Recruitment, Selection, and Job Performance © 2013 by Nelson Education 1 Chapter Learning Outcomes After reading this chapter you should: ◦ Appreciate the important role played by job performance in selection and assessment ◦ Be able to define the differences among task, contextual, and counter-productive work behaviours © 2013 by Nelson Education 2 Chapter Learning Outcomes (continued) ◦ Understand the different types of counterproductive work behaviours ◦ Be able to describe the importance of developing and using scientifically sound measures of job performance in selection and assessment ◦ Understand what constitutes acceptable criteria that may be used to assess performance © 2013 by Nelson Education 3 Chapter Learning Outcomes (continued) ◦ Understand the relationship among individual performance measures, criteria, and performance dimensions related to a job ◦ Appreciate the technical aspects of measuring job performance © 2013 by Nelson Education 4 Job Performance Job Performance Criteria Task Performance Contextual Performance Counterproductive Work Behaviours © 2013 by Nelson Education 5 Job Performance as a Multidimensional Concept Job performance domain: the set of job performance dimensions (i.e., behaviours) that are relevant to the goals of the organization, or the unit, in which a person works © 2013 by Nelson Education 6 Performance Dimensions Performance dimensions: sets of related behaviours that are derived from an organization’s goals and linked to successful job performance © 2013 by Nelson Education 7 A Multidimensional Model of Job Performance 1. 2. 3. 4. Job-specific task proficiency Non-job-specific task proficiency Written and oral communication task proficiency Demonstrating effort © 2013 by Nelson Education 8 A Multidimensional Model of Job Performance (continued) 5. 6. 7. 8. Maintaining personal discipline Facilitating peer and team performance Supervision/leadership Management/administration © 2013 by Nelson Education 9 © 2013 by Nelson Education 10 © 2013 by Nelson Education 11 Types of Counterproductive Work Behaviours (continued) © 2013 by Nelson Education 12 Withdrawal Behaviours Tardiness Absence Presenteeism Workplace Deviance Production Deviance © 2013 by Nelson Education 13 Withdrawal Behaviours Psychological Withdrawal Employee Theft Workplace Aggression and Violence Bullying © 2013 by Nelson Education 14 © 2013 by Nelson Education 15 Measuring Performance Usefulness of selection measures is assessed by how well they predict performance Performance measurement defines what is meant by performance © 2013 by Nelson Education 16 Measuring Performance (continued) Choose a measure or set of measures that best captures the essence of that complex job-related performance Performance measurement plays an important role in developing strategies for effective recruitment and selection © 2013 by Nelson Education 17 Effective Performance Measures Relevancy: requires that a criterion must not only be relevant, but also not be deficient or contaminated Criterion relevance: the degree to which a criterion captures behaviours or competencies that constitute job performance © 2013 by Nelson Education 18 Effective Performance Measures (continued) Criterion contamination: the degree to which the criterion measure is influenced by, or measures, behaviours or competencies that are not part of job performance Reliability: involves agreement between different evaluations, at different periods of time, and with different measures © 2013 by Nelson Education 19 © 2013 by Nelson Education 20 Effective Performance Measures Practicality: the degree to which a criterion measure is available, plausible, and acceptable to organizational decision makers © 2013 by Nelson Education 21 Objective Performance Measures Objective performance measures: production, sales, and personnel data used in assessing individual job performance © 2013 by Nelson Education 22 Recruitment and Selection Today 5.1 Examples of Objective Measures of Job Performance ◦ Production of Sales Measures Quantity Quality Trainability © 2013 by Nelson Education 23 Recruitment and Selection Today 5.1(continued) Personnel data Absenteeism Tenure Rate of advancement Accidents © 2013 by Nelson Education 24 Class Activity 1. What are your views on performance appraisal? Do you believe that individual performance feedback has an impact on improving team or organizational performance? © 2013 by Nelson Education 25 Subjective Performance Appraisal: Rating Systems Ratings or rankings: made by supervisors, peers, or others that are used in assessing individual job performance Relative rating system: a subjective measurement system that compares the overall performance of one employee to that of others to establish a rank order of employee performance © 2013 by Nelson Education 26 Absolute Rating Systems Absolute rating system: compares the performance of one worker with an absolute standard of performance; can be used to assess performance on one dimension or to provide an overall assessment © 2013 by Nelson Education 27 © 2013 by Nelson Education 28 Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS) Behaviourally anchored rating scales (BARS): use empirically derived critical incident job behaviours to anchor the values placed on a rating scale © 2013 by Nelson Education 29 © 2013 by Nelson Education 30 Behavioural Anchors Used to Assess Communication Competency (continued) © 2013 by Nelson Education 31 Behavioural Anchors Used to Assess Communication Competency (continued) © 2013 by Nelson Education 32 Behaviour Observation Scales (BOS) Behaviour observation scales (BOS): very similar to BARS in that the starting point is an analysis of critical job incidents by those knowledgeable about the job to establish performance dimensions © 2013 by Nelson Education 33 © 2013 by Nelson Education 34 Behavioural Observation Scale Used to Evaluate a Security Dispatcher (continued) © 2013 by Nelson Education 35 Summary Job performance plays an important role in recruitment and selection Job performance is linked to an organization’s mission, values, and goals The performance model developed by Campbell is commonly used © 2013 by Nelson Education 36 Summary (continued) The usefulness of any selection system is determined by how well it predicts job performance as measured by job-related criteria Different factors affect criteria and the pros and cons of combining different criterion measures to form composites © 2013 by Nelson Education 37 Discussion Questions 1. 2. Why is it important to understand performance as part of the recruitment and selection process? In this chapter we discuss task performance, contextual performance, and counterproductive behaviour. Discuss the role that each of these plays in developing a recruitment and selection system. © 2013 by Nelson Education 38 Discussion Questions (continued) 3. 4. If you were limited in selecting employees on the basis of only one of the three types of performance discussed in this chapter, which one would you choose? Why? Discuss Campbell’s performance taxonomy. Can you think of a job that does not fit that model? © 2013 by Nelson Education 39 Discussion Questions 5. 6. 7. Compare Campbell’s model to the eight great competencies presented in Chapter 4. What are the differences/similarities? Discuss the distinction among criterion relevance, criterion contamination, and criterion deficiency. What are the characteristics of a good criterion measure? © 2013 by Nelson Education 40