Next Generation Science Framework, Standards and Assessment: Fall 2013 Update Liz Buttner, Science Education Consultant CT State Department of Education Elizabeth.buttner@ct.gov 11/4/2013 1 Framework describes a reformed “vision” of what it means to be proficient in science: • “knowing science” means applying the Practices to demonstrate understanding of Core Ideas and Crosscutting Concepts; • Details the Practices, Core Disciplinary Ideas, and Crosscutting Concepts NGSS adds assessable Performance Expectations: • Adds performances students should be able to achieve at the conclusion of instruction (end of year; end of grade band; or on a large-scale assessment). • Assigns Performance Expectations to each grade (K-5) and to 6-8 and 9-12 grade bands. 11/4/2013 2 NGSS present an opportunity to improve curriculum, instruction, teacher development, assessment, accountability, and ultimately student interest and achievement in science. Will NGSS adoption improve science teaching and learning in Connecticut? Can teaching new standards using current approaches yield improved results? 11/4/2013 3 NGSS ADOPTION MEANS… Much more than teaching new topics 11/4/2013 4 A Reformed Vision of Science Proficiency Are educators and parents ready to embrace a new vision of what it means to be “proficient” in science? • “ Focus on understanding and application as opposed to memorization of facts devoid of context.” (NGSS Appendix A) • “The integration of content and application reflects how science is practiced and experienced in the real world.” (NGSS Appendix A) • “Most state standards and assessments express these dimensions as separate entities, leading to their separation in both instruction and assessment.” (NGSS Appendix A) 11/4/2013 5 New Ways of Assessing for Accountability Are educators ready to prepare students to succeed on state assessment questions like this? “Analyze and interpret data to determine scale properties of objects in the solar system.” (MSESS1-3) 11/4/2013 6 Inclusion of Engineering Design in K-12 Science Curriculum • ETS1.A: Defining and Delimiting Engineering Problems – A situation that people want to change or create can be approached as a problem to be solved through engineering (K-2) • ETS1.B: Developing Possible Solutions – Tests are often designed to identify failure points or difficulties, which suggest the elements of the design that need to be improved (Gr. 3-5) • ETS1.C: Optimizing the Design Solution – The iterative process of testing the most promising solutions and modifying what is proposed on the basis of the test results leads to greater refinement and ultimately to an optimal solution (Gr. 6-8) Design, build, and refine a device that works within given constraints to convert one form of energy into another form of energy* (HS-PS3-3) 11/4/2013 7 Coordinating Science with CCSS-ELA and Math An opportunity for science to be an integral part of students’ comprehensive education by supporting student learning of ELA/literacy and math expectations within the context of science instruction. TURN AND TALK: • What are the benefits? • What are the potential pitfalls 11/4/2013 8 CT Science Framework Gr. 5 Earth/Space CMT Expected Performances • B22. Explain the cause of day and night based on the rotation of Earth on its axis. • B23. Describe the monthly changes in the appearance of the moon, based on the moon’s orbit around the earth. 11/4/2013 NGSS – Gr. 5 Earth/Space 5-ESS1-2: Represent data in graphical displays to reveal patterns of daily changes in length and direction of shadows, day and night, and the seasonal appearance of some stars in the night sky. 9 Comparing CT to NGSS Assessables: Elementary NGSS CONNECTICUT EXPECTATION 3-PS2-1 EXPECTED PERFORMANCE B.8 Plan and conduct an investigation to provide evidence of the effects of balanced and unbalanced forces on the motion of an object. Describe the effects of the strengths of pushes and pulls on the motion of objects. 11/4/2013 . 10 Comparing CT to NGSS Assessables: Middle School CONNECTICUT NGSS EXPECTED PERFORMANCE C15. PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION MS-LS1-2 Describe the basic structures of an animal cell, including the nucleus, cytoplasm, mitochondria and cell membrane, and how they function to support life. 11/4/2013 Develop and use a model to describe the function of a cell as a whole and ways parts of cells contribute to the function. 11 Comparing CT to NGSS Assessables: High School NGSS CONNECTICUT EXPECTED PERFORMANCE D28 Describe the general role of DNA and RNA in protein synthesis. 11/4/2013 PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION HS-LS1-1 Construct an explanation based on evidence for how the structure of DNA determines the structure of proteins which carry out the essential functions of life through systems of specialized cells. 12 Will require: • Preparing students for new, more rigorous, assessments (not just remembering facts). NGSS Performance Expectations ARE assessment outcomes. • 3 years of high school science for all students; • All students to learn biology, physics, chemistry and Earth/Space science in a progression laid out for K-2, 3-5, 6-8 and 9-12 grade bands; • Inclusion of Engineering Design concepts, practices and outcomes at all grade bands; • Standards to be translated into coherent curriculum learning units; • Curriculum performance expectations be developed; • Modifications to existing teaching approaches and materials; • Substantial professional learning opportunities (see MSP 2013-2015 project categories); May require more teachers certified to teach high school Earth Science and Physics. 11/4/2013 13 Moving Toward Next Generation Science in CT PHASE 1: REFLECTION (2011-2013) – – – – – – – NGSS Draft feedback to Achieve Collaborate with other states (BCSSE) Progress reports to State Board of Education Content Crosswalk District Survey Policy implications Adoption Decision PHASE 2: PREPARATION (2012-2013) – – Policy decisions (MS/HS courses; cumulative or end-of year tests, certification) Stakeholder awareness PHASE 3: TRANSITION (2014-2018) – – – – – Professional development system ; new teaching approaches (MSP) Teacher preparation program upgrades Curriculum transition timeline Curriculum and materials modifications Teaching and learning PHASE 4: FULL IMPLEMENTATION (2017-18 school year) – 11/4/2013 New assessments introduced 14 Possible Connecticut Transition Timeline STANDARDS: • 2013-14 school yr: 2004 Science Framework, GLCs, GLEs in effect • Early 2014: CT adoption decision anticipated POSSIBLE CURRICULUM TRANSITION: • 2014-17: Districts develop and transition to new science curriculum and instructional approaches • 2014 and beyond: Professional development POSSIBLE ASSESSMENT TRANSITION: • March 2014-16: CMT and CAPT Science assessments administered (tentative) • Spring 2017: New or hybrid science assessments? Uncertain whether end-of-grade, end-of-course or cumulative 11/4/2013 15 Taking Time to Make Informed Decisions 11/4/2013 16 NRC Framework: Vision and Broad Goals 11/4/2013 NGSS Standards: Assessments: Assessment Expectations by Grade and Grade Band How will attainment of goals be measured? * Curriculum * Teaching Materials * PD System * Teacher Prep courses * Assessments 17 • How will large scale assessments measure Practices integrated with Core Ideas? For example: “Develop and use a model to describe how the total number of atoms does not change in a chemical reaction and thus mass is conserved.” (MS-PS1-5) • Who will pay for innovative, new tests? • How long will it take to develop such tests? • Will new science tests be cumulative or administered at every grade? • How many states will adopt NGSS? How will publishers address NGSS? AND… 11/4/2013 18 • Districts are currently tackling much change: - Common Core implementation - Teacher evaluation SLOs and IAGDs - Personalized learning - Competency-based report cards • NGSS assessment consortia have not been formed or funded. New ways of testing “practices” not determined yet. • Publishers have not yet developed new instructional materials to illustrate the NGSS vision. 11/4/2013 19 Embrace the vision defined in the “Framework for K-12 Science Education” (National Research Council, 2012) and… • Adopt all NGSS Assessment Expectations (Performance Expectations) only; • Adopt some NGSS Assessment Expectations; • Adopt NGSS Assessment Expectations and develop Curriculum Expectations similar to CT K-8 Grade-Level Concepts (GLCs) and Grade-Level Expectations (GLEs); • Revise current CT Framework and Standards to reflect NRC Framework Core Ideas, Practices and Crosscutting Concepts; • Collaborate with other states to develop curriculum standards. • Other possibilities… 11/4/2013 20 ACTIVITY PURPOSE COMPLETIONDATE Content Crosswalk Identify which NGSS concepts are in CT standards at the same grade; at a different grade; or not in CT standards at all. Findings available October 2013. April 2013 District Implications Survey Elicit district input related to capacity and challenges associated with adoption and transition to NGSS. September 2013 Instructional Shifts Report Compare vision for science teaching and learning in NRC Framework to current CT standards; highlight key shifts. Fall 2013 Elicit district input related to challenges and opportunities for organizing NGSS standards into course sequences for all students. January 2014 Middle/High School CourseMapping Study Groups Higher Education Focus Groups Elicit input on NRC Framework/NGSS adoption from higher education science/engineering & teacher prep faculty. What are potential impacts on students’ success in college STEM courses or majors, and on teaching approaches used in undergraduate science courses. January 2014 Adoption Options Focus Group Convene state NGSS Content Review Committee to compare final NGSS publication to January 2013 feedback to Achieve. What concerns persist? What adoption options address the concerns. February 2014 Recommendations to State Board of Education Present adoption recommendations, including systemic improvements and a phased-in transition timeline if adoption is recommended. Early 2014 11/4/2013 21 11/4/2013 22 NGSS-CT Content Crosswalk • CSDE committee compared curriculum concepts in NGSS to those in current state standards. DID NOT COMPARE PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS. Crosswalk answers the following questions: – Which NGSS concepts have a match in Connecticut standards at the same grade (or grade band); – Which NGSS concepts have a match in Connecticut standards at a different grade (or grade band); – Which NGSS concepts have no match in Connecticut standards and would be new for teachers and students; – Which Connecticut standards have no match in NGSS and could potentially be removed from science curriculum and assessment if NGSS were adopted? – Which grades or grade bands would have the greatest proportion of curricular change if NGSS were adopted? 11/4/2013 23 NGSS-CT Content Crosswalk Highlights Complete report to be posted soon. Highlights include: – About two-thirds of the concepts in the NGSS have a match in Connecticut’s current state standards; – Most new content would be in Gr. 9-12: engineering design; wave properties; electromagnetic radiation; evidence of common ancestry and diversity; the universe and its stars and history of planet Earth – More physical science in Gr. K-5. – Current state science standards apply only to Grades 9 and 10, in keeping with the state requirement for two years of high school science and the state CAPT Science assessment administered at Grade 10. – NGSS are intended to apply to Grades 9 through 12, and would require at least three years of high school science coursework. – Implications? 11/4/2013 24 Content Crosswalk Headlines Greatest change would be felt in Grades 9-12*: – only 51% of NGSS concepts are required of all students in current state standards. – 61% of NGSS Physical Science Gr. 9-12 concepts would be new requirements for all Connecticut high school students; – 58% of the NGSS Earth/Space Science Gr. 9-12 concepts would be newly required of all Connecticut high school students. * Disparity partly because current state science standards apply only to Grades 9 and 10, in keeping with the state requirement for 2 years of high school science and the state CAPT Science assessment administered at Grade 10. NGSS, by contrast, are intended to apply to Grades 9 through 12, and would require at least 3 years of high school science coursework. 11/4/2013 25 Content Crosswalk Headlines Concepts in current Connecticut standards that do not have a match in NGSS include: – Bacteria, viruses, infectious disease; optical technologies; food preservation technologies; biotechnology; nutrition; and the physics of bridges – Could be addressed in curriculum designed to teach ETS2: Links Among Engineering, Technology, Science and Society 11/4/2013 26 11/4/2013 27 District Implications Survey • Circulated from mid-August through late September 2013. • Solicits collective and individual feedback about district “capacity” for science program reform: curriculum, science leadership, teaching materials, professional development. • Over 550 responses from assistant superintendents, district science coordinators, teachers, coaches and other district-level personnel. • Will inform a set of adoption recommendation to be brought to State Board of Education. • Will be used to Identify and plan for resources, supports and costs associated with NGSS adoption, transition and implementation. 11/4/2013 30 STAYING INFORMED • NGSS newsletters – Are you on the CSDE science mailing list? – Contact Liz Buttner at elizabeth.buttner@ct.gov to subscribe • RESC Science Council presentations • CSTA and CSSA events • SDE science web page: www.sde.ct.gov 11/4/2013 31