BIOSENSORS FOR PRE-EMERGENCY AND POST-EMERGENCY MONITORING OF RADIOACTIVITY DISPERSAL DEVICES BioRDD Dr. Alba Zanini, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Torino, Italy, NPD Prof. Jurgis Barkauskas, Vilnius University, Lithuania, PPD Dr. Oleg Bondarenko, Chernobyl Radioecological Centre, Ukraine, PCoD Dr. Karel Kudela, Institute of Experimental Physics, Kosice, Slovak Republic, PCoD Prof. Jordan Stamenov, Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, Sophia, Bulgaria, PCoD Dr. Giovanni Basile, BIOSENSOR s.r.l., Palombara Sabina – Rome, Italy, NCoD BIORDD BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION Radioactivity Dispersal Devices (RDD) Urge for the early detection Facts about RDD Blasting materials Radioactive material Consequences of RDD explosion EXPERTISE AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF PARTNERS INFN Torino Section (Dr. Alba Zanini): Expertise in complex space radiation and dosimetry. Previous experience with biosensors for application in space research. CONTRIBUTION: RADIATION PHYSICS AND MOLECULLAR BIOLOGY (CNR). Vilnius University (Prof. Jurgis Barkauskas): Expertise in synthesis, investigation and application of nano-scale carbon structures. Experience with electrochemical enzyme-based biosensors. CONTRIBUTION: BIO-NANO-TECHNOLOGY. SSSIE (Dr. Oleg Bondarenko): Expertise in radioecological and radiological monitoring of the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone. CONTRIBUTION: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND PROTECTION. IEP (Dr. Karel Kudela) Expertise in radiobiological protection and mixed radiation physics. CONTRIBUTION: MIXED RADIATION FIELD and RADIATION SAFETY. INRNE (Prof. Jordan Stamenov) Expertise in radiation dosimetry, nuclear electronics and design of nucleari nstruments,radioecology CONTRIBUTION: DOSIMETRY, BIOLOGICAL RADIATION SAFETY, GENOMICS, MOLECULAR BIOLOGY BIOSENSOR (Dr. Giovanni Basile) Expertise in manufacturing of biosensors and robots. CONTRIBUTION: INDUSTRIAL PARTNER. PROBLEMS TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE PROJECT The economic and social importance Cost of RDD false alarms : closing of a big airport closing of a freight terminal of the port of New York panic reaction million of dollars 500.000 $/hour unvaluable Cost of RDD terrorist attack : Decontamination Medical assistance Psycological assistance Cost for mitigating the consequence of Chernobyl accident : 10 G$ (Large scale RDD) EXISTING TECHNIQUES Radiation detectors based on physical effects are sensitive to: specific radiation specific energy range specific intensity Radiation detectors based on biosensor and mutant technique are sensitive to: every kind of radiation wide energy range different intensity EXISTING TECHNIQUES Radiation Product Berthold Gamma-Analyzer LB 125 Gamma Mobile microspec equipped with gamma probes (BTI) Beta Mobile microspec equipped with beta probe (BTI) Berthold LB 123P Plutonium Monitor Mechanism of detection Solid scintillation detection: NaI with PMT NaI solid scintillation NaI with Be window Phoswich scintillator (100 keV to 3 MeV) Gas proportional counters Gas proportional counters Neutrons Berthold LB 6414 Neutron Survey Meter Mobile microspec equipped with neutron probe (BTI) Thermo PM 1401 GN Mixed (gamma, neutron) Ortec detective Liquid scintillator and He3 counter CsI scintillator (gamma) He3 proportional counter (neutron) High Purity Germanium (HPGe) Detector (gamma) and He3 proportional counter (neutron) GOAL OF BioRDD PROJECT BIORDD The main objective : the realization of a new biological device based on photosynthetic organisms to be used as biosensor for the early detection of different kind of ionizing radiations (beta, gamma rays, neutrons, fission fragments etc.), as required in case of RDD terrorist attack. The final goal : the realization of a commercial prototype of a small size, suitable in public places, airports, underground, to equip police and rescue vehicles. The High Technology issue: the immobilation of proteins on carbon nanostructures CURRENT STATUS OF THE TECHNOLOGY Radiation Biosensor: biomediator (enzymathic photosystem II, PSII); electronic or optical transducer to convert the biochemical modification in electronic signal electronic system to process the electric signal. Radiation Effect: damages to electron transport chain during the first part of photosynthesis reduction of photosynthetic efficiency Sample Conditions: No DNA (EXTRACTED PHOTOSYSTEM II ) mechanisms NO repair Immobilization (FROZEN or IMMOBILIZED ON NANOCARBON STRUCTURE) Only direct effects PRELIMINARY EXPERIMENTS Exposure to Dose rate:7.98 mGy/min San Giovanni Hospital, Torino 01-04-04 0.5 0.4 HIGH LET radiation neutrons (Emean =3 MeV), 0.3 log Ai/Ac Sample is frozen and exposed to: 0.2 Am-Be Source, JRC, Ispra 0.1 y = a+bx a = 0.45756 ± 0.03632 b = -0.00052 ± 0.00008 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 2 X 0 = 0.16319 = 0.97905 -0.3 -0.4 0 100 200 Exposure to neutrons. Dose rate: 0,16 mGy/h Ispra, JRC, April 2002 5.35 300 400 500 600 700 800 5.30 Dose(mGy) log Ai 5.25 5.20 y= a+bx a = 5.31929 ± 0.01691 b = -0.05027 ± 0.01306 5.15 LOW LET radiation radiation 5.10 E1 = 1173.2 keV, E2 = 1332.5 keV 5.00 60Co Source, San Giovanni Hospital, Turin 0= 0.1305 = 0.85667 2 5.05 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 Dose (mGy) 1.8 2.0 2.2 CARBON NANOTUBES Synthesis Varieties Properties BIO-APPLICATION OF CARBON NANOTUBES PROJECT STRUCTURE AND WORKPACKAGES WP1: Management Alba Zanini P1 Transversal WP WP4: Characterization of the biosensor response to radiation J. Stamenov P5 (P1,P3,P4) 2° final output: IMMOBILIZATION OF PSII ON NANOTUBE SURFACE WP2: Biology and Nano-technology J. Barkauskas P2 (P2,P5) WP3: Development of biosensor technology R. Kaukanakov P5 (P2,P6) WP6: Production of a prototype G. Basile P6 (P2,P5) 1° final output: PROTOTYPE WITH FROZEN SAMPLE WP5: Characterization of the biosensor in mixed field O. Bondarenko P3 (P1,P4,P5) Transversal WP WP7: Training, dissemination and exploitation: K. Kudela P4 PROJECT SCHEDULE 1st YEAR 1 2 3 4 5 6 2nd YEAR 7 9 11 8 10 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 11 8 10 12 3rd YEAR 1 2 WP-1 MANAGEMENT WP-2 BIOLOGY AND NANOTECHNOLOGY WP-3 BIOSENSOR TECHNOLOGY WP-4 RESPONSE TO RADIATION WP-5 INTERCOMPARISON WP-6 PRODUCTION OF PROTOTYPE WP-7 TRAINING AND DISSEMINATION 3 4 5 6 7 9 11 8 10 12 7 9 11 8 10 12 2nd YEAR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 11 8 10 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 Assembled prototype 5 6 Immobilization in carbon nanostructures Efficency in RDD detection 1st YEAR Final response curves •Prototype characteristics 3 4 Characterization in mixed field •Mutant selection 1 2 Suitable biomediator Sensitivity to radiation MILESTONES 3rd YEAR 7 9 11 8 10 12 CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS If the biodevice is able to recognize presence of a large range of radiation 20 % If the biodevice is able to recognize presence of low levels of radiation 20 % If the biodevice can recognize the presence of explosives 10 % If the biodevice can recognize the presence of explosives, products of explosion at the same time of the presence of radiation 10 % If the device pass the tests in situ, real situation 15 % If the scientific police will use the prototype for validation in situ after two year from the end of the project 15 % If the developed technology can be extended to agro-environmental analyses within the end of the project 10 % TOTAL 100 % END-USERS 13 End-Users: 2 Hospitals; 2 Protection/Defence State Ministries; 5 Health and Environmental State Agencies; 3Industries; 1 Research Institute APPLICATION ITALY Ministry of dell’Interno, Italian Criminal Laboratory Department San Giovanni Hospital, Torino – RDD/nuclear material detection – Dosimetry in Radiotherapy LITHUANIA Lithuanian State Nuclear Power Safety Inspectorate (VATESI) Lithuanian Radiation Protection Centre (RSC) UAB "Tikslioji Sinteze” Ministry of National Defence of Republic of Lithuania Institute of Physics Science and Technology Park - – Power Plant Dosimetry – Nuclear waste control – Commercial exploitation – Antiterrorism – Radioactive pollution monitoring – Commercial exploitation UKRAINE ERE “AKP” ( “Atom Kompex Prylad”) State Department Administration of the Chornobyl exclusion zone – Commercial exploitation – Contaminant monitoring SLOVAK REPUBLIC Military Air Force Hospital – Monitoring/radioprotection in field BULGARIA State Agency for Metrology and Technical Surveillance Civil Protection State Agency – Contaminant monitoring – RDD/nuclear material detection PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project coordinator ( Dr. A. Zanini) will have to monitor the global activity of the consortium, maintain the relationships with the NATO funding organization and the partners, including the end users. PND director (Prof. J. Barkauskas) will support the project coordinator in management activities, whit a special attention in managing of non-NATO partners. Scientific and technical coordinator (STC- Prof. J. Stamenov) will take charge of the permanent monitoring of the quality of the work and to provide strategic guidelines for the scientific work. Scenario Analysis Coordinator (SAC –Dr. Boyko Vachev) Scenario Analysis will be considered for strategic application and exploitation of the final product The steering committee (SC) will support the project director in discussing technical, administrative, financial, legal or managerial problems; The SC is composed by the STC , the PPD and SA expert and chaired by the NPD Work-package leaders will be responsible for the work accomplished inside their WPs. MANAGEMENT & STEERING COMMITEE A.Zanini INFN (Italy) NPD J.Stamenov INRNE (Bulgaria) (Scientific and technical coordinator) J.Barkauskas (Lithuania) PPD B.Vachev (Bulgaria) Scenario analysis Steering committee WP6 G. Basile WP5 O. Bondarenko WP4 J. Stamenov WP3 R. Kakanakov WP7 – Training and dissemination K. Kudela WP2 J. Barkauskas WP1 – Project management A. Zanini SfP BUDGET DISTRIBUTION per country Italy, INFN 20,000 € Italy, BIOSENSOR 30,000 € Lithuania 70,000 € Ukraine 65,000 € Slovak Republic 50,000 € Bulgaria 65,000 € per item Equipment 83,000 € Travel 47,900 € Training 64,900 € Consumables 91,700 € Other 12,500 € per year 1st year 141,650 € 2nd year 92,450 € 3rd year 65,900 € STRENGTHS AND OPEN ISSUES A new device based on biosensor and mutant technology to detect every kind of radiation ( intensity and energy) Protein immobilization in carbon nanostructures (micro-detector) Various applications in antiterrorism: Radiation Airborne warfare agents Chemical pollutants Explosive traces Possibility to realize an Array of different biosensors for many applications CONTRIBUTION OF NATO FUNDS Improvment in: Biosensor research Bio - Technology, Radiobiology Nanothecnology, High Technology industrial devices Extension in other fields: Detection of Airborne Chemical Warfare Agents (tabun, sarin, mustard, dimethyil sulfide) Control of nuclear material traffic Space Application –Space Dosimetry Health Application- Dosimetry in Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine Food Quality Control Ecology and Environmental protection TOTAL IMPACT ON STABILITY, SECURITY AND PEACE Biosensors application in pre-emergency Improvment in antiterrorism measure Reduction in false alarms Increased security Interdisciplinary project Social and economical development in partner countries Biosensors application in post-emergency Evaluation of: contamination zone water contamination soil contamination food contamination Mitigation of the social, medical, psychological consequence