North American Electric Reliability Corporation History and Developments Rhaiza Villafranca Reliability Assessment Performance Analysis Technical Analyst GRIDSCHOOL, Institute of Public Utilities, Richmond Virginia December 8-9, 2009 What is NERC? FERC has designated the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) as the “Electric Reliability Organization” (ERO) for the United States. 2 Electric Power: Players, Drivers, Etc. ENVIRONMENT $ - FINANCE POLICITAL REALITIES & OBJECTIVES RELIABILITY REGULATORS ELECTRIC POWER CONSUMERS NATIONAL SECURITY SOCIAL CONCERNS ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY POWER INDUSTRY 3 Fully Functioning ERO Develop strong reliability standards Strictly enforce compliance Independent Reliability Assessment Evaluate Past Performance & Root Cause Analysis Promote excellence in planning and operations Promote continuous improvement through analysis of events and “Lessons Learned” Training, education, and certification of personnel Real-time situation awareness 4 Primary Functions Mission: Ensure the reliability of the Bulk Power system (BPS) Assess the BPS operations & future reliability Collaboratively Set Standards for BPS Performance Enforce requirements of these Standards Collaborate with the government Train and certify operators 5 Evolution of Electricity Competition 1978 – PURPA introduced competition 1991 – DOE National Energy Strategy • Allow independent power producers • Encourage open access to transmission 1992 – EPAct • NERC action plan for the future 1996 – FERC Orders on Open Access • Put NERC on a course to become a self-regulatory reliability organization and ERO 6 Regulation of Electricity FERC • Promoted wholesale competition, Order No. 888 • Entrants of ISOs and RTOs States • Adequate, safe, reliable service • Rates for retail power sales, T&D rates • Facility certification and siting 7 About NERC: Vitals Independent non-profit corporation headquartered in Princeton, NJ Second office in Washington, DC NERC has over 112 employees • Engineers, auditors, system operators, analysts, trainers, accountants, policy specialists, lawyers, and administrative assistants 8 About NERC: 8 Regional Entities Delegated functions • Compliance • Regional standards • Organization registration • Reliability assessment Regional consistency is key • Transparency • Predictability • Uniform outcomes 9 10 NERC Reliability Coordinators CMRC -California Mexico Reliability Coordinator ERCOT - ERCOT ISO FRCC -Florida Power & Light TE - Hydro Quebec, TransEnergie ICTE - Independent Coordinator Transmission – Entergy ISNE - ISO New England Inc. MISO - Midwest ISO NBSO – New Brunswick System Operator NYIS - New York Independent System Operator ONT - Ontario - Independent Electricity System Operator PNSC - Pacific Northwest Reliability Coordinator PJM - PJM Interconnection RDRC - Rocky Desert Reliability Coordinator SPC - Saskatchewan Power Corporation – SOCO - Southern Company Services, Inc. SWPP - Southwest Power Pool TVA - Tennessee Valley Authority VACS - VACAR-South 11 12 RTO/ISOs (chart from IRC Council) ISOs and RTOs RTOs: MISO, ISO-NE, PJM, SPP ISOs: AESO, CAISO, ERCOT, IESO, NYISO, NBSO 13 Self Regulation Means… Regulation • Mandatory compliance with standards • Penalties for standards violations Self – Industry Stakeholders … • Develop standards • Elect independent board • Approve changes to bylaws Audited • Independent review of actions, first by board and then by FERC 14 Program Areas 15 Program Areas (Revised Acc. To Gerry’s letter) Standards Development Compliance Enforcement Compliance Operations Reliability Assessments and Performance Analysis Critical Infrastructure Protection Engineering and Operations Situational Awareness Training, Education, and Personnel Certification 16 Monitoring and Standards Implementation 94 NERC standards mandatory in the U.S. • 24 pending 54 actively monitored • Transitional phase in of CIP standards per implementation plan Regional Entities perform compliance monitoring activities on behalf of NERC (with NERC oversight) 17 Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program (CMEP) Consistency and uniformity of CMEP implementation • RSAWs (Reliability Standards Audit Worksheets) • Standardized CMEP process documents Self-Reporting Form Self-Certification Form Mitigation Plan submittal forms • Formal direction and guidance e.g. Process Directives • NERC training Auditor, CVI , & CIP training • Audits of RE conformance to and performance of the Uniform CMEP 18 Reliability Assessment 2009 Findings NERC Annual Completes A Long-Term Reliability Assessment for a 10-year period For example, in 2009 analysis included: • Monitor reserve margins • Monitor performance of demand response • Assess the natural gas supply/delivery and impacts • Monitor transmission siting and planning delays • Assess the challenges of technology demands for integration of variable generation 19 2009 Emerging Issues Economic Recession– Demand Uncertainty Transmission Siting Energy Storage Workforce Issues Cyber Security 20 2009 Emerging & Standing Issues Higher Emerging Issues Risk Evolution: High Likelihood Likelihood Greenhouse Gas Regulations Economy Issues Workforce Issues Variable Generation Issues Smart Grid & AMI Reactive Power 1-5 Years 6-10 Years Energy Storage Low Lower Transmission Siting Cyber Security Consequence Consequence Higher 21 High Standing Issues (Ongoing work) Variable Generation Integration Greenhouse Gas Initiatives Reactive Power Smart Grid and AMI 22 Critical Infrastructure Protection Cyber-security Determine High-Impact, Low-Frequency Events and risks involved NERC Secure Alert System in deployment Modification of Reliability Standards for CIP 23 NERC’s Sample of Task Forces 24 New Renewable Capacity 2018 Variable Generation Capacity (Includes Existing, Future, and Conceptual Generation Resources 45,700 MW 49,039 MW 18,125 MW 12,392 MW 62,041 MW 2,000 MW of Solar Generation 2,000 MW 1. of Solar Generation Less than 2,000 MW of Solar Generation 2,000 MW of Wind Generation Less than 2,000 MW of Wind Generation 46,268 MW 25 IVGTF – Integration of Variable Generation Task Force Areas of Further Study & Effort High levels of variable generation will require significant transmission additions and reinforcements. Barriers to transmission development should be addressed Additional flexible resources, such as demand response, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, and energy storage may help balance steep “ramps” Improved measurement, forecasting, and modeling of variable generation output is needed 26 2010 All Electric Chevrolet Volt Courtesy of General Motors Areas of Further Study & Effort continued More comprehensive planning approaches and operational practices are needed, including probabilistic planning approaches In aggregate, variable generation connected at the distribution level (i.e. local wind generation and rooftop solar panels) may impact bulk power system reliability Deploying complementary types of variable generation (e.g. wind and solar), leveraging fuel diversity over large geographic regions, and advanced control technologies show promise in managing unique operating characteristics Greater access to larger pools of generation and demand may facilitate the large-scale integration of variable resources 27 RMWG - Reliability Metrics Working Group Scope • Identify reliability indicator trends over a period of time • Assessing metrics through continuous communication and data validation from regions • Informing the industry and the public of lessons learned • Develop a performance metric to benchmark 28 Smart Grid – Everybody has a vision… 29 SGTF - Smart Grid Task Force Objectives Identify the technologies and its contribution to reliability of BPS Determine the implications of cyber security and protection implications on critical infrastructure Determine the standards in effect Provide recommendations 30 Summary NERC’s History and Developments Regulatory Engagement FERC & DOE 8 Regional Entities/ Interconnections/ ISOs & RTOs Program Areas: Standards, CMEP, RAPA, and CIP Task Forces: IVGTF, RMWG, and SGTF 31 Question & Answer 32