Assessing student learning from Public Engagement David Owen National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research Councils UK and the Wellcome Trust ENGAGED TEACHING Developing teaching activities which positively impact on the community, and enhance students’ engagement skills Education reaches far beyond the classroom. University of Manchester, Vision Our Teaching and Learning Strategy has five Statement core principles, learner empowerment, active engagement, learning in communities, education for sustainable development, and Professor Craig Mahoney, Chief Executive The Higher Education Academy. learning for equality, diversity and intercultural understanding. Higher education should be a transformative process that supports the University of Gloucestershire, development of graduates who can make Teaching and Learning Strategy a meaningful contribution to wider society, local communities and to the economy. Universities engage with a range of professional agencies in different sectors : they can also engage directly with the public. This diagram ‘maps’ the different external groups with whom they might engage The public The media Schools, colleges and lifelong learning Public sector Communities of interest Cultural and leisure services Communities of place Health and well being agencies Policy community Quangos and govt agencies RESEARCHER, STUDENT Community organisations and societies Local / regional / national govt Voluntary organisations and charities Local authorities / strategic bodies International community Non Governmental Organisations Businesses and industry Business community Social enterprises Community and 3rd sector Recognising learning and celebrating achievement from Public Engagement These are some of the approaches which recognise learning and achievement Certification Graded with levels Inclusion on the HEAR Discipline specific Curriculum embedded Verification Log of hours or activities Learning assessed Flexible accreditation Credit bearing Reflective journal Attending workshops and classes Presentations, mock interviews Embedding Public Engagement in the Curriculum A FRAMEWORK FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING FROM PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Framework Design • Consultation and events • Literature and Research – Attributes Framework for Public Engagement – Embedding Community Engagement in the Curriculum: An example of University-Public Engagement – An extensive literature review – Bursting the Bubble: Students, Volunteering and the Community – Engaging with over 5,000 students and graduates across six universities, this study reported on the impacts and outcomes from student-community engagement for students and community groups. Knowledge Co-Creation Able to own, review and develop module concepts in light of experiences Critically reflects on the manner in which engagement has influenced subject knowledge of self and others Reflective Practice Demonstrates a capacity to reflect on engagement activity, using this to evaluate the programme, and to maintain a process of continual learning Communication Can adapt styles, methods and approaches in order to effectively communicate with, work with and inspire target audience Demonstrates a critical understanding of factors that influence effective communication Managing Engagement Demonstrates a capacity to make management decisions in ambiguous and connected circumstances Able to work across disciplinary and organisational boundaries to support change Awareness of Self and Others Critical understanding of self, society and context in which module operates Detailed understanding of the audiences, communities, institutions and stakeholders engaged with the project KNOWLEDGE Able to internalise, operationalize, review and develop programme and/or module content and concepts in light of experiences Critically reflects on the manner in which engagement has influenced subject knowledge of self and others THRESHOLD ASSESSMENT CRITERIA First Class Third Class Demonstrates an excellent grasp of relevant concepts in relation to their ‘real-world’ application which is thoroughly evidenced Ideas are applied in a sophisticated and creative way, varying approach with context, across multiple layers of complexity Excellent exploration of the manner in which engagement activity influenced the knowledge of others, explored critically and fully supported with examples A solid understanding of relevant concepts in relation to their ‘real-world’ application with adequate appropriate evidence Ideas are applied in a logical way, varying approach with context Good exploration of the influences of the project on the knowledge of others but may lack some critical development Understanding of relevant concepts and their application to the ‘real-world’ is basic Ideas are applied competently, but mechanically, in uncomplicated circumstances A basic understanding of how knowledge of stakeholders may have been influenced, but may lack evidence or support from appropriate examples MANAGING ENGAGEMENT Demonstrates a capacity to make management decisions in ambiguous and connected real-world circumstances Able to work across disciplinary and organisational boundaries to support change THRESHOLD First Class Third Class ASSESSMENT CRITERIA Demonstrates an excellent level of critical thought around the choice, framing and understanding of the engagement situation Provides a comprehensive account of influences of project partners; resources; disciplinary, organisational boundaries; and different levels of expertise on project management decisions and delivery Conflicting goals within the situation are recognised and evaluated in relation to different approaches to managing them Reflects critically on how to support the learning of others, to support emergence and selforganisation The choice, framing and understanding of the engagement situation is good but may need further critical development and supporting examples Effective exploration of a wide range of situational influences on decision making Conflicting goals are recognised, and approaches to managing and evaluating these are explored. Demonstrates a good understanding of the processes that are important to supporting the learning of others and provides some relevant examples of how these processes have been implemented Information about the choice, framing and understanding of the engagement situation is basic and could be supported with more detailed evidence Describes a range of situational influences on decision making Conflicting goals are recognised, but suitable approaches to managing and evaluating these are not offered Demonstrates some understanding of the processes that are important to supporting the learning of others and provides some examples of how these processes have been implemented Embedding Public Engagement in the Curriculum FURTHER RESOURCES WWW.PUBLICENGAGEMENT.AC.UK