Multiple Measures of College Readiness Support Operations for Academic Retention Emily Ehrlich Hammer, M.B.A., A.B.D. Assistant Director October 16, 2013 NEW THECB TSI Rules RULE §4.55 Assessment and Placement For holistic placement of non-exempt students not meeting standards as defined in §4.57(a) and (b) of this title (relating to College Ready and Adult Basic Education (ABE) Standards), institutions shall use for determination of appropriate courses and/or interventions the TSI Assessment results and accompanying Diagnostic Profile, along with consideration of one or more of the following: (1) High school Grade Point Average/class ranking; (2) Prior academic coursework and/or workplace experiences; (3) Non-cognitive factors (e.g., motivation, self-efficacy); and (4) Family-life issues (e.g., job, childcare, transportation, finances). Literature Regarding Multiple Measures Factors that can affect student performance and retention: Student Background in Subject High School GPA Academic Rigor of High School Program SAT ACT College Readiness Assessment Source: Hirschy, A. S., Bremer, C. D., & Castellano, M. (2011). Career and technical education (CTE) student success in community colleges: A conceptual model. Community College Review, 39, 296318. doi: 10.1177/0091552111416349 Literature Regarding Multiple Measures Validity of college success predictions can be improved by including non-cognitive factors commitment to school (Tinto 1993), long-term goal setting (Young and Sowa 1992) social support (Lotkowski, Robbins and Noeth 2004). Sources: Lotkowski, V.A., Robbins, S.B., and Noeth, R.J. (2004). The role of academic and nonacademic factors in improving college retention: ACT policy report. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Young, B., and Sowa, C. (1992). Predictors of academic success for Black student athletes. Journal of College Student Development, 33, 318-324. Developmental Education Menu of Options Who’s Who Reading/ Writing Accelerated Course-Based Options Non-Course Based Competency Options Developmental Education Interventions Traditional Dev Ed Options Students who under multiplemeasures evaluation show selfdiscipline to complete in a more independent environment Students who fall within 3% of College Ready TSI 0204 TSI 0304 Math TSI 0202 TSI 0302 ESOL 1 Hour A Week Traditional Face to Face Class Time 1 Hour A 1 Hour A Two Week Refresher – Week Week Students must retest at meet student end of Refresher. If with a must go to students fail retest, Tutor Learning then students will be Center moved to NCBO and work Option on Aplia or ALEKS TSI 0305 Reading/Writing Developmental Education Placement TSI Course Remediation Version TSI 0204 Accelerated Course-Based TSI 0304 TSI 0305 NCBO 0304 REF 0304 Accelerated Course-Based Accelerated Course-Based NCBO Bubble Option TSI Test Scores TSI Assessment TSI Assessment TSI Assessment TSI Assessment TSI Assessment ACT/SAT/GPA Reading Writing Essay 342-345 350-354 1-2 Reading Writing Essay 346-350 355-362 3-4 Reading Writing Essay 346-350 355-362 3-4 Reading Writing Essay 346-350 355-362 3-4 Reading Writing Essay 347-350 359-363 4 NA NA NA 20-23/450-500/3.0 20-23/450-500/3.0 Mathematics Developmental Education Placement TSI Course Remediation Version TSI 0202 Accelerated Course-Based TSI Assessment Mathematics Accelerated Course-Based TSI Assessment Mathematics NCBO TSI Assessment Mathematics TSI Assessment Mathematics TSI 0302 NCBO 0302 REF 0302 Bubble Option TSI Test Scores ACT/SAT/GPA NA 336-340 NA 341-349 20-23/450-500/3.0 341-349 347-349 20-23/450-500/3.0 Non-Course Based Competency Options Students who meet TSI Assessment exit-level remediation course standards and have met threshold criteria for ACT/SAT/High School GPA and NonCognitive Evaluation will be placed into one of the following: NCBO0304 – Reading/Writing deficient students are placed into a self-paced course with three components: Aplia Homework, Essay and Revisions, and Final Exam NCBO0302 – Mathematics deficient students are placed into a self-paced course with three components: ALEKS Pie, Project, and Final Exam Fall 2013 TSI Student Performance on Admission Tests TAKS Student Score ELA (2200) Essay (3) Mathematics (2200) 2277 2.49 2235 Critical Reading (500) Mathematics (500) Composite (1070) 451.32 467.5 919.70 English (19) Mathematics (19) Composite (23) 18.1 18.73 19.25 SAT Student Score ACT Student Score Fall 2013 TSI Student Performance on TSI Tests Accuplacer Reading Student Score Writing 74.1 Mathematics 53.8 COMPASS Reading Student Score Writing 84 Mathematics 2235 THEA Reading Student Score Writing Mathematics 2277 TSI Assessment Student Score Reading Writing Mathematics 351 None Received 333 Multiple Measure Placement Student Performance Mathematics Total Number of TSI 0302 Students: 87 Average Total Number of Topics 10.14 Average Hours in ALEKS 5.89 Average ALEKS Topics per Hour 2.22 Total Number of NCBO 0302 Students: Average Total Number of Topics 11.2 Average Hours in ALEKS 6.99 Average ALEKS Topics per Hour 1.93 50 Multiple Measure Placement Student Performance Integrated Reading/Writing Total Number of TSI 0304: 72 Total Number of Students Who Took Aplia Pre-Diagnostic 51 Percent Grade on Aplia Basic Writing 64% Percent Grade on Aplia Basic Reading 67% Total Number of NCBO 0304 Students: 51 Total Number of Students Who Took Aplia Pre-Diagnostic 33 Percent Grade on Aplia Basic Writing 70% Percent Grade on Aplia Basic Reading 75% Any Questions?