Joseph V. Rizzi Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 Transaction: Buyout, Acquisition or Recapitalization Leverage: Resulting in highly leveraged (i.e., non investment grade) obligor – fD/EBITDA > 3X Subject to market availability and pricing (function of risk appetite Deal Types: Acquisition Recapitalization Refinance PTP (Public to Private) STS (Sponsor to Sponsor, aka Pass the Parcel) PE Importance: Provides 1/3 of all I/B Revenues and up to 25% of M&A Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 2 Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 7 Year High – 1.77T U.S. - 41% ROW - 59% Drivers Cash Balances Low Rates Exhausted Cost Cuts and Buybacks Pent-up Demand Positive Response Confidence Rising Stock Prices Increase in Hostile T/O 20% of total v single digits post crisis PE: Dog that didn’t bark – Strategic Acquirers crowd-out 20% of total v 27% 4 year average Reflects dearth of larger PTP deals Volume up 6% 2014 v double digit M&A increase PPX: 14X+ Drop in cash in favor of stock/stock + cash All cash at lowest level since 2001 Averages reflect return of the “big deal” 3 Activity Volume ($B) Size (> 10B) 1H14 1H13 1,768 9 1,023 19 Return of Strategic Acquiror Holcim – LaFarge April, 2014: $39.5B Numericable – SFR Facebook – WhatsApp Suntory – Beam Bayer – Merck Cons March, 2014: February, 2014: January, 2014: May, 2014: $23.3B $19.5B $15.7B $14.2B Drivers Increased Stock Prices – Management confidence; Stock as Currency Positive Shareholder Reaction: One Day Indexed Buyer Stock Price Reaction Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 1H14 2.9% 2H13 3.6% 1H13 3.1% 2012 1.8% 2011 .3% 2010 .3% 2009 <1.9%> 2008 <1.3%> Source: S&P Capital IQ 4 Factors Deal Size Timing Price Financing Consideration Buyer Execution Type Tests Best Owner Iron Law Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 5 (Euro/B) 7/31/14 38.8 2013 63.7 2012 29.0 2011 43.9 2010 39.4 2009 9.0 2008 69.3 2007 152.3 2006 164.5 Country UK 28.57% France 19.10% Germany 12.59% Netherlands 10.83% Spain Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 6.45% European PE Dry Powder (Euro/B) – European Focused Fundraising 7/31/14 225 58.4 2013 190 88.8 2012 175 73.8 Key Buyout Stats – 7/31/14 PPX 9X Eq% 35% FDX 5X Source: S&P Capital IQ 6 European LL Volume: Highest Level Post Crisis June/July YTD Volume €59.5B up 19% same period 2013/LY Includes M&A and PE Leverage Up: 5X+ Return of Cov-lite: Reduced Terms 2L Increasing CLO: Returning – 6 Mo 16 v 20 for YE13 Costs dropped from E+200 2013 to E+100 1H14 MEZ N/A: 2L Wipeout HYB (7/31/14): €61.3B v €47.2B LY Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 7 Question Framework 1. How will transaction achieve our goal? Acquisition Strategy 2. Which companies are good targets? Strategic Fit Search Screen 3. Best transaction types? M&A v Alliance JV and Minority Interests 4. Available Synergies? Scale, Scope and Skill Strategic and Due Diligence 5. What is target worth to us and potential bidders? DCF, Comps (trading, transaction) ROV 6. Target assessment? Shareholder value Economic profit, other 7. Risks? Cost of Capital Analysis Sensitivity, Scenario and Simulation 8. Deal Structure? Asset v Stock Cash v Stock Fixed v Contingent 9. Integration Absorption v Preservation Symbiosis v Holding 10. Negotiations Planning and Strategies Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 8 CEO only believer: headstrong; magazine cover effect Only revenue synergies with no investment plan Prefunctory Due Diligence Reservation price changes during bidding Must close deal Failure to identify why buyer is best owner Emphasis on time, effort, cost and reputation sunk into deal Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 9 Stone Age Bronze Age Silver Age Golden Age (1974-84) (1985-90) (1990-2000) (2002-07) Fund proliferation Goes global Shakeout/consolidation Exits Represents 40% higher equity levels Fund Raising of M&A smaller deals Dry Powder Mega Funds Operating improvements Diversification Cottage Industry KKR Bootstrap deals High Yield Back-to-the-Future (2008-2012) Maturity (2013 - ?) focus. Increase in PIPE and minority interests? Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 10 PE Fund Performance Persistence – declining due to competition Access Networks Signaling Crowded (> 5,000) 2,200 funds seeking funds as of July, 2014 Raise $750B Dry Powder LP Selection Issues Strategy Returns Team Terms Relationship Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 11 Tax – Legal – Accounting Knowledge Network Management Industry Expertise Corporate Finance Delivery Fund Raising Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 Investing VALUE Managing/ Monitoring Exit 12 • Buy Right: PPX • Financial Engineering: FDX • Operating Improvements: (pf) EBITDA • Multiple Expansion: Exit X Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 13 Corporate PE Valuation WACC based DCF Equity returns and cost of equity based Debt Capacity Investment Grade (company determined) Maximum debt capacity (lender/market determined) Residual Value Growing Prep Exit X Value Added Synergies Financial Engineering Search Focused Opportunistic Affordability Dilution IRR on required equity Deal Size Large Depends Capital Structure Permanent Temporary Debt Structure Simple Complex Flexibility No financial covenants Cov-lite Horizon Long Term 5+ years Integration Risk High Low Thesis Strategic Transaction Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 14 Sponsor Share CVC 10.13% Carlyle Group 5.06% Astorg Partners 5.06% Permira 5.06% Clayton, Dubilier & Rice 3.80% Goldman Sachs 3.80% Montagu Private Equity 3.80% Advent International 2.53% Bain Capital 2.53% Koch Industries 2.53% Cinven Ltd 2.53% Apollo Management 2.53% Bridgepoint Capital 2.53% Teachers’ Private Capital 2.53% Investcorp 2.53% Triton Managers 2.53% Ardian 2.53% Electra Partners 2.53% ATP Private Equity Partners 1.27% 3i pic 1.27% Source: S&P Capital IQ Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 15 Up Cycle Spreads Narrow Multiples Increase Leverage Increases Exits Accelerate Fundraising Dry Powder Characteristics Government Bond Rates High Yield Spreads Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 16 Superior returns Attracts capital Deals chase money Macro Financial Markets Disappoint returns Impacts fundraising Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 Deal market Capital chasings deals 17 US Investors Fund manager US Exempt Investors General Carried interest LP LP LP Partner partner A B C Non-US Investors FUND Nominee Investment CLO Leverage finance Hedge funds syndicate participants Investment Investment Hold Co. Hold Co. FLL Syndicate participants SLL Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 High Yield Investors Bank Bridge finance Investment Mezzanine Investors Operating Entity 18 Now EBITDA of Acquired Firm Sale value @ 8 x EBITDA 125 1,000 Financing Plan: Equity @ .20 Debt @ .80 Total Capital Raised 200 800 1,000 Fees - $ millions - 188 (c) 1,500 30 50 Net Sale Proceeds on Exit 1,450 Original Debt Less: Debt pay down over 5 years Debt at end of 5 years Return of Original Equity Net gain to be allocated 10% to mgmt options 20% to general partner 70% to limited partners Total (a) Share to CEO Share to next 4 senior officers Share to next 8 key players Total Management share In 5 yrs -540 -200 710 71(a) 142 497 (b) 710 2% points 1% points 1/2% points or or or 800 260 540 $14.2 x 1 = $14.2 $ 7.1 x 4 = $28.4 $ 3.6 x 8 = $28.4 $71.0 (b) Equals a 28.4% compound annual rate of return on investment. (c) Assumes $12 taken out of cost structure immediately and 6.5% growth/year in EBITDA thereafter. Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 Source: Casewriter – The Role of Private Equity Firms in Mergers & Acquisitions Transaction Harvard Business School case 9-206-1 Rev 10/16/06 19 Price ≠ Value eventually converge, but… using price to justify M&A – increases overpaying Most valuations are really disguised Pricings Academic Surveys – DCF Reality – Name Only TV in DCF >60% Value TV calculated using market multiple Venture Capital Valuation Football Field: Flaw of Averages V x x x Average Fit Line x x Asset Value DCF Comp Trade Comp Trans Other (ROV?) Goose that Lays the Golden Egg Story: Price v Value Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 20 Stupidity & Bias Fantasy Competitive Necessity Outlook/Information Advantage Synergies Lower Buyer WACC Undervaluation ROT: Greater than 40% premium over pre-bid market price is difficult to justify for any sizeable acquisition. Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 21 Focus on return: what is the maximum price I can pay based on given set of projections and earn X% return not risk adjusted? Tradition Valuation = Projected cash flows Discounted rate Terminal value LBO Perspective = IRR (Equity discount rate) Projected cash flows Purchase Price Sale Price (Terminal Value) Debt Policy Ratings/Corp Value Transfer from LP’s Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 22 How much can I borrow (XEBITDA) Usually 4 - 6X depending on market Equity Percentage Required (% of PP) Usually 30% - 45% dependent on market Compare Market PPX IRR Adjustments FD Exit Multiple Equity PP EBITDA adjustment (pro forma EBITDA) Example – assume €100 EBITDA FDX – 5X Equity % - 35% Affordable bid 7500 or 7.5x EBITDA Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 23 DCF CFADS Net Income + Dep/Amt +/_ Change in deferred taxes +/- Other noncash items +/- Change in working capital Cash flow from operations +After tax interest (hypo Ƭ) - CAPEX - Unleveraged FCF Net Income Dep/Amt Change in deferred taxes Other non cash changes Change in working capital Cash flow from operations Non interest expense adjustment Capex CFADS Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 24 IRR 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 Equivalent MOIC Over 6 Years 1.8X 3.0X 4.8X 7.5X 11.4X 25 Future Value Market Size (Year 6) 1,000 Market Share 10% Revenue 100 Revenue Multiple 5 Value 500 Ownership Need Investment (today) 10 Required Return (40%) 7.5X Expected Exit Value 75 Today’s Ownership Requirement Expected Exit Value Projected Value % Ownership Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 75 500 15% 26 Fixing the Broken Deal – Price and Structural Flex Increase spread Recycled Original issue discount Eliminate PIK Reduce debt Add a subordinate tranche More equity Add covenants Reduce Price Seller Paper Amsterdam Institute of Finance October, 2014 27