Kevin Marshall

advertisement
Grant County PUD
Plant Upgrades at Wanapum and
Priest Rapids Dams
Kevin Marshall, PE
GC PUD Hydro
Engineering Manager
NWHA Conference
February 18, 2014
Ongoing Upgrades for
Wanapum Dam
 Turbine Replacement (Note: GCPUD took advantage of
CREB bonds and a DOE design/development grant) Work
is complete.
 Generator replacements
 New exciters
 Digital Governors
 Transformers
Reasons for Turbine Upgrades
 Original turbine runners had
reached the end of their
useful life




Blade crack repairs
Trunnion seal issues
Operating linkage failures
Cavitation repair costs $75,000/unit/year (1987-1993
average costs)
 Performance improvements
 Improved fish passage
survival
Wanapum Turbine Upgrades
 Design Features



Semi to fully spherical
Larger diameter: 20 inch increase
Deeper setting : 3.315 feet deeper


Increased capacity: 120khp to 150khp
Efficiency improvement: 3% average weighted
efficiency
Cavitation repair costs: $0
 Performance Improvements

Reasons for Generator Upgrades
 Replace components at
the end of their life.
 Capture increased
output of new turbines
Wanapum Generator Upgrades
 New Parts






Complete Rotor
Complete Stator
Generator Shaft
Ventilation System
Excitation System
Air-Gap Monitoring
Rotor spider arrives in 3
sections, stator frame in 4
Wanapum Governor/Unit Control
Upgrades
 What
 Mechanical governors
replaced with digital
 Dynamic exciters
replaced with static
exciter and digital
controllers
 Why
 Spare parts no longer
available
 Serviceman knowledge not
transferred with
retirements
 Improved control/efficiency
 Improved protection
 More info/better trouble
shooting
 Lower costs to maintain
Existing Wanapum Mechanical
Governors
New Wanapum Digital Governors
Current Wanapum Status
 10th turbine, 4th generator, 4th exciter, and 3rd governor
complete and put into service October 2013
 5th generator, 5th exciter, and 4th governor under
construction
 10th generator and exciter to be completed in 2019
 New turbines have a averaged, weighted efficiency gain of
3%
 As tested new generators have an increased efficiency
from 98.0% to 98.5%
 2 of 5 transformers replaced, 3rd transformer in process
Priest Rapids Dam
Upgrades
Planned Upgrades for
Priest Rapids Dam
 Turbine Replacement
or life extension
 Generator rewinds
 New exciters
 Digital Governors
 Transformers already
replaced
Reason for Upgrades
 Efficiency improvement
 Life Extension
 Aging equipment
 First unit in service in 1959
 Generators
 Rotor pole problems including pole to
pole connection failures (as pictured)
 Stator Winding age (oldest unit =
currently 27 years old)
 Exciters are obsolete
 Turbines starting to exhibit problems
 Increased cycling of governor oil pumps
 Wicket gate operating ring wear
Turbine Upgrade Process
 Goals




Utilize lessons learned from Wanapum project
Obtain as many qualified bids as possible
Competitive turbine hydraulic model testing
Integrate biological considerations into design effort
Turbine Upgrade Process
 Step 1: Hydraulic design contract
 Professional Services Agreement
 Prequalification process – three
contractors prequalified
 All design solutions finalized by
contractors ahead of bidding
 All design solutions verified by
independent hydraulic laboratory
 Step 2: Manufacture and supply
contract
 Bidders must participate in
hydraulic design contract to bid
 Performance guarantees verified
prior to bidding
Status of Priest Rapids Upgrades
 Turbines
 Model testing was completed last week in Lausanne,
Switzerland for the 3 qualified vendors
 Bids are due March 5th
 Contract award this summer (if economics are
favorable)
 Generators: Pre-qualification of Vendors in process
 Controls: Governor specifications are in process
 Field work for upgrades is scheduled for 8/1/2016
Priest Rapids and Wanapum
Upgrades
 QUESTIONS
Download