A New Developing Curriculum on the Transition Effects of the Vocational Training for Adult Learning Program – A Case Study of the Funeral Mortician Services Presented by Kuei-Chih Chuang 1 Ph.D., Hung-Ju Tsai 2 Graduate School of Vocation & Technological Education National Yunlin University of Science & Technology chuangkc@yuntech.edu.tw, g9643215@yuntech.edu.tw Research Background Considerations of adult learning development and utilization in transition training Aging society increases the possibility of career transition. Funeral Mortician Services (FMS) Research Motivation Demands of adult learning development Self-development experiences Effectiveness of career transition training in FMS industry Research Objectives To examine the variances between variables and effectiveness of transition training. To examine the relationship between variables and effectiveness of transition training Research Objectives (cont.) To examine the correlation between trainee’s characteristics, teaching course, career support and effectiveness of transition training. To examine the predictability between trainee’s characteristics, teaching course, career support and effectiveness of transition training. Research Hypothesis Each individual variable of FMS is independent. There is no significant relationship between variables and effectiveness of transition training. Research Hypothesis (cont.) Each individual variable of FMS is interrelated. There is a significant relationship between variables and transition training effectiveness. Definition of Terms Adults Funeral Service Industry Transition training Scope of Research Research objects Samples Selection Limitations Research objects Source of samples Source of research materials Literature Review Characteristics of adult learners Concepts of transition training Factors may influence the effectiveness of transition training Relevant study of transition training Contents of FMS Fundamental of adult learning development Characteristics of adult learning development Adult learning principles Concepts of Transition Training Basic concepts Meaning Theories Effecting Factors of Transition Training Trainee’s characteristics Course design Workplace Relevant Study 研究者 年代 對象 方法 卓雅偵 1996 壽險公司 問卷調查 柯全恆 1997 企業界 問卷調查 、訪談 歐怡君 2001 壽險外勤 問卷調查 王瑞賢 2001 推廣教育 問卷調查 邵孟瓊 2002 公務人員 問卷調查 張瑞芬 2003 失業者 問卷調查 、訪談 張文彥 2003 壽險外勤 問卷調查 Relevant Study (cont.) 研究者 年代 對象 方法 李宜珈 2003 銀行員工 問卷調查 何黛珊 2005 壽險外勤 問卷調查 王玲玲 2005 壽險內勤 問卷調查 魏淳芳 2005 高科技產業 問卷調查 吳進興 2005 飛機維修員 問卷調查 張志長 2006 社福人員 問卷調查 張曉平 2006 觀光旅館員工 問卷調查 Funeral Mortician Services (FMS) Definition of FMS Job classification Job characteristics Research Approach Structure of research Research process Research objects Means Data management Structure of Research Research Objects 540 samples Received over 280 hrs pre-service training from Jan. to Dec. 2008 Qualified trainees who were re-employed. Research Tools Scale of effectiveness Personal details Learning motivation Training course Career support Effectiveness of transition training Research Tools (cont.) Pre-test analysis: 77/90 effective questionnaires (85.6%). 60 questions remained after item, factor and reliability analysis. Sample questionnaire: 352/450 were collected (78.2%) 330 of them were effective. Pre-test Questionnaire 培訓單位 發放數 回收數 無效 問卷 有效 樣本 北區 桃園職業 30 訓練中心 30 1 29 中區 嶺東科技 30 大學 30 3 27 南區 雲林科技 30 大學 30 2 28 Pre-test Analysis(1/3) Item Analysis Using critical ration and relevant analysis to process question selection. Using t ratio to determine the question differences through the group of the highest 27% and the lowest 27% of effective questionnaires. Significance level must reach .01 and the absolute value of critical ration must be higher than 3.0. The standard of question selection: absolute value: higher than .30 with .01 significance level. 1-6, 2-12, 3-1,3-16,3-19 were cut out. Factor Analysis(2/3) The KMO value of learning motivation is .818; teaching course .906, career support .871; transition training effectiveness .862 KMO>.80 3-8, 4-2 were cut out. Pre-test Analysis(3/3) Reliability Analysis 量表 學習動 課程教 職場支 訓練移 整體 機 材 持度 轉成效 Cronb .897 ach α .877 .927 .948 .973 題數 13 19 20 67 15 Sample Questionnaire 培訓 單位 北區 宜蘭縣產業技能訓練 發放 回收 無效 數 率 問卷 30 23 2 有效 問卷 21 推廣協會 北區 華梵大學 30 26 0 26 桃園職 訓中心 桃園職 訓中心 桃園職 訓中心 職業訓練中心 30 25 1 24 職業訓練中心 30 24 2 22 職業訓練中心 30 25 1 24 Sample Questionnaire (cont.) 培訓 單位 南區 發放 回收 無效 數 率 問卷 中華殯葬教育 30 23 3 學會 有效 問卷 20 台北市 華梵大學 30 24 1 23 台北縣 華梵大學 30 23 2 21 30 24 2 22 30 25 2 23 苗栗縣 苗栗縣 苗栗縣殯葬教 育學會 苗栗縣殯葬教 育學會 Sample Questionnaire (cont.) 培訓 單位 南投縣 台中縣 發放 回收 無效 數 率 問卷 社團法人台灣 30 23 4 就業輔導協會 中州技術學院 有效 問卷 19 30 23 4 19 高雄縣 中華殯葬教育 學會 30 23 3 20 高雄縣 中華殯葬教育 學會 30 24 2 22 屏東縣 大仁科技大學 30 27 3 24 Research Process Research Methodology Questionnaire survey research Interview Data Management Quantitative analysis Qualitative interview survey Findings & Discussion 參訓學員性別 180 170 人 160 數 150 140 1 2 男性 女性 Findings & Discussion (cont.) 學員年齡統計 100 80 人 60 數 40 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 30以下 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-65 Findings & Discussion (cont.) 學員教育程度 140 120 100 人 數 80 60 40 20 0 1 初中以下 2 高中職 3 專科 4 大學 5 研究所 Findings & Discussion (cont.) 學員婚姻狀況 250 200 人 數 150 100 50 0 1 未婚 2 已婚 3 其他 Findings & Discussion (cont.) 家庭經濟責任 250 200 人 150 數 100 50 0 1 父母親 2 本人 3 配偶 Findings & Discussion (cont.) 受訓前就業狀況 250 200 人 150 數 100 50 0 1 待(失)業中 2 就業中 Findings & Discussion (cont.) 受訓後到就業時間 200 150 100 50 0 1 1 2 2-3 3 4 4-6 7-12 (單位:個月) 5 13以上 Findings & Discussion (cont.) 受訓經費分擔比例 200 150 100 50 0 1 政府 2 3 公司 公司與員工 4 自費 Analysis of Variances – Background Variables There is no significant difference in trainee’s characteristics (P>.05). There is a significant difference in employment situation (P=.000<.001) H null is partially accepted. Analysis of Variances – Background Variables (Cont.) There is no significant difference in training course (P>.05). There is a significant difference in employment situation (P=.000<.05) H null is partially accepted. Analysis of Variances – Background Variables (cont.) There is no significant difference in career support (P>.05). There is a significant difference in employment situation (P=.000<.05). H null is partially accepted. Analysis of Variances – Background Variables There is no significant difference btw background variables and transition training effectiveness. Gender, education, employment, expenses in the period between pre and post training shows there is a significant difference (P<.001). Analysis of Variance – Background Variables versus Training Effectiveness H2-1:There is no significant difference between genders and training effectiveness. – Accepted Analysis of Variance – Background Variables versus Training Effectiveness (cont.) H2-2:There is no significant difference btw age and training effectiveness. – Rejected. Analysis of Variance – Background Variables versus Training Effectiveness (cont.) H2-3:There is no significant difference btw education level and training effectiveness. – Rejected. Analysis of Variance – Background Variables versus Training Effectiveness (cont.) H2-7:There is no significant difference btw martial status and training effectiveness.Accepted Analysis of Variance – Background Variables versus Training Effectiveness (cont.) H2-8:There is no significant difference btw family financial burden and training effectiveness - Accepted Analysis of Variances – Background Variables versus Training Effectiveness (cont.) H2-6:There is no significant difference btw pre-training employment status and training effectiveness. Rejected Correlation Analysis H3-1:There is a significant relationship between trainee’s characteristics and training effectiveness. – Accpeted r=.484;P=.000<.05 Correlation Analysis (cont.) H3-2:There is a significant relationship btw training course and training effectiveness. Accepted r=.594;P=.000<.05 Correlation Analysis (cont.) H3-3:There is a significant relationship btw career support and training effectiveness. – Accepted r=.645;P=.000<.05 Regression Analysis Trainee’s characteristics versus Training effectiveness F=44.409, p=.000<.001 Positively related Better trainee’s characteristics = better training effectiveness H null - accepted Regression Analysis (cont.) Training course versus training effectiveness F=178.999, p=.000<.001 Positively related Better training course = Better training effectiveness H null – accepted Regression Analysis (cont.) Career support versus training effectiveness Positively related F=234.241 ,p=.000<.001 Better career support = better training effectiveness H null- accepted Conclusion 1. Trainee’s characteristics and training effectiveness are correlated. 2. Living and employment pressures are the sources of learning motivation. 3. Higher the education level, higher the training effectiveness 4. Combination of organization goals and career planning could improve training effectiveness. Conclusion (cont.) 5. Creating a positive learning environment could improve the training effectiveness. 6. The satisfaction of training course and the awareness of career support could significantly increase the predictability of training effectiveness. Recommendations Council of Labour Affairs To held the examination of professional FMS license. Improve transition training effectiveness by combining both public and private resources in the society. Government assistance and supports Recommendations (cont.) Training Center To establish trainee verification mechanism. To establish HR database and improve the diversity of teaching strategies. Recommendations (cont.) Companies To create a more interactive working environment for employees To provide internal training class for employees and strengthen the core competency. To adopt TTQS to improve the quality control management. To take advantage of internet resources and improve the internal training effectiveness Recommendations (cont.) Companies To improve the integration of employee training plans and the needs of learning. To seek for strategic alliance Recommendations (cont.) For researchers 1. Trainee’s managers or co-workers could be incorporated in the research survey. 2. More focus on longitudinal study 3. Freelancers shows higher level of effectiveness than in-position trainees during transition training. End of Presentation Thank you for listening !