Unit 1 Microeconomics of the Firm Horizontal Boundaries from Scale and Scope Economies AEC 422 Lecture 2/3 Sept 3, 10 Horizontal Boundaries of the Firm Unit is intended to help you understand how to more fully answer the following strategy questions: How do we define “our” firm? What activities is the firm engaged in? What are our firm’s “boundaries” – what products or services? Horizontal Boundaries Refers to the quantity (scale) and variety (scope) of goods and services a firm produces and sells Food companies are extensively diversified horizontally. Diamond Foods, Inc. Look at an agribusiness company like ADM Processing and services across wide range of product types Horizontal Boundaries Firms having extensive horizontal boundaries are said to exhibit economies of scale (or size) and scope -Declining average costs with volume (scale) -How does variety of related products offered (scope) lower costs? Horizontal Boundaries Economies of scale and scope are present whenever larger: Production Distribution Marketing And/or retailing processes result in a cost advantage over smaller processes Horizontal Boundaries In some industries a few large firms dominate the market Farm implements (John Deere) Corn sweetener manufacturing (ADM) Ready-to-eat breakfast cereals (Kellogg/General Mills) Pet Food (Purina) Eggs – Cal Maine, Land O Lakes? In others, smaller firms are the norm Higher education (private colleges) Apparel design, art studios Farms, wineries, landscaping services, artisanal products Economies of Size and Scope Why Important? Affects size of firms and structure of markets Fundamental to merger/acquisition strategies Affects pricing and entry strategies Can small firms enter? Fundamental to formulating competitive strategy and sustaining that strategy Determinants of Horizontal Boundaries Economies of scale Declining average cost with volume Economies of scope Cost savings when different goods/services are produced “under one roof” Learning curve Cost advantage from accumulated expertise and knowledge Economies of Scale Said to exist when Average Cost (AC) declines as Quantity (Q) increases What is Average Cost? Cost per unit – declining initially as fixed costs are spread out over additional units of output, increasing as production meets capacity constraints Average Cost (AC) AC = Total Cost (TC) / Output (Q) What is TC? Made up of Total Variable Costs (TVC) and Total Fixed Costs (TFC) Costs of Production Since TC = TVC + TFC Then AC = (TVC + TFC) / Q So AC = (TVC / Q) + (TFC / Q) Or AC = AVC + AFC Why Do We Observe Economies of Scale? Answer lies in our last definition of AC AC = AVC + AFC Fixed Costs Result from owning a fixed input or resource. Incurred even if the resource isn’t used. Don’t change as the level of production changes (in the short run). Exist only in the short run. Not under the control of the manager in the short run. The only way to avoid fixed costs is to sell the item. Why Do We Have Fixed Costs? Some inputs are “lumpy” or indivisible Kellogg cereal plant. Same physical plant is necessary to make 1 box of corn flakes as is required to make 1 million boxes. Infrastructure resources Think in terms of fixed in the “short run” Second, fixed costs rise when an operation is capital intensive! Look at AFC Text refers to this as “spreading out fixed costs” Numerator (TFC) is fixed or constant so as the denominator (Q) increases, AFC goes lower and lower Hence AC is also drawn somewhat lower Important Fixed Costs Total fixed cost (TFC): All costs associated with the fixed input. Average fixed cost per unit of output: AFC = TFC/Output Variable Costs Can be increased or decreased by the manager. Variable costs will increase as production increases. Total Variable cost (TVC) is the summation of the individual variable costs. TVC = (the quantity of the input) X (the input’s price). Important Variable Costs Total variable cost (TVC): All costs associated with the variable input. Average variable cost per unit of output: AVC = TVC/Output Average Total Cost Average total cost per unit of output: AFC + AVC ATC = TC/Output U-shaped cost curve $/unit U-Shaped Cost Curve Average cost declines as fixed costs are spread over larger volumes Average cost eventually starts increasing as capacity constraints kick in (fixed facilities, management extensions) U-shape implies cost disadvantage for very small and very large firms Unique optimum size for a firm L-shaped Cost Curve L-shaped Cost Curve In reality, cost curves are closer to Lshaped curves that to U-shaped curves A minimum efficient size (MES) beyond which average costs are identical across firms Is bigger better? Nest Fresh Eggs – epilogue Is there room for different size firms in an industry? Revisit mergers and acquisitions Cargill and ADM – who wants the chocolate? Economies of Scale Occur as Firms Become More Efficient in an Engineering/Physical Production Sense How Does This Happen? Nest Fresh Egg vs Cal Maine and LOL Competitiveness from Productivity Advantages When you produce same output with less input When you produce more output with same input When you produce more output with less input What about WalMart? Economies of Scale in Advertising and Marketing Occur when you can spread out advertising costs over larger markets. Advertising a fixed cost – not directly varying with level of output. “Bigger” brands better (usually) - Reputation effects often work in your favor! Economies of Scale in Advertising Consider ConAgra’s flagship brand "Healthy Choice" Can be used for ice cream products, frozen dinners and spaghetti sauce. Referred to in the literature as “umbrella branding.” Top-Selling RTE Cereal Vendors 2009 $ Sales Kellogg General Mills Kraft Foods Quaker Oats Malt-O-Meal Nature's Path Foods Small Planet Foods Bear Naked Barbara's Bakery Private Label (000s omitted) $2,174,341 $2,000,471 $885,374 $401,362 $223,416 $43,249 $33,598 $31,569 $24,798 $678,678 (Source: Milling and Baking News 2010) Note: Kellogg 2009 adv expense: $1.091 billion % change unit sales % Chg. (000s omitted) -0.40% 703,222 -2.40% 7.90% 637,908 7.20% -1.40% 294,586 -5.90% -3.10% 129,631 -7.70% 4.70% 71,474 -6.80% 8.70% 11,401 4.10% 18.00% 9,067 11.60% 5.80% 6,985 6.20% 1.30% 6,374 -0.30% 11.10% 298,391 7.30% Scale Economies in Wine Advertising Production Shipped Million cases Ad Expenditures $ million Ad $/case E&J Gallo 63.3 $27.2 $0.43 Sutter Home 3.7 $2.3 $0.63 Mondavi 3.0 $2.1 $0.69 Brown-Forman 12.4 $23.6 $1.90 Wine group Source: Adams Wine Handbook, 1998 Economies of Scale in R & D Scale economies may occur when technology in one project “spills over” into another for a company. Example: Big life science companies develop a vaccine for humans and are able to apply it to the animal area as a vaccine. Innovation and Size Are big firms better at innovating compared to small firms? Size reduces the average cost of innovations Smallness may be more suitable for motivated researchers Biotechnology in agribusiness - ERS debate Economies of Scale in Distribution Cost advantages from moving large volume of product to market – truck, rail, ship, pipeline Agri-industries heavily dependent on these assets dominated by large firms – food processing, energy, food retail Fixed assets - Distribution centers, warehouses, rail lines Is there a shipping cost advantage for local farmers? Watsonville, CA to Cincinnati, OH 2,455 miles @$6,000 total for 40,000 pints (lbs) Refrigerated trailer Back haul provided Springfield, KY to Cincy 157 miles, no back haul (so x2) Refrigerated truck (VERY cheap at $0.85/mile) 6 hours driving labor @$15/hour 2,160 pints (lbs) Economies of Scale in Procurement May occur when there are discounts for bulk or large purchases. Reduced transaction costs More aggressive bargaining by large buyers Assured flow of business for supplier Scale and size economies: Rationale for Volume Discounts Cost of service (per unit) is lower for large buyers Large buyers may be more price sensitive Large buyers can disrupt operations of the seller by refusing to buy Diseconomies and AC Why does this happen? 1. When input prices rise (such as wages) your cost structure rises. This makes economies of scale shrink and diseconomies of scale grow. Larger firms for example, tend to pay higher wages than smaller ones. Firm Size and Labor Cost Large firms experience lower worker turnover compared to small firms Savings in recruitment and training costs due to lower turnover may partially offset the higher labor cost Diseconomies and AC Why does this happen? 2. When there are “incentive and bureaucracy effects” (also called agency effects)…..we now incur a “management” cost Diseconomies and AC Example of an agency effect Most companies are absentee owned (shareholders). Professional managers hired. Sometimes a company get lazy and flabby (or management compensation goes up too high for the value gained). Can show up as relatively large and/or growing expense margins we can calculate from financial statements. Compare to a small family business Diseconomies and AC Why does this happen? 3. Occur when specialized resources are spread too thin. Example: as a restaurant expands the chef may find him/her self spread too thin. Uniquely skilled inventor, artist, scientist Consulting as an expert