ASME/ANS Joint Committee on Nuclear Risk Management (JCNRM) Presented to Nuclear Energy Standards Coordination Collaborative (NESCC) November 2014, Washington DC C.R. (Rick) Grantom P.E. Co-Vice Chair BNCS, JCNRM Co-Chair crgrantom@stpegs.com 1 Presentation Outline Introduction ASME/ANS Risk Management Role & Governance ASME Board on Nuclear Codes & Standards ANS Standards Board Nuclear Risk Management Coordinating Committee JCNRM Overview Main Committee Subcommittees Working Groups Project Teams JCNRM Strategic Plan JCNRM Products Risk Informed Applications Communication & Contact Paths Opportunities to Participate 2 INTRODUCTION 3 ASME/ANS RISK MANAGEMENT ROLE & GOVERNANCE 4 Current ASME / ANS / NRMCC Organization ANS Standards Board ASME BNCS NRMCC NRC, DOE, NEI, EPRI Owners Groups, IEEE, ASME, ANS ASME/ANS JCNRM BNCS Organization 6 ASME Organization Chart for Nuclear Codes and Standards Development Board of Governors Council on Codes and Standards Board of Nuclear Codes & Standards Committees NQA CNF Council on Public Affairs Council on Engineering O&M CONAGT Board of Performance Test Codes Council on Members Affairs Board of Safety Codes and Standards Council on Education Board of Pressure Technology Codes & Standards QME JCNRM Section III Over 3,000 volunteers participate in this process BPV Section XI 7 ANS Standards Board Organization 8 The ANS Standards Committee Standards Board (Top-level committee) Large Light Water Reactor Consensus Committee Research and Advanced Reactors NonReactor Nuclear Facilities Consensus Committee Consensus Committee Joint Safety & Committee Radiological on Nuclear Analyses Risk Consensus Management Committee Consensus Committee Subcommittees Working Groups Risk-Informed & PerformanceBased Principles Policy Committee Nuclear Fuel, Environmental Criticality Waste, and and Siting Decommissioning Safety Consensus Consensus Committee Committee Consensus Committee Nuclear Risk Management Coordinating Committee MEMBERS • • ASME, ANS, IEEE, Owners Groups, EPRI, NEI, DOE, and NRC Committee can also include interested standards developing organizations, such as ASTM, NFPA, and AISC PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES • • Coordinate codes and standards activities related to risk management for current and new nuclear power plants, nuclear facilities, and the transportation and storage of nuclear material Ensure that codes and standards associated with risk management, and their underlying principles, are consistent and compatible CURRENT ACTIONS • • Facilitates coordinating activities between ASME, ANS, and IEEE on riskinformed initiatives Acts on inputs from industry and regulating organizations relative to the use of risk methods in codes and standards 10 JCNRM Overview 11 JCNRM CHARTER • To develop, revise and maintain standards and guides on probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) and related risk management techniques supporting risk- informed and performance-based applications for nuclear facilities. 12 JCNRM SCOPE • The development of standards and guidance that establish risk criteria and methods for PRA, risk assessment, and risk management for nuclear facilities. • Review of standards as requested by other American Nuclear Society (ANS) and American Society standards of Mechanical committees, Engineers and other (ASME) standards development organizations on related topics to identify inconsistency, lack of integration of risk concepts and duplication, as appropriate. 13 JCNRM Overview • National consensus committee • ~70 volunteers working in all JCNRM organizational areas • All nuclear sectors interest areas represented • Member rosters can be found on JCNRM web page 14 JCNRM BACKGROUND RA-S Chronology ASME RA-S-2002 ASME/ANS RA-Sa-2009 ASME/ANS RA-S1-2008 ASME/ANS RA-Sb-2013 15 JCNRM Products 16 Current JCNRM Products • Level 1/LERF PRA (Internal Events & external hazards): RA-Sb-2013 • Advanced Non-LWR PRA Standard (Published 2013), RA-S-1.4 (Trial Use) • In process – New Edition, RA-S-1.1-2016 – Level 2 PRA (Containment Response & Radiological Release), RA-S-1.2 (Trial Use) – Level 3 PRA (Consequences), RA-S-1.3 (Trial Use) – Low Power and Shutdown PRA (LPSD) – Advanced LWR PRA 17 JCNRM Organizational Chart JCNRM Executive Committee Subcommittee Standards Development (SC-SD) Joint Committee on Nuclear Rick Management [JCNRM] (Consensus Group) Subcommittee Standards Maintenance (SC-SM) Subcommittee on Risk Applications (SCoRA) JCNRM Working Groups JCNRM Project Teams 18 Subcommittee Standards Development • Chair/Vice Chair – Barry Sloane (ERIN Engineering), Chair – Dennis Henneke (GE Hitachi), Vice Chair • Working Groups (“Writing Groups”) – – – – – • Advanced LWR PRA Standard (Jim Chapman, lead) Low Power/Shutdown PRA Standard (Don Wakefield, lead) Level 2 PRA Standard (Ed Burns, lead); currently being balloted for trial use Level 3 PRA Standard (Keith Woodard, lead) Non-LWR PRA Standard (Karl Fleming, lead); currently in Trial Use phase Project Teams – Spent Fuel Pool PRA Needs Assessment; work is completed • Primary focus 2014 – 2016 – – – – – – Issuance of LP/SD PRA Standard for Trial Use Issuance of Advanced LWR PRA Standard for Trial Use Issuance of L2 PRA Standard Trial Use Issuance of L3 PRA Standard for Trial Use Evolution of Trial Use Process, interaction with Trial Use Standard users Eventual Issuance of Trial Use standards as ANSI Standards 19 Subcommittee Maintenance • Chair Paul Amico/Vice Chairs Andrea Maioli, Gareth Parry • Working Groups: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Parts 5-10 • Project Teams: 8 PTs addressing groups of cross cutting issues. • Primary focus 2014 – 2016 is new edition of RA-S. Expect to inherit new standards and WGs beginning in 2016 20 Subcommittee on Risk Applications • Chair Ken Kiper/Vice Chair Stanley Levinson • Project Teams - New PT on interface with BNCS Board Committee Nuclear Quality Assurance (NQA) to facilitate and improve 50.69 implementation • Primary Focus 2014-2016 - Establish POCs with key stakeholder organizations & national consensus committees with risk initiatives 21 Strategic Plans 22 ASME BNCS Risk Management Strategic Plan MISSION Factor risk, as well as performance, into all ASME Nuclear Codes and Standards, as appropriate, to further ensure, on a worldwide basis, that they protect public health and safety and meet the needs of users ACTION PLAN Identify and track short-term (1-2 years) and long-term (3+ years) riskinformed initiatives within the Committee on Board Operations and across all BNCS Committees PRA STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT Identify needs to enhance or develop PRA Standards to support applications defined in the action plan UPDATES Plan is updated and approved at each BNCS meeting (~4 months) and is then placed on the ASME website for public access 23 ANS Standards Board Risk Management Strategic Plan • The American Nuclear Society Standards Board (SB) has established the Risk Informed and Performance Based Principles Policy Committee (RP3C) as a committee that reports directly to the SB. • The RP3C is responsible for the identification and oversight of the development and implementation of the ANS Risk Informed and Performance Based Standards Plan that establishes the approaches, priorities, responsibilities and schedules for implementation of risk informed and performance based principles in American Nuclear Society (ANS) standards. • The RP3C is also responsible for reviewing standards being developed by other standards developing organizations as assigned by the ANS SB on related topics to ensure consistency. 24 JCNRM Action Plan 25 26 27 28 Risk-Informed Applications Support 29 Regulatory Infrastructure • RG 1.200 endorses PRA Standards • Other supporting RGs for applications are – RG 1.174, Risk Informed Licensing Changes – RG 1.175, Risk Informed Inservice Inspection – RG 1.177, Risk Informed Technical Specifications – RG 1.201, Risk Informed Categorization & Treatment of SSCs – RG 1.205, 50.48(c) Fire Protection, NFPA 805 – RG 1.206, 10CFR52, New Plants 30 Use of PRA Results in Regulatory Applications • NRC has adopted a risk-informed approach to use of PRA in regulatory decision-making (Risk Informed Regulation) • The philosophy is discussed, in the context of changes to licensing basis, in RG 1.174 • PRA analyses are one, but not the only, input to the decision • NUREG-2150 describes a proposed risk management regulatory framework 31 Risk Informed Regulatory Areas – Maintenance Rule (10CFR50.65), – Mitigating Systems Performance Index (MSPI), – Reactor Oversight Program/Significance Determination Process 32 Industry PRA Applications Risk-Informed Applications used by US NPPs • On-Line Maintenance, Configuration Risk Management, Risk Informed Inservice Inspection (prior to PRA Standard) • 10CFR50.69, Risk Significance Categorization • Risk-Informed Technical Specifications – Risk-Managed Tech Specs (Flexible Allowed Outage Times) (RITS 4B) – Surveillance Frequency Control Program (RITS 5B) • NFPA-805 (Risk Informed Fire Protection) • Risk-Informed GSI-191 33 PRA Standard Utility Interfaces Utility PRAs use the guidance in the Standard for establishing in part or in whole: • Role of Peer Reviews • Risk-Informed Application Process 34 Communication & Contact Paths 35 Communication Venues • Owners Group Meetings • EPRI meetings • Two JCNRM Meeting weeks per year (February, September) – Monday/Tuesday (WGs, Exec Committee) – Tuesday/Wednesday (Subcommittees) – Thursday (Main Committee) • NRMCC Meetings (two per year) • ASME & ANS • Many telecons at all levels 36 Contact Information • UTILITY REPRESENTATIVES • ASME JCNRM committee website – http://cstools.asme.org/csconnect/CommitteePa ges.cfm?Committee=100186782 • Officers – Co-Chairs: C.R. (Rick) Grantom, Bob Budnitz – Vice Chairs: Dennis Henneke, Pamela Nelson • SDO Secretaries – Oliver Martinez (ASME), martinezo@asme.org – Pat Schroeder (ANS), pschroeder@ans.org 37 Opportunities to Participate • Subcommittees • Working Groups (permanent JCNRM technical groups) • Project Teams (temporary teams chartered to address or resolve a specific short term activity) 38 INSIGHTS • Codes & Standards are the consensus mechanism to develop guidance and requirements for industry use and subsequent regulatory endorsement • Many areas need attention and further development • Opportunities to help ensure that technical requirements ultimately to be imposed on Users are accurate, efficient, and effective • What is contained in C&S typically become requirements (participation is important) • Good opportunity for younger professionals to have a voice in their future 39 QUESTIONS? 40