Understanding primary school performance in Southern Africa (SACMEQ) Nicholas Spaull nicspaull.com/research nicholasspaull@gmail.com 30th AEAA Conference – Gaborone 10 Aug 2012 Full paper available at: sacmeq http://www. .org/downl oads/Working%20Papers/08_Comparis on_Final_18Oct2011.pdf Background: Data SACMEQ Southern and Eastern African Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality 14 participating countries 61,396 Grade 6 students 8,026 Grade 6 teachers 2,779 primary schools SACMEQ II (2000), SACMEQ III (2007) Background survey Testing : o Gr 6 Numeracy o Gr 6 Literacy o HIV/AIDS Health knowledge SACMEQ: South Africa 9071 Grade 6 students 1163 Grade 6 teachers 392 primary schools Research propositions 1. Students should be functionally literate and numerate by the 6th year of primary schooling. 2. Students cannot learn if their teachers are not present, in school, teaching (teacher absenteeism). 3. Teachers cannot teach what they do not know (teacher knowledge). 4. Hungry children have difficulty learning. 5. Textbooks are a fundamental pedagogical tool especially in poorer, text-deprived schools. Distribution of student performance WCA LIM Looking specifically at South Africa South Africa: Socioeconomic breakdown SA primary school: Gr6 Literacy – SACMEQ III (2007) Never enrolled 2% Functionally illiterate 25% Basic skills 46% Higher order skills : 27% 17 Grade 6 Literacy – SA & Kenya 1% SA Gr 6 Literacy 25% 5% Kenya Gr 6 Literacy 7% 49% 46% 39% 27% Public current expenditure Public current expenditure per pupil: $1225 per pupil: $258 18 Grade 6 Literacy – SA & Namibia South Africa Namibia 2% 27% 7% 25% 21% 12% 46% 60% Public current expenditure Public current expenditure per pupil: $1225 per pupil: $668 Regional comparisons SA in regional context Public Current expenditure on Country Total population Adult literacy (mil) rate Net Enrolment Rate (2008) GNP/cap PPP primary education per pupil (unit US$ (2008) cost) 2007 – [PPP constant 2006 US$] Survival rate to Grade 5: school year ending 2007 Botswana 1.92 83% 87% 13100 1228 89%3 Mozambique 22.38 54% 80% 770 792 60% Namibia 2.13 88% 89% 6270 668 87%3 South Africa 49.67 89% 87% 9780 1225 98% (UNESCO, 2011) (UNESCO, 2011) (UNESCO, 2011) (UNESCO, 2011) (UIS, 2009) (UNESCO, 2011) Source SACMEQ III (2007) Self-reported teacher absenteeism Proportion of Grade 6 students functionally illiterate Proportion of Grade 6 students functionally innumerate Proportion of students Proportion of students with own reading with own mathematics textbook textbook Botswana 10.6 days 10.62% 22.48% 63% 62% Mozambique 6.4 days 21.51% 32.73% 53% 52% Namibia 9.4 days 13.63% 47.69% 32% 32% South Africa 19.4 days 27.26% 40.17% 45% 36% Teacher knowledge Maths teacher content knowledge SACMEQ III Preschool incidence Grade repetition Free school meals Resources the issue? More reading textbooks More maths textbooks Accountability: teacher absenteeism (SACMEQ III – 2007 – 996 teachers) Non-strike teacher absenteeism SACMEQ III (2007) 25 20 4th/15 15 Days per year 10 19 5 6 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 14 14 14 0 29 Accountability: teacher absenteeism (SACMEQ III – 2007 – 996 teachers) Self-reported teacher absenteeism (days) 15th/15 SACMEQ III (2007) Non-strike teacher absenteeism Teachers' strikes 25 20 0 15 0 Days per year 0 10 0 0 5 7 0 0 8 9 9 10 10 0 11 12 2 0 19 0 0 6 0 0 12 14 14 14 11 8 0 20 days 30 (1 month) Conclusions, questions & recommendations Conclusions 1. High provincial inequality in SA, NAM and MOZ 2. Unacceptably high levels of functional illiteracy/innumeracy in SA, NAM, and MOZ 3. Unacceptably high levels of teacher absenteeism in SA 4. Unacceptably high levels of grade repetiton in MOZ 5. Unacceptably low levels of textbook access in SA + NAM 6. Very low levels of preschool access in Botswana (given its education spend per pupil) 7. Low access to free school meals in Namibia Questions 1. How is it possible that more Mozambican students have access to their own textbooks than SA /NAM students, and this when SA spends 15 times as much per child than Mozambique? 2. Why do Namibian students do much worse on numeracy tests than on literacy tests? 3. Why is it acceptable in South Africa for teachers to be absent (unjustifiably) for an entire month? 4. Why is preschool education so uncommon in Botswana? (especially given the international research showing cognitive benefits of ECE) 5. For each country, what is the low-hanging fruit? Recommendations GET THE BASICS RIGHT • Get all schools in the country to minimum quality standards in both basic infrastructure (water, electricity, desks, and so on) and in educational performance (numeracy and literacy milestones by certain grades); – • All children should have access to a quality textbook – • Roll-out free school meals starting with most under-resourced communities All pupils should attend at least one year of quality preschool education – • Teacher inspectorate Pupils who are mal-nourished should receive free school meals – • Textbook campaign + survey schools to check access & use All teachers should be in class teaching for the full school day – • Set clear and succinct goals that everyone must follow. For example, “Every child will read and write by the age of eight”; also provide parents with feedback on how their children are performing Define curriculum and resource requirements and train Reception teachers All teachers must have a minimum level of content knowledge in the subjects that they teach – Teacher board exam? Thank you www.nicspaull.com/research nicholasspaull@gmail.com @NicSpaull