Phase 1: SETTING
DIVISION TARGETS
AND STRATEGIES
VISION: “Globally competitive, morally upright and fully committed learners.”
MISSION: “The Division of City Schools is committed to provide learners
access to excellent basic education and life-long learning through
technologically-driven, value-laden and fully engaged instruction.”
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES:
Goal 1. Increased Access to Basic Education (PROVISION OF ACCESS)
General Objectives: Improved enrolment participation rates in all levels of
basic education systems
Improved program resources and the corresponding program/project
indicators
Goal 2. Improved learners performance (QUALITY AND RELEVANCE OF BASIC
EDUCATION)
General Objective: Improved performance in the National Achievement Test
Goal 3. Improved Internal Efficiency (MANAGEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL
SERVICES
General Objectives: Improved Cohort Survival Rate and Completion Rate in all
levels
Decreased Dropout / Leaver Rate in all levels.
DIVISION CORE VALUES:
I-CARES
Integrity
Creativity
Accountability
Responsibility
Excellence
Strategic Partnership
BASIC INPUTS-PUBLIC SCHOOLS
No. of Schools
Classes
Enrolment
Teacher Items /Mobile
Pupil/Student :Teacher Ratio
Classrooms
Pupil/Student: Classroom Ratio
(1 shift)
Seats (1 shift)
Pupil/Student: Furniture Ratio
(1 shift)
Prep
Elementary Secondary
(96)
96
46
1080
5109
2806
26,712
261,616
151,856
382
6,115
4,529
34.96
42.78
33.53
201
3139
1973
132.90
83.34
76.97
151,792
92,060
1.72
1.65
Total
142
8,995
440,184
11,026
39.92
5,313
82.85
243,852
1.81
EXTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
AREA
DATA
(Source: Online)
Economic QC is gaining place in the global
arena with WB citing QC as one
of the richest and cleanest city in
the Philippines
Large consumer market of 2.9
million people
(24% of NCR population)
One of the largest sources of
manpower in the Philippines
Employable human resource =
1.67 million
Young labor force of almost 1
million
OPPORTUNITIES
THREATS
•QC is an ideal place to Incidence of
put up any legitimate
poverty is high
kind of business and
livelihood
Resources of
schools are
depleted
Large employable
Population:
Ages 20-64 = 1.672 M
Ages 31-40 = 1.0868 M
Ages 30 below = 0.617M
Negative effect on
Access, quality and
Efficiency of the
schools
EXTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
AREA
Economic
DATA
(Source: Online)
Land area = 16,112
hectares (25% of the land
area of Metro Manila)
Large tracts of land
available for development
CD I,III & IV)
Reasonably priced real
estate values
Ideal transshipment point
between north and south
•3,631 Php. Per capita
 home of the country’s best
schools and universities
OPPORTUNITIES
THREATS
•QC is an ideal place
to put up any
legitimate kind of
business and
livelihood
Incidence of poverty is
high
Resources of schools
are depleted
•One of the most
Negative effect on
strategic and most
Access, quality and
cost-effective
Efficiency of the schools
locations for business
in the Philippines
•Families are sources
of enrolling children
in schools
EXTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
AREA
Social
DATA
(Source: Online)
OPPORTUNITIES
Large dependent
population
 1/3 (33%) of population is
less than 15 years old.
 34.38% or 997,000 people
are youthful people
 More than 40% of the
population is younger than
20 yrs
Average age is 24
year20,000 college
graduates produced
yearly
Literacy Rate = 98.32%
slightly higher than the
NCR
THREATS
•Families are sources
of enrolling children
in schools
EXTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
AREA
Social
DATA
(Source: Online)
OPPORTUNITIES
Large dependent
population
 239,605 families are
informal settlers
 Densely populated but
unevenly distributed; most
populated is CD II
THREATS
•Families are sources
of enrolling children
in schools
 12.1% of children of ages
5-14 population is working
 Poverty incidence of 3.8 %
(NSCB 2009) or
 19,397 Families as
estimated from the total
population of 2,960,627
Child labor due to
poverty
EXTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
AREA
Political
DATA
(Source: Online)
4 Congressional Districts
6 Councilors & 1
Congressman each
142 barangays
Presence of Ordinances to
support education
Institutionalization of the CDP
for QC (Master plan)
ECCD support (daycare centers)
Good housekeeping of the City
Business-Friendly City
City-government initiated Lowcost housing project
OPPORTUNITIES
THREATS
Strong political
support from the LSB
for quality basic
education
Strong private-public
industry partnerships
More business
networking
Teachers as
beneficiaries of city
housing projects
High population
density in CD II
EXTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
AREA
Ecological-
DATA
(Source: Online)
• with many large parks
integrated in mixed-use
communities
• with expansive lands
available for large-scale
development
with major parks which
include La mesa Reserve
/Eco Park, Ninoy Aquino
Parks & Wildlife, QC
memorial Circle. Balara
Filters Park, UP Arboretum
OPPORTUNITIES
Ideal for high rise
“green” buildings
THREATS
Its large population
produce tons upon
tons of solid wastes
daily, posing threat to
the environment
Vulnerable to floods,
earthquakes
EXTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
AREA
Technological
DATA
(Source: Online)
• More than 60 business
process outsourcing
companies
• All leading telecom
providers
• Top ICT schools in the
country
• More than 450 computer
retailers and distributors
OPPORTUNITIES
Highest
concentration of ICT
zones in the country
which provide
educational and
employment
opportunities
Provide improved
educational
• 6 major television stations
competencies
• Close to 600 internet
cafes
•Entertainment center of
the country
•28 registered ICT Parks
with PEZA
THREATS
Lower school
efficiency
unregulated use of
ICT (cyber crimes
involving students
and school-age
children)
INTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
AREA: Basic
Inputs
Enrolment
Teachers
DATA
Enr (Prep) = 26,712
Enr (Elem) = 261,616
Enr (Sec) = 151,856
Total nr = 440,184
Prep = 369
Elem = 6,115; PTR= 42.78
Sec = 4,529; STR = 33.53
ALS =
13
Total = 11,026 STR = 39.92
Classrooms
STRENGTHS
Existence of physical
and human resources
WEAKNESSESS
22 schools are
congested
Strong political support
from local and national Disproportionate
elected officials for
distribution of teachers
additional teacher
in 4 CD’s
items
Trained and competent
teachers on Policy
governance e-Kasi QC,
FUSE
Good QC teachers
become curriculum
writers/ speakers, etc.
CD I,III & IV, 1 shift;
Prep = 201
Elem = 2,950 PCR = 83.34
(41)
National and local
Sec = 1,649 STR = 76.97 (38) gov’t partnership in the
TOTAL = 4,800 STR= 82.85 (42) construction of
additional classrooms
Disparity in availability
of classrooms; (inavailability in CD II)
No buildable for some
congested schools
INTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
AREA: Basic
Inputs
Seats
DATA
243,852
Textbooks
WatSan
Facilities
STRENGTHS
WEAKNESSESS
1:1 seat:pupil ratio Preventive maintenance
not in place
1:1 textbook:pupil
ratio
Toilet bowls ES&Prep:
ForGirls = 1139+336
shared = 1475
Girls-TBowl Ratio = 95:1
For Boys = 886 +218 indiv
+218*3 urin troughs=1758
Boys-TBowl Ratio = 85:1
No water supply or not
adequate in some
schools (Sauyo ES, etc.)
At the close of
2012, 240 and
111 toilet bowls
had been added Preventive Maintenance
constructions in 54 and repair not in place
elementary
Toilet bowls HS:
schools and 23
For Girls =544+44 shared secondary
Not enough toilet bowls
Girl-TBowl Ratio = 130:1
schools,
especially for girls
For boys = 438+ 145 indiv. respectively
+95*3 urinal troughs
Boys-TBowl Ratio = 89:1
INTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
AREA: Performance
Indicators*
Access Indicators
DATA
AIR = 116.32
NER = 60.50
GER (ES) = 100.93
GER (HS) = 96.79
NER (ES) = 87.72
NER (HS) = 74.69
STRENGTHS
WEAKNESSESS
High enrolment
Physical, and financial
participation of school- resources stretched to
going age population the limit
High absorptive
capacity of schools
16.32% of enrollees in
Kinder & Grade 1 are
over-aged ; 0.93% in
the elementary are
over-aged.
Weak instructional
supervision
NAT (GR 3) = 46.96 Availability of
NAT (GR 6) = 54.26 competent teachers
Quality Indicators NAT (Yr 4) = 50.41 More room for
improvement
No assessment plan
Challenge to do better
CSR (ES) = 82.01
Institutionalization of
High dropout rate
CSR (HS) = 83.60
Parents Values Seminar
CompR (ES) = 79.10
Institutionalization of
Efficiency Indicators CompR (HS) =
79.11
best DORP
DOR (ES) = 0.47
practices/DORP
DOR (HS) = 5.62
Journal
*on Access, Quality, Efficiency, Governance (both public and private schools)
INTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
AREA: PI
DATA
EBEIS
LIS
HRIS
Governance
e-NGAS
STRENGTHS
Data driven decisions
WEAKNESSESS
Technical problems
re: connectivity
Updated employee records System stability and
implementation
ICT driven communication
issues
system for internal efficiency
Transparency
INTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
AREA: Awards and
Recognitions
Regional
National
International
DATA
Sports Regional Palaro
Elem –Champion
Champion in Regional
Journalism
STRENGTHS
Presence of
seasoned and
veteran trainers
2 Metrobank TeacherAwardees
Journalism
-do-
Delegate to the 1st Lego
League in Australia
Arts competition in
HongKong
Math Olympiad
Deutsch (German) Song
& Dance Competition3rd place
-do-
WEAKNESSESS
Talents are pirated
The SWOT Matrix
S-O
Strategic Options:
 Social marketing to enhance publicprivate partnership/enhance stakeholders
participation to basic education
 Provide increase access to different kinds
of learners (Curriculum modification to
enhance/strengthen Technical-Vocational
education, special program for the arts, ESEP
and Sports curriculum)
 Public-private partnership to Intensify
teachers’ housing advocacy
 Capacity building to improve learning
outcomes
S-T
Strategic Options:
 Strengthen career guidance and
counselling Program
 Intensify disaster and waste management
program in school
 Improve schools level of SBM Practice
 Improve the capacity of school heads in
managing resources
 Institute programs that will enhance schools
efficiency
W-O
Strategic Options:
 Improve teacher deployment system to
address the problem of disparity
 Use of technology to improve access
(ADM/ALS)
 Media advocacy to Intensify Information
and dissemination campaign for ECE and
other special programs
 Technical Assistance to strengthen
Instructional Supervision
 Institutionalize existing PAP’s in all school to
address efficiency
 Expand Mentoring and coaching program
 Capacity building to enhance teachers’
competence in special programs
 Improve teachers’ welfare and well-being
 Sustain talent pool among teachers
W-T
Strategic Options:
 Enhance absorptive capacity of schools
 Enhance teachers capacity to handle and
manage large classes
 Improve and align existing learning
materials to special curricula
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
ELEMENTARY
Gross/Apparent Intake
Rate
Net Intake Rate
Gross Enrolment Rate
Net Enrolment Rate
Cohort Survival Rate
Completion Rate
School Leaver Rate
No. of Dropouts
2011 (11-12)
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016 (16-17)
Annual Increase to
Meet the Target
NCR
121.29
117.03
112.78
108.52
104.26
100
-4.26
Total
Male
Female
NCR
Total
Male
Female
NCR
Total
Male
Female
NCR
Total
Male
Female
NCR
Total
Male
Female
NCR
Total
Male
Female
NCR
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
116.32
119.27
113.17
62.04
60.05
58.68
61.51
104.25
100.93
99.67
102.26
90.72
87.72
85.6
89.97
86.26
82.01
79.11
84.76
83.06
79.12
78.00
82.56
2.93
3.70
4.85
3.06
1328
813
425
112.06
115.42
110.54
69.63
67.64
66.94
69.21
105.40
102.08
101.74
103.81
92.57
89.58
88.48
91.98
88.61
86.00
82.89
87.41
85.45
81.51
81.40
85.05
2.35
3.00
3.88
2.45
1062
650
340
107.80
111.56
107.90
77.23
75.23
75.21
76.91
106.55
103.23
103.80
105.36
94.43
94.43
91.36
93.98
89.96
88.35
86.67
90.06
87.84
83.90
84.80
87.54
1.76
1.75
2.91
1.84
797
488
255
103.55
107.71
105.27
84.82
84.82
83.47
84.60
107.70
107.70
105.87
106.90
96.29
96.29
94.24
95.99
90.00
90.70
90.44
92.70
90.22
86.28
88.20
90.02
1.17
1.16
1.94
1.22
531
325
170
99.29
103.85
102.63
92.41
92.41
91.74
92.30
108.85
108.85
107.93
108.45
98.14
98.14
97.12
97.99
95.00
95.00
94.22
95.35
92.00
88.67
91.60
92.51
0.59
0.58
0.97
0.61
266
163
85
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
110
110
110
110
100
100
100
100
98
98
98
98
95
95
95
95
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-3.26
-3.85
-2.63
7.59
7.99
8.26
7.70
1.15
1.81
2.07
1.55
1.86
2.46
2.88
2.01
2.35
3.20
3.78
2.65
2.39
3.18
3.40
2.49
-0.59
-0.74
-0.97
-0.61
-265.60
-162.60
-85.00
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
National
TOTAL-NCR
Achievement Test
Grade 3
Total-QC
2011 (11-12)
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016 (16-17)
45.17
51.14
57.10
63.07
69.03
75
52.67
58.63
64.60
70.56
75.5
NCR-Reading English
46.96
59.13
42.80
49.24
55.68
62.12
68.56
75
QC-Reading English
44.41
50.63
56.85
63.06
69.28
75.5
NCR-Reading Filipino
50.68
55.54
60.41
65.27
70.14
75
QC-Reading Filipino
52.20
56.86
61.52
66.18
70.84
75.5
NCR-English Grammar
42.07
48.66
55.24
61.83
68.41
75
QC-English Grammar
44.66
50.83
57.00
63.16
69.33
75.5
NCR-Filipino Grammar
48.25
53.60
58.95
64.30
69.65
75
QC-Filipino Grammar
49.45
54.66
59.87
65.08
70.29
75.5
NCR-Science
42.44
48.95
55.46
61.98
68.49
75
QC-Science
44.23
50.48
56.74
62.99
69.25
75.5
NCR-Math
43.75
50.00
56.25
62.50
68.75
75
QC-Math
45.98
51.88
57.79
63.69
69.60
75.5
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
National
Achievement Test
2011 (11-12)
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016 (1617)
Annual Increase
to Meet the
Target
NCR - Total Test
57.08
60.66
64.25
67.83
71.42
75
3.58
QC - Total Test
54.26
58.51
62.76
67.83
72.08
75.5
4.25
58.33
Grade 6
Eng-NCR
56.80
60.44
64.08
67.72
71.36
75
3.64
English-QC
54.95
59.06
63.17
67.72
71.83
75.5
4.11
Math-NCR
51.99
56.59
61.19
65.80
70.40
75
4.60
Math-QC
47.99
53.49
58.99
65.80
71.30
75.5
5.50
Science-NCR
56.63
60.30
63.98
67.65
71.33
75
3.67
Science-QC
53.65
58.02
62.39
67.65
72.02
75.5
4.37
Filipino-NCR
64.61
66.69
68.77
70.84
72.92
75
2.08
Filipino-QC
63.05
65.54
68.03
70.84
73.33
75.5
2.49
HEKASI-NCR
55.38
59.30
63.23
67.15
71.08
75
3.92
HEKASI-QC
51.66
56.43
61.20
67.15
71.92
75.5
4.77
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
SECONDARY
Gross Enrolment
Rate
NCR
QC
Male
Female
Net Enrolment Rate NCR
Total
Male
Female
Cohort Survival Rate NCR
Total
Male
Female
Completion Rate
NCR
Total
Male
Female
School Leaver Rate NCR
Total
Male
Female
No. of Dropouts
Total
Male
Female
2011 (11-12)
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016 (1617)
Annual Increase
to Meet the
Target
98.43
98.74
99.06
99.37
99.69
100
0.31
96.79
95.3
98.3
78.00
74.69
71.16
78.30
84.47
83.60
80.18
87.04
79.80
79.11
74.95
83.27
5.77
6.01
7.41
4.59
8520
5489
3031
97.10
96.24
98.64
81.00
77.69
75.53
81.24
85.58
84.71
82.14
87.63
81.26
81.15
77.96
84.72
4.91
5.16
6.23
3.97
6816
4391
2425
97.42
97.18
98.98
84.00
84.00
79.90
84.18
86.68
86.00
84.11
88.22
83.45
83.19
80.97
86.16
4.06
4.30
5.05
3.35
5112
3293
1819
97.73
98.12
99.32
87.00
87.00
84.26
87.12
87.79
87.11
86.07
88.82
85.63
85.63
83.98
87.61
3.21
3.45
3.86
2.74
3408
2196
1212
98.05
99.06
99.66
90.00
90.00
88.63
90.06
89.00
88.21
88.04
89.41
86.00
87.67
86.99
89.05
2.00
2.59
2.68
2.12
1704
1098
606
100
100
100
93
93
93
93
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
0
0
0
0.64
0.94
0.34
3.00
3.66
4.37
2.94
1.11
1.28
1.96
0.59
2.04
2.18
3.01
1.45
-0.85
-0.90
-1.18
-0.62
-1704.00
-1097.80
-606.20
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
National
Achievement Test
Fourth Year
2011 (11-12)
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016 (1617)
Annual Increase
to Meet the
Target
NCR
49.32
54.46
59.59
64.73
69.86
75
5.14
QC
55.43
60.45
65.46
70.48
75.5
5.02
NCR-English
QC-English
50.41
49.01
36.58
38.57
44.26
45.96
51.95
53.34
59.63
60.73
67.32
68.11
75
75.5
7.68
7.39
NCR-Math
QC-Math
67.09
67.66
68.67
69.23
70.25
70.80
71.84
72.36
73.42
73.93
75
75.5
1.58
1.57
NCR-Science
QC-Science
39.14
40.42
46.31
47.44
53.48
54.45
60.66
61.47
67.83
68.48
75
75.5
7.17
7.02
NCR-Filipino
QC-Filipino
53.13
53.25
57.50
57.70
61.88
62.15
66.25
66.60
70.63
71.05
75
75.5
4.37
4.45
NCR-AP
QC-AP
53.20
54.92
57.56
59.04
61.92
63.15
66.28
67.27
70.64
71.38
75
75.5
4.36
4.12
NCR-C Thinking
QC-C Thinking
50.53
50.70
55.42
55.66
60.32
60.62
65.21
65.58
70.11
70.54
75
75.5
4.89
4.96
Priority
Areas
ACESS:
1. Congested
schools in CD
II
Data
22
elementary
and
secondary
schools are
congested
Situational Analysis
PPA’s
Target
Strategies
Deconges
t 22
schools
Use of
Technology





Rationalize the
assignment of
teachers


2. Inadequate
WATSAN
facilities
StudentTbowl Ratio =
101:1
Pupil-Tbowl
Ratio = 74:1
50% out of
142
schools
will have
adequate
TBowls
Enhance
enrolment in
SPA, ESEP in
CD I, III, & IV

Social
Marketing



Develop online learning system for ALS
and ADM
Procure online learning system
infrastructure
Capacity building for online ALS/ADM
personnel
Pilot implementation of online ALS/ADM
Procure interactive software to augment
MISOSA
Assign old vacant items to special
program teachers (ALS, SPED, Madrasah,
etc.)
Transfer old vacant teacher items in CD I,
III & IV to CD II
Encourage and assist schools like Quirino
HS, QCHS & E Rondon HS in establishing
SPA and ESEP
Conduct counselling and information
dissemination program to grade six
pupils in CD II schools to encourage them
to enrol in schools offering SPA and ESEP
Make representation with the LSB for the
construction of WATSAN
Look for establish partner ship with private
entity whose advocacy is health and
sanitation
Situational Analysis
Priority
Areas
QUALITY:
NAT results
below mastery
level
Data
GR 3 = 46.96%
GR 6 = 54.26%
Yr 4 = 50.41
Target
Increase
NAT MPS
to:
GR3=
60.98%
GR6=
64.63%
Yr4= 62.71
Strategies
Provide
technical
assistance to
strengthen
instructional
supervision
Enhance
teachers
competence
and
commitment
Improve and
align existing
learning
materials to
special
curricula
PPA’s









Train teachers on mentoring and
coaching
Require supervisors , school heads
and head teachers to conduct
instructional supervision to at least 3
times per week.
Require schools to conduct inset
which is focused on the TSNA and
NAT results
Mock NAT administration and
analysis
Train teachers on strategies for
teaching least mastered
competencies
Conduct TIP to all teachers
Teachers academy
Conduct workshop on the
development of NAT parallel test
bank
Conduct workshop on the
development of modules
Situational Analysis
Priority
Areas
Data
Target
Strategies
PPA’s
EFFICIENCY:
High drop-out
Rate
.47 % Elem
5.62 % HS
Decrease
drop-out
rate by
.25% in
Elem and
2% in HS
Strengthen guidance
and counselling
program

Institutionalize PAP,s
Institute programs
that will enhance
schools efficiency



High incidence
of malnutrition
12,501
pupils are
severely
wasted
Reduce
severely
wasted
pupils by
35%
Improve the wellbeing of pupils

Orient and train the guidance
counsellors and guidance
teachers on the different
modalities of
preventing/reducing drop-out
Train teachers on effective
classroom management
Conduct search for best
school DORP and provide
yearly budget to this activity
Harmonize GAM, PEPT and
ALS A & E implementation
Implement health and
nutrition programs in schools
such as:
 Feeding program
 Quarterly dental and
medical check-up
 Deworming
 Gulayan sa paaralan
Situational Analysis
Priority
Areas
GOVERNANCE
Data
142 SH
Target
142 SH
Strategies
PPA’s
Enhance
capacity of
school heads in
managing school
resources


Principals academy
Policy Governance for
education/Temasek
Improve schools
level of SBM
Practice

Close monitoring and evaluation of
SBM implementation/SBM Level of
Practice
SBM Grant

Intensify disaster
and waste
management
program in
school

Quarterly conduct of disaster
management training
Improve teachers
welfare and wellbeing

Housing committee to screen
qualified teacher beneficiaries of
socialized housing
Enhance internal
efficiency

ICT supported systems and
processes for internal efficiency
Proposed FY
2014 Budget
DIVISION OF QUEZON CITY
Total = P 4,472,918,704
COMPARISON, CY 2013 & 2014 BUDGETS
CY 2013
PS
CY 2014
4,112,033,000
4,154,199,561
MOOE
360,885,704
360,885,704
TOTAL
4,472,918,704
4,515,085,265
* % increase= 0.94% of CY 2013 budget
INCREASE
42,166,561
42,166,561
Programs, Projects, Activities (PPAs)
Support to Special Science Elementary Schools . . . . .
Php
736,859.00
Support to Regional Science High School . . . . . . . . . .
3,666,000.00
Support to Special Program for the Arts . . . . . . . . . . . .
500,000.00
Support for SPED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,882,000.00
Support for ALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10,983,257.00
MADRASAH Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,272,000.00
SBM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,341,837.00
Health & Nutrition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4,387,300.00
Engineering and Science Education Program . . . . . . .
963,535.00
Alternative Delivery Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
389,300.00
Support to Multi-Grade Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
29,758,764.00
TOTAL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Php 65,880,852.00
“THE BEST WAY TO
PREDICT THE FUTURE IS TO
CREATE IT”
-Peter Drucker
The Division Planning Team:
Dr. Corazon C. Rubio, CESO VI
Dr. Betty C. Cavo
Engr. Araceli T. Liwanagan
Ms. Cecil Diaz
Mr. Juan C. Obierna
Schools Division Superintendent
Asst. Schools Div. Superintendent
Supervising Educ. Program Specialist
Budget Officer
Public Schools District Supervisor