Garware Polyester Ltd. Aurangabad
1
Company Profile
2
Unit Profile
Garware Polyester Limited is the pioneer in the field of polyester film.
The Company has developed various types of films and is exporting to
57 countries in World. The company has excellent infrastructure and
strong commitment to Safety, Quality, Energy Conservation ,
Environment preservation and R&D.
Winner of Highest Export Award-Plex council (Govt. of India, Ministry
of Commerce) since last 20 years.
Winner of “Energy Efficient Unit- 2010” by CII.
Winner of 1st award in 2009 in “Plastic Category” on National Level
(NECA)
Winner of 2nd award for excellence in Energy Conservation and
Management in 5th Maharashtra State Level Award competition in year
2008 in category “Other Industries“.
The company has set up cross functional Energy Conservation Cell,
which focuses on energy management and improvement.
The company recognizes the importance of energy conservation, not
only to improve the bottom line but also to help the environment and
society at large for sustainable growth.
3
Process Flow Diagram
4
5
6
ENCON
7
Energy Management Policy
Garware Polyester Limited plays vital role for producing variety of products
with high level of quality standard and prioritizes energy value for the final
product.
Our mission is :
To produce products with minimum use of energy.
Use of cleaner technologies wherever possible and ensuring efficient and
uninterrupted supply of utilities to plants.
This, we plan by following ways.
Efficient energy generation, utilization and distribution.
Continuous evaluation of performance of plant equipments and processes to
achieve most efficient, high standard quality products.
Targeting the under-performance equipments and processes for improvement.
Monitoring and targeting the specific energy consumption to achieve best
possible as compared to past performance.
Use of internal and external expertise to achieve targeted performance.
Train employees and implement ideas of energy conservation thorough
small ENCON teams.
M S Adsul
Director-Technical
8
ENCON Team Structure
DIRECTOR - TECHNICAL
ENGINEERING HEAD
DY. GENERAL MANAGER
CENTRAL UTILITY
ENCON TEAM
FILM PLANT
ENCON TEAM
POLYMERISATION
PLANT
ENCON TEAM
CENTRAL
UTILITY
ENCON TEAM
CHIKALTHANA
PLANT
9
Energy Monitoring
•
1.Daily
Energy report is generated by Central Utility on daily basis and
circulated to all concerned.
•
2.Monthly
Based on daily energy report, monthly energy report is prepared and
circulated to all concerned. Comparison & analysis of energy
consumption is done with previous months and deviations are studied
for reduction in Energy Bills.
•
3.Yearly
Yearly reports generated from data collected as above.
Specific energy consumptions are calculated and targets are set for
future.
Major ENCON projects are listed in annual report.
10
ENCON Methodology
1. Identification of high energy consuming equipments/processes
through internal & external audits.
2. Elimination of inefficient equipment & substitution with new &
efficient technologies.
3. Continuous energy performance monitoring through statistical
analysis.
4. Brainstorming in small group activities for innovative ideas.
5. Reduction in Carbon foot print & implementation of green projects.
6. Benchmarking with other competitors.
7. Involvements of employees through suggestion schemes &
competitions.
11
1. Failure losses - Breakdown loss
2. Setup / adjustment losses
3. Cutting blade loss
4. Start up loss
5. Minor stoppage / Idling loss.
6. Speed loss - operating at
low speeds.
7. Defect / rework loss
8. Scheduled downtime loss
9. Management loss
10. Operating motion loss
11. Line organization loss
12. Logistic loss
13. Measurement and adjustment loss
14. Material Yield loss
15. Energy loss
16. Die, jig and tool breakage
loss
12
ENCON IMPLEMENTED PROJECTS
13
ENCON PROJECTS 2008-09
S. No.
Achievement of energy savings per year basis
Project description
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Provision of VFD for VAHP Cooling tower
Fan.Central Utility, Waluj.
Convertion of VAHP m/c.from single effect
to double effect. Central Utility, Waluj.
Commissioning of 40TR & 100TR VCC Chiller
m/c. C.U. Waluj.
Convertion of Boiler from furnace oil to Biocoal firing. Central utility, Waluj.
Provision of cooling water to poly plant
cutter instead of chilled water. Poly Plant,
Waluj
Optimisation of ejector cooling tower. Poly
Plant, Waluj.
Palletizing return water pump replaced by
high efficiency pump. Film Plant, CHK.
K.G.Khosla compressor operation stopped
by taking portable compressor in line. Film
Plant, CHK.
Sub Total
Electricity
F.Oil
(Lakhs (kWh)
(KL)
0.52
Investment
incurred on the
project (Rs.
Lakhs)
Others
Total
savings in
(Rs. Lakhs)
0
0
1.81
0.20
0
1123.12
0
207.55
60.00
-10.58
313.60
0
20.91
4.00
0.00
231.52
0
42.78
0.20
0
528
0
97.57
0.50
5.04
0
0
17.64
0.50
0.35
0
0
1.23
0.30
1.20
0
0
4.20
0.00
-3.48
2196.24
0.00
393.70
65.7014
ENCON PROJECTS 2009-10
Year of S. No.
Project description
Commissi
oning of
the
projects
2009-10
1 Installation of high efficiency screw chillers
2 Commissioning of H.P.Ejectort
Achievement of energy savings per year basis
Electricity
F.Oil
Others
(Lakhs (kWh)
(KL)
-12.60
0
1130
580.00
0
0
Total
savings in
(Rs. Lakhs)
219.09
138.97
Investment
incurred on the
project (Rs.
Lakhs)
71.00
80.00
3
Optimisation of compressed air system.
3.03
0.00
0
12.42
0.00
4
Optimisation of chilled water system.
3.03
0.00
0
12.42
0.00
5
Provision of VFD to boiler F.D. fan
1.34
0
0
5.49
2.00
6
1.00
0
0
4.10
0.00
7
Replacement of 150 H.P. blower motor with
75 H.P. motor
VFD to biopeq feed pump in ETP
0.67
0
0
2.75
2.00
8
Aeropeq blower speed reduction in E.T.P.
0.58
0
0
2.38
0.08
9
VFD to C.W. return sump in Polyplant
0.67
0
0
2.75
2.00
10
EIL heater efficiency improvement.
0.00
70
0
16.77
10.00
-2.28
1780.00
0.00
417.14
167.08
Sub Total
15
ENCON PROJECTS 2010-11
Year of
S. No.
Commissionin
g of the
projects
1
2
Project description
EIL heater efficiency optimization.
Central Utility, Waluj.
Polyplant cutter cooling tower.
Achievement of energy savings per Investment
year basis
incurred on
the project
Electricity F.Oil Others
Total
savings in (Rs. Lakhs)
(Lakhs
(MT)
(Rs. Lakhs)
(kWh)
0.00
69.3
0
15.43
11.00
7.2
0.00
0
29.38
15.00
0.00
51.04
0
11.37
0.00
2.38
0.00
0
9.69
0.00
0.00
1800.00
0
91.26
332.41
6
Direct transfer of condensate from
Glycol Recovery to De-aerator.
Stopping of MDO chilled water
system and hook up from Central
Utility.
Commissioning of Biomass fired
Boiler.
p.f. incentive at Waluj.
0.00
0.00
0
169.30
0.00
7
p.f.incentive at Chikalthana
0.00
0.00
0
76.69
0.00
8
Use of emulsified F.O. for Thermic
fluid heater in CHK plant
Provision of VFD to TDO oven
blower.in CHK plant
Secondary hot oil pump impeller
trimming in CHK plant.
Sub Total
0.55
0.00
0
2.26
1.50
0.24
0.00
0
0.97
1.50
0.10
0
0
0.40
0.10
10.47
1920.34
0.00
406.76
361.51
3
4
5
2010-2011
9
10
16
ENCON PROJECTS 2011-12
Year of
S.
Commissio No.
ning of the
projects
2011-2012
Project description
Achievement of energy savings per year basis
Electricity
F.Oil
(Lakhs
(kWh)
0.00
(KL)
69.3
0
18.04
11.00
0
0.00
448
21.50
8.00
3 Direct transfer of condensate from Glycol recovery to deaerator, Waluj.
4 Conversion of Aluminum blade to FRP blade for cooling tower
fan (Waluj)
0.00
0.00
200
9.60
0.00
0.25
0.00
0
1.10
1.00
5 Provision of booster compressor for instrument air system
(Waluj)
2.52
0.00
0
10.99
1.00
6 p.f. Incentive at waluj
7 p.f. Incentive at Chikalthana
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0
190.44
84.95
0.00
0.00
8 Commissioning of 110 TR chiller & reducing VAHP load (Waluj)
-5.91
0.00
1000
22.23
12.00
9 Operation of separate 13TR chiller for Kappa cooler stopped by
transferring load to primary chilled water system. (Chikalthana)
1.85
0.00
0
8.06
8.06
10 Pneumatic booster installed & stopped operation of portable
compressor. (Chikalthana)
0.34
0
0
1.46
0.50
11 Return water pump for twin screw vacuum system operation
stopped by using gravity flow system. (Chikalthana)
0.17
0
0
0.73
0.00
12 Energy Efficient lighting used in L#2 TDO & slitter area. Total –
45 Nos (Chikalthana)
0.08
0
0
0.34
0.34
13 Rotary feeder installed at L#1 instead ventury system.
(Chikalthana)
14 Replacement of 125W HPMV lamps by 23W CFL-60 nos.
(Waluj)
1.01
0
0
4.39
0.50
0.27
0
0
1.17
0.50
1 Thermal Fluid Heater (EIL) efficiency optimization. Central
Utility, (Waluj)
2
Waste heat recovery from boiler flue gases.(Waluj)
Sub Total
0.58
Others
Investment
incurred
on
Total
savings in the project
(Rs. Lakhs) (Rs. Lakhs)
69.30 1648.00 375.00
42.90
17
ENCON PROJECTS 2012-13
Achievement of Annual energy savings in 2012-13 Investm
Year of
Commission
S.NO.
ing of the
projects
2012-2013
Project description
ent
incurred
Fuels*
Total on the
savings
project
F.Oil
Gas
Total
in (Rs.
(Lakhs Coal
Rs.
(lakh (fuel) in
Lakhs) (Lakhs)
kWh) (tonnes) (kL)
3
Nm ) (MTOE)
Electrici
ty
1
Optimisation of Cooling tower pumps (at waluj)
7.35
0
0
0
0
44.06
0.5
2
Optimisation of chilled water pumps. (At waluj)
5.37
0
0
0
0
26.99
0.5
3
Optimisation of Therminol pumps. (at waluj)
3.1
0
0
0
0
19.2
0.75
4
Power factor incentive (at waluj)
0
0
0
0
0
277.66
0
5
Replacement of Cooling tower fan blades with FRP blades (at
waluj)
0.15
0
0
0
0
0.76
0.75
6
Complete stoppage of FO Boiler (at waluj)
0
0
38.4
0
36.66
12.83
0
7
Replacement of Condenser water pump by low head.
(chikalthana)
1.34
0
0
0
0
6.75
0.45
8
Provision of Rotary feeder for chips conveying instead of
ventury system. (chikalthana)
1.01
0
0
0
0
5.07
1.2
9
Water Emulsification of furnace oil. (chikalthana)
0
0
81.66
0
77.96
27.3
9.5
10
Twin screw return water pump stopped by using gravity flow
system. (chikalthana)
0.25
0
0
0
0
1.26
0
11
L#2 AHU No-3 water pump replaced by energy efficient pump.
(chikalthana)
0.42
0
0
0
0
2.11
0.2
12
Power factor incentive (at chikalthana)
0
0
0
0
0
98.87
0
16.68
0
120.06
0
SUB TOTAL
114.63 500.5
18
13.85
ENCON SUMMARY - LAST 5 YRS
YEAR
No. of
Measures
implemente
d
(i)
Investment
made
(Rs.
Lakhs)
(ii
Savings
achieved
(Rs. Lakhs
/ year)
(iii)
Energy
Cost
(Rs.
Lakhs/
year)
(iv)
%
Savings
of Energy
Cost
(iii /iv x
100)
2008-2009
8
65.70
393.7
4730.70
8.32
2009-2010
10
178.00
417.14
5216.91
10.17
2010-2011
10
360.71
406.76
5025.71
8.28
2011-2012
10
42.9
375.00
5599.59
6.69
2012-2013
12
13.85
530.5
6407.11
8.30
19
Energy Reduction – Chips Plant
Chips - Specific Electrical Energy - kWhr/MT
300
290
280
270
260
6.88%
3.29%
291.8
250
3.24%
271.76
1.92%
254.29
249.42
2011-2012
2012-2013
262.81
240
230
220
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
Chips - Specific Thermal Energy - Mkcal/MT
1.6
1.4
1.2
10.42%
6.12%
1
11.64%
0.8
1.4
0.6
1.29
5.61%
1.21
1.07
1.01
2011-2012
2012-2013
0.4
0.2
0
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
20
Energy Reduction – Film Plant
Film - Specific Electrical Energy - kWhr/MT
1200
1150
5.46%
1100
1050
1180.5
7.5%
1116.06
1000
950
0.2%
0.87%
1032.60
1030.49
1021.56
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
900
2008-2009
2009-2010
Film - Specific Thermal Energy - MkCal/MT
1.6
1.4
18.91%
1.2
16.8%
1
-1.1%
0.8
1.7%
1.4
0.6
1.20
1.00
1.01
0.99
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
0.4
0.2
0
2008-2009
2009-2010
21
INNOVATIVE PROJECTS
22
ENCON Project : 1
Title : Poly Plant Cutter Cooling Tower
• Loss no: 15
•
•
Background of the project : To reduce chilled water load.
Observation made :
o Chilled water is used for Poly plant cutter for cooling of chips from 280°C to 40°C.
o Cooling water can also be used for cutter cooling.
• Technical and Financial Analysis
Investment : Rs. 15 Lacs
Implemented : Aug. 2009
1st year cost Saving : Rs. 29.38 Lacs
Impact of implementation : Reduction in chilled water load by 200 TR/Hr.
•
On annual basis
Energy consumption before :
Energy consumption after :
Electricity cons. (Lacs kWh)
9.81
2.61
23
Before
After
24
25
Process Flow Diagram of Chilled Water
System
Chilled water out
Cooling water
out
Film Plant
VAHP
MACHINE
Cooling water in
Chilled water in
Poly Plant
Batch Plant
Pump
Chilled water return from plants
26
Single effect Machine
Steam consumption single effect machine = 8.1 Kg/TR
27
Double Effect Machine
Condensor
High Temp.
Generator
Low temp. generator
Over flow pipe
Cooling Water
Evaporator
Absorber
Purge Pump
Diluted Solution
Inter Solution
Concentrated LiBr
Refrigerant
Chilled Water
Cooling Water
Refrigerant Vapour
Steam/ Flue Gases
Steam consumption Double effect machine = 4.1 Kg/TR
28
Cost Saving Table
Single Effect
Machine
Double Effect
Machine
Steam
consumption
8.1 Kg/TR
4.1 Kg/TR
Cost of Steam
Rs.
737 Lacs /Annum
373 Lacs /Annum
Cost Saving
(fluctuates as per
FO Price)
364 Lacs / Annum
29
Machine Photographs
Single Effect Machine - Before
Double Effect Machine - After
30
ENCON Project : 3
• Title : Commissioning of Biomass Fired Boiler
• Loss No- 15
• Background of the project : To reduce Furnace oil consumption for
Boilers.
• Observation made :
• Cost of steam on briquette is almost half that of F.O.
• Unused IAEC make F.O. fired boiler of 18 MT/Hr capacity is available.
• Can be used by installing external furnace for biomass firing.
• Existing underutilized go down can be used for boiler operation and
briquette storage.
• Technical and Financial Analysis :
• Investment : Rs. 332 Lacs
• Implemented : Jan. 2010
• Impact of implementation :Reduction in Furnace Oil consumption.
• Thereby reduction in SO2 by 108000 Kg/annum and estimated reduction
in CER by 11000 per annum.
31
Avg. Furnace oil Reduction
= 200 MT/M
 Average Cost of Furnace Oil
= 34500 Rs./MT
 Yearly Cost savings
(Fluctuate as per Price variation in the Fuel) = 183 Lacs/Year

32
33
Briquette Fired
Boiler
34
F.O. Fired Boiler
Biomass Fired Boiler after conversion
35
Percentage Renewable Energy
Before KAIZEN
Implementation
FURNACE OIL 100%
Percentage Renewable Energy Utilisation
For Steam Generation
After KAIZEN
Implementation
15, 15%
85, 85%
Furnace Oil
Briquettes
36
ENCON Project : 4
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Title :Optimization of Cooling water system
Loss no- 15
Background of the project :
To reduce power consumption for Cooling water pumping.
Observation made :
1. Cooling water high head and low head requirement areas were
identified.
2. It was observed that high head heat exchangers were starving due to
low pressure although the flow through pumps was satisfactory.
3. The low head areas were provided with positive isolation wherever
possible to reduce the unnecessary power consumption and other heat
exchangers were tuned for appropriate diff temp for optimum flow.
Technical and Financial Analysis :
Investment : 0.5 Lacs Implemented : Dec. 2012
1st year cost Saving : Rs. 44.06 Lacs
Impact of implementation : Reduction in power consumption—5.04
LkWh per annum
37
Sample Calculation
Equipment
Main process cooling DG cooling tower
tower pump no 1
pump no 2
Time
KW
KVA
KVAR
PF
VOLTS
AMPS
FREQUENCY
17.45
246.2
275.08
0.895
404.2
394
50.02
13.20
33.38
37.76
17.65
0.883
395.2
55.87
49.77
DG cooling tower
pump no 3
13.30
41.61
45.97
19.12
0.904
395.8
67.91
49.84
Main process
cooling tower pump
no 2
11.5
161.6
191.3
102.3
0.843
414.8
264
49.65
Previous condition : Pumps running : PCT pump no.1 and DGCT pump no. 2 & 3
After optimisation : Pumps running : PCT pump no. 2 only
For saving we have considered the difference in KW of PCT pump no.1 and 2
KW saved = 246 – 161
= 85 KWH
Saving in Rs . = 85 x 24 x 30 x 5.
= Rs. 3.67 lacs / Month
= Rs. 44.06 Lacs / Annum
38
ENCON Project : 5
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Title :Optimization of chilled water system
Background of the project : To reduce power consumption for Chilled water
pumping.
Observation made :
1. Chilled water high head and low head requirement areas were identified.
2. It was observed that high head heat exchangers were starving due to low
pressure although the flow through pumps was satisfactory.
3. The expansion tank of the system was raised by 8 M of height to improve
the suction and discharge head.
4. The low head pumps were put into operation to reduce the power
consumption.
5. All heat exchangers were tuned for required chilled water flow.
Technical and Financial Analysis :
Investment : 0.5 Lacs Implemented : Dec. 2012
1st year cost Saving : Rs. 26.99 Lacs
Impact of implementation : Reduction in power consumption---5.37LkWh per
39
annum.
Sample Calculation
Chilled water system
Pump. no.1
pump no.2
Total
pump no.3
KW
KVA
KVAR
PF
VOLTS
AMPS
FREQUENCY
70.05
76.33
29.19
0.921
407.5
107.6
50.09
33.7
,-,-,-,-,-,--
103.75
39.13
29.66
25.15
0.754 Lag
410.4
54.72
49.38
Previous condition : Pumps running : pump no.1 and 2
After optimisation : Pump running : pump no. 3 only ( Pump replaced )
KW saved = 103 – 39
= 64 KWH
Saving in Rs . = 64 x 24 x 30 x 5.85
= Rs. 2.69 lacs / Month
= Rs. 26.99 Lacs / Annum
(for 300 Days/year)
40
ENCON Project : 6
•
•
•
Title :Optimization of Hot oil system
Background of the project : To reduce power consumption for Hot oil pumping.
Observation made :
1. Hot oil high head and low head requirement areas were identified.
2. It was observed that high head heat exchangers were starving due to low
pressure although the flow through pumps was satisfactory.
3. Thermic fluid heater coil flow made fine tuning.
4. Before implementation one high head pump was running with full impeller,
after that two pumps impeller trimmed & reduced the head & increased the
flow .
Technical and Financial Analysis :
• Investment : 0.5 Lacs Implemented : Dec. 2012
• 1st year cost Saving : Rs. 19.2 Lacs
• Impact of implementation : Reduction in power consumption---3.1 Lac
kWh/annum
41
Sample Calculation
Equipment
Time
KVA
KW
KVAR
PF
VOLTS
AMPS
FREQUENCY
Primary santotherm
pump no 1
12.45
105.9
98.29
39.3
0.927
409.5
149.9
49.85
Primary
santotherm
pump no 3
12
106
99.02
39.8
0.928
410
150
49.75
Primary
santotherm pump
no 2
Total
197.31
13.40 Hrs
254.8
235
56.44
0.922
408
353
49.79
Previously condition : Only pump no. 2 in line
After optimisation : Pump no. 1 & 3 in line.
NET KW SAVED = 235 – 198
= 35 KWH
SAVING IN Rs.
= 35 x 24 x 30 x 6
= Rs. 1.6 Lacs / Month
= Rs. 19.2 Lacs / Annum
42
Efforts on Electrical Energy reduction
• Utilization of High efficiency motor for blower.
• Blower old motor efficiency was lower i.e 88%.
• Before implementation blower motor taking 18.18 Kwh
& with high efficiency motor 14.92 Kwh .
• Cost Saving : Rs. 1.69 Lacs
• Impact of implementation : Reduction in power
consumption---0.3Lac kWh/annum
43
Sample Calculation
BALDOR HIGH EFFICIENCY MOTOR TRIAL AND COMPARISION WITH NORMAL MOTOR
ENERGY READINGS WITH THE HELP OF ENERGY MGR.(DATE-09/05/07,TIME- 17.15
Make Type Hz M/C No
Duty Amps Kw P.F. -
TRIM SUCTION BLOWER NO - 01
BBL
3Ph I.M.
1LAJO872
FR 160L
50
Ins cl B
K4610292
S1
V 415 Delta
33
18.5
0.83
Eff. RPM -
Valve position on - 3
MEASUR
E
AVG
R
V
A
F
Wh
Vah
VARh
PF
402.3
28.36
50.2
18.18
20.19
7879
0.917
88%
2920
Y
RY-400.7 YB-401.8
28.04
28.77
6088
6772
2818
0.904
TRIM SUCTION BLOWER NO - 03
Make Baldor FR D160
6131
6571
2281
0.932
B
BR404.8
29.7
6280
6877
2784
0.914
Kw Amps ENCL Ins. Cl Nima Eff
Rating Sr No -
18.5
30
TEFC
F
AVG
R
400.7
22.6
50.18
14.92
16.03
5542
0.936
V RPM Hz SER. F -
415
2915
50
1
93%
IP 45 C
AMB Z0605110010
Usable at 208 V
Valve position on - 3
Y
RY-401.8 YB-401.1
22.34
23.07
5002
5426
1924
0.926
5028
5416
1897
0.932
55
CONT
B
RB-399.4,Ln231.7
21.63, N - 1.83
4904
5252
1720
0.942
44
Efforts on Electrical Energy reduction
• Conversion of motor connections from delta to star.
• Methanol recovery cooling tower fan motor
connections changed from delta to star reducing power
by 0.16 kwh
Calculation: (1.78*24*30*12/100000)*6
• Total Cost Saving : Rs. 1.00 Lacs
• Impact of implementation : Reduction in power
consumption---0.15Lac kWh/annum
45
Sample Calculation
DELTA TO STAR CONVERSION
SR
NO
1
2
NAME OF
EQIPMENT
MEOH RECOVERY
COOLING TOWER
FAN NO 1
MEOH RECOVERY
COOLING TOWER
FAN NO 2
MOTOR
RATING
KW KV NET NET
SAVI AR ENER DEM
DELT
NG SA GY AND
STAR
A
VIN SAVIN SAVI
G G PER NG
MONT
VAH WH VARH PF AMP FREQ VAH WH VARH PF AMP FREQ
H
ENERGY PARAMETER
11 KW,
1500 6758 4497 5029 0.667 9.49 49.68 4768 4339 1962 0.91 6.6 50.3 0.16 3.07 113
RPM
11 KW,
1500 6976 4849 4971 0.72 9.48 50.05 5055 4633 2086 0.90 7.2 49.7 0.22 2.47 155
RPM
1.95
1.6
DMT SCRUBBER
PUMP
3.7KW,
3000 1732 929.3 1426 0.537 2.42 49.88 983.8 828 420 0.85 1.6 50.0 0.10 0.95 72.72 0.756
RPM
REBOILER PUMP
7.5 KW,
3000RP
3984 2812 2715 0.71 5.652 49.51 3011 2782 1131 0.91 4.0 49.7 0.00 1.59 2.16
M
3
0.93
4
46
Sample Calculation
DELTA TO STAR CONVERSION
SR NAME OF EQIPMENT MOTO
NO
R
RATIN DELT
A
G
KW KV NET NET
SAVI AR ENER DEM
STA
NG SA GY AND
R
VIN SAVIN SAVI
G G PER NG
VAR
FRE
VAR
FRE
VAH WH
PF AMP
VAH WH
PF AMP
MONT
H
Q
H
Q
H
SEC EI PUMP
5
MEOH FEED PUMP
NO 2
ENERGY PARAMETER
5.5
KW,
3017 1191 2729 0.39 4.97 49.8 1255 965.3 742 0.77 1.07 50.1 0.23 1.8
3000
RPM
162
1.792
3635 2598 2512 0.71 406 49.5 2551 2403 775 0.94 3.58 49.8 0.20 1.6 140.4 1.087
6
7
CASTING COOLING 9.3KW,
TOWER FAN
1500R 5634 4169 3808 0.73 7.08 49.7 4404 3934 1853 0.90 6.92 49.4 0.24 1.9 169.2 1.313
PM
PACKING AHU
11KW,
1500
RPM 8461 6362 5555 0.75 11.51 50.2 6409 5716 2857 0.89 9.75 49.3 0.65 4.4 465.12 2.060
8
47
List of Awards
Sr.
No.
1
2
Awards Title
5th State Level For
Excellence in Energy
Conservation and
Management
National Energy
Conservation Award-2009
Organized
by
MEDA
Year
Winner Category
2008
Second Award in
Other Industries.
BEE
2009
First Award in Plastic
Sector.
3
CII – Energy Efficient Unit
CII
2010
Energy Efficient Unit
4
CII – National Award for
Excellence in Energy
Management
6th State Level For
Excellence in Energy
Conservation and
Management
7th State Level For
Excellence in Energy
Conservation and
Management
CII
2011
Excellent Energy
Efficient Unit
MEDA
2012
Certificate
MEDA
2012
Certificate
5
6
48
49