DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT Presentation to Ad-hoc Task Force at 11 am on 21.3.2012 IIFT, New Delhi. 1 OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION SECTION 1 SECTION 2 Brief description and background of Department of Rural Development RFD of the Department for the year 2011-12 – experiences and lessons learnt. What worked and what did not ? SECTION 3 Overview of the strategy and strategic plan of the department. SECTION 4 Status of relevant discussions with Planning Commission (including with Working Groups) SECTION 5 RFD of the Department for the year 2012-13 2 SECTION 1 Brief description and background of Department of Rural Development 3 Our Vision Sustainable and inclusive growth of rural India Our Mission Sustainable and inclusive growth of rural India through a multi-pronged strategy for eradication of poverty by increasing livelihood opportunities, providing social safety net and developing infrastructure for socio-economic growth and improvement of quality of life in rural India 4 Programmes of Rural Development… …aim at Universal Coverage …are aimed at increasing sustainability …follow Participatory Approach …are Demand Driven …aim at Empowerment of the Poor …have built in Transparency and Accountability 5 PROGRAMMES LIVELIHOODS: • Enhancing and improving livelihood security by providing minimum 100 days of guaranteed wage employment in every financial year to every household. (MGNREGA) • Providing livelihood opportunities to BPL households.(SGSY/NRLM) INFRASTRUCTURE: • All-weather rural connectivity to unconnected rural habitations and up gradation of existing roads.(PMGSY) • Providing basic housing and homestead to BPL households.(IAY) • Providing urban amenities in rapidly urbanizing rural areas and improve the quality of life.(PURA) SOCIAL SECURITY: • Providing Social assistance to the elderly, widow and disabled persons.(NSAP) 6 DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT Minister of Rural Development Shri Jairam Ramesh MOS(RD-SA) Shri Sisir Adhikari MOS(RD-PJ) Shri Pradeep Jain MOS(RD-AS) Ms. Agatha Sangma SECRETARY (RURAL DEVELOPMENT) SHRI S. Vijay Kumar AS & FA Chief Controller of Accounts Chief Economic Adviser Joint Secretary (RL) (Rural Livelihoods) Finance/Budget Divisions of DRD/DLR & Min. of PR & Min. of DWS SGSY/NRLM/ DRDA Div. Joint Secretary (SA) (Social Assistance) 1. RH Div. 2. NSAP Div. 3. OL Div. Joint Secretary (RE-I) Joint Secretary (RE-II) (Rural Employment) (Rural Employment) MGNREGA Div. MGNREGA/ PURA Div. Joint Secretary (A & C) (Administration & Coordination) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Joint Secretary (RC) & CVO Adviser (Statistics) Economic Adviser (Rural Connectivity) ADMIN. Div. 1. RC Div. RFD/Sevottam 2. Vig. Div. International 3. DG, NRRDA Coop. Div. PC Div. IEC Div. GC/TRG/Parl. Div IT Div. 1. 2. 3. MON. Div. NLM V& MC 1. MON./EVALUATION 2. NE Div. 3. P&P Div. 7 RESPONSIBILITY CENTRES NIRD, Hyderabad DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT CAPART, Delhi NRRDA, Delhi 8 Implementation Mechanism Department of Rural Development - Formulates policies and programmes - Releases funds State Governments - Facilitates implementation - Monitors Programmes INDIA • 35 States/UTs • 625 Districts • 6484 Blocks • 2.5 lakh Village Panchayats • 15 lakh Rural Habitations District Administration - Prepares district perspective plans - Implements the programmes Panchayati Raj Institutions - Plans at the grass root level - Selects works/beneficiaries and implements 9 Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 10 Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 An Act to provide for the enhancement of livelihood security of the households in rural areas of the country by providing at least 100 days of legally guaranteed wage employment in every financial year to every household whose adults volunteer to do unskilled manual work 11 Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) Primary: Supplement employment opportunities in rural areas Auxiliary: Create sustainable livelihoods through regeneration of natural resource base – land, water, forests (“Green Jobs”) Process outcomes: Strengthen grass root democratic processes 12 Impact of MGNREGA Employment provided to 41m Households (upto Jan. 12) Increase in Wage Income Reduction in Distress Migration Enhanced Food Security Higher Land Productivity Increase in Wage Rates Equal Wages for Men and Women Improvement in Wage Negotiation Power Financial Inclusion, 100 million institutional accounts Insurance of Wage Earners Major Safety Net Annual Budget Rs 31000 crores 13 Supplementing Employment Opportunities 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 (till Jan., 12) 5.49 crore households 4.10 crores households Rs. 257.15 crore Rs. 140.29 crores Women 49% Women 49% Employment Provided 5.26 crore households Persondays Generated Rs. 283.59 crore Women 48% Persondays per household 54 days 47 days 34 days Average wage per personday Rs. 90 Rs. 100 Rs.117 Earning per household per year (average) Rs. 4860 Rs. 4700 Rs. 3978 Rs. 35377.27 cr Rs. 26800 cr. 50.99 lakh 66.06 lakh Total Expenditure Rs. 37905.23 cr Works taken up 46.17 lakh 14 NRLM (Aajeevika) 15 Promoting sustainable livelihoods SGSY now restructured as National Rural Livelihood Mission (Aajeevika) 16 Enhancing Sustainable Livelihoods Swaranjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) now restructured as National Rural Livelihood Mission (Aajeevika) Key Features • Social Mobilisation and Institution Building • Financial Inclusion • Livelihoods promotion • Social Development • Convergence 17 Social Mobilization and Institution Building Institutional Architecture Secondary Level Federations Primary level federation - 10-20 SHGs (relaxation in difficult areas) •Support to primary level federations •Linkage with departments •Auditing of groups •Anchoring community cadre •Training to SHGs •Financial and Livelihood Services •Access to public services and entitlements SHGs one member from each household, preferably a woman, organized into a S.H.G. To cover 7crore rural poor households •Savings •Internal Lending •Accessing Credit from Banks 18 Financial Inclusion • Access to credit is key to come out of poverty • Out of Rs.100,000 per family required, around 90% has to come from financial institutions. • Strategic partnerships with banking sector, NABARD and cooperative banks. • Promoting financial intermediation by mature S.H.G federations • Interest subsidy on loans to S.H.Gs • Micro insurance to cover life, health and assets 19 Livelihoods Enhancement • Coping with vulnerabilities – debt bondage, food insecurity, migration, health shocks • Strengthening existing livelihoods – agriculture, livestock, forestry and nontimber forest produce 20 Livelihoods Enhancement (contd…) Self employment Entrepreneurship development among local youth to generate insitu employment. Targeting 60 lakhs micro-entrepreneurs by 2017 Skilled wage employment opportunities for youth in growing sectors of the economy – targeting 1.0 crore youth by 2017 21 Empowerment 22 Outcomes of SGSY/Ajeevika (since inception) (as on Jan., 2012) 174.79 lakhs (17.48 million) 120 Series1 100 80 (105.91 lakhs (10.59 million) 60 40 (42.87 Lakhs) (4.29 million) 20 0 SHGs Formed Assisted Assisted Beneficiaries Women Investment on SGSY/Ajeevika : Rs. 44420 crore on both credit and subsidy 23 Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) 24 Rural Connectivity Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) Provision of all-weather road connectivity to all the eligible habitations in core network with population of 500 persons or more in plain areas and 250 persons or more for Hill States, Tribal (Schedule-V), Desert Areas (identified in DDP) and 78 selected Tribal and Backward districts under Integrated Action Plan (IAP). Upgradation of selected eligible roads though it is not central to the programme. 100% financing by Central Govt. Maintenance by States. Quality assurance mechanism. 25 Status of Road Network in India • Total length of road network in India : 32 Lakh km • National Highways: 65,600 Km (2%) • State Highways & Major District Roads : • Rural Roads State Highways and Major District National Highways Roads 2% 14% : 4,32,000 Km (14%) Rural Roads 84% 27 Lakh Km (84%) • 80 % of Rural Roads unsurfaced • 3.42 Lakh habitations (39%) out of 8.88 Lakh rural habitations lacked all-weather connectivity in the year 2000. 26 PMGSY - Current Implementation Status A. Physical Progress Activity Habitations (in Nos.) New Connectivity (km.) Upgradation (km.) Total Eligible Projects Sanctioned Net 1,58,849 1,14,433 (72%) 82,019 Eligible (52.%) Sanctioned (72%) 2,55,835 (70%) 2,04,285 Eligible (56.%) Sanctioned (80%) 3,68,000 1,63,991 (45%) 1,36,972 Eligible (37.22%) Sanctioned (84%) Value of project cleared Funds Released Expenditure Rs. 1,26,657 Cr. Rs.96,952 Cr. (77%) Rs.88,931Cr. (92 %) 3,65,094 Completed upto Jan. 2012 B- Financial Progress 27 Transforming Rural Lives Increased access to market, health and education Investment of One Million Rupees enables 165 poor people to move above poverty line 28 Source : IFPRI, Research Report 110, 1999 Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY) 29 Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY) Financial assistance is provided to rural BPL houseless households • Unit assistance Revised w.e.f. 1.4.2010 - Rs. 45,000 for new construction in plain areas - Rs. 48,500 for new construction in hilly areas and IAP Districts and 78 LWE affected districts. -In addition, Rs. 20,000 available as credit under DRI at interest of 4% per annum. • Allocation to States/Districts -to States on the basis of 75:25 weightage to housing shortage and poverty ratio respectively. -To districts on the basis of 75:25 weightage to housing shortage and rural SC/ST population respectively. 30 Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY) • Earmarking of Funds -Sanctions in the name of women or jointly. -60% funds for SC/STs. -15% for minorities. -3% for persons with disability. • Selection of Beneficiary - From Permanent IAY Waitlist based on BPL list of 2002. - There are separate lists for SC/ST & others. - Lists are displayed publicly. 31 National Social Assistance Programmes (NSAP) 32 National Social Assistance Programmes (NSAP) NSAP at present consists of the following schemes exclusively for Below Poverty Line (BPL) persons/households: - Pension schemes for Old, Widow and Disabled - National Family Benefit Scheme (NFBS) for households on the death of the primary breadwinner. 33 Pension Schemes under NSAP - - - Old age pension under Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS) All BPL persons of 60 years or higher 196.96 lakh persons have been benefitted so far. Widow Pension under Indira Gandhi National Widow Pension Scheme (IGNWPS) All BPL widows of 40-59 years 36.11 lakh widows have been benefitted so far Disability Pension under Indira Gandhi National Disability Pension Scheme(IGNDPS) All BPL persons with severe/ multiple disability of 18-59 years 7.70 lakh disabled persons have been benefitted. Budget to be enhanced from Rs 6158 Cr in 2011-12 to Rs 9434.76. Cr (projected requirement) in 2012-13 34 SECTION 2: RFD 2011-12 :- Experience and Lessons learnt, What worked and What did not ? • Third RFD of the Department. • Total 10 Objectives (including 3 mandatory objectives were taken up with 46 Actions to be attained through 74 Success Indicators. • Overall achievements – 90% + expected MGNREGA • Experience and Lessons learnt, what worked: - The indicator % of rural households provided employment against demand in the RFD is the appropriate success indicator of the programme. • What did not work: - Persondays generated and fund utilised were fixed as success indicators. However, MGNREGA is a demand driven programme and the pesondays generated and fund utilised do not reflect the success of the programme. The programme by providing employment guarantee to the rural households has led to increase in wages in agriculture and other sectors and consequently household incomes. The demand for MGNREGA work is also closely linked to good monsoons and availability of other employment options. Therefore these indicators were not appropriate and have been removed. Other outcome 35 indicators have been added. Contd… SGSY (NRLM) • What worked? The efforts of the Ministry in providing continuous technical assistance to the states in setting up of the State missions, and, preparation of their annual action plans. • What did not work? The proposition that all S.H.Gs to be supported under credit cum subsidy component should pursue common economic activity. This has now been changed to ’promoting diversified livelihoods of individual members’. The group becomes a solidarity unit and not a ‘common production unit’. • What worked, but was not part of the RFD last year? Large scale proof of concept for sustainable and viable livelihoods of the poor around key sectors – agriculture. This is being reflected in the RFD of 2012-13. We are also increasing the sectors to include – forest produce, livestock and fisheries 36 Contd... PMGSY What worked and what did not • “Number of Inspections” as an indicator did not work, since the objective is to improve quality, therefore a new indicator, “percentage of ongoing/completed roads graded satisfactory” being taken for 2012-13. • Instead of “length of roads constructed ” a better indicator of “Number of habitations connected” being taken for 2012-13. 37 Contd... IAY Experiences & Lessons learnt • States/Implementing Agencies need to be taken on board for the success of Results-Framework Document because actual execution of the programmes is in their hands. What Worked – The agreed objectives, success indicators and the target to measure progress clearly indicated in RFD have made it easier to understand how to effectively implement and monitor the scheme. What did not work – Non-inclusion of Management Information System (MIS) to monitor the programmes to have comprehensive data input about programme implementation. 38 Contd... PURA Experience and Lessons learnt, what worked and What not ? • Since PURA is being tried out on pilot basis, proper assessment of the time needed to complete the processes involved could not be done. This rendered the timelines unrealistic. NSAP – Experiences & Lessons learnt • Key improvement – better coverage of eligible beneficiaries. 39 Section 3: Overview of the Strategy and Strategic Plan of the Department MGNREGA • Focusing on labour intensive land development works on community lands and land belonging to marginalized sections. • Use of ICT to improve delivery of services and enhance transparency and accountability. SGSY (NRLM) • Emphasis on setting up of dedicated state missions, staffed with quality human resources, continuous capacity building of the missions and state developing their own poverty reduction action plans. • Phasing strategy to ensure capacities are built at all levels and scaling up happens in a seamless organic manner • Establishing large scale proof of concepts in all critical components, to draw lessons for scaling up – resource blocks, primary sector livelihoods, financial inclusion pilots, self employment pilots, social inclusion pilots, 40 etc. Contd… • • • • PMGSY Proper planning through preparation of Core-Network and web-based monitoring and management High technical standards for design and execution and capacity creation for the purpose Emphasis on quality Proper maintenance of assets to ensure sustained socioeconomic dividends 41 Contd… IAY • Ensure adequate and affordable housing for all and facilitate development of sustainable and inclusive habitats in rural areas by expanding Government support, promoting community participation, self-help and public-private partnership within the framework of Panchayati Raj. • Provide access to land, finance, basic amenities and technical support for the construction of the houses. • Creation of web based knowledge network of appropriate technology for specific region/areas of the country for IAY houses with an aim to create a knowledge repository. • Set up Resources Centres at Centre for handling technical, financial & research needs for Rural Housing Habitats and set up similar Centres at States. 42 Contd… PURA • PPP mode to achieve efficient implementation of Rural Infrastructure projects and high standards of service delivery. • Convergence of several schemes and simultaneous implementation in a project mode. NSAP • To build a database of beneficiaries with Unique ID number • Open accounts in Banks for all beneficiaries as far as possible. • Disbursement of benefits under NSAP through transaction based NSAP-MIS. 43 Section 4 Discussion with Planning Commission (including Working Groups) MGNREGA - The working group has recommended strengthening the institutional arrangement at all levels for better implementation of MGNREGA. This includes cluster level teams in high expenditure Blocks. The working group has also accorded priority to capacity building efforts. These recommendations will help in achieving the RFD indicators in 2012-13. - Use of modern technology including ICT for timely disbursement of benefits. 44 Contd… SGSY (NRLM) • Emphasis on capacity building of State, district and Sub—district Mission units. • Placement linked skill development to be a major initiative in 12th Plan • Sustainable livelihoods initiatives in agriculture, forest produce (nontimber), livestock, fisheries, etc. • Financial inclusion to be major thrust area for savings and credit • Special initiatives for social inclusion of weaker sections and vulnerable categories. 45 Contd… PMGSY: • Working Group has recommended striking of balance between maintenance and creation of assets. • Working Group has recommended more emphasis on providing connectivity to IAP Districts. • Working Group has recommended intensification of efforts to use marginal/local materials in road construction. IAY (Rural Housing): • Working Group has recommended enhancement in unit assistance for the construction of houses . • Provision for capacity building and man-power strengthening to make MIS successful recommended. • New ways to implement new financial instruments/bankable schemes to be investigated. • Provision of technical training and technical support to the ground level officials and beneficiaries respectively. 46 Contd… PURA The working group has recommended a larger role for the State Governments in the appraisal and approval of PURA projects and also conversion of the scheme into a centrally sponsored scheme. This will enhance the commitment of the States to the scheme. The working group has also recommended establishment of adequate institutional arrangement for project implementation. These recommendations will help in achieving the RFD indicators in 2012-13. NSAP • No working group 47 RFD 2012-13 Inter se priorities among key objectives, success indicators and targets Table 1- Result-Framework Document (RFD) Table 2- Trend Value for Success Indicators 48 Section 2 Table 1 – Result Framework Document Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%) Objective 1 15 1.1 % of households provided employment against demanded employment under MGNREGS % of rural households 2.00 98 1.2 Person days generated under MGNREGS (women) % of persondays (women) generated 2.00 33 49 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%) Objective 1 15 1.3 Approval of State Labour Budget for 201213 Approval of Labour budget of States 2.00 28 1.4 Review by Central Employment Guarantee Council No. of meetings held 2.00 2 1.5 Regional Review meetings in 6 Regions. No. of meetings 1.00 12 1.6 Monitoring of MGNREGA process and quality of works No. of district for NLM visit 1.00 100 50 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%) Objective 1 15 1.7 MIS reporting of expenditure % of expenditure reported on MIS 2.00 90 1.8 Capacity building for enhancing effectiveness of Gram Sabha No. of Gram Panchayat for training 1.00 100 1.9 Pilot e-FMS solution in States Number of States initiated e-FMS 1.00 6 1.10 Pilot social audit in States Number of States piloted social audit. 1.00 20 51 Contd… Objective Weight Objective 2 15 Actions Success Indicators 2.1 State Missions for Number of new State NRLM Implementation missions set up 2.2 District Programme Management Unit set up for NRLM Implementation 2.3 Block Programme Management Unit set up for NRLM implementation Weight Target Value (100%) 1.00 7 No. of new District 1.00 Programme Management Unit Set up 58 No. of new Block 1.00 Programme Management Unit Set up 144 2.4 Formation of Self No. of SHGs formed (in Help Groups (SHGs) lakhs) 2.00 2.88 52 Contd… Objective Weight Objective 2 15 Actions Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%) 2.5 Capacity Number beneficiaries Building and Training provided training (in of beneficiaries lakhs) 2.00 5.47 2.6 Provision of economic support (credit and Subsidy) to SHGs for livelihood promotion 2.7 Promoting Sustainable Livelihoods- large sized proof of concepts Number of SHGs assisted (in lakhs) 2.00 1.74 No of key livelihood sectors where proof of concepts has been established 1.00 2 53 Contd… Objective Weight Objective 2 15 Actions Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%) 2.8 Sustainable livelihoods Pilots families benefited No of beneficiaries 2.00 intervened by livelihood interventions (in lakhs) 9.60 2.9 Sanction of Placement linked skill development projects through private sector participation 2.10 Number of micro enterprises created through RSETI and partnership organisations Number of beneficiaries 2.00 trained and placed (in lakhs) 3.84 Number of beneficiaries 1.00 trained (in lakhs) 0.96 54 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%) Objective 3 15 3.1 Habitations – Habitations to be connected Connection of habitations 4.00 4,000 3.2 Satisfactory Quality of roads under construction. % of “satisfactory grading” 2.00 70 3.3 Satisfactory Quality of roads completed. % of “satisfactory grading” 2.00 75 3.4 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. road length sanctioned. % of data entry on OMMAS 1.00 90 55 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%) Objective 3 15 3.5 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. value of projects sanctioned % of data entry on OMMAS 1.00 90 3.6 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. habitations sanctioned % of data entry on OMMAS 1.00 90 3.7 Maintenance Funds credited Funds credited (%) 1.00 80 3.8 Maintenance Funds expenditure Expenditure (% of deposit) 1.00 60 3.9 Regional Review Meetings No. of review meetings 1.00 12 3.10 Improving the capacity of NRRDA Implementation of McKinsey Report 1.00 9 56 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Objective 4 15 Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%) 4.1 Develop Active MIS architecture convergence with States 3.00 18 4.2 Fulfilment of physical target for the year Construction of houses 6.00 17.30 4.3 Focus on weaker sections No. of houses (in lakhs) 3.00 10.38 4.4 Monitoring of performance of States Effective Monitoring by way of monthly meetings of coordinating offices, quarterly meetings of Secretaries and annual meetings of PDs, DRDAs etc. 3.00 10 57 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%) Objective 5 10 5.1 Scrutiny of proposals for release of funds Release of funds to the States (in lakhs) 2.00 9434.76 5.2 Identification of eligible beneficiaries for Pension Schemes for the aged, widows and the disabled Coverage of beneficiaries vis-àvis the estimated number (in lakhs) 3.00 315 5.3 Identification of eligible households for assistance under NFBS. Coverage of 3.00 eligible households vis-à-vis the estimated numbers (in lakhs) 3.43 58 Contd…. Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%) Objective 5 10 5.4 Placing the database of pensioners in the public domain under MIS Uploading of 2.00 pensisoners database vis-à-vis the physical coverage (in lakhs) 170 Objective 6 5 6.1 Rolling out of remaining 7 pilot projects of PURA Approval of DPRs and release of funds to DRDAs 0.5 31.10.12 6.2 Execution of State support agreement and concession agreement Signing of Agreements 0.5 30.11.12 59 Contd… Objective Objective 6 Weight 5 Actions Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%) 6.3 Commencement of activities Inventorisation of assets, procurement of land, release of grant instalment, financial closure and dissemination of project documents 0.5 31.12.12 6.4 Selected private developers to provide urban amenities in PURA clusters, drinking water and sewage treatment, construction of village streets, drainage, solid waste management, skill development of rural BPL youths etc. Approval of DPRs and release of funds to DRDAs 0.5 31.10.12 60 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%) Objective 6 6.5 Revision of PURA guidelines based on learning so far in the pilot phase Incorporating modifications in consultations with connected Ministries for effective implementation 0.5 31.12.15 6.6 Calling for Expression of Interest (EOI) for the next set of pilot projects After revising the guidelines, finalization and advertising of EOI document. 0.5 31.10.12 6.7 Evaluation of EOIs and short listing to select capable Private developers Scrutiny of EOIs received and shortlisting 1.00 30.9.12 5 61 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%) Objective 6 5 6.8 Calling for Request for proposals (RFP) from short listed private developers Finalization of RFP 1.00 document and its publication in newspapers 30.11.12 Objective 7 5 7.1 Improving service delivery of NIRD Implementation of recommendation of Committee 2.00 30.11.12 7.2 Organisation Number of of Training Trainings Courses conducted 2.00 23,000 7.3 Organisation April, 12, June, 12, of five national August 12, Nov., Colloquia of 12 and Jan., 13 SIRDs and ETCs 1.00 5 62 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%) Objective 8 8.1 Finalization / Preparation of final reform proposal Preparation of Detailed target oriented action plan for implementation 3.00 April, 12 8.2 Implementation of Action Plan Engaging Implementation agent 2.00 June, 12 5 63 Section 3 Table 2 – Trend value for Success Indicators Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 Objective 1 1.1 % of households provided employment against demanded employment under MGNREGS % 99 99 99 1.2 Person days generated under MGNREGS (women) % 48 49 33 15 64 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Objective 1 15 Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 1.3 Approval Nos. of State Labour Budget for 2012-13 28 28 28 1.4 Review by Central Employment Guarantee Council Nos. 3 2 3 1.5 Regional Review meetings in 6 Regions. Nos. 2 1 12 65 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 Objective 1 15 1.6 Monitoring of MGNREGA process and quality of works Nos. - - 100 1.7 MIS reporting of expenditure % - 85 90 1.8 Capacity building for enhancing effectriveness of Gram Sabha Nos. of GP - - 100 66 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 Objective 1 1.9 Pilot eFMS solution in States Nos. - - 6 1.10 Pilot social audit in States 2.1 State Missions for NRLM Implementation Nos. - - 5 20 8 Objective 2 15 15 Number of new State missions set up 67 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Objective 2 15 Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 2.2 District Programme Management Unit set up for NRLM Implementation No. of new District Programme Management Unit Set up - 60 2.3 Block Programme Management Unit set up for NRLM implementation No. of new Block Programme Management Unit Set up - 150 3.00 3.00 2.4 Formation of No. of SHGs 2.85 Self Help Groups formed (in (SHGs) lakhs) 68 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Objective 2 15 Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 2.5 Capacity Building Number and Training of beneficiaries beneficiaries provided training (in lakhs) 27.45 19.00 5.70 2.6 Provision of economic support (credit and Subsidy) to SHGs for livelihood promotion 2.7 Promoting Sustainable Livelihoods- large sized proof of concepts 3.86 2.00 1.78 - 3.00 Number of SHGs assisted (in lakhs) No of key livelihood sectors where proof of concepts has been established 69 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Objective 2 15 Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 2.8 Sustainable livelihoods Pilots families benefited No of beneficiaries intervened by livelihood interventions (in lakhs) - - 10.00 2.9 Sanction of Placement linked skill development projects through private sector participation 2.10 Number of micro enterprises created through RSETI and partnership organisations Number of beneficiaries trained and placed (in lakhs) Number of beneficiaries trained (in lakhs) 0.85 3.75 4.00 - - 1.00 70 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Objective 3 15 Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 3.1 Habitations – Habitations to be connected Nos 7584 4000 4000 3.2 Satisfactory Quality of roads under construction. % of “satisfac tory grading” - - 70 3.3 Satisfactory Quality of roads completed. % of “satisfac tory grading” - - 75 71 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 Objective 3 3.4 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. road length sanctioned. % of data entry on OMMAS 70 80 80 3.5 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. value of projects sanctioned % of data entry on OMMAS - 60 80 15 72 Contd…. Objective Weight Actions Objective 3 15 Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 3.6 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. habitations sanctioned % of data entry on OMMAS - - 80 3.7 Maintenance Funds credited Funds credited (%) - - 70 3.8 Maintenance Funds expenditure Expenditu re (% of deposit) - - 50 73 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Objective 3 15 Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 3.9 Regional Review Meetings No. of review meetings - - 12 3.10 Improving the capacity of NRRDA Implemen tation of McKinsey Report - - 9 74 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 Objective 4 4.1 Develop MIS architecture No. of States - - 18 4.2 Fulfilment of physical target for the year Nos. of houses (In lakhs) 29.09 27.26 17.30 4.3 Focus on weaker sections -do- 17.45 16.87 10.38 4.4 Monitoring of performance of States No. of meetings 10 10 10 15 75 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 Objective 5 5.1 Scrutiny of proposals for release of funds Rs. in crores 5110 6658 9434.76 5.2 Identification of eligible beneficiaries for Pension Schemes for the aged, widows and the disabled No. in lakhs 215 226 315 10 76 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Objective 5 10 Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 No. in 5.3 lakhs Identification of eligible households for assistance under NFBS. 2.05 3.43 3.43 No. in lakhs 164 170 170 5.4 Placing the database of pensioners in the public domain under MIS. Unit 77 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 Objective 6 Time period - - 31.10.12 - - 30.11.12 5 6.1 Rolling out of remaining 7 pilot projects of PURA 6.2 Execution of State support agreement and concession agreement 78 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Objective 6 5 6.3 Commencement of activities 6.4 Selected private developers to provide urban amenities in PURA clusters, drinking water and sewage treatment, construction of village streets, drainage, solid waste management, skill development of rural BPL youths etc. Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 Time period - - 31.12.12 - - - 79 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 Objective 6 Time period - - 31.5.12 - - 31.7.12 6 6.5 Revision of PURA guidelines based on learning so far in the pilot phase 6.6 Calling for Expression of Interest (EOI) for the next set of pilot projects 80 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Objective 6 6.7 Evaluation of EOIs and short listing to select capable Private developers 6.8 Calling for Request for proposals (RFP) from short listed private developers Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 Time period - - 30.9.12 - - 30.11.12 81 Contd… Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 Objective 7 7.1 Improving service delivery of NIRD Time period - - 30.11.12 7.2 Organisation of Training Courses Nos. 41030 13144 23000 7.3 Organisation of five national Colloquia of SIRDs and ETCs Nos. 2 5 5 5 82 Contd…. Objective Weight Actions Objective 8 5 Unit 8.1 Finalization / Time Preparation of period final reform proposal 8.2 Implementation of Action Plan Nos. Actual Value for FY 10-11 Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.) Target value for 1213 - - April, 12 June, 2012 83 Description of Success indicators and measurement methodology Schemes of DoRD are Centrally Sponsored Schemes that are implemented through:(i) State Governments (ii) Autonomous societies under State Governments (iii) District Rural Development Agencies (DRDAs). Role of Union Government (DoRD): (i) Issue guidelines of schemes/ programmes. (ii) Provide financial assistance. (iii) Periodically monitor progress of the secheme. (iv) Evaluate the impact of the schemes. The various success indicators have been prescribed accordingly. 84 Description of Success indicators and measurement methodology MGNREGA I. II. Wage income provided per household. Coverage of marginalized groups • Percentage of SC participation. • Percentage of ST participation • Percentage of women participation. SGSY: 1. No. of new District Programme Management Unit Set up 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. No. of new Block Programme Management Unit Set up No. of SHGs formed No. of beneficiaries provided training No. of SHGs assisted No of key livelihood sectors where proof of concepts has been established 7. No of beneficiaries intervened by livelihood interventions 8. Number of beneficiaries trained and placed 9. Number of beneficiaries trained and placed 10. No. of beneficiaries trained 85 Description of Success indicators and measurement methodology PMGSY (i) Financial support provided to State Governments to construct rural roads. (ii) State Governments responsible to execute projects (iii) Projects of State Governments sanctioned by Ministry after examining their DPRs. (iv) Progress periodically reviewed through reports review meetings, field visits etc. (v) Success indicators are:(a) Length of new roads (b) Amount of fund released. (c) Inspections done by National/State Quality Monitors. 86 Description of Success indicators and measurement methodology Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY) I. (i) (ii) II. III. IV. (i) (ii) This Centrally Sponsored Scheme is implemented : By DRDAs at District Level By PRIs at Gram Panchayat level. Central Government releases funds and monitor progress Release of funds dependent on submission of complete proposals by DRDAs for 2nd Installment. Success indicators are:Amount of funds released. Number of Houses sanctioned and constructed 87 Description of Success indicators and measurement methodology PURA (i) Success indicators for 2012-13:Achievement of performance standards incorporated in the Concession Agreement – as certified by the Independent Engineer. National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP) I. All Schemes of NSAP are for poverty alleviation. II. Funds to be released and number of beneficiaries generally specified. III. Process of identification of eligible beneficiaries under IGNWPS and IGNDPS underway. IV. Monitoring done through review meetings indicated under various schemes. 88 Specific performance requirement from other Departments 1. State Government/UTs must submit complete proposals well in time. 2. Support of M/o Finance and Planning Commission required for budget outlays. MGNREGA:(i) Demands of PRIs to be projected timely. (ii) Mechanism of convergence of various programmes should be positively exploited. SGSY/NRLM • State Government/UTs must submit complete proposals well in time. • Support of M/o Finance and Planning Commission required for budget outlays. • Support of Public Sector Banks required under SGSY/NRLM for provision of credit for SHG members and federations. 89 Specific performance requirement from other Departments PMGSY:(i) State agencies must implement programmes meticulously. (ii) Timely provision of budgets and mobilization of assistance from external agencies to be done meticulously. IAY :(i) State/ UTs must submit timely proposal for release of funds. (ii) They must timely release funds to beneficiaries and assist them logistically. (iii) Agencies to monitor constructions of houses in stipulated time. (iv) Public Sector Banks to provide loan to beneficiaries under Differential Rate of Interest (DRI) Scheme with minimal required documentation. PURA:(i) Signing of State support Agreement for PURA (ii) Sponsoring the PURA proposals for Public-Private Partnership with private parties; signing of Concession Agreement for PURA. 90 Outcome/Impact of the Ministry/Department Section 6 : Outcome/Impact of Department/Ministry Outcome /Impact of Department /Ministry Jointly responsible for influencing this outcome/impact with the following organization(s)/depar tments/ministries Success Indicator Enhance State Governments, livelihood security Ministry of Finance, of households in Planning Commission rural areas 1.1 Credit mobilised for women SHGs 1.2 Total Wage Expenditure 1.3 Wage Income per household 2.1 Length of rural roads constructed in Kms. Improved allweather rural road connectivity -do- Unit 20102011 20112012 20122013 20132014 20142015 Rs. In crore 12622 - - - - -do- 25579 25686 16368 - - Rs. Number 4865 45,109 4675 29,700 3996 24,400 27,000 32,000 2.2 Length of rural roads upgraded in Kms. Enhanced basic housing to BPL households in rural areas -do- Increase in coverage of rural households % 93.36 47.25 90 90 90 Improved social assistance to the elderly, widow and disabled persons -do- Increase beneficiaries % 105% (215) 100% (226) 100% (315) 100% (315) 100% (315) in 91 92