UN Guidelines for Consumer Protection “… to address imbalances in economic terms, educational levels, and bargaining power “… create market conditions to provide consumers with greater choice at lower prices. “… adequate information to make informed choices … individual wishes and needs “… protected from contractual abuses as one-sided standard contracts, exclusion of essential rights in contracts, and unconscionable conditions of credit by sellers. National Credit Act 1 To promote a fair and non-discriminatory marketplace for access to consumer credit To promote responsible credit granting and use and for that purpose to prohibit reckless credit granting; To provide for debt re-organisation in cases of over-indebtedness Financial crisis, impact of the NCA and role of debt counselling March 2010 National Credit Act Impact since implementation? Improved disclosure, contracts Change credit provider behaviour Legal action, repossession Credit bureau conduct & records Enforcement (Rudco; housing scams; Counsellors etc) Impact on cost, debt counselling … Interest & fees Agreements & quotes 3 National Credit Act Credit Bureaus National Credit Register Enforcement & debt collection National Credit Regulator Departments of Finance, Housing & Social Development Department of Trade & Industry Board of Directors Executive Office CEO, COO Registrations Credit Bureau Regulation 4 Complaints & Call Centre Statistics & Research 100 staff members R70 million pa budget Investigations & Prosecutions Consumer awareness & education Debt Counselling monitoring &support Consumer Credit Market in South Africa Credit Providers Credit Bureaus 18 million Credit Consumers R1.1 trillion consumer credit Credit Providers = 4,120 Branches = 33.500 1,571 Debt Counsellors 5 Credit Provider Statistics Overview of consumer credit market Approximately R1.1trillion consumer credit, provided to 17 million consumers & consisting of 36m accounts Registration 4120 credit providers with 33,500 branches 11 credit bureaus, managed 22 audits, 16,8 m data removals Outstanding balances Un-Secured, 4.18% Short Term , 0.06% Facilities, 12.01% Secured(Other), 19.78% Mortgages, 63.97% Mortgages biggest category, “other secured” next biggest (m/vehicles & furniture) Banks 90% of total, non-bank vehicle 3%, retailers 3% Banks Gross loans outstanding Banks 90% Motor dealers 3% Retailers 3% 6 approx R1.1 trillion (exclude micro-lenders & other small providers) Accounts 19 m 286,000 15,8 m 90% Statistical overview of the consumer credit market in South Africa Statistics from Credit Bureaus & Credit Providers (including banks) Dramatic decline in gross credit granted Quarterly disbursements by type - 2009-Q1 R51.7bn credit granted in 2009Q1 to 3.9m agreements (R102bn in 2007Q4) 15 Billions 47% of credit in Gauteng, WC =15% & KZN =13 % 20 10 5 0 Mortgages Ongoing decline in quarterly credit granted (loan book remains flat) Un-Secured Short Term Credit Facilities Trend in disbursements over year 90 Most significant declines in mortgages & motor vehicles 80 70 Billions Middle / low income products performing better Other Credit Agreements 60 50 -16% 40 - 8% 30 20 - 22% 10 0 2008Q2 8 2008Q3 2008Q4 2009Q1 Analysis of decline by type - mortgages & other Mortgage disbursements consistently down Number of accounts - Mortgages 90 000 80 000 70 000 For Q4’08, 52,000 mortgages granted, at 60 000 50 000 R27bn; For Q1’09, down to 36,000 19% 40 000 30 000 21% 20 000 mortgages at R19bn 30% 10 000 0 2008Q2 Decline in other products less significant 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 R 100 000 000 000 R 10 000 000 000 9 Non-bank vehicle financiers Retailers Other credit providers 2008-Q2 R 71 441 412 503 R 7 590 792 297 R 3 248 491 011 R 3 342 576 539 2008-Q3 R 62 380 941 745 R 3 920 472 859 R 3 296 974 148 R 2 729 071 722 2008-Q4 R 54 954 750 229 R 3 825 018 702 R 4 570 058 406 R 2 725 428 406 2009-Q1 R 43 033 877 946 R 3 529 893 440 R 3 174 245 605 R 2 046 117 784 2008-Q3 2008-Q4 2009-Q1 2009Q1 -21% -19% 31% 2008Q2 Banks 2008-Q2 2008Q4 Gross disbursements per quarter - Mortgages, Rbn Credit granted by industry type R 1 000 000 000 2008Q3 2008Q3 2008Q4 2009Q1 Applications, rejection rates Disbursement by segment Q2/Q1 Q3/Q2 Q4/Q3 Bank -5% -13% -11% Non-bank Vehicle Finance-2% -48% -2% Other 1% -17% -13% Retail -10% -3% 53% Consumer demand for credit fairly static Gradual increase in banks’ rejection rates, (41% in 2008Q1 to 45% in 2008Q4); Applications received vs Applications rejected Greater increase in Big 4 banks’ rejection rates (50% - 58% - 53% in qtrs to 2009Q1) 3 000 000 2 500 000 2 000 000 1 500 000 1 000 000 500 000 - Significant contraction in demand for credit 2008Q1 2008Q2 2008Q3 Applications received 10 Banks Non Banks financiers other Retailers 41% 57% 46% 43% Rejected/Received 2008Q2 42% 60% 46% 48% 2009Q1 Applications rejected Decline in demand for credit! Rejection rates 2008Q1 2008Q4 2008Q3 44% 52% 47% 44% 2008Q4 45% 51% 35% 43% Credit Bureau Statistics & impaired records 18 million credit active consumers. For nearly 2 million people, credit records deteriorated over last 2 years Banks, retailers, doctors, dentists, municipalities … all affected Ongoing increase in consumers with impaired records, from 36% in June 2007 to 44% in September 2009 Nearly 50 000 people/month being added to the “impaired" category 11 Impact of financial crisis on consumers Special research projects Distribution of credit across different income groups Lowest gross exposure in Gr1, but more significant relative to income. Gr 2 & Gr 3 greatest levels of debt stress. Gr 4 also significant, but greater ability to adjust. With time, short & medium term debt levels reducing automatically Reduction in income as much a risk as job loss Protection of housing greatest priority 13 Mortgage & vehicles greater threats given payment term & loss in asset value if repossessed Debt profile & vulnerability of different groups Group 1 = informal sector, domestic workers, social grant recipients & agricultural sector o o o Low credit exposure, mainly furniture & unsecured. BUT – more significant relative to income! Position may be improving if new credit limited Often unaware of protective measures, e.g. UIF, insurance or counselling Group 2 = Entry level workers in public & private sector, earning R1.8k to R6.1k/m o o 14 Significant exposure, both unsecured (< 3 years), vehicles & mortgages Short term credit exposure ‘selfcorrecting’ over time, but mortgages & vehicles require assistance Group 3 = middle income, R6k to R17k/m o o High level of exposure to all products & high debt stress Most vulnerable, to debt stress & loss of house if affected by either job loss or reduced income Group 4 = high income, R17k/m + o o high credit exposure, mainly mortgages, vehicles & credit facilities. Also 2nd properties. Income reduction biggest threat. Greater ability to resolve own problems. But often resorts to DC assistance / protection. Policy response - consumers Income Risk of job losses Debt stress Potential debt fall-out Policy response ? Gr 1 - low 0 to R1,800 Moderate Low to moderate Low, getting better Gr 2 R1,800 – R6,100 High Moderate to high Moderate/ high, debt improving Awareness & education on protective measures & behaviour change Gr 3 – R6,000 – R17,000 Moderate to high High High Gr 4 – R17,000 + Low, but risk of income loss High, but have options Moderate Low income groups least aware of protective measure, whether counselling, UIF or others. Awareness programme important – also on ‘selfprotection strategies’ 15 Access to support & debt counselling Protection of primary residence Debt counselling huge role in resolving cases of reduced income –legal problems major obstacle Debt counselling little value in case of job loss, no income to service debt … some form of personal bankruptcy, while protecting housing? Debt Counselling Debt Counselling A new profession was born in 2007 The aim is to assist the over indebted consumer For some role players in the credit market this was an unwanted baby DEBT COUNSELLING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH AFRICA 17 Importance & role of debt counselling Role of debt counselling, in the context of the lack of appropriate personal insolvency mechanisms in SA. o o Not have appropriate “personal insolvency mechanisms”. US, UK & EU have range of different mechanisms for personal insolvency. The mechanisms in SA are outdated and ineffective. As result, when debt stress occurs there is no effective mechanisms to resolve the issues, or for creating a “settlement” in which the obligations of the consumer and the demands of different credit providers are reconciled. Negative social impact of debt stress o o o 18 No mechanism to resolve a personal financial crisis and enable an individual to get another chance. Household income is permanently reduced through debt payments. Household needs not met and social welfare receipts are diverted to debt servicing. School fees not being paid, arrears on municipal service payments and a multitude of related areas. Causes of debt stress & implications in the current environment Borrowers o o Reckless & aspirational borrowing, External factors – loss of income / relationships breaking up / death and sickness Credit providers & consequences of hard selling o o o Hard selling by credit providers contribute to over-indebtedness. Call centre agents & misleading disclosure = consumers taking on credit which they cannot afford. Resist implementation of debt counselling Job losses + reduced income = debt stress o o o o Debt counsellors confronted with huge demand. Additional impact of the financial crisis. Job losses + significant reductions in income. Reduced overtime; sales commissions; year-end bonuses etc. Even people who were not over-indebted are affected. Staff of credit providers also under pressure (sales targets, collection targets, clients …). Challenge is to recognise these realities, and to find mechanisms to reconcile the conflicting claims. Engagement between debt counsellors and credit providers critical. 19 Debt Counselling current position Applications Consumer Applications 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 R 180 Amount (R's) R 160 Monthly Distributions Monthly Payments 42,000 consumers R 140 R 120 R 100 R 80 R 60 R 40 R 20 R0 May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 Month 20 Jan-10 Dec-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Sep-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Jun-09 Apr-09 May-09 Mar-09 Jan-09 Feb-09 Dec-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Sep-08 Jul-08 Month Millions 42,000 consumers making payment = R150 million pm Aug-08 0 Jun-08 Number of Applications 120000 Apr-08 140,000 applications for counselling, growing at 9,000 pm (Feb 154 000) 140000 May-08 1,571 debt counsellors registered, and 5 independent payment distributors 160000 Backlogs, reasons & risk to debt counselling Interpretation of NCA & Magistrates Court procedures exploited by industry to prevent magistrates court hearings from taking place o Credit providers exploited every area of uncertainty to oppose hearings. NDMA not implemented. Delays in providing documents, cause overruns on time limits. Opposing application of certain section of Act, eg 90(2)(n) and 103(5). Irregular terminations & repossessions. o But, major improvement recently, with banks taking a more constructive approach o And, 1000’s of consumers have already benefited both from debt counselling and from internal restructuring by banks NCR’s Application for Declaratory Order, 21 August. o clarified number of issues; certain issues not addressed; some complications Still problems. Require amendments to NCA & Regulations. 21 Consumers Case studies Consumer Net. Income Distributable Amount Contractual Instalments Credit agreements Total exposure Reason for overindebtedness A Auditor R13 539 R7 000 R21 153 16 R300 407 Excessive family spending B Medical doctor R18 503 R11 357 R63 423 10 R1.4m Business collapsed C Ex-employee of bank R59 000 R43 000 R87 568 19 R6.1 m Irresponsible lending D Property Trader R36 315 R19 225 R200 000 15 R22.3 m Business collapsed E Nurse R5 155 R5 845 10 R80 000 Irresponsible lending F Clerk, spouse unemployed R5 512 R500 R4 500 10 R46 000 Irresponsible lending G (Taxi owner) R25 000 R17 000 R42 000 15 R1.6m Living beyond his means 22 Nil Challenges in resolving cases 1. Certificates of balance, timelines, administration process 2. Reckless credit 3. Reconcile claims of different creditors 4. Interest, term extension & capital write-off … consent 5. Repayment arrangements 23 PAYMENTS Payments Per Product Type of Product Home Loans = 30% of payments Other 4% Vehicle & Asset Finance = 25% 12% Personal Loan All Legal 5% Furniture Banks = 74% of payments . 1% Store Card 3% Overdraft All 3% 2% Cheque All 25% VAF All 30% Home Loan All 15% Credit Card All 0 5000000 1E+07 1.5E+07 2E+07 Amount (R's) 24 2.5E+07 3E+07 3.5E+07 4E+07 Problems: Debt counsellor behaviour Majority of debt counsellors working very hard, under great pressure. But also a number of “bad apples” … o o o o Taking clients fees, doing no work Refusing to use PDAs, misappropriating client repayments Restructuring proposals unprofessional and meaningless Confrontational with credit providers, running to courts when consensual solutions possible o Time-lines not met; Bad administration (e.g. account numbers); o Delegate counselling to unregistered employees Biggest risk: debt counselling becoming a payment holiday o Creditors must terminate & enforce if not comply with process, no payments made 25 Problems: Credit providers Certificates of Balance: not provided or late & inaccurate Unrealistic payment expectations. Unsecured creditors unreasonable. Competitions between products. Can’t find ‘settlements’. Not cancel old debit orders. New restructured debit orders thus ‘rejected’ Preventing hearings in magistrates courts from taking place Practices of collection departments & outsourced legal representation. Not adjusting account details. 26 Problems: Payment distribution Payment distribution by counsellors not acceptable. o Debt counsellors neither trained nor equipped to do payment distribution. Conflicts of interest and huge threat to integrity of process o Compliance with Reserve Bank rules Many problems created by information supplied by debt counsellors. And bank system problems. Volumes and administrative complexity a challenge, but the system works. 27 NCR implemented a range of interventions to support debt counselling … 28 Training & support: Accredited specialised training institutions & provided initial material. Implemented before effective date of Act. Also arranged follow up courses & workshops, to support debt counsellors & improve expertise. NCR capacity: NCR appointed special call centre agents & complaints officers specialising in debt counselling – to deal with problems, intervene when things go wrong, protect homes from repossession wherever possible. Payment distribution: NCR accredited specialised payment distribution agencies. To separate debt counselling from payment distribution. To limit risk of fraud & theft of consumer payments. Audits & inspections: Performing ongoing audits & inspections on debt counsellors, PDAs and credit providers (including banks) o University of Pretoria review to identify problems o Audits on PDA’s o 552 on-site visits + 65 investigations NCR Task Team to investigate problems o Banks o Debt counsellors o Payment arrangements Challenges: Magistrates Court process Delays = risk to the banking sector + incentive for consumers to use it as a payment holiday … Differences between requirements of different courts = increase cost, complexity & confusion 29 Latest developments Despite these challenges, debt counselling already made a significant contribution in creating a mechanism to ‘mediate’ between consumers and multiple creditors, & limiting losses through repossession of houses & cars BUT: cannot allow consumers to abuse process for payment holiday!! 30 Concluding comments Impact of NCA: curbed excessive credit extension, creating basis for lower but more sustainable credit growth, curbing social cost of reckless lending Debt counselling – reconcile claims of different credit providers, to create a sustainable repayment stream on non-performing consumer o While minimizing social cost, o BUT, significant implementation challenges Fall-out from financial crisis still increasing, driven by reductions in income as much as loss of employment. Contraction in domestic credit a significant negative impact, aggravating domestic position In policy response, important to focus not just on protection of industry, but also on protection of households, o noting that crisis impacts differently on different consumer groups o the longer the downturn lasts, the more households with high debt burdens run out of options 31 Thank You ! 32 www.ncr.org.za