RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) Adapted from School District of Philadelphia Rtii Materials Learning Objectives Part I Understand the philosophy of RtII Review benefits for the transition from CSAP to RtII Identify the key components of the RtII model Explain Rtii and IEP interaction Roll-out plan: Implementation 2012-2013: District-wide implementation of RtII ALL Grades: K-12 Replaces CSAP Process Phase 1 focus areas: Literacy, Behavioral Health, Attendance, Student Discipline New Documentation in the online system in Schoolnet Process Roll-out plan: Online System The CSAP database will no longer be in use after the 2011-2012 school year New Process Beginning with the 2012-2013 school year, Rtii, a module in Schoolnet, will replace the CSAP reporting system Roll-out plan: Online System The Interventions system will document the following: New Process Strategic and Intensive academic intervention plans provided through RtII Positive behavioral interventions in compliance with the Statemandated SAP (Student Assistance Process) EIS (Early Intervening Services) mandated by Federal law Truancy interventions in compliance with the State-mandated compulsory attendance procedures and TEP (Truancy Elimination Plan) Intervention plans will be automatically closed out in the system on the last day of school each year What Is Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtII)? A multi-level system of support focused on improving learning for ALL students A data-driven model to enable early identification and strategic interventions for students at academic or behavioral risk (screening, progress monitoring) A shared, collaborative, data-driven decision-making process among professional educators. Differences in CSAP & RtII Student Support Model Tier 3 •Individual Students evaluated for Change of Placement Tier 2 •Individual Student Intervention plans •60 days to demonstrate progress Tier 1 •Small Group supplemental instruction •30 days to demonstrate progress Level 3 •Small group or Individual supplemental and targeted instruction Level 2 •Small group supplemental and targeted instruction CSAP RtII Level 1 •All students •Research - based, effective instruction •Progress monitoring through Curriculum Based Assessments Key Components of RtII Implementation Quality Standards-Based Core Curriculum RtII School Team Time for Collaboration Time for Intervention Delivery Screening Progress Monitoring Evidence-based Interventions Documentation and Accountability System The Key Components of RtII Courtesy of the National Center on Response to Intervention Monitor & Document Data-Based DecisionMaking • Progress Monitoring • Evidence Based Interventions Scheduling Intervention Time RTI Process Identify Interventions 10 • Screeners Group Meetings to Analyze Data RtII Components: Speaking a Common Language Core Program: Research-based curriculum and instruction Strategies: Instructional tools used broadly across all RtII levels to support learning Interventions: Academic : Evidence-based programs that supplement Core Program Behavioral/Attendance/Discipline : Evidence–based programs or best practices that address the barriers Screening: Academic : assessing ALL students a minimum of 3X/year to group students according to risk level Behavioral/Attendance/Discipline: assessing ALL students on a monthly basis to group students according to risk level Progress Monitoring: On-going assessment of students identified as at-risk to determine accuracy of screener, and to gauge student progress with selected intervention program RtII School Team Principal & Assistant Principal “RtII Champion” Teachers Counselor Technology Teacher Leader - TTL Attendance Designee Student Discipline Designee Special Education Liaison – SEL School Psycologist Key components of RtII: Time for collaboration Purpose To create dedicated time for the RtII team to analyze student data for the purpose of improving all student’s achievement. Recommended Best Practices Frequency: data meetings 1-2 per month Review screener data every marking period (monthly for attendance) Review progress monitoring data Structure: Grade group meetings or other group meeting times RtII Team present Key components of RtII: Time for collaboration Outcomes Form consensus on students identified for intervention plans Assign team members for a specific plan Initiate the plan online Task completion and progress monitoring New Process Philadelphia School District RtII Model Attendance ~85% of students Level 1 Level 2 Behavior ~10 % of Students ~5% of Level 3 Students Small Group/Individu al Small Group Discipline Whole Class Literacy Key components of RtII: Screeners Screeners are assessments tools used to assess ALL students a minimum 3 times/year to group students according to risk level To prepare for start of school year, use prior year cycle four data to group students RtII Model For Reading Literacy 2+ years below grade-level (chronically underperforming) Within 2 years below grade-level Just at or above grade-level Level 3 Few students at this level Level 2 Some students at this level Level 1 Most students at this level RtII Model For Attendance 10 or more illegal absences 3 or more unexcused and illegal absences Level 3 Few students at this level Level 2 Some students at this level Level 1 Most students at this level RtII Model For Behavioral Health Students with a behavioral health diagnosis Students who struggle with exhibiting appropriate social skills Level 3 Few students at this level Level 2 Some students at this level Level 1 Most students at this level RtII Model For Student Discipline Students with an EH-21 Discipline Referral Level 3 Few students at this level Students with 3 or more suspensions Level 2 Some students at this level Level 1 Most students at this level Key components of RtII: Selecting Interventions Choose an intervention using the following criteria: Evidence-based Matched to student need Available Staff are trained to implement with fidelity Identify evidence-based interventions: National RTI Center www.rti4success.org Key components of RtII: Time for Intervention Delivery Time should be allotted/scheduled for interventions to be delivered to the identified students Regular and consistent delivery of the intervention Key Components of RtII: Progress Monitoring Progress monitoring (PM) assesses progress of students identified through the screener as “at-risk” Determines accuracy of screener Gauges student progress with selected intervention program The online system requires monthly Progress Monitoring for all interventions, but may be administered more frequently. PM data should be reviewed collaboratively 1-2 times/month; time for structured and facilitated data analysis should be built into RtII team meeting agenda Recommended Progress Monitoring Tools: Assessments built into evidence-based interventions Some screeners (e.g., DIBELS) ScholarChip (High Schools)