WV HFMA Spring Revenue Cycle Workshop 2014 Belinda Bennett & Okey Silman II Keys to reducing Denials Tools to identify Denials How to reduce Denials System Related Staff Related QA Processes Denial Committee Vendor Assistance Monitoring and Feedback Denial Log to track denials from payers Rebill Logs – why are we rebilling accounts Vendor review of Denials and issue report Review of Authorization Denials i.e. status billed did not mirror authorization in system RAC Denials Install a Denial System QA System Automated real-time system in Registration Manual QA System Process to obtain authorizations, vendor or hospital staff Process to identify when a service is pre-certified but when in Radiology a test is added or changed – communication between departments and staff to update the pre-certification Process to ensure when a status changes for a patient that you notify payers for new authorizations for observations, in-patient, etc. Flash meeting daily to review authorizations, payer requirements, etc. Charge Master – possible review Billing System edits Computer System Identify settings that may not be correct, i.e. Revenue Code, CPT/HCPCS codes Billing System Edits Review Payer Contracts Link to a check list for avoiding denials in Payer contracts: http://www.hfma.org/WorkArea/DownloadAss et.aspx?id=19451 Computer System Identify settings that may not be correct, i.e. Revenue Code, CPT/HCPCS code, etc. Checklist: Avoiding Denial Traps in Payer Contracts While healthcare organizations can’t completely prevent denials through strong commercial contract language, they can go a long way toward limiting those denials. Following is a brief checklist to follow when examining payer contracts. Be precise and avoid ambiguity. The clearer you are, the less wiggle room for denials. Remove coding/billing requirements that are subject to change. If a reference to coding/billing has to remain, then make sure language exists to ensure compliance with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Prohibit (or set a time limit for) retroactive determinations. Agree on what will be disallowed, if anything. Be clear about what happens when there are payment policy changes. You may want to require written notification of any changes and allow time to model those changes before agreeing to them. Prohibit recoupments and refund requests after a certain amount of time. Delineate a timeframe for retroactive authorization of services. Explicitly define timely filing and appeal limits. Ensure contract language allows the contract to supersede other payer documents when conflicts arise. Prohibit any language that relies on information that only the payer can create or provide. Avoid detrimental contract language that gives “absolute discretion” to the payer in claim determination. Include contract language about how “new” technology services will be paid and/or addressed, rather than having to wait for the next negotiatio n period. Source: Sonia Franklin, Palette Health. Used with permission. Denial Committee reviews Denial logs and reports Tracking progress Provide Feedback to all staff – scheduling, registration, coding, and billing Provide Feedback to Physicians i.e. Sterilization Forms required for payers Authorization issues Provider Errors Clinical Technical/Administrative Medical Nececssity Can't ID Patient Non-Covered Service Not Eligible Level of Care Not Authorized Non-Emergent Late Notification Benefits Exhausted Coverage Terminated Other Insurance Prime Duplicate Claim Timely Filing Lack of Information Invalid Provider Number Unbundled Code Modifier Not Provided Procedure Code Doesn't Match Gender Procedure Code Inconsistent with POS Diagnosis Inconsistent with Age, Gender, or Procedure Listed Worked by UR or CM Worked by Business Office, Access Services or Revenue Integrity Payer Errors Underpayments Payment Not Equal to Claim Payment Not Equal to Case Rate Stop Loss Not Paid Paid Wrong DRG Correct % of Charges Not Paid Invalid Fee Schedule Incorrect Per Diem Worked by Business Office, Contracting or Revenue Integrity 835 posting files – need to watch how the reason codes are being posted. Each payer is different and may utilize a code differently Each system is different and may post a reason code differently Claim Adjustment Reason Codes Reason Code Adjustment Group Description 223 CO – Contractual Obligations Adjustment code for mandated federal, state or local law/regulation that is not already covered by another code and is mandated before a new code can be created. 223 OA – Other Adjustments 223 PI – Payer Initiated Reductions 223 CR – Corrections and Reversals Reduce Denials Improve Cash Reduce Net AR Days Get accounts paid timely without interruption