Low Income Housing: State of the Market Deloitte Consulting LLP April 2013 State of the Market – June 2013 OUTPUT ACTIVITIES Extensive ground research, effort of more than 300 man-days, in 8 large urban centers to scan for sub-10 lakh housing In-depth discussion with more than 25 developers spread across the country In-depth discussion with all prominent Housing Finance players in the LIH ecosystem Estimate and characteristics of sub-10 lakh supply in large urban centers Benchmarking business practices across players Best practice case studies from the field Customer insights from MIM’s ‘Unintended Consequences’ and ‘Demand Aggregator’ studies will be integrated with this report Key Objectives of the SOM Report Increasing Supply Building a Robust Industry Reduce the entry barriers for new players & Insights for existing Provide government and other stakeholders with a fact base to define and refine policy and strategy Share best practices from the industry; rovide existing players with peer comparisons Feedback from the field on challenges and what is working 2 Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. CAS-COD-Prez-Date-CTL Good Performance of HFCs : High Growth & Low NPAs Company/ Organization Size of Loan Book1 (FY 12, INR Cr) % Portfolio <10 lakhs Average Ticket Size NPAs Spreads MHFC 40 100% Rs. 4.2 lakhs NIL NA MAS 30 100% Rs. 4.5 lakhs NA NA DHFL 19,355 67% Rs. 12.84 lakhs 0.68% 2.78%3 Muthoot 23 70% Rs. 6.45 lakhs <0.1% NA Shubham 31 100% Rs. 5.5 lakhs <0.1% 4% ISFC 40 100% Rs 1.45 lakhs2 <0.1% NA Note: 1Outstanding Loan Portfolio as of March 2012. For Muthoot, MHFC the data is as of June 2012. An approximate figure has been used for Shubham. 2As of Dec 2011. 3 Net Interest Margin as of Q3 FY12 Source: Annual Reports, Management Conversations, Monitor Analysis 3 Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. CAS-COD-Prez-Date-CTL Selected HFCs Serving Low-Income Customers Key Insights HFCs are serving different Market Segments Type of Purchase (INR 2-12 Lakhs) Representative Low-income Housing Finance Market Map – India, 2013 New Resale Incremental Self-construction (Single units) Small Developer (Typically <20 units) No Housing Activity Here Mid-Large Dev. (>50 units) Type of Developer Note: This market map indicates primary activity of select housing finance companies Source: Management Interviews, Monitor Analysis & Research 4 Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. CAS-COD-Prez-Date-CTL No Housing Activity Here Key Insights LIH Landscape Market has become deeper with an increase in the number of developers building in existing markets; LIH activity has sprung up in new cities as well, especially Indore. May 2010 (27 Projects) Jan 2013* (103 Projects) 2 3 Delhi NCR3 Delhi NCR Baroda Ahmedabad 18 6 Ahmedabad 2 Mumbai 10 2 Nagpur Surat 2 4 Jaipur 1 Lucknow Indore 28 2 Nagpur2 8 Bhubaneswar Mumbai1 25 5 Kolkata 4 Pune 1 Hyderabad Bangalore 2 Coimbatore 1 1 Chennai 1 Chennai Trichy xx Number of active projects Cities where detailed survey was conducted * Initial results, the number here is an estimate of the number of projects which were launched post June 2011 Note: 1 Estimate for Mumbai based on initial results; 2 Nagpur includes one project from Amravati; 3 Delhi NCR includes Meerut 5 Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. CAS-COD-Prez-Date-CTL 2 Key Insights Sample Findings from Indore Very active LIH market dominated by 1 BHK units. Industrial development activity in the southern part of the city driving supply. Small developers are also quite active in Indore 4,4741 LIH Units xx # of projects Manglia Average PSF 1,573 3 2,251 Average Saleable Area and Product Mix 449 sq-ft 15% 1 RK 592 sq-ft 76% 1 BHK Chhota Bangarda Kanadiya Rd. 4 2 806 sq-ft Bicholi Samvad Nagar Betma Road 9% 2 BHK 6 “only LIH” projects Rau Pithampura 22 “mixed development” projects 6 1 2 Khandwa Rd. 5 5 Note: Indore: n = 28 (projects); 1 : Supply from large developers (>50 units in a projects) only, launched post June ‘11 Source: Survey conducted by Hansa Research; Monitor Analysis 6 Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. CAS-COD-Prez-Date-CTL 1,150 Key Insights Challenges in LIH Supply Rising Construction Costs Availability of Affordable Land Developers claim that for large projects it often takes anywhere between 9-24 months for the combined land and project approvals, which has an impact on construction timelines, project IRRs and unit pricing In addition, the cost of approvals can be as high Rs 50-100 psf in certain cases Realizing the difficulty, we have seen certain developers build on gram panchayat land or adopt G+3 structures to by-pass the lengthy approval process According to developers across cities, their construction costs have increased by 15-20% on yearly basis LIH is a ‘low-margin’ business and such high inflation has forced several developers to book loss on their LIH projects – High inflation also makes it difficult for developers to build their business plans as there is uncertainty over the eventual project cost Availability of well-connected affordable land still remains a concern in some cities However, in some cities, infrastructure development has opened up new areas and developers in these cities don’t see land as their biggest problem 7 Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. CAS-COD-Prez-Date-CTL Long & Expensive Approval Process Key Insights Positive Developments There have also been some positive developments on the government side which should drive the field further forward – Rajasthan Housing Board’s efforts to provide quality housing for EWS and LIG segments in Jaipur – Gujarat government’s recently announced intention to reserve 2km area in peripheral areas of Ahmedabad for LIH 8 Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. CAS-COD-Prez-Date-CTL – Orissa government’s recent engagement with private developers to come up with a policy for LIH that serves the needs of urban poor Key Insights Challenges and potential interventions 9 Potential interventions 1. Provide interest rate subsidy to lowincome customers 2. Waive VAT, stamp duty and registration fees for low-income customers 3. Mandate zones for low-income housing 4. Provide fast approvals for projects 5. Build infrastructure to increase serviced land 6. Provide FSI of 1.6-2.2 for affordable housing 7. Kick start privately built low-income housing in new geographies 8. Increase availability of low-cost funds to housing finance companies Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. CAS-COD-Prez-Date-CTL Customer challenges Inadequate supply of low-income housing Customers’ lack of awareness on affordability, payment terms, legal clearances, and rights Customers have limited access to legal recourse Delay in possession leading to payment of rent and EMI simultaneously Developer challenges Approval processes for developing projects are time consuming Affordable land is often not well connected to transportation and/or public services Construction finance/funding is not easily accessible Housing finance companies’ challenges High cost of debt Customers Key Insights Some Other Aspects MIM is also studying the effectiveness of ‘Micromortgages – as a tool for financial inclusion’; we are using a theory of change framework to evaluate its effectiveness Theory of Change for Financial Inclusion Appropriate design, easy accessibility, and competitive pricing are key product inputs Access to suitable financial services Capability and confidence in using financial services appropriately Utilisation of financial services to sustainably meet life needs, build assets, grow incomes and manage risks Improved life situation facilitated by financial inclusion Source: Monitor Analysis 10 Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. CAS-COD-Prez-Date-CTL Capability is not a one-time input. Usage can be increased by providing for continuous capability improvements of the user Key Insights Micromortgages as a Tool for Financial Inclusion By improving access and building capability, micromortgages have improved customers live by helping to create an asset and influencing positive financial behaviour Theory of Change for Financial Inclusion – Micromortgages Access to suitable financial services Capability and confidence in using financial services appropriately Educative product information by loan agents helps build awareness However, experience based learning through micromortgages is more effective in building long-term capability Flexible customer assessment model that addresses accessibility issues Increased awareness of options due to: – Prevalence of specialist HFCs – Developer tie-ups with HFCs Utilisation of financial services to sustainably meet life needs, build assets, grow incomes and manage risks Monthly EMI payments promotes financial discipline Increased confidence in navigating formal institutions to fund major needs 11 Improved life situation facilitated by financial inclusion Enables building of asset base through house ownership Openness to formal loans reduces exposure to informal lending and its risks Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. CAS-COD-Prez-Date-CTL State of the Market Report – JUNE 2013 ‘. For any questions, please contact any one of us Vikram Jain – vikramjain2@deloitte.com Namrata Maheshwari – darshm@deloitte.com Ashish Aditya Karamchandani – akaramchandani@deloitte.com Agarwal – adiagarwal1@deloitte.com 12 Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. CAS-COD-Prez-Date-CTL Darsh Kapoor – knamrata@deloitte.com 13 Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. CAS-COD-Prez-Date-CTL Backup Key Insights Sample Findings from Ahmedabad Presence of a highly evolved LIH market with supply being driven by 1 RKs; Presence of sophisticated developers who have a deep understanding of the segment. 4,7131 LIH Units xx # of projects Average PSF 1,542 Nikol 1,889 1,200 4 Average Saleable Area and Product Mix 400 sq-ft 647 sq-ft 855 sq-ft 50% 45% 5% Vastral 1 Juhapura 1 Hathijan Narol 1 BHK 2 BHK 1 Moraiya Gam 5 “only LIH” projects 2 2 Bavla 12 “mixed development” projects 5 Note: Ahmedabad: n = 17 (projects); Supply from large developers (>50 units in a projects) only, launched post June ‘11 Source: Survey conducted by Hansa; Monitor Analysis 14 Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. CAS-COD-Prez-Date-CTL 1 RK Key Insights Challenges in LIH Supply Despite the increase in LIH activity, the supply still remains a challenge and several fundamental barriers remain for this market to scale at rapid pace Rising Construction Costs Availability of Affordable Land Developers claim that for large projects it often takes anywhere between 9-24 months for the combined land and project approvals, which has an impact on construction timelines, project IRRs and unit pricing In addition, the cost of approvals can be as high Rs 50-100 psf in certain cases Realizing the difficulty, we have seen certain developers build on gram panchayat land or adopt G+3 structures to by-pass the lengthy approval process According to developers across cities, their construction costs have inflated by 15-20% on yearly basis LIH is a ‘low-margin’ business and such high inflation has forced several developers to book loss on their LIH projects – High inflation also makes it difficult for developers to build their business plans as there is uncertainty over the eventual project cost Availability of well-connected affordable land still remains a concern in some cities However, in some cities, infrastructure development has opened up new areas and developers in these cities don’t see land as their biggest problem 15 Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. CAS-COD-Prez-Date-CTL Long & Expensive Approval Process Key Insights Potential interventions 16 Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. CAS-COD-Prez-Date-CTL Demand interventions • Provide interest rate subsidy to low-income customers • Waive VAT, stamp duty and registration fees for lowincome customers Supply interventions • Mandate zones for low-income housing • Provide fast approvals for projects • Build infrastructure to increase serviced land • Provide FSI of 1.6-2.2 for affordable housing • Kick start privately built low-income housing in new geographies • Increase availability of low-cost funds to housing finance companies