Louisiana Petro-Populism and public services in the city of New Orleans By Brian Marks and Christian Roselund Huey Long, 1893-1935 What is petro-populism? A political system whose primary feature is the redistribution of oil and gas revenues through one or more means for the benefit of the general population Term first coined by journalist and author Christian Parenti to describe the Chavista regime in Venezuela Longite Petro-Populism is an oil production/ votes/ public services deal between big oil companies, Longite political leaders and the masses in the state of Louisiana. The role of public services in the city of New Orleans Services such as public schools, Charity Hospitals and housing under-girded the social reproduction of New Orleans residents In the early decades, public housing provides a quality of life not otherwise available to many urban residents Increased the productivity of New Orleans residents Public funding for such services was particularly important for New Orleans as an economically underdeveloped city with high, persistent poverty Longite Petro-Populism and the New Deal Longite Petro-Populism: Predates the New Deal (first major features established in 1928) Is an influence on the New Deal via the roads programs, “Share Our Wealth”, and political threat that Huey Long posed to Roosevelt. Becomes a regional variant on the New Deal after the Death of Huey Long and the basic political economy of the state of Louisiana Longite Petro-Populism and the New Deal contrasted Longite Petro-Populism Based on a resource extraction economy Public services/votes deal Direct connection between charismatic leader and the masses The New Deal Based on a manufacturing economy Wages/productivity deal Unions mediate between working people, corporations and the state Petro-populism: inputs and outputs Inputs Oil and gas severance taxes Outputs Gasoline tax Roads and bridges Charity hospitals Other taxes Bonds Federal money (after death of Education (largely through severance taxes) State old age pensions Welfare systems Petro-populism: outputs for New Orleans New Orleans is a primary beneficiary of Longite Petro-Populism Education: Including textbooks, adult literacy, UNO, LSU medical school, scholarships, teacher pay increases and equalization. Public hospitals: Funding for Charity, medical training, associated services Old age pensions: Increased to $50/month under Earl Long in 1948 Welfare programs: Including free school The special case of public housing • Public Housing is not a Longite promise or concept, but a product of the New Deal • New Orleans receives a large share of federal funds for public housing, and these funds are used swiftly by the Longite Maestri Administration • Fits into the scheme of Longite public services (votes for services), but on a federal level Crisis of race 1960 Longite petro-populism is a system that provides services to all state residents, but those services are profoundly unequal on racial lines This becomes unacceptable in the post-war period Public services - schools, hospitals and housing – are a primary battleground of integration and equality Longite petro-populism is class-based and race-neutral, which does not hold up during a time of heightened racial tension Whites de-invest from the city and public services regime starting in the late 1960's Frantz Elementary, 1960 Crisis of oil production 1970 Mineral wealth, both in production and consumer forms, is the primary fuel of petro-populism Louisiana fails to obtain its share of the OCS oil wealth, starting in 1948 Oil and gas production in Louisiana land and state waters peaks in 1970 and declines steadily thereafter Prices fall 1984-1986, leading to a collapse of the system and a fiscal crisis in Louisiana