© 2014 Cairn India Limited DELIVERING SAFE & RELIABLE OPERATION Risk Based Inspection in Asset Integrity Management © 2014 Cairn India Limited DELIVERING SAFE & RELIABLE OPERATION The American Petroleum Institute defines failure as The loss of containment from a pressure boundary resulting in leakage to the atmosphere or a rupture of the pressurized component. The RBI analysis used to evaluate the probability of failure (POF) and the consequence of failure (COF) for given components in a pressurized environment. RBI evaluation enables to cost-effective inspection plan and reduce the risk of failure. RBI minimizes or avoid unscheduled and short term shutdowns & downtimes. RBI minimizes the risk to Health, Safety and Environment (HSE). RBI Increases reliability, availability and maintainability (RAM) & maximizes the resource utilization and increase the effectiveness of Asset Integrity. 2 3 © 2014 Cairn India Limited RISK MANAGEMENT – A BASIC IDEA In mathematical terms, risk can be calculated by the equation: Risk = Probability × Consequence Possible consequences are: a) form a vapor cloud that could ignite causing injury and equipment damage; b) release of a toxic chemical that could cause health problems; c) result in a spill and cause environmental damage; d) force a unit shutdown and have an adverse economic impact; e) have minimal safety, health, environmental, and/or economic impact. Probability of Failure Risk is the combination of the probability of some event occurring during a time period of interest and the consequences, (generally negative) associated with the event. High Medium LOW Consequence of Failure Probability of Failure The mean frequency or rate with which the specified failure event would be expected to occur in a given period of time, normally one year. 4 © 2014 Cairn India Limited Risk Based Asset Integrity Management – Key Elements Objectives & Goals Establish of Physical Boundaries & Operating Boundaries Data and Information Collection Inspection plan to maintain ALARP, Process Control and Implementation of mitigation activities. Risk Based Asset Integrity Management Statement of CoF Define mitigation plan for unmitigated PoF Analyze of CoF Statement of PoF Define Time and degradation mechanisms for Failure Scenario Determination of PoF Determine unmitigated POF 5 © 2014 Cairn India Limited Management System of Risk Based Asset Integrity Risk Based Asset Integrity Management Objectives & Goals Safe and reliable operation through cost-effective inspection plan. Identification of the operational risks via material degradation Reduction in plant downtime or business interruption. US Real Productivity = Total Capacity – { US + PS + OS + TS } OS System Sub-System Component Other Components Establish Operating Boundaries Start-up and Shutdown Normal, Upset, and Cyclic Operation Operating Time Period TS Plant Capacity Understanding Risks and Defining Risk Criteria Establish Physical Boundaries of an RBI Assessment PS Real Productivity US Unscheduled Shutdowns of Equipment Failures PS Planned Shutdowns for Maintenance & Inspections OS Other Shutdowns like pigging, corrosion cleaning TS Short-term Shutdowns Data and Information Collection Design, Construction and Inspection records / Reports Process and Hazards Data, and Management of Change Records; Site Conditions Failure Data and Incident Investigations 6 © 2014 Cairn India Limited Probability of Failure The probability of failure (POF) is determined using applicable damage factors (mechanisms), a generic failure frequency and a management system factor: 𝑃𝑂𝐹 𝑡 = 1 − 𝑒 −𝑔𝑓𝑓 ×𝐹𝑀𝑆 × 𝐷𝑓 𝑡 where: 𝑔𝑓𝑓 is the generic failure frequency. The generic failure frequency is based on industry averages of equipment failure or design life. 𝐹𝑀𝑆 is the management system factor. The management system factor is a measure of how well the management and labor force of the plant is trained to handle both the day-to-day activities of the plant and any emergencies that may arise due to an accident. 𝐷𝑓 𝑡 is the overall damage factor. The overall damage factor is the combination of the various damage factors that are applicable to the particular piece of equipment being analyzed like CRC, SRC etc., Possible Qualitative Rank Annual Failure Probability or Frequency Low <0.0001 Moderate 0.0001 to 0.01 High >0.01 7 © 2014 Cairn India Limited Consequence of Failure The consequence of failure is calculated as the combined values of the consequences for damage to the failed equipment, damage to the surrounding equipment, loss of production, the cost due to personnel injury and the damage to the environment. FC = FCcmd + FCaffa + FCprod + FCinj + Fcenviron CA = max (CAequip, CApersonnel) Where: FCcmd is the financial consequence to failed equipment. FCaffa is the financial consequence to surrounding equipment. FCprod is the financial consequence due to production downtime. FCinj is the financial consequence due to personnel injury. FCenviron is the financial consequence due to environmental damage/cleanup. CA equip is the area consequence to surrounding equipment. CA personnel is the area consequence to nearby personnel. © 2014 Cairn India Limited Risk Management with Inspection Activities Managing Risk by Reducing Uncertainty Through Inspection Identifying Risk Management Opportunities from RBI Results Establishing an Inspection Strategy Based on Risk Assessment Managing Risk with Inspection Activities Frequency of Inspection Coverage Tools and Techniques Procedures and Practices Internal, On-stream, or External Inspection 8 9 © 2014 Cairn India Limited DELIVERING SAFE & RELIABLE OPERATION THANK YOU Presented By: Anirban Ghosh, Sr. Manager (QA/QC), Cairn India Limited E.mail: anirban.ghosh@cairnindia.com; Mo: +91-8826392072 Web site: www.cairnindia.com