The 6th International Conference on Financial Criminology “Economic Crimes in the 21st Century” Supa Thamthitivat Director, Enforcement Department Securities and Exchange Commission, Thailand 5th September 2014 Rangsit University, Thailand The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Thailand Agenda • Regulatory Structure in Thai Capital Market • Facts about Listed Company in Thailand • Enforcement Program: Today and Future • Recent Court Decision 2 SEC’s Roles in Capital Market Balancing Role Market Development to Meet Economic Needs Market Integrity & Long-Term Sustainability Competitiveness Investor Protection Inclusive Growth Fair & Orderly Market Accessibility & Efficiency Reducing Systemic Risk 3 Regulatory Structure in Thai Capital Market Company Law (MoC) General Welfare of Company • Company’s set up • Shareholder’s rights • Director’s duties • Company’s book & record Securities & Exchange Law (SEC) Raising Fund from Public • Merit approval • On-going disclosure • Enhance good corporate governance • Investor protection Exchange Rule (SET) Listing on the Exchange • Full, accurate and timely disclosure • Fair, transparent and orderly market 4 Three Wheels of Discipline in Capital Market Self Discipline Prevention Monitoring Market Discipline Regulatory Discipline Enforcement 5 Mechanism Available Self Market Regulation Shareholder’s Meeting (Ordinary/Extraordinary) exercise voting rights ask director to answer or explain Company Disclosure Obligation Financial statement (quarterly/annually) Non-financial statement (annually) Others (upon major event) Right to Vote in Corporate Action which affects Company Fundamental Structure Related Party Transaction Procedures Auditor’s Report Public Notice Issued by Exchange or Regulator Opinion of Independent Director / Audit Committee Investing in company with good CG, AntiCorruption Practice, etc. Shareholder’s Action Derivatives action Direct action Deterring Measures Trading Suspension Delist CG Awards Enforcement Tools Administrative Criminal 6 Facts about Shareholder’s Structure in Thai Listed Company Family businesses in Asia, 2011 India 67% Phillippines 66% Thailand 66% Singapore 63% Malaysia 62% Indonesia 61% Hong Kong, China 62% South Korea 58% o Top 50 companies account for 76.5% of total market capitalization o Majority of companies listed on the Exchange are small/medium size o Average free float on the market is 47% (Only 139 companies have free float > 50%) o 66% of companies are familycontrolled business Chinese Taipei 35% Sources: Stock Exchange of Thailand China 13% Source: Credit Suisse, 2011 “Asian Family Businesses Report” 7 Thailand Has Been Improved in Corporate Governance CG Watch Market Scores: 2007 to 2012 2007 2010 2012 1. Hong Kong (67) 1. Hong Kong (67) 1. Singapore (69) 2. Singapore (65) 2. Singapore (65) 2. Hong Kong (66) 3. India (56) 3. Japan (57) 3. Thailand (58) 4. Taiwan (54) 4. Thailand (55) 4. Japan (55) 5. Japan (52) 5. Taiwan (55) 4. Malaysia (55) 6. Korea (49) 6. Malaysia (52) 6. Taiwan (53) 7. Malaysia (49) 7. India (49) 7. India (51) 8. Thailand (47) 8. China (49) 8. Korea (49) 9. China (45) 9. Korea (45) 9. China (45) 10. Philippines (41) 10. Indonesia (40) 10. Philippines (41) 11. Indonesia (37) 11. Philippines (37) 11. Indonesia (37) CG ROSC Assessment: Thailand’s scores are above average in all area ASEAN CG Scorecard: Top 100 Thai listed company has the highest average score Sources: 1. ACGA, September 2012 2. World Bank – “Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC): Corporate Governance Country Assessment – Thailand, January 2013 3. Thai Institution of Directors (Thai IOD) 8 Enforcement Is the Area that Thailand Got the Lowest Score CG Watch Report 2012 • Judicial process is inefficient, only a small percentage of criminal cases has filed in court when compare with the total number of complaints filed by the SEC to criminal authority • No progress in the Civil Sanction Bill • Concern on corruption issue 9 Economic Crime in Capital Market Accounting Fraud False Disclosure Corporate Fraud Insider Trading • Making false entry into books / records of company :- Hide bad debt; Create fake revenue; Manipulate the recognition of revenue/expense etc. • Making materially false statement or omission of the material information :- Besides accounting figures, do not disclose ultimate beneficial owner of major shareholder or significant liability etc. • Using the company’s asset for personal benefit :- Create fake investment; Create sham transaction; Overpay in related party transaction etc. • Trading in securities based on non-public, material information :- Information regarding company’s financial status, dividend payment, M&A transaction etc. 10 Current Public Enforcement Program Administrative Sanction o Exchange’s surveillance o Auditor’s report o Public’s complaints o Whistle blowers Referral/Complaint Disqualify from serving as director/executive of listed company Suspend/Revoke its privilege to do business in capital market:- B-D; IA; FA; Auditor etc.) SEC’s Investigation Enforcement Action Criminal Action Sufficiency of power for info gathering Competency of officer Temporary freeze of asset Out-of-Court Settlement Monetary penalty In-Court Action • Rely on other criminal authorities • Time consuming, in part, because of redundancy in info gathering • Independence of opinion 11 • Level of expertise Deterring Transgressions Through Alternatives o Using CG awards as incentives for companies to practice CG best practices such as AGM award, CG ranking and CG Scorecard o Revise CG best practices, guidelines, self assessment tools to raise standards Positive Reinforcement Supervision of major transactions o Closely supervise related party transaction and other major transaction o Revising RPT rules for more practical “related party”, role of audit committee and individual director, quality of professional opinion, quality of information for voting, etc. o Warning on possible abusive RPT and encourage Shareholder’s voting o Support roles of Thai Investor Assoc. o Urge for passage of Class Action Law Private Enforcement Public Enforcement o Push forward for enactment of Civil Sanction Law o Study the use of share repurchase as redress mechanism 12 Recent Court Decision in A Criminal Case Held 44.82% shares Parent Company CEO of Media Co. Held 0.98% shares Held 50.83% shares Media Company (Listed on SET) Borrow 1,078 million Baht Guarantor Guarantor Commercial Bank Falsify documents of Media Co. submitting to bank No disclosure of guarantee liability 13 Recent Court Decision in A Criminal Case (Continue) In March 2009, CEO was charged with 17 counts of corporate fraud. CEO pleaded guilty during the midst of the trial. In February 2012, the Criminal Court sentenced CEO for 85 years in prison. Because of the guilty plead, the period of imprisonment was reduced in half to 42 ½ years. However, under the Thai Criminal Code the maximum term for imprisonment is 20 years. So the final imprisonment term for CEO is 20 years. Defendant appealed. August 2014, the Appeal Court upheld the Criminal Court’s decision. Late last month, Defendant filed a motion for Supreme Court’s review. 14 Thank You 15