Use and Abuse of Tax Increment Financing

advertisement
Tax Increment Financing
A Quick Overview
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
Tax Increment Financing

TIF is a tool of local
general
governments to
finance
(re)development of
blighted property for
the purpose of
economic
revitalization
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
Background
 Problem
 Urban
flight left blighted areas in the inner
city unable to compete with the urban edge
communities
 Slums are economically depressed
(blighted) areas in inner cities that need
revitalization
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
Slums = Market Failure
 Cheap
and available supply of fuel and
the auto lead to urban flight in the 1940s
and 1950s
 Owners allow their properties to fall into
disrepair
 Values spiral downward
 Tax base erodes
 Businesses flee
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
Results
 Government
revenues fall
 Social costs climb without offsetting
revenue
 High
unemployment
 Increased crime
 Increased substance abuse
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
Competing With The Urban Edge

Solution


State governments
established Urban
Renewal Authorities
(URA) in the 1950s
Power given:



Declare blighted
areas
Eminent domain
TIFs
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
History

Began in CA in 1952
 CO established
parallel legislation in
1958

Heavily used since
the 1970s
nationwide
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
How They Work
 Declare
blighted
 Freeze the tax base
 Split the revenue stream
 Original
underlying authority revenue
remains frozen at the time of blight
declaration for up to 25 years
 Increment accrues to the URA
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
Typical TIF
2
1.5
Tax Amount
1
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.1
0.2
0.3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
Years
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
URA / Blight / TIF Solution

Urban Renewal Authorities

Eminent domain



Holdouts
Small parcels
TIFs






Finance redevelopment
Stop sprawl
Retain tax base
Level economic playing field with urban edge
developments
Finance infrastructure improvements without a general
tax increase
Development pays its own way
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
TIFs = Financing Options
 Finance
infrastructure
 Estimate future value
 Bond for difference
 Dollars today for dollars tomorrow
 Improved community
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
General TIF Problems
 Result
in market distortion
 Traditional tax base shifts from
underlying authorities to the city
 Job quality
 No accountability
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
New URA / TIF Problems
 Eminent
domain is abused
 Taking
land from one private party to
benefit another private party
 High
jacks the tax base
 TIFs misapplied
 Used
on the urban edge rather than
competing with it
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
What is Blight?

Lack of infrastructure
 Incorrectly configured infrastructure
 Site or other improvement deterioration
 Faulty lot layout
 Unsanitary or unsafe conditions
 Unusual topography
 Defective or unusual conditions impairing
economic growth
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
Colorado Community
Revitalization Association
 TIF:
 Prevents
leakage of sales tax dollars to
outside communities
 Retains revenue for government services
 Contains costs for providing government
services by reusing in-fill locations;

In-fill development carries a significantly lower
public cost compared to edge, or sprawl,
development
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
Colorado Community
Revitalization Association

Revitalizing in-fill
locations:



Reduces pressure
on urban edges
Preserves open
space & agricultural
land
Retains Colorado’s
character and quality
of life
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
Subjectivity = Blight Anything
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
TIFs on the Urban Edge

Meant for development
to pay its own way
without a general tax
increase


Meant to limit sprawl


Yet overuse leads to a
general tax increase
Subsidizes sprawl
Leads to newly blighted
areas from overbuilding
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
Winners



Losers

Developers get
subsidized
City gets new
infrastructure
Citizens have:




higher property values
New jobs
No new general taxes
Local shopping
All other county
residents
 County government
 Competing communities
 Truly blighted areas in
cities
 All state residents

State legislature has to
find the money to backfill
schools
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
Irony
 Meant
for development to pay its own
way without a general tax increase
 Yet
overuse leads to a general tax
increase
 Meant
to limit sprawl
 Subsidizes
sprawl
 Leads
to newly blighted areas from
overbuilding
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
Questions
Prepared by Weld County
Treasurer John Lefebvre
Download