithstanding the fact that their representatives may be authorised by each to act in a sovereign capacity on their collective
behalf in strictly limited sets of circumstances, such as those Mankind currently finds itself in, for the purposes of achieving the
inter-community consensus required to establish a globally enforceable jurisdiction under the guiding principles of Natural Law,
supplemented and interpreted in this TREATY OF UNIVERSAL COMMUNITY TRUST, with a view to peacefully bringing
about the following aims and objectives:
1. An end to all crimes against Mankind and the Earth that are currently being perpetrated by governments, whether elected or
not, corporations, organisations, individuals and legal entities of all natures and descriptions.
2. The dismantling of all industries which cause actual damage, harm, injury or loss to Mankind and the Earth, in developing,
manufacturing and exploiting for profit any substance, product or bi-product which has or causes such an effect.
3. The prohibition of the apparatus of financial tyranny, the monopolisations of land rights, mediums of exchange, trading
platforms and the means of communicating, publishing and distributing information.
4. The nullifying, settlement and/or discharge of all outstanding debts, obligations and liabilities and the creation of Permanent
Credit Facilities for the benefit of every member of every community that stands under the jurisdiction of UNIVERSAL
COMMUNITY TRUST.
5. The eradication of all forms of artificial scarcity, famine and disease and the facilitation of an abundant, peaceful and
harmonious environment for Mankind to dwell.
6. The dissolution of the fossil fuel [including coal seam gas mining, commonly known as fracking], the chemical pollutant
[including the currently ubiquitous and extremely harmful practice of chem-trailing] and the nuclear power industries, as well as
the manufacture and implementation of free and clean energy technologies in every community.
7. A cease-fire in all wars, the repatriation of all armed services personnel and the lawful repudiation of all oaths made in good
faith but under false pretenses to the detriment of Mankind and the Earth.
8. The establishment of Co-operative Trade Networks in and between all communities, with a view to promoting the
localisation of trade, self-sufficiency, mutual co-operation and natural abundance for every nation under UNIVERSAL
COMMUNITY TRUST.
FURTHERMORE, in the light of the evidence that the member states and account holders of the UNITED NATIONS, the
PAN-CONTINENTAL UNIONS, NATO, the WORLD BANK, the BANK OF INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS
(BIS) and the INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND (IMF) [without limitation], have been and continue to be implicated
in the crimes against Mankind which are alleged to have been committed by what former US President Eisenhower dubbed, the
military-industrial complex, including the continuing media cover-up of the devastating effects of the radiation caused by the
Fukushima catastrophe; the parties to this Treaty hereby declare that every nuclear reactor, power plant and facility must cease
and desist in all operations within 28 days of receipt of an injunction issued under the superior jurisdiction of UNIVERSAL
COMMUNITY TRUST, for the benefit of Mankind and the planet we were all born to share as joint custodians under Natural
Law.
In the most simplistic of terms, let Mankind be self-governed by the divine maxim:my rights end where yours begin.
REPUDIATION OF PRESUMED JURISDICTIONS
Having agreed that the presumption of the authority to act upon the people or any nation or community must necessarily be
derived from their consent to be regulated by the rules governing any lawfully established jurisdiction; it has been subsequently
concluded that, given the available evidence suggesting that almost every community of people on the Earth has been forced,
coerced and/or manipulated under threat of force, violence and/or incarceration, to accept the diktats of an international
banking dictatorship, which has inevitably resulted in the destruction of the Universal Bond of the Common Unity of Mankind,
as well as large areas of the beautiful, bountiful environment that we have allowed to be exploited for private gain.It is therefore
declared that every jurisdictional claim by any authority demonstratively acting in the interests of the UNITED NATIONS,
NATO, the CROWN, the HOLY SEE, the G8, the European, African, American and Asian Unions, the IMF, the WORLD
BANK, the BIS, or any other such-like organisation, legal or illegal entity or individual, has been repudiated by their criminal
actions over many decades, and in some cases, centuries, for and on behalf of every member of every community under the
jurisdiction of UNIVERSAL COMMUNITY TRUST, within which, from henceforth, all disputes and allegations will be
settled or heard in arbitration proceedings or before a common law jury, subject to the provisions of this treaty and any duly
ratified amendments and the necessary and appropriate infrastructure for such a system of justice.
DECLARATION OF UNALIENABLE RIGHTS
THIS DECLARATION OF UNALIENABLE RIGHTS IS MADE AND EXECUTED BY DULY
AUTHORISED SOVEREIGN REPRESENTATIVES OF THE FREE PEOPLES OF THE
EARTH, WHO ARE ALL INVITED TO DO SO WITH A VIEW TO ESTABLISHING
LASTING PEACE, FREEDOM AND ABUNDANCE FOR ALL MANKIND, IN HARMONY
WITH NATURE, RATHER THAN EXPLOITING IT FOR PRIVATE GAIN.
IN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE ANCIENT USAGES, RIGHTS & CUSTOMS OF THE
FREE PEOPLES OF THE EARTH, THE SOVEREIGN NATIONS PARTY TO THIS
DECLARATION AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
No law can unman a man, or uncall a calling.
Freedom cannot co-exist with inequality of rights, coercive taxation and the restriction of our freedom to come and go as we
please.
Any Sovereign Nation of Free Peoples is necessarily ruined by inordinate privileges, corruption of justice and a general national
apathy, which has become the norm in all so-called ‘modern’ societies.
Peace, individual property rights and the rule of Natural Law cannot be established without an end to all illegal wars between
nations and corporations, the de-monopolisation of land and natural resources and the repudiation of the laws that were made
by Mankind to its own detriment and that of the Earth.
There are three universally binding actions that should require the verdict of a Supreme Jury of 25 Sovereign Representatives
from different communities to lawfully effect: the deposition of a de facto government or acting sovereign paramount; the
banishment of criminal religious institutions and monarchies; and the suspension of statutory laws that do not require the
express and unequivocal consent of those parties subjected to them. The means by which this should be achieved is by a
referendum of the people in the affected community or communities.
Every man and woman has the unalienable right to go wherever they please, provided they do not cause actual injury, harm,
damage or loss; the unalienable right, wherever they are, to the benefits of UNIVERSAL COMMUNITY TRUST; and the
unalienable right of equal benefits and equal restrictions.
There are three unalienable birthrights: the right to peaceful possession of an acre of land to grow food and raise a family, with
unlimited access to clean, unpolluted water, minerals and the airspace above it; the right to use all necessary force to protect the
body, family and property from theft, fraud, damage, harm and loss, but without recourse to violence; and the right of selfdetermination under Natural Law.
There are three guarantees of every community which has the voluntary consent of its sovereign people: security for life and
limb; security for property held in peaceful possession without malfeasance or fraud; and security of the right to selfdetermination.
There are three things the safety of which depends on that of the others: the sovereignty of the people; the integrity and fairness
of a nation’s domestic and foreign policy; and the just and consistent administration of its laws by deciding each and every case
on its own merits.
There are three things free to everybody on Earth, the refusal of which no law can justify: food from the field, forest or orchard,
water from spring, river, tap or well; firing from a decayed tree or fence; and a block of stone not in use for at least 90 days.
There are three thieves who should not suffer proceedings against them: a man or woman compelled by his/her wife/husband; a
child under 16 years; a necessitous individual who has gone through three communities and to nine houses without being able
to obtain sustenance or shelter upon repeated and reasonable requests.
There are three just applications of the law: prevention of actual suffering, harm, damage and loss; compensation and/or
restitution for all injured parties; and insurance of equitable resolutions, peaceful civil enforcement and the reconciliation of
offenders with their accusers by means of private arbitration proceedings, with each case being decided by an independent
arbitrator from a community without an interest in the general proceedings brought before it.
There are three sacred things by which the conscience binds itself to truth: by experience gained through self-realisation; by
knowledge accrued through actual experience of the divinity that dwells in the heart of Mankind; and by wisdom obtained
through knowing that every truly selfless act is a gift of pure unconditional love.
WHEREFORE, IN THE INDOMITABLE SPIRIT OF ALTRUISM, WE STAND UNITED BY
BOTH OUR DIVINE SIMILARITIES AND OUR INDIVIDUAL UNIQUENESS, AND
HEREBY STAND IN COMMON UNITY TO AFFIRM THE FOLLOWING TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT:
1. Natural Law, also known as the Law of Nature, is that which the Universal Causation of all that is, or howsoever described
according to subjective preference, has prescribed to all Mankind, not by any formal promulgation, but by the internal dictate of
reason with heart-felt resonance alone.
2. Natural Law forms the permanent and underlying basis of all law and theories of Natural Law have been an integral part of
jurisprudence throughout the history man-made laws.
3. We must therefore distinguish between Natural Law and positive law, which is the body of law created by Mankind.
4. Natural Law is always superior to positive law.
5. The principals of Natural Law derive from Universal or Divine Law, otherwise known as the Laws of Nature.
6. The Universal Law of Allowance dictates that all sentient beings must be allowed to exercise their own Freewill, at all times
and without exceptions.
7. Common Law is that which derives its force and authority from the consent and immemorial practice of the people within
any community; it has never received the sanction of the legislature by an express act, which is the criterion by which it is to be
distinguished from statute law, which is inferior in every respect to Common Law.
8. In accord with the Laws of Nature, Common Law dictates that all Men and Women are free to do what they choose for
themselves, provided they do not infringe the unalienable rights of another to do the same.
9. UNIVERSAL COMMUNITY TRUST is a Community of Nations of Sovereign Men and Women, united together by
mutual consent, in order to deliberate, determine and act jointly for the purposes of the restoration of Natural Law on Earth, as
well as bringing about an end to all war, genocide, debt-slavery, usury, famine, poverty, chemical pollution and preventable
disease.
10. No individual or legal entity is above Natural Law, and equity, meaning natural justice, is paramount and mandatory, in that
no law can be enforced at the expense of a just and reasonable outcome.
11. In positive law, a ‘sovereign’ is one who governs themselves independently of any foreign control, in the union and exercise
of all lawful powers possessed and exercised by a Sovereign Head of State and/or government. In Natural Law, a sovereign is a
Man or Woman who exercises their unalienable right to self-govern.
12. ‘Government’ is the manner in which sovereignty is exercised in each sovereign state, and ‘democracy’ is that form of
government in which the sovereign power is exercised by the people in a body; therefore, ‘democratic government’ is the body
which purportedly exercises the sovereign power of the people who consented to it, notwithstanding the opposition of the
majority; mob rule by another name.
13. The enforcement of democratic, autocratic or despotic government policy by coercive and/or deceptive methods is always,
and without exception, a breach of Natural Law and therefore void ab initio, even if those methods of enforcement are
permitted or prescribed under corporatist statutes and/or the orders of criminal courts and/or governments.
14. The only form of government which is recognised as lawful anywhere on Earth is an unambiguously representative
administration. Representative administration necessarily requires the express voluntary consent of the self-governed. In the
absence of the voluntary consent of the self-governed, representative government or administration cannot lawfully exist.
15. Subject to the principles of Natural Law, Mankind has the unalienable right to self-determination and self-governance, and
can therefore, at any time, choose to revoke or deny its consent to be governed by or subject to any administration or entity or
individual.
16. Any Man or Woman who does revoke or deny their consent to be governed by any purported authority is free from
government control and any perceived statutory obligations, restrictions and restraints imposed by the state they were formerly
or supposedly governed by.
17. Any and all agreements made for and on behalf of the indigenous peoples of the Earth, whether made
by HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED
KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN & NORTHERN IRELAND & THE COMMONWEALTH, THE CROWN,
THE CITY OF LONDON, THE EUROPEAN UNION, THE UNITED
NATIONS, THE VATICAN, THE SOCIETY OF JESUS, THE HOUSE OF ROTHSCHILD and/or any of their
executives, agencies, officers, partners, trustees, creditors, representatives, affiliates or any other legal entities, organisations or
individuals, do not in any way bind those who have revoked or denied their consent to be governed, nor do any of those
agreements preclude the unalienable rights of the indigenous peoples to self-determination and self-governance.
18. Living freely in peace is within any community’s standards and does not create any harm, loss, injury, damage or liability, or
comprise a breach of the peace, in any way whatsoever, whereas, violence, which only ever begets more violence, has been
monopolised by successive unaccountable and/or purportedly democratic governments that have been hijacked by private
interests, many of which have committed multiple crimes against Mankind without restraint, restriction or remorse.
THEREFORE, IN AFFIRMATION OF MANKIND’S BIRTHRIGHTS, WE DECREE THAT
ALL MANKIND IS UNALIENABLY ENDOWED WITH:
1. The right to deny our consent to be governed, regulated or coerced in any manner whatsoever.
2. The right to hold, use and enjoy any and all property in our peaceful possession, without having to pay for the use or
enjoyment of it.
3. The right to an acre of permanent land, water, mineral and air use, and to live on it in harmony with nature.
4. The right to use all necessary force to protect ourselves, our kin and our interests, in the event of any and all circumstances,
but without resorting to violence, save for in self-defence at such times when armorial bearings become a necessary for the
purposes of protecting the community.
5. The right to refuse to supply or recall an intimate or non-intimate DNA sample for any purpose whatsoever.
6. The right to refuse to supply or recall samples of our bodily fluids, skin, hair or tissues, in the event of any and all
circumstances.
7. The right to refuse to be medicated by any individual, government, corporation or legal entity, under any circumstances
whatsoever.
8. The right to cultivate, harvest, store, trade, barter and/or use for our own purposes, any and all organic substances which will
grow naturally upon the Earth.
9. The right to refuse to be bound by the judgments, orders, warrants, directives and/or rulings of the de facto courts of any
entity, party or individual claiming unlawful jurisdiction over us, under any circumstances whatsoever.
10. The right to Diplomatic Immunity, including (without limitation) the right to a Diplomatic Passport and immunity from
statutory obligations that we have not expressly consented to.
11. The right of superior guardianship over our offspring, whether singularly or jointly with the other biological parent, without
limitation and strictly precluding government and/or corporate intervention of any kind, under any circumstances whatsoever,
save for those in which the safety of said offspring is proven beyond reasonable doubt and by sworn or affirmed testimony to be
in jeopardy.
12. The right to hold exclusive Powers of Attorney over the physical bodies and estates of our offspring, whether singularly or
jointly with their other biological parent, without limitation and until the sixteenth anniversary of their physical birth.
13. The right to educate our children at home or in any way we deem to be beneficial for their intellectual, emotional and
spiritual development, without limitation, supervision, intervention, inspection or interference of any and all natures and
descriptions.
14. The rights of full Freedom and Intercourse of Trade and Navigation, to and from any port or place on the Earth, including
(without limitation) the rights to cross international borders and to return to the land of our physical birth at our sole discretion
and without interference of any and all natures and descriptions.
15. The right to create our own currency or medium or exchange.
16. The rights to life, health, well-being, privacy, silence, habeas corpus and the protection of the community.
THIS DECLARATION IS EXECUTED AS A DEED BELOW BY THE AUTOGRAPHS AND
SEALS OF THE DULY AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVES OF THE SOVEREIGN
NATIONS OF THE FREE PEOPLES OF THE EARTH, WITH THE UNAMBIGUOUS
CONSENT OF THEIR SOVEREIGN COMMUNITIES.
This Treaty will be opened for ratification by the UNIVERSAL COMMUNITY TRUST on 173rd day of 312th year of
Dwapara (Ascending) [21 June 2012 AD].