Prepared for NC ASSE by Stephen Wrightenberry – Intern Cree EHS Presented by Erin Hite – EHS Program Manager, Cisco Systems ASSE Chapter meeting 12/13/12 Overview of a sample plan to implement GHS in an industrial setting. ◦ Objectives ◦ Challenges ◦ Plans and ideas Will include tips and things to think about as you implement the program at your worksite. Will not be a detailed review of the changes to the regulation (hopefully you already know the details!). See handout for side by side comparison of 1994 and 2012 Haz comm regulation changes Sections with changes: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Purpose Scope/Application Definitions Hazard Classification Written Program Labels Safety Data Sheets Employee Training Trade Secrets Compliance Plan Step Planned Completion Date (Compliance required) Update and Publish the internal Hazard Communication Program. June 1, 2013 (June 1, 2016) Train employees regarding the new label elements, safety data sheets (SDS) format and provide any additional employee training for newly identified physical or health hazards. June 2013 (December 1, 2013) Update existing labels at the site Start July 2013 (June 1, 2016) Update existing MSDSs with newly formatted SDSs provided by the chemical manufacturer/importer. Ongoing (June 1, 2016) Timing for implementation – SDSs are already becoming available everywhere, need to train employees on how to read. Training needs to cover: ◦ Changes to HazCom, 16-section SDS, new label requirements, new classification system, any newly identified physical or health hazards on new SDSs to include in employee training Include new label information in training ◦ Since there will be new Manufacturer labels – if internal labels remain the same it will be confusing for employees. ◦ New SDS will have classification numbers that are opposite of NFPA labels that are currently in use (1 is highest hazard rather than lowest hazard) Classification system is more complicated. Individual employees may not be able to make label choices without EHS assistance. Pictograms – new for employees – different from numbered hazard rating • Online Powerpoint class – required for all employees. • Updated website – with links to information and contacts for help • Posters – for work areas, gowning rooms, break rooms, bulletin boards • Badge Cards – for employees to carry • Newsletter – company wide prior to training. Sample Badge Card Sample Poster Materials from: GHS Compliance Kit KHA Online-MSDS 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 16) Focus in Identification of the substance or mixture and of the supplier employee Hazards identification Training will be Information on ingredients (composition) substance/mixture on changes to First Aid Measures these sections Firefighting Measures Accidental Release Measures Handling and Storage Exposure controls/Personal protection Physical and Chemical Properties Stability and Reactivity Toxicological Ecological Information (Non-mandatory) Disposal Considerations (Non-mandatory) Transport Information (Non-mandatory) Regulatory Information (Non-mandatory) Other information including information on preparation and revision of the SDS Chemical Identification Classification and how to Pictograms Interpret and what they mean Hazard Statements Handling Response and Prevention LOTs and LOTs of labels! ◦ Includes: squeeze bottles, equipment, tanks, hoods, buckets, beakers, jars and on and on! Larger labels required – with inclusion of pictograms, hazard statements and other requirements. What to do with small containers? Difficult to use preprinted labels for the multitude of chemicals (need all sizes, pictograms can’t be blank, who manages) Manufacturer label pictograms need to be in color – determine if internal labels will follow this rule – requires specialized printers. Finding printers made in the US to print updated labels (Printers available in the UK as of now; US is slowly transitioning printer labels over). New HazCom regulation allows employers to use existing workplace-specific labeling systems as long as they provide the required information. However, existing systems may not match what will now be on manufacturer labels and on the SDS. ◦ Leads to confusion for employees so implementing consistent format is a good idea. Company is using NFPA/HMIS Labels on all non-manufacturer containers and equipment. NFPA HMIS NFPA labels use number system to Rate the hazards. ◦ 4 is high hazard, 1 is low hazard GHS labels will have pictograms and hazard statement, SDS will classify using numbers ◦ 1 is high hazard Sample GHS Internal labels should have the following: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Product Identifier Pictogram Signal Word Hazard Statement(s) Other: ◦ Precautionary Statement(s) ◦ Manufacturer contact info BIG!! Will need glasses to read if use all this information if used on secondary containers! • As you can see, the format may differ as long as the required information is present. • May need to have several options available for internal labels to accommodate container size and type of hazard. • Manu. labels require red outlines for pictograms. • Blank diamonds are not permitted on a label from manufacturer, but currently ok for site labels • Might change! • Black out pictograms that are not applicable? • Need to train employees how to complete label • What to do if updated SDS is not available? Using in house printing will cut time in receiving labels and will also expedite the process, since labels can be designed, printed, and then posted. Important to find a cost effective printer that can handle all necessary applications. Would be great if integrated with existing MSDS system so labels would auto print based on specific MSDS information. ◦ MSDS online system Costs for uploading new SDSs, Implementing label printing module (configure information from MSDS to label, train employees on how to use) ◦ Manpower for requesting updated SDSs from all manufacturers ◦ What to do when you don’t have an updated SDS? (product no longer made, manufacturer out of business, outside of US etc) ◦ Who reviews for any newly identified physical or health hazards? From: sigma-aldrich.com/safetycenter.html This is a good reference for EHS professionals to check classifications and make label choices if MSDS is not available. http://www.labcluster.com/news4/3033 4_ghs_poster_eu.pdf