Giving change a chance – Enterprise Project Management @ EPA Disclaimer: This presentation contains the personal views of the presenter and is not an official representation of Environmental Protection Agency policies, practices, or viewpoints. Giving change a chance – Enterprise Project Management @ EPA 21-year Navy career 18-years in the private sector Demoed Microsoft Merchant Server onstage with Bill Gates for its launch (now Commerce Server 2009) Several CIO, CTO, and CSO roles with manufacturing and technology sector companies Founded Judd’s Online Launched Martha Stewart, Reba McEntire, Ford Motor Company, American Diabetes Association, many others Joined EPA in 2009 PMP, MBA E-Business PhD candidate in IT specializing in Project Management MCITP in EPM with Project Server 2007 Focused on helping the public sector improve IT project outcomes that directly impact change and transparency http://richardlwarren.info No agency-wide EPM context Office of Water commissioned a maturity assessment in 2007 Robbins Gioia conducted the survey and assessment Not favorable Not favorably received Led to the formation of a PMO for OW in 2008 No agency-wide EPM context Office of Water commissioned a maturity assessment in 2007 Robbins Gioia conducted the survey and assessment Not favorable Not favorably received Led to the formation of a PMO for OW in 2008 Still no agency-wide PMO or EPM initiative Only 2 of the 15 EPA “offices” have a PMO Only tools have been Project Professional 2003/2007 Spotty implementation of less than 12 copies within the Office of Water Inconsistent usage with little formal training on the product Low PMP certification % – even within the PMO Desire for transparency Bipartisan desire to make governance visible to public, Administration, and Congress Mandate for accountability Office of Management & Budget, Federal CIO “More than half of all major IT projects funded in FY08 ($25.2B) are poorly planned, performing poorly, or both. That’s more than 35% of the federal IT budget.” Applying Standish Group CHAOS 2009 figures: Only $8.1B of that investment succeeds Fully $11.1B is either late, over budget and/or less than optimally functional A miserable $6B is wasted altogether (failures except for lessons-learned) Marginal improvement in ‘at risk’ fraction of $17.2B per year is possible with EPM Increasing scrutiny OMB focus on cutting waste is focused on PM practices and personnel 120-day window for improvement recommendations expires in just 7 days – 10/26/2010 Increasing scrutiny OMB focus on cutting waste is focused on PM practices and personnel 120-day window for improvement recommendations expires in just 7 days – 10/26/2010 Critical elements of success: Clearly defined goals and sufficient planning to achieve them Executive sponsorship Team readiness Platform availability Organizational tailoring & customization Establish agency standard Propose a prototype that would eventually lead to a standard Start-to-finish: 7 months Architecture nobody liked Didn’t integrate well with other enterprise choices (Oracle, Lotus Notes) Used versions not yet approved for internal agency use (SQL Server 2008, SharePoint v.Anything, Windows Server 2008, SQL Server 2008, etc.) Executive buy-in it.usaspending.gov By agency/department By investment Use same metrics & measures – provide a “common view” irrespective of investment level Believable? IT Projects with 17-year schedules and budgets? Heat or Light? Team readiness PM basics Mulcahy PMP Exam prep (6th ed.) Project & Project Server training MSProjectExperts 5-day course (28 PDU’s for the few PMP’s we have…;-) Very hands-on Hampered by lack of their 2010 book on Project Server Team readiness PM basics Mulcahy PMP Exam prep (6th ed.) Project & Project Server training MSProjectExperts 5-day course (28 PDU’s for the few PMP’s we have…;-) Very hands-on Hampered by lack of their 2010 book on Project Server SaaS as an accelerator Early TAP exposure Hosted at ProjectHosts.com Prototyped in the Release Candidate First Project Server 2010 customer – more than a little unusual for the public sector Three instances (Landman model) Development, Training, and Production Security-ready (FISMA) Already in use for two months before the “approval” for the prototype was granted…we all have our schedules… Organizational tailoring & customization EPA-specific organization EPA-specific SDLC implemented as project templates tailored to investment level EPA- and Office-specific site provisioning Generic EPA project sites Office of Water project sites Driven by investment level Organizational tailoring & customization EPA-specific organization EPA-specific SDLC implemented as project templates tailored to investment level EPA- and Office-specific site provisioning Generic EPA project sites Office of Water project sites Driven by investment level Organizational tailoring & customization EPA-specific organization EPA-specific SDLC implemented as project templates tailored to investment level EPA- and Office-specific site provisioning Generic EPA project sites Office of Water project sites Driven by investment level Organizational tailoring & customization EPA-specific organization EPA-specific SDLC implemented as project templates tailored to investment level EPA- and Office-specific site provisioning Generic EPA project sites Office of Water project sites Driven by investment level Organizational tailoring & customization EPA-specific organization EPA-specific SDLC implemented as project templates tailored to investment level EPA- and Office-specific site provisioning (ongoing) Generic EPA project sites Office of Water project sites Driven by investment level Barriers Enterprise architecture Heavy organizational enterprise relationship with Oracle favors Primavera, but only at the platform level (not at the PM practitioner, executive, or participant levels) Unwillingness to federate AD to provide ESSO and ease firewall rule restrictions for remote desktop access to hosted solutions Strong anti-Microsoft bias and very slow technology adoption process/schedule Lotus Notes for messaging lacks both Sharepoint awareness and calendar/task updating Just now upgrading to Office 2007 on the desktop, still running XP SP3 Product shortcomings Excel services in a hosted environment cannot provide direct database connectivity (OLAP, yes, database, no) Only workarounds are to not use SSRS or have remote desktop access Doesn’t impact local installations of Project Server 2010, just SaaS implementations Entrenchment With the initial round of training complete, foster daily usage to entrench learning and best practice adoption Extension Extend our use of Project Server to contractors through sub-projects (which is where our SaaS strategy really pays off by not having them inside the WAN) Expand the community of users upward to managers and executives who will discover ease of use and consistency with broader federal project management standards and grading criteria Integration Begin to offer linkages between IT.USASpending.gov and public views of the projects upon which their data is based – full drill-down support Produce XML feeds needed by IT.USASpending.gov as reports from Project Server to begin with First things first Tackle current-project PM first Tackle investment selection either as a follow-on or with a separate effort Use the customization/tailoring process as a discussion enabler for lowmaturity adopters Provides a constrained framework for process-focused discussions Allows strategic discussions to evolve from the tactical, bottom-up customization discussions Try before you buy Excellent risk mitigation strategy for companies and organizations that may not be ready to make an investment plunge but need to get started on the path to EPM (and just don’t yet know it…;-) Public-Sector Project Management David W. Wirick ISBN: 978-0-470-48731 Public-Sector Project Management David W. Wirick ISBN: 978-0-470-48731 Researching the Value of Project Management Janice Thomas, PhD Mark Mullaly, PMP ISBN: 978-1-933890-49-4 Public-Sector Project Management David W. Wirick ISBN: 978-0-470-48731 Researching the Value of Project Management Janice Thomas, PhD Mark Mullaly, PMP ISBN: 978-1-933890-49-4 Managing Public Sector Projects David S. Kassel ISBN: 978-1420088731 EPM @ EPA