Ewen Macleod`s slides

advertisement

Regulatory changes and new opportunities:

What the new BSB Handbook will mean for you

Ewen Macleod

Head of Professional Practice

Bar Standards Board

Overview

• New structure and approach

• Key changes in new Code of Conduct

• Key enforcement changes

• New approach to supervision

• Entity regulation

• Next steps

BSB Handbook

– Introduction

– Code of conduct

• You and the Court

• Behaving ethically

• You and your client

• You and your regulator

• You and your practice

– Scope of practice, authorisation and licensing

– Qualifications (yet to be reviewed)

– Enforcement

– Definitions

The Code of Conduct

• 10 core duties

– Core elements of professional conduct that apply to all barristers

(and others)

• Outcomes

– Descriptive, rationale for rules and aid understanding of rules and guidance; not mandatory but will be taken into account when considering breaches of the rules

• Rules

– Supplementing core duties where specific rules necessary

• Guidance

– Assists in the interpretation of rules, examples of expected behaviour etc (not mandatory)

The Core Duties

• You must observe your duty to the court in the administration of justice

[CD1]

• You must act in the best interests of each client [CD2]

• You must act with honesty and integrity [CD3]

• You must maintain your independence [CD4]

• You must not behave in a way which is likely to diminish the trust and

confidence which the public places in you or in the profession [CD5]

• You must keep the affairs of each client confidential [CD6]

• You must provide a competent standard of work and service to each client [CD7]

• You must not discriminate unlawfully against any person [CD8]

• You must be open and co-operative with your regulators [CD9]

• You must take reasonable steps to manage your business, or carry out your role within your business, competently and in such a way as to achieve compliance with your legal and regulatory objectives [CD10]

Some key changes

• All core duties to apply to unregistered barristers when providing legal services

– Trust and confidence and co-operation with regulators apply at all times

– Also need to provide information to clients

• Associations and premise sharing

– generally relaxed; but novel business arrangements can’t circumvent the regulatory requirement / outcome and especially not confuse clients

• Reporting certain matters to the BSB:

– includes serious misconduct by self and others

– Exemption for barristers working on Ethical Helpline

• Chambers admin:

– Appoint someone to liaise with BSB

– Members to take (reasonable) personal responsibility

– No appointment of person disqualified by BSB

– Requirement to have risk management arrangements in place

• Option to apply for authorisation to conduct litigation

Further areas of clarification

• Referral fees

• Not misleading clients

• Accepting and return of instructions

• Non-discrimination and cab-rank rules

• Ceasing to practice

• Client money

• Insurance

Enforcement changes

• Admin sanctions available for breach of any rule

– Power to impose rests with PCC (can be delegated to staff)

– Max fine increased to £1,000 for individuals

• ‘Professional misconduct’ will be a breach not appropriate for NFA or admin sanctions and referred to a disciplinary tribunal

• New enforcement policy

Enforcement changes

• Disqualification powers:

– Where breach caused and in public interest to prevent them working for a BSB regulated person

– Requirement to seek BSB approval before employment

– Only DT (or interim panel) could impose

– May apply to us to have it lifted

• Interim suspension and disqualification panels:

– PCC’s powers enhanced

– Triggers for referral and powers available widened

– Immediate interim suspension powers

Supervision

• Recently consulted on proposals for risk-based approach to supervision;

• Whilst the current focus is on Chambers/entities – risk based supervision extends to other areas of regulation – CPD, QA of education providers;

• All supervision of the practising Bar consolidated within single department;

• Risk assessment framework will be a fundamental tool in determining supervision priorities;

• Key part of proposals to become an entity regulator;

• On-going supervision of all sets of chambers and new entities

(rather than one off spot checks);

• Consideration of evidence from wide range of sources (all BSB departments, LeO and specific evidence gathering);

Supervision cont.

• Greater priority given to higher risk sets of chambers or higher risk areas through thematic reviews;

• Supervision v enforcement – a focus on early, constructive engagement rather than punishment;

• Only persistent or very serious non-compliance referred for enforcement;

• Supervision to be available for individuals instead of, or following, enforcement action.

Regulation of entities

• BSB will regulate entities where generally: o The services are the same as those permitted to be provided by the self-employed Bar under BSB regulation (option to include litigation) o All owners with material interest are also active managers of the entity (managers / owners must be natural persons) o A majority of an entity’s managers are entitled to practise as advocates with higher rights (but need not all be barristers) o Restrictions on non-lawyer owners and management (ABS only) o Discretion over the application of these principles, subject to risk assessment

• Aim is to be low risk and draw on the capacity and capability of the BSB; and

• Be flexible in adapting to changes in the market

Regulation of entities (2)

• New Handbook proposes new duties for managers of entities and authorised persons who work in them (rules similar to those for self-employed barristers)

• Cab rank rule to apply in a similar way as to individuals

(named advocates)

• Specific HOLP and HOFA duties

• Duty to ensure all employees do nothing that causes or contributes to a breach of the Handbook

Next steps

• LSB considering Handbook application for individuals (decision due early July)

• Next application (non-ABS entities) submitted following that decision – decision due Sept?

• Both due to go live January 2014

• ‘Licensing authority’ application submitted after entity decision (aim to regulate ABSs in

2014)

Any questions?

Download