Oakland Unified School District
2012-2013 Enrollment Presentation v11
November 14, 2012
Presented by:
Tony Smith, Ph.D., Superintendent of Oakland Unified School District
David Montes de Oca, Executive Director of Quality Community Schools Development
1
OVERVIEW
PART I:
Trends : Results
PART II:
Initiatives (Expanding Grades, STEM, Transitional Kinder)
PART III:
Restructuring
PART IV:
District – Charter Enrollment Dynamic
PART V:
Enrollment Projections
2
PART I: TRENDS : RESULTS
What is the enrollment* of the Oakland Unified School District this year?
Total Non-SDC:
Total SDC:
Total w/ SDC:
20000
34,789
1,473
36,262
19,349
10000
6,829
8,611
6th - 8th
9th - 12th
0
TK-5
2012-13 Enrollment (Non-SDC)
District & OUSD Authorized Charter Enrollment Over-Time
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
Charter
2,021
2,466
3,407
3,887
5,340
5,992
7,208
7,553
7,861
8,256
8,052
8,635
10,228
OUSD
52,842
51,079
49,094
46,550
43,874
42,143
39,804
38,878
38,655
38,360
38,532
37,742
36,262
* Enrollment Data 2012-13: September 24, 2012 referred to as the Day 20 Count
2000-2001 through 2011-12 Enrollment based on – CBEDS Reporting (Includes SDC)
* * Note: Charter data is OUSD Authorized Charters ONLY, based on historical data record.
3
PART II: District Initiatives: Expanding Grades, STEM
Graph A: All schools approved for grade level expansion met or exceeded 2012-13 enrollment targets for 6th grade.
Graph B: Over past two years an increasing number of 6th grade students new to OUSD helps off-set the ongoing
decline in retention of 5th grade students within OUSD transitioning to 6th grade.
• 5th Grade Retention = % of District 5th graders that remain in District for the following 6th grade year.
• 6th Grade Progression = ratio of District 6th grade class compared to prior year District 5th grade class.
A.
K-5 or 9-12 Enrollment
B.
New 6th Grade Enrollment
65
5th Grade Retention
69.1%
6th Grade Progression
78.8%
74.2%
67.5%
66
30
438
255
298
Sankofa K-6
Life 6, 9-12
Greenleaf K-6
2011-12
2012-13
All West Oakland STEM Corridor Schools serving grades K-8 experienced an increase in Entry Grade Enrollment
(K, 6) for 2012-13. Additionally, McClymonds High School experienced 10.1% increase in enrollment school-wide.
2011-12 Entry Grade Enrollment
C.
Growth in 2012-13
McClymonds H.S.
17
19
300
269
250
5
3
48
54
58
Lafayette
Hoover
King
9
200
69
37
237
150
100
50
PLACE @ Prescott
West Oakland Middle
2011-12
2012-13
4
* Data Used: 2011-12 & 2012-13 based on Day 20 Count
PART II: District Initiatives: Transitional Kindergarten
Transitional Kindergarten enables OUSD to continue serving over 200 students affected by California's new
Kindergarten age requirements, while also supporting our youngest students' developmental growth and
preparedness for traditional Kindergarten.
2012-13 Sites
TK Enroll
Region 1
Emerson
21
PLACE @ Prescott
8
Sankofa
10
Region 2
Allendale
23
Garfield
42
Global
25
La Escuelita
23
Region 3
Community United
23
Greenleaf
17
Markham
22
TOTAL
214
2013-14 Sites to be Added
Region 1
Region 2
Region 3
Hoover Bella Vista
Grass Valley
Sequoia Bridges
Parker
Horace Mann
Reach
Manzanita SEED Sobrante Park
5
PART III: Restructuring
Percent of student loss from closed elementary schools is slightly lower than national average closure loss (20%).
Total student loss represents small portion of total enrollment loss for OUSD in 2012-13.
Remained in OUSD: 508 (81.02%) Left OUSD: 119 (18.98%)
100.00%
21.55%
16.25%
21.77%
14.41%
78.45%
83.75%
78.23%
85.59%
Lakeview
Maxwell Park
Santa Fe
Marshall
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
Left OUSD
Remained in OUSD
20.00%
0.00%
Consolidated High Schools gained as many students into OUSD at grades 10-12 as was lost from OUSD at 9-11.
700
A. Change from June 10, 2012 to September 24, 2012
600
500
400
71
68
63
51
134
100
59
Students
452
371
B. Gained as of Sept. 24, 2012
150
300
200
200
50
75
100
0
0
Castlemont 9-11
Remained in School
Fremont 9-11
Left for Other OUSD
Left OUSD
19
Castlemont 10-12
# Gained Other OUSD
50
Fremont 10-12
# Gained Non-OUSD
6
* Data Used: Comparison based on Aeries SIS Loss / Gain between June 10, 2012 and September 24, 2012
PART IV: District and Charter Enrollment Dynamic
Comparison between 2011-12 and 2012-13 District and charter school enrollment change.
Most of the District enrollment losses* can be accounted for by gains in charter schools** with the
exception of a few grade levels, particularly at secondary.
0
-50
TK/K
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
District
7th
-93
-91
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
-69
-100
-150
6th
-127
-140
-143
-127
-104
-127
-173
-200
-202
-250
-222
-216
-300
-350
332
350
300
263
280
244
250
234
181
200
155
Charter 150
151
114
86
100
92
70
29
50
0
K
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
* Data Used: The Day 20 Count 2011 and 2012
** Based on attendance accounting reported September, 2011 and September, 2012.
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
7
PART V: Enrollment Projections
Timing of program changes has implications for Enrollment Projections. Decisions made after
February impact budgets, staffing and fall consolidations; because they are driven by enrollment
projections.
EXAMPLE:
• 2012-13* Grades 1st – 8th Enrollment projection difference: 695
• 2012-13** Grades 1st – 8th Enrollment change based on AIPCS II Renewal/Expansion (OUSD) & Lazear Charter Conversion (ACOE): 663
0
-20
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
-40
-60
-44
-48
-80
Projection Difference
-100
-120
-88
-82
-87
-104
-119
-140
-123
-160
160
143
140
120
80
102
100
100
72
76
70
64
AIPCS II/Lazear Growth
60
36
40
20
0
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
* Date Used: The Day 20 Count 2012
** Based on attendance accounting reported September, 2011 and September, 2012.
7th
8th
8
Questions & Discussion
9