PowerPoint Presentation - Slide 1 - International Council on Social

advertisement

Social Cash Transfer as a Tool for

Social Protection

Eduardo Klien

HelpAge International

Social Protection Floor Initiative

Hong Kong, June 2010

Outline

• Why are Social Cash Transfers (SCT) important?

• Indications of impact

• What triggers decision-makers in adapting SCT?

Why are they important in the scope of the SPF-I?

• Social fairness

• Inequalities create instability

• China’s commitment to social harmony implies redistribution of wealth. SCT is a way

Economic reasoning

• Direct contribution to growth and development of local markets

• Healthier and more educated workforce

• Political common-sense

• Design of schemes needs to consider political support

• Universal approaches gain more support and are less vulnerable to corruption

Evidence of measurable improvement

• Education

- Enrolment & attendance duration in Mexico, Brazil,

Nicaragua, Zambia, Bangladesh

• Health & Nutrition

- Increase in height, weight and improvement in nutrition in Colombia, Chile, Malawi, South Africa

Evidence in poverty reduction

South Africa Social Transfers

Source: UNDESA, 2009

One type of SCT: Social Pensions

• The challenge of ageing

• 350 million older people lack income security

• In Asia only 1 out of 5 reach old age with some formal pension

Trends in Ageing

Dynamic pyramids, change every 5 years

Japan Bangladesh South Africa

Ageing

• 700 billion by 2050 in Asia (50% of total)

• Growth of older old

- 1 out of 2 Japanese born today will live up to 100 years

• Feminisation of old age

- 67 men for every 100 women in developing countries

• Poverty in old age

- Generally larger proportion than non-olds. More vulnerable

How are Social Pensions distributed?

Brazil

Food

Other household

Source: UNDESA, 2009

Health

Gifts & savings

Utilities & Fuel

Transport

How are Social Pensions distributed?

Zambia

Food Animals Clothes Agriculture School Other

Source: UNDESA, 2009

Are Social Pensions affordable?

Nepal – less than 1% of GDP

Vietnam – 0.12% of GDP

Thailand – 0.5% of GDP

Zambia – Pilot in Kolomo – if expanded it would cost 0.5% GNI

Key determinant

Political will

Political will

Political will

Political will

Social Pensions in the last 3 years

(In Asia)

Philippines – Approval of a means-tested pension scheme for 1.7 million

Vietnam – Reduction of age of entry to

80 years and increase in the amount (200%) –

Decree 67

Nepal – Reduction of age of entry from 75 to

70 years and increase in amount

Thailand – Increase in coverage from 1.8 to

5.4 million older people

What triggers decision-makers?

Governments are the decision-makers

• Motivations vary:

• Understanding of social pensions as a tool for development

• Political pressure depending on contexts

• political opportunity

• Commitment to fairness

It helps:

• Research on specific contexts

• Evidence of positive impact helps decision making

• Building scenarios of affordability through microsimulation can dissipate fears of insolvency

• Building capacities

• Targeted processes, mainly at government levels

• Necessary involvement of Ministries of Finance, Planning and Social welfare.

• Not prescriptive training but building and understanding of options mechanisms

• Involving civil society

• As a force to support and influence

• Cannot work isolated from governments

• Voice of rights, depending on contexts

• Use of the media

• To expand social acceptance and social pressure

• To share experiences form elsewhere

• To provide a voice form the demand side

• Building Alliances

• Networks, academics, sectors within government, political parties

Thank You

Download