Document

advertisement

Public Participation in

Regional Economic Development

Module 6

Public Participation in

Regional Economic Development

Objectives:

 to specify the role of public participation in regional economic development

 to explore degrees of public involvement and expectations for decision-making

Module 6

Objectives (contd)

 to identify obstacles to and benefits of public involvement

 to identify some public participation methods and show how they can be used

Module 6

Public Participation in

Regional Economic Development

“I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion.”

Thomas Jefferson, 1820

Module 6

Why Public Participation?

 lack of government resources

 uncoordinated community development activities

 failure of centralized approaches

Module 6

Public Participation as a

Contribution to Development

Buy-in and support are tied to economic benefits or rewards.

Decisions affect and implementation depends on the public.

Outsiders design programs.

Local people are perceived to lack technical and process skills.

Module 6

Public Participation as a Contribution to Development (contd)

 Control, direction, and decisionmaking remain with “professionals.”

 Technical aspects become prominent.

 Organizations are usually externally conceived.

Module 6

Public Participation as a Contribution to Development (contd)

 Organizations reflect only part of the community.

 There is little empathy with those who should be served.

 Local accountability is lacking.

Module 6

Empowerment

Basic Principles:

 People are the primary ingredients of development.

We must recognize people’s knowledge and expertise.

 The total community is included.

 People must feel empowered to control their own destinies.

Module 6

Empowerment (contd)

People’s skills and abilities must be developed through participation.

 The role of education and training is recognized.

 Expertise is a resource to the people rather than to the product.

 People have the ability to determine their own futures.

Module 6

Organizational Qualities

 personal control and growth

 self-reliance

 conformity to local values, ideals, and expectations

Module 6

“Animator”

 works in local development

 coordinates and facilitates based on people’s wishes

 concentrates on the people’s participation in the process

Module 6

“Animator” (contd)

 provides focus, forecasting problems through environmental scanning

 earns trust and credibility through empathy

Module 6

Participants’ Input 6.1

Module 6

Obstacles to Participation

Power:

 Governments traditionally designed and controlled programs.

 Limited input resulted in a lack of buyin and support.

Module 6

Obstacles to Participation (contd)

 Community beliefs about organizational autonomy:

 The community should control design and priorities for development.

 The community knows best.

 Responsibility is shared without authority and resources.

Module 6

Obstacles to Participation (contd)

Administration:

 Accountability interferes with delegation.

 Administrators reserve the right to determine priorities.

 Planners and administrators are reluctant to concede their practice.

 Local involvement adds time.

Module 6

Benefits of Public Participation

 recognition of local needs and priorities

 recognition of local knowledge and skills

 direct input VS prescriptive solutions

 more reliable feedback on impacts of initiatives

Module 6

Benefits of Public

Participation (contd)

 new insights from the community for adapting programs

 lower costs in dealing with local organizations

 better design of programs

 improved utilization of facilities

 cooperation in new program innovation

Module 6

Implications for REDBs

 improved organizational structures

 added accountability through

Performance Contracts

 need for better public education

 more equitable sharing of roles and responsibilities

 less conflict and misunderstanding

Module 6

Participants’ Input 6.2

Module 6

Methods

Public Meetings:

 good for discussing general ideas and approaches

 widespread input and perspectives obtained

Module 6

Methods (contd)

Newsletters:

 one-way communication

 best for dispensing information

Module 6

Methods (contd)

Focus Groups:

 effective for obtaining input on specific topics

 allow involvement of those most affected

 useful for updating sector strategies

Module 6

Methods (contd)

Questionnaires:

 recommended for collecting information

 limited opportunity for exploring issues

 low return rates

 lack validity

Module 6

Methods (contd)

Media:

 most powerful public participation tool

 can become a forum for public discussion

 a method of community education

Module 6

Participants’ Input 6.3

Module 6

Download