L-04 Risk Perception - Publications

advertisement

EPR-Public Communications

L-04

Risk Perception

IAEA

International Atomic Energy Agency

Risk perception

“Experience from nuclear and radiological emergencies highlights public communication as one of the most important challenges in emergency management. Sometimes, an event is not considered an emergency to experts or responders but is perceived very differently by the general public.

Communicating effectively with the public about radiation emergencies is key to successful emergency management. It will help mitigate the risks , support the implementation of protective actions , and contribute to appeasing negative psychological impacts.

- Communication with the Public in a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency

(EPR-Public Communications, 2012)

IAEA

Risk Perception

• “ What we had done to these people was just outrageous. We had frightened them so bad, they thought they were going to die.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission official describing government communication during the Three Mile Island event.

IAEA

Public response

Public risk response is a matter of perception which may seem:

• ‘right’ or ‘wrong’

• ‘rational’ or ‘irrational’

Perception is real and may result in physical, psychological, economic, and other harms.

Communication is a vital tool for mitigating these risks, regardless of the objective risk nature of such events.

IAEA

Public response

Public thinks differently about radiation risks than experts;

Public perceives and responds to risky situations based on emotion in addition to facts. What matters most is how those facts feel;

Emotion can play a bigger role in the way people perceive risks, than reason and rational thinking.

IAEA

Risk perception characteristics

Nuclear and radiological risks feel more frightening to the public;

Even when scientific facts show a risk is low, psychological characteristics play a big role in how people perceive the situation;

These characteristics must be acknowledged in order to effectively manage public behavior.

IAEA

Key characteristics

Media attention

Understanding

Familiarity

Scientific certainty

History / Stigma

Onset of effects

Reversibility

Trust

Availability of information

Voluntariness

Control

Benefits

Fairness of risk distribution

Nature of risk

Catastrophic potential

Personification

Personal participation

Uncertainty

Awareness

Fear

Influence on children and future generations

IAEA

Trust

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

Lack of trust in officials and institutions

Trustworthy officials and institutions

IAEA

Trust

More trust = influence, less trust = fear

In the communicator;

In the organization that ’ s supposed to protect the public (the regulator);

In the organization creating the risk (the radiological facility).

IAEA

Trust

Key Behaviors for Trust:

Honesty, even when there is risk or mistakes have been made;

Avoid secrets;

Dialogue and respect for audience feelings must be sincere;

Avoid telling people how they should feel. That ’ s up to them;

Do not over-reassure. Beware the Fear of Fear.

IAEA

What influences trust?

IAEA

Key elements in trust and credibility (http://www.centerforriskcommunication.com/).

Media attention

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

A lot of media attention Little media attention

IAEA

Understanding

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

Scientific concepts are difficult to understand

Easily understood concepts

IAEA

Familiarity

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

Unfamiliar hazards Familiar hazards

IAEA

Scientific certainty

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

Lack of scientific consensus Scientific consensus

IAEA

History/ stigma

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

Accidents have already occurred

No accidents

IAEA

Onset of effects

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

Little warning of onset of effects

Anticipation of onset of effects

IAEA

Reversibility

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

Effects are not reversible Effects are reversible

IAEA

Availability of information

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

Insufficient authoritative information

Sufficient authoritative information

IAEA

Voluntariness

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

Compulsory participation in a situation

Voluntary participation in a situation

IAEA

Control

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

Absent or limited personal influence on the outcome of a situation

Full or partial personal control of a situation

IAEA

Fairness of risk distribution

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

Distribution of costs and benefits is unfair

Distribution of costs and benefits is fair

IAEA

Nature of risk

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

Result of human activity Result of natural phenomenon

IAEA

Catastrophic potential

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

High number of people injured or killed

Small number of victims

IAEA

Personification

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

Risks are represented by a specific victim or potential victim

Risks are represented as an idea

IAEA

Personal participation

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

A situation directly affecting someone and/or their family

A situation with no direct effect

IAEA

Awareness

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

Poorly understood situation and mechanisms

Clear situation and mechanisms

IAEA

Fear

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

An outcome involving greater pain and suffering

An outcome without greater pain and suffering

IAEA

Children and future generations

Greater perception of risk Lesser perception of risk

Consequences represent a danger to children and threat to future generations

No special danger to children or threat to future generations

IAEA

Key characteristics summary

Media attention

Understanding

Familiarity

Scientific certainty

History / Stigma

Onset of effects

Reversibility

Trust

Availability of information

Voluntariness

Control

Benefits

Fairness of risk distribution

Nature of risk

Catastrophic potential

Personification

Personal participation

Uncertainty

Awareness

Fear

Influence on children and future generations

IAEA

Summary

The public and emergency managers think about risk differently;

Non-expert risk perception is a matter of emotion more than rational factual thinking;

These feelings are real and must be taken into account by emergency managers and

PIOs.

IAEA

Summary

Understanding emotional risk perception factors in a nuclear or radiological emergency helps communicators to express empathy and respect;

This will help build trust.

IAEA

Summary

Building trust gives emergency responders more influence on how the public behaves, which is a vital part of maximizing public health and safety in preparing for, responding to, and recovering from nuclear and radiological emergencies.

IAEA

Download