‘Pre-accession assistance as a mechanism of Europeanisation: the effects of CARDS/IPA on administrative capacity in Croatia’ Eleftherios Antonopoulos PhD student, UACES scholar, European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde Source: European Communities, Regional Cooperation in the Western Balkans, 2005 Europeanisation • What is Europeanisation? – The domestic impact of Europe – A two way (top-down, bottom-up) process (Börzel 2002). Other definitions (Risse 2001; Radaelli 2003; Bache 2008). • Does Europeanisation theory apply in the following cases: – Public Administration (Olsen 2003; Trondal 2007; Knill 2004; Goetz 2001; Esmark 2008) – Enlargement, CEECs Western Balkans and Croatia (Schimmelfenig, Sedelmeier, Dimitrova) – Pre-accession financial assistance (Grabbe 2003; Hughes, Sasse and Gordon 2005) Europeanisation and domestic change Source: Caporaso (in Vink and Graziano 2008:28) Europeanisation’s influence on administrative capacity • Administrative capacity (Dimitrova 2002) – Absorption capacity (Molle 2007: 196; Hughes, Sasse, Gordon 2005:23) – Administrative absorption capacity (ibid.) • Sectoral, horizontal, capacity to implement the acquis. • Disaggregation for measurement – Structures – Human and financial resources – Systems and tools (based on NEI/ECORYS 2002) Research design • Qualitative desk research and fieldwork with use of available quantitative data for triangulation. • Case study: Croatia (time and budget constraints, first in the queue for membership) • 30 Semi-structured interviews with policy-makers, academics and consultants. • Convenience sampling, snowball-chain referral sampling. • Process tracing: post 2000 EU-WB and EU-Croatia relations, strategy, policy, programme, project, documents, regulations, laws, evaluation reports (EU & Croatian documents) and interview transcripts. • Budget: UACES fieldwork grant 2009 Assessing administrative capacity building under CARDS/PHARE/IPA Instrument CARDS (2000-2004 in Croatia) PHARE (2005-2006) IPA (2007-2013) Cohesion Policy and Structural Instruments (future) Goodness of fit/ institutional misfit Initially centralised and focusing on postwar reconstruction Misfit on the eve of decentralisation of assistance to Croatia Adaptational pressure Similar management with later phase of CARDS therefore similar degree of fit/misfit Institutional misfit particularly in relation to components II-IV High in the case of the CFCU/Ministry of Finance and later CFCA. High pressure in the case of the line ministries, coordination authority, operational structures etc. Very high but potential pressure at the sectoral level depends on the successful implementation of IPA. Institutional misfit. Better chances of goodness of fit if administrative capacity is improved through the influence of IPA. Limited pressure related to the project-based model. High in the case of the CFCU/Ministry of Finance. Medium in general CARDS allocations to Croatia Sector[1] 2001 2002 2003 2004 TOTAL JUSTICE & HOME AFFAIRS 14.1 10.0 12.0 26.85 57.95 ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY BUILDING 2.5 12.0 11.8 15.1 41.4 ECONOMIC & SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT 15.4 18.0 17.5 17.75 68.65 ENVIRONMENT, NATURAL RESOURCES 3.8 3.0 3.7 3.8 14.3 DEMOCRATIC STABILISATION 24.2 16.0 17.0 17.5 74.7 TOTAL ALLOCATION 60 59.0 62.0 81 257.0 [1] The table is available online at http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/how-does-it-work/financial-assistance/cards/statistics2000-2006_en.htm#1 CARDS allocations to Croatia IPA allocations to Croatia Component 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 49,6 45,3 45,6 39,4 39,9 40,8 9,6 14,7 15,8 16,2 16,5 16,8 Regional Development 45,0 47,6 49,7 56,8 58,2 59,3 Human Resources Development 11,3 12,7 14,2 15,7 16,0 16,0 Rural Development 25,5 25,6 25,8 26,0 26,5 27,2 141,2 146,0 151,2 154,2 157,2 160,4 Transition Assistance and Institution Building Cross-border Co-operation TOTAL Source: DG Enlargement website http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/candidate-countries/croatia/financial-assistance/index_en.htm CARDS Structures Competent The National Aid The state secretary in charge of CODEF. bodies Coordinator (for EU assistance) (NAC) The National A state secretary in the Ministry of Finance heading Authorising Officer the National Fund (NF). (NAO Senior Programme An official in a line ministry/agency in charge of Officer (SPO) technical implementation, Project Implementation Units (PIU) are answerable to him. Implementing The Central Financing and Contracting Unit (CFCU) is Agencies headed by the Programme Authorising Officer (PAO). Other within ministries. Final Bodies of central administration, regional and local beneficiaries self-government, public institutions, civil society. European European Commission central services Commission European Commission Delegation IPA Structures Source: European Funds for Croatian Projects. A handbook on Financial Cooperation and European Union Supported programmes in Croatia, CODEF, Zagreb 2009. Summary & Conclusion • Conceptual issues of Europeanisation and administrative capacity. • Research methodology and design. • The cases of CARDS and IPA in Croatia • Some early results based on the fieldwork, show a differentiated, mixed picture of Europeanisation in the fields of Pre-accession assistance and preparation for Cohesion Policy.