PORT HEDLAND PORT AUTHORITY Lumsden Point Development August 2012 Port Hedland Overview • Iron Ore Exports – 105 mtpa 2005/06 – 246 mtpa 2011/12 – 487 mtpa 2016/17 (forecast) • Berths – Current • 11 Cape Size Iron Ore Berth • 1 Multi User Mini Cape Bulk Berth (Utah Point) • 3 General Cargo Berths – Approved (inner harbour) • 16 Cape Size Iron Ore Berths (inc. South West Creek) • 1 Multi User Mini Cape Bulk Berth (Utah Point) • 3 General Cargo Berths Iron Ore Exports Actual Forecast Non Iron Ore Overview • Port Hedland Berths 1 – 3 used for General & Bulk Cargo – Fuel – Salt – Copper Concentrates – Containers – General Cargo – Project Cargo – Rail – tracks, locomotives, bogies General Cargo – Existing Berths Non Iron Ore Trade Growth • General cargo activity linked to exports – Department of Transport estimates this at 1 – 1.5% of throughput • Cargo forecast, including general cargo, to grow from 4.9 mtpa in 2011/12 to 9.2 mtpa 2016/17 • Capacity of 6.3-6.5 mtpa at existing berths to be reached in 2012/13 • Significant congestion of the berths expected beyond this timeframe • Growth in export berths has not been matched by growth in general cargo berths Non Iron Ore Trade Growth 2010/11 Actual Acid & Caustic Soda 0% Acid & Caustic Soda 0% Containers 0% Copper Concentrate (bulk) 11% 2016/17 Forecast Containers 3% Rock 0% Manganese (bulk) General Cargo 0% 7% Copper Concentrate (bulk) 4% General Cargo 8% Salt 40% Rock 18% Salt 60% Oil 22% Manganese (bulk) 10% Oil 17% Relation berth occupancy/waiting time – General Cargo 2 - Berth case Port performance and Productivity: Source United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) Berth Congestion Lumsden Constructed 2014 Berth Occupancy 2011-2017 140% 120% Berth Occupancy (%) 100% PH1 80% PH2 60% PH3 40% Lu1 Lu2 20% 0% 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 * 100% berth occupancy reflects 70% actual berth usage, plus vessel sailing and change over, and berth maintenance * Rock Load Out for 2 years 2015/16-2016/17 Berth Congestion Lumsden Constructed 2015 Berth Occupancy 2011-2017 140% 120% Berth Occupancy (%) 100% PH1 80% PH2 60% PH3 Lu1 40% Lu2 20% 0% 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 * 100% berth occupancy reflects 70% actual berth usage, plus vessel sailing and change over, and berth maintenance * Rock Load Out for 2 years 2015/16-2016/17 Channel Capacity • A & B Class – Priority sailing for iron ore vessels – loaded and empty – Tidal constrained • C Class – PHPA Utah Point and General Cargo – Typically non tide constrained • Other – D Class Inner Harbour Capacity Allocations Inner Harbour PHPA 30 Mtpa BHP 240 Mtpa FMG 120 Mtpa RHI 55 Mtpa NWIOA 50 Mtpa Total 495 Mtpa Outer Harbour BHP “Quantum” 200 Mtpa Multi-User 200 Mtpa Total* 400 Mtpa * Can be increased Channel Capacity AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak A & B Class Tide Sailings 18.3m A & B Class Entry - Empty C Class Non Tide Constrained Sailings 4 Hrs 14.3m 24 Hrs Theoretical Channel Capacity based on a 6 Cape Size Vessel per tide configuration:4380 number of Slots Calculated as follows: 365 days x 2 Tides x 6 vessels per tide 4 Hrs Lumsden Point • Identified originally in the 2007 Ultimate Development Plan as site for multi user berths • Early concept work by PHPA created the ‘triangle’ option – Multiple land backed berths – Variety of cargoes – ore, fuel, containers, general – Staged development • Involved substantial capital investment Lumsden Point Current Concept Predominantly general cargo (excluding iron ore, salt) Staged development to match cargo demand Stage 1 entails– 2 Handymax berths, 400m length, land backed Optimise capital investment Operationally aligned to PHPA service delivery objectives – reliable, competitive & efficient port Minimise dredging and environmental impact Stage 1: Concept design Lumsden Estate • Approx. 140 Hectares • Mix of light and medium industries to support port activities • Direct access to Lumsden Point and Common User Facility (CUF) • Direct access to Great Northern Highway realignment • Developed in stages to meet industry demand • Pre Assembled Modules (PAMs) access road for Boodarie CUF Concept Design • • • • • • Maritime Servicing Facility Wharves Ship lift Laydown area Supporting Industries Synergies with General Cargo at Lumsden • Proposed location adjacent to Lumsden general cargo berths *Concept only for illustrative purposes. General Cargo Investment Sequencing • Lumsden Point - 2 Berths (Handymax) 2014/15 • South West Creek – Anderson Point 6 Berth (Fuel – Post Panamax) – Demand Driven • Lumsden Point – 2 Berths (Handymax/Panamax) – Demand Driven Lumsden Funding Approvals • Concept Design & Strategic Business Case complete – PHPA Board approved a market sounding study on concept design and business case • Liaise concept design with key agencies • Next stage of approvals dependent on preferred procurement / funding strategy – PHPA / Government Funded – Proponent Funded / PPP Approvals process If privately ‘owned’ N O W Infrastructure option assessment and short listing ‘Next Steps’ Prepare procurement strategy focusing on commercial framework, risk and approvals Determine funding and procurement approach plus project development Place funding If publicly ‘owned’ Finalise final business case/project definition plan for Funding approval Actions Actions Actions Seek Board endorsement of the preferred concept. Seek Board approval for recommended funding and procurement approach. Seek Board approval to prepare to go to market for funding Seek Board approval to appoint a consultant tasked with conducting a market sounding process to fund and/or operate the project. PHPA to explain progress with Department of Transport and Treasury. Submission of Application for Concept Approval to Minister. Seek endorsement of Government on funding, operating and procurement approach including, requests for state funding (if required). Seek funding approval for a consultant to conduct the procurement process. Seek endorsement of Government to go to market for funding Prepare tender and go to market Build Thank You