Day 2 - for Ed

advertisement

CAADP 10 YEARS ON:

DIALOGUE TO IMPROVE IMPLEMENTATION,

COORDINATION AND

ALIGNMENT WITH NATIONAL AGRICULTURE

INVESTMENT PLANS (NAIPs)

Day 2

Donor Coordination,

Harmonization and Alignment

Who’s Here

• Quick Introductions of Delegates

– Boaz Blackie Kezire

Day 1 RECAP & SYNTHESIS

Facilitator: Ed Rege

Objective

– Quickly review emerging priority issues identified yesterday that need to be addressed to improve

CAADP implementation over the next 10 years

Emerging Issues Arising from Group Break

Private Sector – should be driving force. Public sustainability

Outs Sessions sector should support Private sector to achieve

M&E (tracking progress) and KM (Impact oriented policies / commitments / outcomes)

Embedding thinking and doing in national frameworks (NAIPs)

Sustainability/ self-sustaining (e.g. continuing investment that doesn’t depend on outside resources, building institutional framework, continuity of program)

Emerging Issues Arising from Group

Break Outs Sessions

Bringing youth into agriculture

• Be more direct in supporting PPPs in value chain development so youth can benefit

• Entrepreneurship training for youth

Local capacity / institutional strengthening

Political commitment at all levels

• Develop model on how we can promote to encourage political commitment of our principles

Go beyond drafting documents to our own resource mobilization and identify other sources of funding beyond what we are already familiar with.

Consistency, stable, predictable government polices (e.g. trade policies)

Research for development / innovative ideas being introduced into agr. systems

BIG ISSUES Mentioned by these Regions

No. of Times

Private Sector – should be driving force. Public sector should support

Private sector to achieve sustainability

M&E (tracking progress) and KM

(Impact oriented policies / commitments / outcomes)

Southern Africa,

East Africa, West

Africa GR1, West

Africa GR 2

Southern Africa,

East Africa, West

Africa GR1,

4

3

Embedding thinking and doing in national frameworks (NAIPs)

Southern Africa,

East Africa

2

Sustainability/ self-sustaining East Africa, West

Africa GR1,

2

Bringing youth into agriculture Southern Africa,

West Africa GR

2,

2

Day 2:

Donor Coordination, Harmonization and Alignment -

Conditions to be Met

Objectives:

• Exchange ideas and suggestions on current status of donor coordination and alignment

• Share ideas on how to improve donor coordination and alignment (at country level, between in-country and headquarter offices)

• Clarify conditions that countries need to meet in order for donors to turn promised support into high level policy commitments

Part 1

Status of Donor Coordination, Harmonization

and Alignment (10 min)

– Jeff Hill, USAID Food Security Policy Chief

Sample Responses on Mutual Accountability,

Donor Alignment, Coordination and Aid

Effectiveness Stocktaking Exercise (10 min)

– Hubert Cathala, DPTT

Panel Dialogue

Moderator: Boaz Blackie Keizire

• Saga Pascal Yves Ilboudo, PS, Ministry of Agr for

Coordination of Agriculture Policy, Burkina Faso

• Patrick Mutabwire, PS, Ministry of Local

Government, Uganda

• Fenton Sands, USAID/Ghana, ASWG

• Sam Kanyarukiga, CAADP Coordinator in COMESA

• Eric Force, ADWG/DPTT Country Rep, Cameroun

30 min

BREAK

Mapping Donor Coordination Efforts

Objective:

• Share case studies that illustrate what it takes to align efforts of donors and countries or regions to achieve a common goal

Donor Mapping Cases

ECOWAS: Donor Mapping (15 min)

– Alain Sy Traore, Director of Agriculture, ECOWAS

Ethiopia: Examples of approaches and tools used to support better coordination (15 min)

– Ato Dejene and Gary Wallace, MoA and Donor

Coordinators of RED&FS Discussion, Ethiopia

Discussion / Summary

LUNCH – 1 HOUR RECONVENE BRIEFLY IN

PLENARY IMMEDIATELY AFTER LUNCH

Afternoon DISCUSSION TASK

Objectives of group discussion:

• Agree on 3-4 most critical donor coordination, harmonization and alignment issues that need to be fixed

• Brainstorm and agree on 3-4 specific, realistic actions that can be taken to overcome these issues (how can they be fixed)

• Summarize 3-4 Issues and How to Fix Them

Process

Country teams will meet in regional groups after lunch

NO FORMAL PRESENTATIONS – Keep comments concise so everyone can participate in dialogue

REMEMBER

• Frank, open dialogue

– share experiences on how issues have been dealt with to date

– help outline and guide specific actions needed to address these issues or challenges

• These are sessions to learn from each other

– It’s a RARE opportunity to have collegial problem solving discussions -starting with a good understanding of the problems you are facing and

MOVING TO SOLUTIONS

Focus Questions

1. How Do You Recognize If Coordination,

Harmonization and Alignment are really happening?

(What would be the most critical indicators)

– Agree on 3-4 Indicators

1. What specific actions would you suggest to make coordination / alignment happen or to improve it beyond the current situation

– agree on 3-4 Actions

1. What is currently constraining national level leadership in coordination, alignment and harmonization? What specific steps should be taken to address this issue?

– Share 3-4 suggestions

Donor Coordination, Harmonization &

Alignment – HOW DO WE MAKE IT WORK

Regional Group Configuration

West Africa Group 1 (Jim Tefft) – CAUCUS 11

Burkina Faso, Cameroun, Sierra Leone, Mauritania, ECOWAS

West Africa Group 2: (Maurice Lorka) – CAUCUS 12

Ivory Coast, Senegal, Togo, DRC, Niger, ECOWAS

East Africa: (Mbosonge Mwenechanya)– CAUCUS 13 Ethiopia,

Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, COMESA, IGAD

Southern Africa: (Nalishebo Meebelo) – CAUCUS 10

Mozambique, South Africa, Malawi, Zambia, COMESA

R EGIONAL G ROUP D ISCUSSIONS

UNTIL 1600

B REAK AT 1600/ PLENARY AT 1630

BREAK

(30

MIN

)

Specific ACTIONS Needed To Improve Donor

Coordination, Harmonization & Alignment

Reports, Discussion & Synthesis

Objectives

• Share reports

• Agree on most critical issues and most realistic actions needed on donor coordination, harmonization and alignment

• Agreements will provide input into revised

“Guidelines for Donor Support to CAADP Process at a Country Level”

W

RAP

U

P

W HAT HAPPENS TOMORROW

Download