The Art of Argument: Exploring Toulmin Logic By Patrick, Daniel and Rodney Stephen Toulmin • British philosopher, author, and educator • Devoted his works to the analysis of moral reasoning • Believed absolutism has limited practical value • Introduced practical argument method New System of Logic • • • • Based on justification rather than inference More literal rather than theoretical New argument could now stand up to criticism Published in his book “The Uses of Argumentation” Definitions Data: information that is gathered through observation or experimentation Warrant: inferences or assumed beliefs that support the claim, can be based upon logos, pathos, ethos, or shared values Claim: the statement that one is asserting Data Claim Warrant Structure of Logic • Using data, supported by a warrant, to form a claim. • Warrant supports data which supports claim. • Backing, qualifiers and rebuttals can further support the claim • Very literal and scientific approach Data Claim Warrant Data Simple Example Claim Warrant • Data: My pen is not writing on the paper • Claim: My pen has run out of ink • Warrant: Pens without ink do not write One Step Further • Backing: a credible source or citation, backing up the warrant • Qualifier: Indicates speaker’s degree of certainty of the claim, often uses words such as certainly, absolutely, maybe, etc. • Rebuttal: argument opposing the opposition, can be in the same setup (i.e. data, claim, warrant), Full Structure of Toulmin Logic Qualifier Claim Data Warrant Rebuttal Backing Simple Example Expanded • • • • Data: My pen is not writing on the paper Claim: My pen has run out of ink Warrant: Pens without ink do not write Backing: Bic came out with a study proving that pens with less than 5% of the original supply of ink cannot write properly • Qualifier: I am completely sure this pen ran out of ink • Rebuttal: There are other problems that can lead to the malfunction of pens, such as a broken tip Advantages to using Toulmin Logic • Presents argument structure that facilitates support and validity for said argument. • Always room for doubt in an argument, leaving room for reasons yet undiscovered and rebuttal • Allows for logic to be updated as new discoveries are made • Arguments can be presented and debated as long as you have some data to back up your claim • Presents arguments literally rather than theoretically (dichotomy) Disadvantages to using Toulmin Logic • Does not allow for absolutes • Requires an extensive support system if the claim is to be validated • Can always be disputed as there is always a limited degree of validity Uses in School • • • • Science Labs Socratic Seminars Persuasive Essays Debates Uses in the Real World • • • • • • • Lawyers Scientists Statistics Will Politicians Literary Analysts Everyday life Real Life Example Each year, a World Championship Pumpkin Weights Competition is held to determine the largest pumpkin of the year. Here are the data for years 1979 to 2007 Year Weight (lb) Year Weight (lb) Year Weight (lb) 1979 438.5 1989 755 1999 1131 1980 459 1990 816.5 2000 1140 1981 493.5 1991 780.5 2001 1262 1982 445 1992 827 2002 1337.6 1983 481 1993 884 2003 1385 1984 612 1994 990 2004 1446 1985 531 1995 968 2005 1469 1986 671 1996 1061 2006 1502 1987 604.5 1997 977 2007 1689 1988 633 1998 1092 Analysis • Claim: as years increase, farmers will grow larger and larger pumpkins because of genetic modification biology • Warrant: Pumpkins modified to grow larger will grow larger • Backing: Genetic modification of potato development using Ri T-DNA scholarly article by G. Ooms, A. Karp, M. M. Burrell, D. Twell and J. Roberts proved that potatoes and other vegetables/fruits can be genetically modified to grow larger • Qualifier: These data were recorded in the World Championship which is a valid event • Rebuttal: N/A Backing Warrant Qualifiers Qualifiers The End Data Claim Qualifiers Qualifiers Data Data Rebuttal Warrant Backing Qualifiers Qualifiers Warrant (Daniel’s Original Model of Toulmin Logic) Backing