Summary & Conclusions

advertisement
ADQ IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP
Summary, Conclusions
Session 6
EUROCONTROL, SES unit
May 2013
Objectives of the Workshop
 Brief on the latest relevant developments
 Provide a platform for stakeholders to share
views concerning: approach to implementation,
lessons learned, best practices, implementation
difficulties
 Initiate creation of a 'pan-European' overview
concerning ADQ implementation
 Brief on mechanisms for monitoring and audit
 Identify requirements for potential future
implementation support activities.
Aeronautical Data Quality - Implementation in Europe
2
Overall notes – Summary key points (1)





Good attendance at this workshop gathering key regulated parties
Excellent and open presentations highlighting current stakeholder
approaches, progress and implementation difficulties
Clear demonstration of effort applied and commitment to implement ADQ
confirming that the underlying concept of ADQ is fully valid
Numerous challenges were highlighted ranging from initial lack of
management commitment, legacy issues, some initial originator
“reluctance”, oversight issues through to huge impact stemming from
technical changes or new systems to be put in place
Key issue in Member States (MS)/Organisations appeared to be the ADQ
Timelines.
 European Commission will need to better understand the current status
achieved in MS:
Question is to how can this be achieved? Could a dedicated ADQ questionnaire
be helpful to ascertain a consolidated view.
 Once having achieved this, discussions to address notified implementation
difficulties may be arranged in coordination with SSC.
Aeronautical Data Quality - Implementation in Europe
3
Overall notes – Summary key points (2)
 Time at WS was limited to discuss all detailed questions that were
raised
 Agency will extract more detailed questions/aspects from the
presentations and answer them separately
 A number of specific support requirements for continued generic
stakeholder support were collected and those will be analysed,
prioritised and actioned
 The method for individual stakeholder support was outlined and will
have to be further addressed:
 States/Organisations are requested to raise specific needs back to the
Agency, ideally through the ADQ-ISC
 Detailed aspects raised - example AIXM:
 There is a need for additional guidance on e.g. AIXM Business Rules
and Metadata in the ADQ context
 Workshop will be organised to address those issues
Aeronautical Data Quality - Implementation in Europe
4
Overall notes – Summary key points (3)
 Agency will publish the presentations, conclusions on the web after
the WS and all participants will be informed.
 Stay engaged and ensure that your State regulator engages in the
ARWG - this is an important group.
 Let us know your views and share issues also after the WS
 make use of the ADQ-ISC email address adq@eurocontrol.int
Very many thanks to Presenters and your input
This made the WS “information rich”
Aeronautical Data Quality - Implementation in Europe
5
ADQ IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP
28-29 May 2013
EUROCONTROL HQ
Contact:
adq@eurocontrol.int
or
manfred.unterreiner@eurocontrol.int
www.eurocontrol.int/adq
www.eurocontrol.int/aim
Download