Assessment and Intervention for Executive Function Difficulties Part 3 Presented by George McCloskey, Ph.D. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine gmccloskz@aol.com or georgemcc@pcom.edu 1 Workshop Objectives Describe general strategies for mediating ef difficulties through external control and improving ef capacities through strategies for self-regulation. Describe specific intervention methods that address executive function difficulties. 2 Internal versus External Control The neural circuits for executive function activation are routed differently depending on whether the activation is based on an internally driven desire or command versus an external demand. 3 Internal versus External Control Because internally driven production is much easier to accomplish than externally demanded production for children with “producing difficulties” their lack of production on demand often stands in stark contrast to their seemingly effortless production “when the spirit moves them.” 4 Internal versus External Control The on-demand deficiencies observed by others are often attributed to negative personal characteristics such as lack of responsibility, apathy, passive aggressive stance, or oppositional defiance. 5 Producing versus Learning Difficulties As Martha Denckla has pointed out, Executive Function difficulties of a severe nature (especially in the Symbol System Arena) do not result in Learning Disabilities; they result in “Producing Disabilities.” 6 A General Model for Conceptualizing Learning and Producing Difficulties Learning Difficulties Only Learning Difficulties And Producing Difficulties Producing Difficulties Only Often NOT recognized as a Learning Disability, even when severe, unless an evaluation involving process assessment is done Recognized fairly quickly as a Learning Disability When severe, typically attributed to lack of motivation, character flaws, or behavior/personality 7 problems Functional Behavior Assessment The focus of a traditional FBA: “Behavior support plans are designed to alter patterns of problem behavior. The process by which this is done, however, involves change in the behavior of family, teachers, staff, or managers in various settings. Plans of behavior support define what we will do differently. It is the change in our behavior that will result in improved behavior of the focus person.” (O’Neill, Horner, Albin, Sprague, Storey, & Newon, 1997, p. 65). Functional Behavior Assessment A B C In traditional functional behavior assessments antecedents are said to TRIGGER the behavior that results in the consequences, but the reasons WHY the antecedents trigger the behavior is not really addressed. FBA: Is A-B-C Enough? Since the antecedent does not trigger the same undesirable behaviors in ALL students in the same situation, there must be something about the students that differs in an important way. Functional behavior assessment ignores internal considerations (i.e., perceptions, emotions, thought) and focuses on applying external control to effect change in behavior. FBA: Is A-B-C Enough? Because of their strong emphasis on observable behaviors, functional assessments typically do not provide a conceptual basis for understanding the root causes of why setting events and antecedent conditions result in problem behaviors even when the negative consequences associated with the problem behaviors are completely undesirable from the student’s perspective as well as everyone else’s. FBA: Is A-B-C Enough? While some strict behaviorists might argue that it is unnecessary to speculate on such causal issues, parents, teachers, and students themselves find such explanations to be central to their attempts to make sense of things. The EF Driven FBA Informed by knowledge of executive functions, the functional behavior assessment model can be revised as follows: A B C EF Behavior Response Antecedents Perception Emotion Cognition Action Consequences EF-Driven FBA While it might appear that the child is consciously choosing how to perceive, feel, think and act when a lack of production is observed, proper conceptualization of executive function difficulties requires an acknowledgement that the source of the executive function problem is most likely a result of less than optimal nonconscious brain function rather than a conscious choice to act in a contrary manner. Most importantly, clinicians must help parents and teachers, as well as themselves, realize that the executive difficulties that are so exasperating to them are just as exasperating to the child, with the only difference being in the nature of the reactions that are expressed. EF-Driven FBA With a good understanding of executive functions, problems can be clearly stated in terms of perceptions, emotions, thoughts or actions that can be changed through intervention. The goal here is twofold: 1) to help the child, the parents, and professionals to understand the nature of the deficit and 2) through proper intervention, to assist the child or adolescent in changing the behavior from a negative to positive. EF-Driven FBA An Executive Function-driven FBA can identify the executive function difficulties that are the source of the behavior problems. Subsequently, part of the intervention plan would be to help parents and teachers understand the nature of these executive function difficulties, their impact on the student’s behavior, and the reasons why external control strategies are required. Additionally, understanding the executive function difficulties producing the problem behaviors will help those charged with delivering the intervention adopt an appropriate perspective during implementation. Executive Function Difficulties Are they the result of: Disuse through Conscious Choice Innate Deficiency Maturational Delay Disuse through Nonconscious Choice Executive Function Intervention For intervention purposes, it is best to assume that EF deficiencies are the result of disuse through nonconscious choice. The general intervention goal then becomes education to make the child conscious of the EFs needed and how to engage them. EF Intervention Strategies Orienting Strategies External Control Strategies Bridging Strategies Internal Control Strategies EF Intervention Continuum Orienting Strategies External Control Strategies Bridging Strategies Internal Control Strategies EF Intervention Levels Interventions will vary depending on the EF level or levels at which difficulties are occurring and will be constrained by the level of development attained by the person. EF Intervention Levels Individuals with little selfactivation capacity need classical conditioning interventions that do not require any EF involvement Individuals with little or no selfregulation or self-realization capacities will require strict behavior modification treatment regimens EF Intervention Levels Individuals with some selfregulation capacity may respond well to cognitive behavior therapy Individuals with some selfregulation and self-realization capacities may respond to mindfulness-based cognitive behavior therapy Development of Interventions for EF Difficulties Requires keeping in mind: The need to increase awareness and provide goals. The need to move from external control to internal control through bridging strategies. The environment in which intervention is happening: Requires those close to child to have reasonable EF capacities and be able to model those capacities. Development of Interventions for EF Difficulties EF Self-regulation skills eventually need to be just that—Self-regulated. During classroom instruction, it is necessary to find the balance between providing enough EF SR cueing to help students function, but not too much to prevent EF skill-development. It is easy to underestimate the multiplicity of Efs required and focus only on those related to attention and organization. General Literature Sources for Intervention Information Executive Function References ADHD Interventions TBI Interventions Dynamic Assessment/ Instrumental Enrichment Programs I Can Problem Solve (ICPS) program Metacognition applied to academics skill areas; especially reading Cognitive Behavior Therapy OT/PT Motor Planning and Motor Praxis Executive Function References Promoting Executive Functions in the Classroom– Lynn Meltzer (2010) Executive Function Skills in Children and Adolescents 2nd Edition – Dawson & Guare (2009) Smart but Scattered – Dawson & Guare (2009) Late, Lost, and Unprepared – Cooper Kahn & Deitzel (2008) Assessment & Intervention for Executive Function Difficulties – McCloskey, Perkins & VanDivner (2009) Executive Functions in the Classroom – Chris Kaufman (2010) Orienting Strategy Increase student awareness of: self-regulation expectations personal self-regulation strengths and weaknesses Orienting Strategy Increase Awareness of EF Difficulties; raise consciousness of the specific difficulties that result from EF deficiencies in order to clearly define the problems; when possible, use videotaping for reality testing. 29 Orienting Strategy STATING GOALS To assure that executive function capacities are used to their fullest potential, it is important to state goals for both achievement and self-regulation. Stating goals enables executive function capacities, either consciously or nonconsciously, to engage the perceptions, emotions, thoughts, and actions, needed to achieve the goals. External Control Strategies Provide predictable, consistent structure to classroom environments and routines: Post and discuss class rules and schedules Review and rehearse routines Maintain basic room arrangement Classroom Management that Works (Marzano) Marzano & Pickering (2003) identified four components of effective classroom management: Classroom Rules and Procedures Disciplinary Interventions Teacher-Student Relationships Mental Set External Control Strategies Design and Implementation of Classroom Rules and Procedures involves clearly stating general expectations and standards (rules) for behavior and providing specific behavior routines (procedures) that enable the students to meet the general expectations. Classroom Rules should address SelfRegulation expectations, thereby increasing awareness of the need for self-regulation. External Control Strategies Provide external prompts and cues as a substitute for self-regulation. External Control Strategies In preschool, kindergarten and early elementary years, in many ways, teachers ARE their student‘s frontal lobes. Providing executive prompts and cues are important to assure that children are engaged appropriately in the instructional process. Modeling good executive functions helps children see how they can self-regulate their own perceptions, emotions, thoughts and actions. External Control Strategies In late elementary, junior-senior high school, college, and even graduate school and work places, effective teachers/supervisors provide executive function prompts and model good executive function use. Assessing the Use of EF Prompts in the Classroom An Observation Form (McCloskey, Perkins & VanDivner) has been developed for use to help structure observations and assist in providing effective feedback to teachers. Executive Function Classroom Observation Form (EFCO) The form has two components A definition and sample sheet to help you focus on the types of prompts that you are observing. The observation form, that lists all 33 SREFs, has a space for taking notes and keeping track prompts that are observed. Example Prompts The definitions & sample prompts are used to prepare for the observation For each self-regulation EF, examples of positive and specific prompts and negative, vague and/or poorly timed prompts are provided. EFCO Example Prompts Each self-regulation EF has sample prompts for each of the four domains of function: P =Perceiving; F = Feeling; T = Thinking A = Acting 33 Self-Regulation EFs Perceive Focus Sustain Energize Initiate Inhibit Stop Interrupt Flexible Shift Modulate Monitor Organize Correct Prioritize Balance Decide Gauge Sense Time Anticipate Pace Estimate Time Sequence Analyze Execute Compare/Eval Hold Generate Manipulate Associate Store Plan Retrieve Strategies for Becoming Familiar with SREFs and Prompts To effectively use the observation form, you will have to build familiarity with each of the 33 self-regulation areas. At first, this can seem overwhelming, but if you use your own EF’s effectively, it can be accomplished! Organize according to the 7 clusters, perhaps study one a day. In less than 2 months, you can have them mastered. SREF “Clusters” The 33 self-regulation executive functions can be grouped based on “Clusters” in which several srefs are used in an integrative manner. There are seven primary clusters to consider. SREF “Clusters” Attention Engagement Optimization Inquiry Solution Efficiency Memory Attention Cluster “What’s going on out there?” Includes: Perceive, Focus/Select, Sustain Engagement Cluster “Get to it – or not” Includes: [Attention Cluster], Energize, Initiate, Inhibit, Stop/Interrupt, Flexible, Shift, [Optimization Cluster] Optimization Cluster “How am I doing?” Includes: [Attention Cluster], Monitor, Modulate, Balance, Correct Efficiency Cluster “The Smooth Operator.” Includes: Sense Time, Pace, Sequence, Execute, [Optimization Cluster] Memory Cluster “You CAN get there from here.” Includes: [Attention Cluster], Hold, Manipulate, Store, Retrieve, [Efficiency Cluster] Inquiry Cluster “Inquiring minds need to know.” Includes: Anticipate, Gauge, Estimate Time, Analyze, [Memory Cluster], Evaluate/Compare, [Solution Cluster] Solution Cluster “I’m the Decider.” Includes: Generate, Associate, Prioritize, Plan, Organize, [Memory Cluster], Choose/ Decide, [Optimization Cluster] Perceive The Perceive function cues the use of sensory and perception processes to take information in from the external environment or “inner awareness” to tune into perceptions, emotions, thoughts, or actions as they are occurring. Prompt examples: “Listen to this.” “Look up at the board.” “How are you feeling right now?” Focus The Focus function cues the direction of attention and effort to the most relevant specifics (perceptions, emotions, thoughts, and/or actions) of a given environment, situation, or content while downgrading or ignoring the less relevant elements. Prompt example: “Pay attention to what happens to the baking soda after the vinegar is added.” Sustain The Sustain function cues sustained attention to the most relevant specifics (perceptions, emotions, thoughts, and/or actions) of a given environment, situation, or content. Prompt example: “You will need to watch the computer screen carefully for the entire 10 minutes.” Energize The Energize function cues the investment of energy to the level needed to achieve the desired results Prompt example: “This will require a lot of effort.” “You’ll need to focus all of your energy on task if you want to finish.” Initiate The Initiate function cues the initial engagement of perceiving, feeling, thinking, or acting . Prompt example: “Start walking now.” “Begin work on the count of five.” Inhibit The Inhibit function cues resistance to, or suppression of, urges to perceive, feel, think, or act on first impulse. Prompts direct capacities to an alternate source rather than drawing attention to the perception, emotion, thought, or action that should be inhibited. Prompt example: “Don’t start until I tell you to go.” Stop The Stop function cues the sudden, immediate discontinuation of perceiving, feeling, thinking, or acting. The Stop cue always precedes the Shift cue when altering problemsolving based on changing conditions, and switching or alternating attention. Prompt example: “Stop writing now.” Interrupt The Interrupt function cues the brief cessation of, and the return to perceiving, feeling, thinking or acting. Efficient use of the interrupt cue enables a quicker return to a previous mental state or activity. Prompt example: “Stop for a moment and listen, then I want you to go back to what you were doing.” Flexible The Flexible function cues a willingness to alter the frame of reference for the direction and engagement of perceptions, emotions, thoughts or actions in reaction to what is occurring in the internal or external environments. Prompt example: “It doesn’t need to be done exactly the same way each time.” Shift The Shift function cues a relatively quick change in the direction and engagement of perceptions, emotions, thoughts or actions in reaction to what is occurring in the internal or external environments. Prompt example: “The museum is closed for emergency repairs, so we won’t be able to go on the field trip.” Monitor The Monitor function cues the activation of appropriate routines for checking the accuracy of perceptions, emotions, thoughts or actions. Prompt example: “Periodically check the task directions to see if you are following all of them.” Modulate/Adjust The Modulate function cues the regulation of the amount and intensity of mental energy invested in perceiving, feeling, thinking, and acting. Prompt example: “Let’s all use our indoor voices now.” “Please tone it down a bit.” Balance The Balance function cues the regulation of the trade-off between opposing processes or states (e.g., pattern vs detail; speed vs accuracy; humor vs seriousness) to enhance or improve experiencing, learning, or performing. Prompt example: “Work as quickly as you can, but be careful not to make any mistakes.” Correct The Correct function cues the use of appropriate routines for correcting errors of perception, emotion, thought, or action based on feedback from internal or external sources. Prompt example: “Correct any errors you find.” Sense Time The Sense Time function cues the monitoring of the passage of time (e.g., cueing the engagement of the mental functions that enable a person to have an internal sense of how long they have been perceiving, feeling, thinking or acting). Prompt example: “How long have you been working on that?” Pace The Pace function cues the awareness of, and the regulation of, the rate at which perceptions, emotions, cognitions, and actions are experienced or performed. Prompt example: “You will need to work quickly as there is not much time left.” Sequence The Sequence function cues the orchestrating of the proper syntax of a series of perceptions, feelings, thoughts, and/or actions, especially in cases where automated routines are being accessed or are initially being developed. Prompt example: “Remember the order of the steps needed for completion.” Execute The Execute function cues the engagement of a well-known series of perceptions, feelings, thoughts, and/or actions, especially in cases where automated routines have been practiced and used frequently. Prompt example: “Use the routine you learned to do these.” Hold The Hold function cues activation of the necessary cognitive processes required to maintain information in working memory and continues cueing these processes until the information is manipulated, stored, or acted on as desired. Prompt example: “Hold that thought while we hear a reaction from the other group.” Manipulate The Manipulate function cues the use of working memory and other cognitive processes for the manipulation of perceptions, feelings, thoughts or actions as they are being held in mind or being accessed in the environment. Prompt example: “Visualize what it would look like if you turned it upside down.” Store The Store function cues the movement of information about perceptions, feelings, thoughts and actions from the mental processing environment of the present moment into “storage” for possible retrieval at a later time. Prompt example: “This is important; it will be on Friday’s quiz.” Retrieve The Retrieve function cues the activation of cognitive processes responsible for finding and retrieving previously stored information about perceptions, feelings, thoughts and actions. The more specific the demands or constraints placed on the retrieval task, the greater the requirements for precision of retrieval cues. Prompt example: “To answer the question correctly, you will probably need to recall all that we learned about photosynthesis.” Gauge The Gauge function cues one to identify the demands (perceptual, emotional, mental, physical) of a task or situation and cues the activation of the resources needed to effectively engage the task or situation. Prompt example: “Consider what it’s going to take to get this job done right.” Anticipate The Foresee/Plan function cues the anticipation of conditions or events in the very near future, such as the consequences of one’s own perceptions, feelings, thoughts and/or actions. Prompt example: “If you keep erasing in that same spot, what do you think will happen to the paper?” Estimate Time The Estimate Time function cues the use of time estimation routines (e.g., cueing the engagement of mental functions that enable a person to have an internal sense of how long something will take to complete, or how much time is still left in a specific period of time). Prompt example: “Tell me how long you think this will take you to do.” Analyze The Analyze function cues the realization of the need to examine more closely perceptions, feelings, thoughts or actions to obtain a greater understanding of a problem or situation. Prompt examples: “Make a list of the positives and negatives and then compare them.” “Are there additional factors that need to be considered?” Compare/Evaluate The Compare/Evaluate function cues the realization of the need to make comparisons among, or evaluate the adequacy of, perceptions, feelings, thoughts or actions. Prompt examples: “Is that the best you can do?” “Are you sure you are finished?” “Does yours look like the model?” “Are you sure that what you said was a good explanation?” Prioritize The Prioritize function cues the use of routines for ordering perceptions, feelings, thoughts, and/or actions, according to their relevance, importance, or urgency. Prompt example: “Think about how important each of these tasks is, and then list them in order of importance so the most important ones get done first.” Generate The Generate function cues the realization that novel, fluid problem-solving efforts are required and cues the activation of the resources needed to carry out problemsolving routines. Prompt example: “We haven’t tried to solve a problem like this one before.” “This problem will require some novel thinking if you are going to find a solution.” Associate The Associate function cues the realization that associations need to be made, and cues the activation of the resources needed to attempt to make the necessary associations. Prompt examples: “Have you heard anything like that before?” “This problem is very similar to one you worked on last week.” Organize The Organize function cues the use of routines for sorting, sequencing, or otherwise arranging perceptions, feelings, thoughts, and/or actions, to enhance or improve the efficiency of experience, learning, or performance. Prompt example: “Let’s establish the order in which you need to do things to get this task done.” Plan (Short-term) The Plan function cues the engagement of the capacities required to identify a series of perception, feelings, thoughts, and/or actions that, if carried out, would be most likely to produce a desired outcome in the very near future (within minutes to within several hours). Prompt example: “Write down what you will do over the weekend and when you will do it so that you will be ready for the test on Monday.” Choose/Decide The Choose function cues the need to achieve closure, i.e., to make a choice among alternatives now. Prompt example: “Make a choice now.” “Pick one now.” “Choose now.” The Choose cue often must be preceded by the Stop/Interrupt cue. Prompt example: “You need to stop thinking about it and make a choice now.” External Control Strategies Provide time management aids, such as calendars, clocks, timers, schedules, peer leaders and coaches, work teams, etc. External Control Strategies Rewards can be a tremendous benefit to a child who has difficulty aligning internal desires with external demands. Use rewards, but heed the following cautions: Using Rewards to Increase Production Rewards do not teach the child how to reflect on and alter perceptions, emotions, thoughts or actions, they simply reward the presence of desired behaviors. Reward programs imply that a child can do it if he/she wants to or is motivated enough. This often leads away from the realization that many children who are motivated and do want to change their behavior don’t know what to do to change it. External Control Strategies Punishment in mild form can be an effective means of obtaining compliance with external demands. When choosing to use punishment, heed the following cautions: Using Punishment to Increase Production Punishment does not teach the child how to reflect on and alter perceptions, emotions, thoughts or actions, they simply punish the presence of undesired behaviors. Punishment implies that a child can do it if he/she wants to or is motivated enough. This often leads away from the realization that many children who are motivated and do want to change their behavior don’t know what to do to change it. Bridging Strategies Encourage the engagement of executive functions through the use of reflective questioning. Reflective Questioning Repeat the child’s question back to the child instead of providing an answer. In situations where the child seems unaware of the need to be asking questions for adequate engagement, reflective questioning involves the mediator asking the child a question that is intended to make the child aware of the need to engage executive functions. Bridging Strategies Provide immediate and frequent feedback about the effectiveness of attempts to engage self-regulation executive functions. Providing students with feedback about their performance enables them to engage executive capacities more effectively to learn from their mistakes and improve future performance. Feedback About Accuracy When providing feedback, be sure to emphasize the importance of effort; make sure the child realizes that selfregulation is not simply something you have or don’t have – it can be increased by applying techniques and strategies; the more effort placed into applying the techniques, the more likely the improvements. Bridging Strategies Model appropriate use of self-regulation executive function capacities Bridging Strategies Teach self-regulation capacities as specific skill routines using Cognitive Strategy Instruction approaches (e.g. Graham & Harris Self-Regulated Strategy Development approach for Written Expression). Bridging Strategies Strategy Example – CC3 Method: Carefully CONSIDER (accurately perceive) and COPY the word. COVER and COMPOSE the word. COMPARE your spelling with the word and CORRECT any errors you see. Bridging Strategies Develop a common vocabulary and set of nonverbal symbols for describing or signifying selfregulation capacities and signaling their use (e.g., cueing flexibility with “The Coconut Story”) Bridging Strategies Based on assessment of EF difficulties, school psychologist and 9 year-old student established cue vocabulary that staff and parents used: “Read the room”—to increase perceive and monitor capacity “Start”—to increase initiation “Wait”—to increase inhibition “Check”—to monitor work or behavior “Correct”—to edit/fix errors Bridging Strategies Practice and rehearsal of the use of executive functions. This is the single best way to increase engagement and efficiency of the use of executive functions. Bridging Strategies Align external demands with internal desires to maximize motivation. Allow self-selection or choice of assignments whenever possible Use high interest material to illustrate application of new knowledge and skills Internal Control Strategy Once learned, the child can use internalized “self-talk” as a means of increasing awareness of executive functions and of when and how to use them (e.g., modified Berninger mantra for writing: “What I can think I can say. What I can say I can write. What I can write I can revise.”) Internal Control Strategy Model and teach the use of selfadministered reward routines to increase the use of selfregulation executive functions (e.g., teach the child how to “bargain with yourself” to get homework accomplished). Internal Control Strategy Teach the use self-monitoring routines. These routines can be used to monitor and correct perceptions, feelings, thoughts and actions. Executive Functions Interventions Specific Programs and Approaches to Improving Clients’ Executive Functions include the following: 104 Executive Functions Interventions Teaching self-control in Preschool and Kindergarten; programs such as Tools of the Mind (Bodrova and Leong) are being used to increase the self-regulation capacities of young children. 105 Early Childhood Evidenced Based Interventions: Tools of the Mind Teachers can have a positive effect on children’s self-regulatory capacities (e.g., Burchinal, PeisnerFeinberg, Bryant, & Clifford, 2000). Interventions that include selfregulatory components are more likely to improve achievement (Blair & Raza, 2007). Early Childhood Evidenced Based Interventions: Tools of the Mind Children who participated in Tools of the Mind classrooms had higher rates of selfregulation than matched controls and selfregulation levels correlated with achievement in literacy and mathematics (Diamond, Barnett, Thomas, & Munroe, 2007). Early self-regulation has a stronger association with school readiness than IQ or entry-level pre-reading or pre-math skills (Blair, 2002. 2003; Normandeau & Guay, 1998). Techniques Used in Tools of the Mind Self-Regulation Activities Children practice self-regulated learning throughout the day by engaging in a variety of specifically designed developmentally appropriate self-regulation activities. Children learn to regulate their own behaviors as well as the behaviors of their friends as they enact increasingly more complex scenarios during imaginary play activities. Briefer activities are also used. For example, children practice inhibitory control during an activity called Graphics Practice. Children draw different kinds of marks to music and must stop and start on cue. Techniques Used in Tools of the Mind Dramatic Play The cornerstone of Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development on which the curriculum is based. Structured dramatic play involves role-playing scenarios that are planned and agreed upon in advance. Engaging in sustained role-playing requires the inhibition of role-inappropriate behaviors, as well as the use of working memory to sustain attention and effort to the imaginative enactment of the selected role. Techniques Used in Tools of the Mind Scaffolding The strategy of providing, and gradually removing, external support during learning and producing activities. During scaffolding the task itself is not changed but what the learner initially does is made easier with support. As the learner takes more responsibility for performance of the task, less assistance is provided. Scaffolding attempts to move the child further along the continuum of self-regulation from being externally regulated by others to engaging in "shared" regulation to eventually becoming selfregulated. Techniques Used in Tools of the Mind Example of the Use of Scaffolding: If a child needs support to approach writing as a task that is performed from left to right, the teacher may begin shaping the behavior by explaining to the child that writing begins on the left and progresses across the page. Verbal prompts may be used several times, then a mediator (a visual prompt such as an asterisk) is placed on the left side of the page to remind the child of where to start writing. Once the child follows the visual prompt without difficulty or hesitation, the asterisk is no longer placed on the page. Techniques Used in Tools of the Mind Reflective Thinking Refers to thinking about how you arrived at an answer or how you are thinking about something. Reflective thinking involves the use of metacognition (the ability to think about thinking). During activities, children are asked to think about how they arrived at an answer or how/what/why they are thinking about something. Teachers model their use of reflective thinking by explaining to children what/how they are thinking about something. Techniques Used in Tools of the Mind Using Props to Enhance Attention and Working Memory Physical props are used as reminders of what the child should be doing during an activity. For example, during an activity where children read to each other. The reader holds a picture of lips and the listener holds a picture of an ear. The pictures are exchanged when the roles are switched. Techniques Used in Tools of the Mind Using Props to Enhance Attention and Working Memory: Continuum of Outcomes The children learn to transition from both wanting to read and neither wanting to listen, to one listening while holding the ear and one reading while holding the lips, to not needing the physical props to engage in the reciprocal roles, to changing the passive role of listening into an active role of listening and asking questions of the reader to a final state where active listening becomes an internalized process for enhancing the listener’s comprehension. Techniques Used in Tools of the Mind Self-Regulatory Speech Activities involve teaching children how to internally regulate speech and use internal speech to monitor external events. For example, children pair off and collaborate in counting objects; one child counts aloud, and the other monitors the oral counting of the first child. The child doing the monitoring learns to inhibit the desire to count for themselves and instead to listen to the counting of the other child and to think metacognitively about the accuracy of the other child’s counting. Evidence Based Intervention: Cognitive Strategy Instruction Cognitive Strategy Instruction (CSI) emphasizes the development of thinking skills to increase learning and production. CSIs help students to become more strategic, self-reliant, flexible, and productive in their learning endeavors (Scheid, 1993). Use of these strategies have been associated with increased academic production (Borkowski, Carr, & Pressley, 1987; Garner, 1990). Evidence Based Intervention: Cognitive Strategy Instruction CSI techniques employ metacognition and focus on modeling and teaching students strategies for completing tasks and routines and then modeling and teaching methods for selfcueing the use of the strategies. Evidence Based Intervention: Cognitive Strategy Instruction CSI techniques have been used effectively to improve written expression, reading comprehension, math calculation and problemsolving, study skills, test-taking, and project completion. Evidence Based Intervention: Cognitive Strategy Instruction Lynn Meltzer (2010) employs CSI techniques in the Drive to Thrive classroom program and the BrainCogs and Essay Express software programs. Evidence Based Intervention: Cognitive Strategy Instruction Drive to Thrive and BrainCogs both address five general areas of self-regulation: Goal Setting, Planning and Prioritizing Organizing Remembering Shifting and Flexible Problem-Solving Self-Monitoring and Self-Checking Executive Functions Interventions Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT). CBT teaches strategies for improving the use of executive functions to cue and direct effective perceiving, feeling, thinking and acting. Techniques have shown good results at the adult and adolescent levels and some early indications that the techniques can be applied effectively with children in the elementary grades. 121 Evidence Based Intervention: Cognitive Behavior Therapy Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) emphasizes collaborative reality-testing and the monitoring and modification of automatic perceptions, feelings, thoughts, and actions that cause difficulties for the child. Evidence Based Intervention: Cognitive Behavior Therapy CBT with children and adolescents: Reduces the use of thought logs Focuses on internal experiences such as monitoring perceptions, feelings, thoughts and actions Works toward affective shifts to illustrate the cognitive model Summarizes session content frequently Keeps abstractions to a minimum, focusing instead on concrete examples based on personal experience Evidence Based Intervention: Cognitive Behavior Therapy Outcomes of CBT with children and adolescents: Increased ability to monitor perceptions, feelings, thoughts and actions Increased engagement in positive problem-solving strategies Increased capacity for self-regulating perceptions, feelings, thoughts and actions Evidence Based Intervention: Cognitive Behavior Therapy CBT has been used with children and adolescents to deal with: Depression Anxiety Bipolar Disorder Eating Disorders Evidence Based Intervention: Cognitive Behavior Therapy CBT has been used with children and adolescents to deal with: ADHD Disruptive Behavior Problems Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Social Skills Deficits Evidence Based Intervention: CBT for Depression “Since depression is most often an episodic disorder, it usually improves over time. With young children, CBT has been shown to be more effective than 'watchful waiting' and more effective than traditional school counseling as a treatment for depression. With adolescents, CBT has also been shown to be more effective than 'watchful waiting' and more effective than nondirective supportive therapy.” www.abct.org Evidence Based Intervention: CBT for Depression “For moderately to severely depressed adolescents, the most effective treatment at this time is the combination of CBT and an SSRI medication. In the NIMH-sponsored Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS), this combination led to the best outcomes in terms of both reduced depression and reduced risk of suicidal events.” www.abct.org Evidence Based Intervention: CBT for Substance Abuse “Support for CBT was found in a recent review of the quality of evidence in support of outpatient interventions for adolescent substance abuse (Becker & Curry, 2008). Across 31 randomized controlled trials, CBT was the outpatient intervention supported by the highest proportion of methodologically stronger studies.” www.abct.org Cognitive Behavior Therapy Resources for Practice Friedburg, R. D., & McClure, J. M. (2002). Clinical practice of cognitive therapy with children and adolescents: the nuts and bolts. New York: Guilford Press. Mennutti, R. B., Freeman, A., & Christner, R W. (Eds.) (2006). Cognitive-behavioral interventions in educational settings. New York: Routledge. Cognitive Behavior Therapy Resources for Practice Reinecke, M.A., Dattillo, F.M., & Freeman, A. (Eds) (2003). Cognitive Therapy with Children and Adolescents: A Casebook for Clinical Practice. Kendall, Philip C. (Ed) (2005). Child and Adolescent Therapy: CognitiveBehavioral Procedures (3rd ed.). Guilford Press. Executive Functions Interventions CBT variants such as Jeffrey Schwartz’s “Brain-Lock: Free Yourself from Obsessive-Compulsive Behavior; subtitled as “a four-step self-treatment method to change your brain chemistry.” This method uses CBT oriented techniques to strengthen selfregulation capacities and decrease unproductive perceptions, feelings, thoughts and actions. 132 Executive Functions Interventions Ross Greene’s Collaborative Problem-solving approach featured in his books on Treating Explosive Kids. Although Greene does not specifically use the concept of executive functions, his intervention approach teaches parents techniques for improving both external control and building internal self-regulation capacities. 133 Executive Functions Interventions Myrna B. Shure’s I Can Problem-Solve (ICPS) techniques for teaching young children increased self-control and improved cueing of appropriate problem-solving routines. 134 Executive Functions Interventions Rueven Feuerstein’s approach to improving cognitive functioning through instrumental enrichment, mediated learning and dynamic assessment, all focused on increasing self-regulation through increased self-awareness and strategy use. 135 Executive Functions Interventions Michelle Garcia Winner’s Social Thinking Curriculum Superflex. Uses cartoon characters to teach about self-regulation concepts (e.g., Rock Brain represents inflexible thinking). Intended for upper elementary age children diagnosed with Asperger’s, but the techniques and ideas appear to have wider application. 136 Executive Functions Interventions Computer-based cognitive training programs such as CogMed and neurofeedback programs are being closely studied to determine the extent to which they can be used to improve self-regulation in settings other than the “computer lab.” 137 Executive Functions Interventions Mindfulness-based CBT improves Self-Awareness and Self-Analysis capacities through the incorporation of meditative techniques along with teaching strategies for regulating perceptions, feelings, thoughts and actions, making it more likely that learned CBT strategies will be cued when needed. 138 Executive Functions Interventions Use of Meditation, especially witnessing meditation techniques. Improving all forms of self-control, especially Self-Awareness, through “quieting of the mind.” 139 Executive Functions Interventions Fostering development of internal and external control mechanisms through “strengthening of the will”; Improving or Developing “Magnetic Center” therapeutic techniques such as Roberto Assagioli’s Psychosynthesis. 140 Executive Functions Interventions Mindfulness-based Physical Exercise Programs such as Yoga and Thai Chi are likely to have generalized effects on a number of selfregulation executive functions. 141 Executive Functions Interventions Time - Natural maturational processes affect executive functions at all levels; timerelated expectations for EF development often need to be adjusted (e.g., recall the 30% developmental delay often found with individuals with ADHD) 142 Executive Functions Interventions Pharmacological - Medications help increase executive functions use in conditions such as ADHD, mood disorders, and OCD. In most cases, the medication does not directly enhance EFs but rather reduces the disrupting effect of less than optimal function of other neural circuitry. 143 Executive Functions Interventions Engage the Services of a Cognitive Coach (i.e., Renta-Lobe) Make extensive use of an external executive function substitutes where appropriate, e.g., ADHD and Life Coaches. 144 Executive Functions Interventions Encourage Symbiotic Relationships (e.g. “Marry-aLobe” and Support Networks. Enter into relationships where there is a mutual interdependence that enables reduction of the effects of EF deficiencies. 145 Executive Functions Interventions Progress monitoring of interventions targeting the improvement of the use of executive functions. 146 EF Assessment Using the MEFS-SRAV Effectiveness Ratings Rate the students use (or disuse) of the 23 Self-Regulation Executive Functions using the following criteria: Internally SelfRegulated Externally Guided Typically self-regulates this executive function. 7 Extremely effective; does not require any external guidance; highly independe nt with selfregulation. 6 Effective; usually does not require any external guidance; often independent with selfregulation; may occasionally require some external guidance. Externally Controlled Typically does not self-regulate this executive function but demonstrates the capacity to use this executive function when external guidance is provided. Does not self-regulate; use of this executive function is minimal or nonexistent even when external guidance is provided; External control is required as a substitute to maintain adequate functioning. 5 4 3 2 1 Requires only minimal external guidance to maintain the effective use of this executive function. Requires frequent external guidance to maintain the effective use of this executive function. Requires very frequent external guidance to demonstrate the use of this executive function; use is not maintained even when guidance is provided. External control can be used to effectively substitute for the absence of this executive function; the lack of this executive function is apparent when external control is not present. External control is only marginally effective or not effective at all as a substitute for the absence of this executive function; a lack of this executive function is apparent even when external control is present. EF Assessment Using the MEFS MODULATE Cues the regulation of the amount and intensity of mental energy invested in perceiving, feeling, thinking, and acting. Internally Regulated Externally Guided Externally Controlled MODULATE Self Perceiving 3 Environs Academics 3 2-3 5 3 Thinking 2 3 3 2 Acting 6 2 5 2 Feeling 7 6 5 4 3 2 Others 1 Notes: very negative about self and others; has a hard time returning to a calm state once agitated; finds academic work extremely frustrating; cannot modulate attitude toward schoolwork. Self Regulation Capacity: Focusing and sustaining attention when working independently on tasks. Duration Frequency 1 Never 0% of the time. 1 Unable to focus and sustain attention for more than a few seconds when independently working on tasks. 2 Able to focus and sustain attention for about 1 minute when working independently on tasks. 3 Able to focus and sustain attention for about 2-3 minutes when working independently on tasks. 4 Able to focus and sustain attention for about 5 minutes when working independently on tasks. 5 Able to focus and sustain attention for about 10 minutes when working independently on tasks. 6 Able to focus and sustain attention for about 15 minutes when working independently on tasks. 7 Able to focus and sustain attention for 20 or more minutes when working independently on tasks. 2 Occasionally Approximately 10% of the time. 3 Sometimes Approximately 20%-40% of the time. 4 Often Approximately 50%-70% of the time. 5 Very Often Approximately 80% of the time. 6 Almost Always Approximately 90% of the time. 7 Always 100% of the time. Self Regulation Goals for Lauren A College-Age Student Diagnosed with Asperger’s Disorder Self Regulation Goal: Use appropriate problem-solving routines to reduce excessive negative emotional reactions and resistance to engagement when routines are altered or unappealing tasks must be completed. Effectiveness Rating Internally Regulated 7 Self Regulation Goal: Work through and resolve difficult situations by use appropriate problemsolving routines to generate and compare alternate scenarios and selecting the most appropriate course of action. Internally Regulated 7 2 1 6 Externally Guided 5 4 3 Externally Controlled 2 1 Effectiveness Rating Internally Regulated 7 Self Regulation Goal: Recognize the need to engage in good personal hygiene routines, learn the necessary routines, and perform the routines on a daily basis. 5 4 3 Externally Controlled Effectiveness Rating Self Regulation Goal: Recognize the need to engage in self-advocacy and use an appropriate problem-solving routine to determine what to do and how to do it and then carry out the actions needed to effectively address the self-advocacy need. 6 Externally Guided 6 Externally Guided 5 4 3 Externally Controlled 2 1 Effectiveness Rating Internally Regulated 7 6 Externally Guided 5 4 3 Externally Controlled 2 1 Strategies for Improving Assessment Methods 1) Offer bonus points for handing in homework and assignments on time instead of taking points away 2) Point out minor errors and offer students a chance to correct them before assigning a grade Strategies for Improving Assessment Methods 3) Offer feedback and opportunities to revise writing assignments before grading them 4) Offer students choices for ways to demonstrate content knowledge Strategies for Improving Assessment Methods 5) Offer credit for all efforts to correct work; offer opportunities to retake failed tests 6) Deduct no more than 5-10% of total points for minor detail errors Strategies for Improving Assessment Methods 7) Offer multiple ways to participate in classroom activities, not just oral expression 8) Use pop quizzes only as a diagnostic tool rather than a graded performance measure Strategies for Improving Assessment Methods 9) Offer response choices (word banks) for open-ended question formats 10) Provide guidelines and progress checks for long-term projects Strategies for Improving Assessment Methods 11) Avoid placing constraints on response modes as much as possible 12) Teach note-taking, memory strategies, and study skills when necessary