Quality and Effectiveness Assessment in Higher

advertisement
Quality and Effectiveness
Assessment in Higher
Education
Milton Krivokuca DBA
Quality Program
Coordinator
Objectives for this presentation:
Develop and deliver an academic
program using Quality tools and
techniques.
Academic Planning






Academic planning must support university goals
Faculty have primary responsibility for curriculum
development
Faculty Senate typically reviews/approves/ recommends
course and program development
Course/program learning outcomes must be clearly stated
Learning outcomes assessment must be defined
Resource implications must be stated
 Faculty, staff, facilities, funding requirements,
implications for accreditation
Academic Planning
Periodic review of programs
 Provost/Academic Vice President makes
recommendation to the President
 In university systems special approval is
required for some programs.

California State University,
Dominguez Hills
College of Extended & International Education
Master of Science In
Quality Assurance
Master of Science Quality Assurance
The master of Science in Quality Assurance
(MSQA) is designed to prepare professionals in
quality, engineering, science, management,
health care, government and service industries
for career advancement.
FACULTY




ONE FULL TIME COORDINATOR
SIXTEEN PART TIME
 FIVE DOCTORATES
 ELEVEN MASTERS - INCLUDING FIVE PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEERS
MAJORITY OF FACULTY ARE PRACTICING PROFESSIONAL
QUALITY ENGINEERS AND MANAGERS/DIRECTORS/VP’S
SEVERAL INDUSTRY RECOGNIZED SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS
College of Business Administration & Public Policy
MSQA Curriculum Design and
Assessment
Overview of MSQA Curriculum and
Assessment Processes
8
Curriculum Design & Assessment:
Alignment of Learning Objectives
MSQA
Mission
Learning
Standards for
the Program
Program Goals for Each
Course
Learning Objectives Assessment
at the Course Level
9
MSQA Assessment Process
Verify MSQA SLO’s align with university
mission
 Map the curriculum to SLO’s per course
 Assess effectiveness of meeting each
SLO
 Analyze results
 Advisory board meeting

University Mission – Program
Mission
Basis to Map Curriculum
MSQA Program Course Lists
Manufacturing Concentration:











QAS 510
QAS 511
QAS 512
QAS 513
QAS 514
QAS 515
QAS 516
QAS 518
QAS 598S
QAS 599
Elective
Advanced Probability and Statistics3 Units
Quality Function Management and TQM
Reliability
Statistical Quality Control and Sampling
Advanced Experimental Design
Human Factors in Quality Assurance
Measurement and Testing Techniques
Quality Project Management & Productivity
Directed Research
Project
(with approval of Academic Coordinator)
Total:
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Units
Units
Units
Units
Units
Units
Units
Units
Units
Units
33 Units
MSQA Program Course Lists
Service and Health Care Concentration:










QAS 511
QAS 515
QAS 516
QAS 518
QAS 530
QAS 531
QAS 532
QAS 598S
QAS 599
Elective
Quality Function Management and TQM
Human Factors in Quality Assurance
Measurement and Testing Techniques
Quality Project Management & Productivity
Statistical Quality Control for Service Professionals
Customer Satisfaction & Quality Assurance
Quality Assurance for the Service Delivery Process
Directed Research
Project
3 Courses (with approval of Academic Coordinator)
Total:
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
9
Units
Units
Units
Units
Units
Units
Units
Units
Units
Units
33
Units
MSQA Program –
New Courses for 2010!
QAS 534
QAS 535
QAS 536
QAS 537
QAS 538
QAS 539
QAS 540
QAS 541
QAS 542
Change Management
Lean Manufacturing
Six Sigma Principles and Application
Qualify Function Deployment:
Understanding Customer Requirements
Evaluation and Outcome for Healthcare
Delivery
Good Manufacturing Practices
Food & Drug Law
Biomedical Quality Control methods
Risk Management in FDA Regulated
Industries
Curriculum Map
Program SLO Mapping
Assessment Planning
Assessment Letter to Faculty
Faculty assessor: ___William Trappen______________
MSQA Student Learning Outcomes #1, #3, #5, #7, and #8
MSQA Course Level Objective #1
Apply advanced principles and tools from quality and measurement science to problem solving and measuring
reliability and performance in production and service industries
MSQA Course Level Objective #3
Evaluate complex, integrated organizational systems and processes in order to recognize and measure system
failures scientifically, synthesize data and form solutions
MSQA Course Level Objective #5
Demonstrate the ability to conduct and present independent research using primary and secondary sources,
analyze information, interpret data, draw conclusions
MSQA Course Level Objective #7
Design a quality system or process to meet industry standards or quality system compliance requirements.
MSQA Course Level Objective #8
Identify, formulate and solve quality problems involving physical, human, and economic parameters inherent to
core processes for both manufacturing and service focused industries.
Spring 2013 Assessment
MSQA SLO Map Spring 2013
Unbalanced SLOs
Survey Questions – Lickert Scale 1 -5
The MSQA program provided me with
skills that I can immediately apply 4.5
 The MSQA staff at the university were
supportive of my needs and were a
dependable resource. 4.25
 The faculty were knowledgeable and
approachable to assist with issues or
questions. 4.5

Survey Questions – Lickert Scale
1 -5
I feel that the personal value I received
from form time and effort will be
rewarding in my career 4.25
 I would recommend the MSQA program
to a friend or professional associate
interested in advancing his or her
knowledge of Quality. 4.6

Graduate Survey Results
2011 Graduate Survey
Results
Q1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Q2
Q3
Q4
1
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
5
5
5
3
5
1
5
5
5
5
4
5
5
5
3
4
4
2
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
5
54
4.5
51
4.25
54
4.5
Milt Krivokuca
Q5
4
4
5
5
4
5
4
4
5
5
5
5
3
5
4
5
5
5
4
4
5
5
5
5
15
23
17
25
24
25
23
21
24
24
25
23
51
55
4.25 4.583333
269
22.41667
Survey – Two years after graduation
MSQA Graduate Survey
Please circle the term that is most applicable to your current job assignment.
Since graduating from the MSQA program:
1.
I utilize tools and methodologies learned in the program:
Not Applicable
Never
Occasionally Frequently
2.
Since completing the MSQA, I have (circle all that apply)
Received a raise
Received a promotion
Made a positive career change
Made a negative career change
Received a performance award
Became unemployed
Gave back to the community through volunteer efforts
Became active in ASQ or another professional society
3.
I would recommend the MSQA to someone interested in attaining an advanced
education in quality
Yes
No
4.
To help my career, the MSQA could have included (circle all that apply):
More practical SPC exercises
Additional case studies
More industry specific elective course opportunities
________________________________________
________________________________________
5.
Any additional comments that will help us to improve the MSQA curriculum?
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
Survey Results
Spring 2013
Advisory Board Meeting
March 15, 2013
Agenda for Advisory Board Meeting
General Welcome - 15 Minutes
 Introductions – 15 minutes
 Program Status – 15 minutes
 Assessment -20 minutes
 Breakout Sessions – 95 minutes
 Closing reports – 20 minutes
 3 Hours total!

Advisory Board Report
Spring 2013
CSUDH Advisory Board Meeting
Following are the action plans developed as a result of the March 15, 2013 Advisory Board meeting. The
information gained from this meeting was evaluated and developed into a realistic action plan. The planned
activities will assure the CSUDH Quality programs remain current in the content and support the mission of the
University, College of Extended and International and Extended Education, as well as the program itself.
Item I:
Develop CEU certificate program to support the Measurement Science Conference.
Item II:
Request additional information as to the goal for developing CEU credit for CCE CAPE training.
Item III: Formalize BSQA Metrology Certificate of Completion
Item IV: Contact instructors for QAS 512, 513, and 514 to include class assignment or activity supporting
MSQA SLO #4.
Item V:
Revise QAS 538 to address biostatistics. This revision will further address SLOC #7 and review if
revised QAS 538 can replace QAS 530 for a Healthcare specific MSQA track.
Item VI: Revise SLOCs #4 and #7 to be more applicable to the current needs of Quality professionals.
Item VII:Develop new version of QAS523 Software Quality. Place QAS 523 in refrigerator. New course to
include elements of software quality, but move focus to IT and suspect/counterfeit issues.
Item VIII: Develop three (3) new MSQA elective courses: Hoshin Planning, Sustaining Quality Improvement,
Laboratory Accreditation and Proficiency Testing
IX:
Revise MSQA program to 3 tracks, Manufacturing (minor program changes), Service (minor
program changes), and Healthcare (new track, but existing classes available for this track).
Milt Krivokuca
April 1, 2013
Next Steps:
Prioritize the Action Plan per the
University Program and Course
revisions policy.
The Final Results
Educational
Excellence!
Thank You!
Milton Krivokuca DBA
Quality Program Coordinator
mkrivokuca@csudh.edu
Download