Human Security A Tool for Better Solutions Mara Simane – LAPAS Poor and Vulnerable Populations 2007—10 EE CA FSU Turkey IMF WEO databases and WB staff calculations Economic Premise May, 2010 nr. 12. Under 5$ per day. Why Human Security ? • In time of limited funding helps determine priorities • Facilitates collaboration • Puts people first • It works with perception • It gives answers data can’t Definitions Human Security – “freedom from fear and freedom from want” (Kofi Annan) Securitability – ability to be and feel secure, and to reestablish a state of security and sense of security when these have been compromised Dimensions of Human Security Objective Perception Situations Threats Warning Signals Risks Opportunities low ------------------ securitability --------------- high Trauma Security Strategies Illnesses Lessons Learned Suicide Helplessness Anxiety Temporary Unease Consequences Security Threshold Concentric Circles of Security Individual Family/Friends Society/Local National International Strengthening Securitability 1. Identify the individual/group 2. Identify insecurity/threats (perceived and actual) 3. Identify priority securitability factors 4. Identify security providers 5. Develop security strategies 6. Prioritize the actions based on relevance to threats and ability to implement the actions. Health Security Economic Security Personal Security Environmental Security 7 Realms of Human Security Food Security Community Security Political Security Poverty and Inequality in the Baltics Absolute poverty ? Poverty risk (after social transfers)E-stat 08 Objective EE 19% (19-22nd) LV 26% (27-last) LT 20% (22-24th) GINI EU27(31) EE(31) LV(38) LT(34) S80/S20 EU12(5.2) EE(5.0) LV(7.3) LT(5.9) » Shadow economy » Non monetary support Perceived Poverty Threats (to others) Access to decent housing Hot meal 1 time per day Higher/adult education Having medical care Starting up a business EE+23 EE+0 EE+6 EE+6 EE+8 LV+22 LV+24 LV+35 LV+23 LV+24 LT+18 LT+1 LT+23 LT+11 LT+15 Eurobarometer 321, 2009 “Would you say that being poor hampers very much, somewhat, not very much or nota at all people’s chances of ? Answer “very much” Expectations of security levels Mainly responsible for reduction of poverty EU 27 EE LV LT EU 9 -7 -3 -3 National 53 + 11 + 24 +23 Local auth. 7 +2 -5 -5 NGOs 7 -6 -6 -6 Individuals 13 +6 -3 0 Eurobarometer 321, 2009 Desirable policies – National level Desirable policy to help people out of poverty EU 27 EE LV LT Work opportun. 61 +11 +13 +14 Ensuring ec. growth 42 +2 +16 +21 Suf and reg > social benefits 32 +0 +8 -1 Training & qualification 38 + 16 - 11 +2 Eurobarometer 321, 2009 Trust of Security Levels Tend to trust when speaking about measures in fight against poverty EU 27 EE LV LT EU 45 +14 +8 +14 National 36 +1 -22 +9 Local auth. 50 +5 -8 -17 NGOs 63 -1 -5 -6 Individuals 57 +4 -3 -4 Eurobarometer 321, 2009 Building Securitability 1. Identify the individual/group: 2. Identify insecurity/threats (perceived and actual) o ask people o verify actual threats o identify perceptions 3. Identify priority securitability factors Building Securitability 4. Identify security providers – perceived and potential 5. Develop security strategies 6. Prioritize the actions based on relevance to threats and ability to implement the actions. 30,000 per day - children die of hunger and poverty related diseases http://endpoverty2015.org