Conformity to Quality Standards in International Tea Markets The Case of South Indian tea Marianne Nylandsted Larsen Department of Geography & Geology Introduction • Market concentration high (OECD countries) – few players (large branded tea manufacturers) such as Unilever, Tata Tetley, Twinings • Slow growth in tea consumption in traditional importing countries in Europe – quality differentiation a key strategy in order to stimulate demand and maintain market position • Product differentiation and chain restructuring in European markets fairly well-known, but little is know about product and quality requirements in emerging markets in Asia, the Middle East, CIS countries. • Asia is currently the largest importer, followed by Europe, Africa and Russia Department of Geography & Geology Introduction (cont.) 1) The ‘tea market’ is highly segmented - Quality requirements and reward structures - Tea products are almost always in blended form (or defined by geographical indicators, single origin) - ‘Quality by design’ (a blend contains different grades (with different ‘quality attributes’); processing methods) 2) A tendency to move away from spot market transactions to other forms of vertical coordination between producers and processors – quality management 3) Improvement in quality management practices by small tea growers constrained by high labour supervision and monitoring costs Department of Geography & Geology Outline of presentation • Explore how three groups of stakeholders in the South Indian industry meet (changing) quality requirements in new and existing markets • Exporters – export destinations, quality requirements and sourcing strategies • Bought leaf factories – product differentiation and sourcing strategies • Small tea growers’ conformity to quality requirements Department of Geography & Geology Background - the south Indian tea sector • Approximately 50% of India’s tea exports come from South India. • Approximately 65,000 small tea growers contribute to around 50% of South Indian tea production. • 60-80% of Nilgiris’ production was exported to the Soviet bloc from the mid-1970s to the mid-1990s • Demand: low-quality bulk teas, but relatively high returns for these sales. • 1990s: Expansion of tea production by small growers and rapid growth of Bought Leaf Factories • 1998/99 – a sharp decline in exports to Russia and CIS countries combined with declining global tea prices affected the sector detrimentally Department of Geography & Geology Production of tea in South India Production of tea in South India, CTC and Orthodox, 1961-2006 250 Million kg 200 150 CTC Orthodox 100 50 0 61 19 81 19 92 19 94 19 96 19 98 19 Year 00 20 02 20 04 20 06 20 Department of Geography & Geology Export companies • Tea estates • Bulk tea and between 70 and 100% exported directly to buyers in Europe (branded tea manufacturers) • The quality of green leaf itself and method of processing are significant to the branded tea manufacturers • Selective plucking methods implemented • Orthodox tea production (converted or increased production) • Third-party certification (ISO 9000 series of quality management and compliance to food safety HACCP procedures) Department of Geography & Geology Export companies (cont.) • Group of blending companies: • Main export countries: Russia, Ukraine (CIS), Kazakhstan, Poland (60-70%) • Export of Orthodox and CTC teas (bulk, blended form) • Packing facilities in consuming countries, several entered the packed tea market • Secondary export countries: Australia, EU, USA, Japan – bulk, blended form (30-40%) • Third-part certification (ISO 9000 series of quality management and compliance to food safety HACCP procedures) • Group of blending companies: • Main export countries: Iraq, Pakistan, Kenya, Russia • Bulk export - CTC blends (low unit price) • None certified against e.g. ISO 9000 Department of Geography & Geology Sourcing strategies • Blenders exporting to higher quality segments (including packed tea segments) in Russia, CIS, Europe, Japan, Australia: 50-60% from auction centres while 40-50% purchased directly from few tea estates (orthodox tea) • Blenders exporting to lower quality segments in the Middle East, West Asia, Africa (Kenya): 70-80% from auction centres, 30-20% procured directly from tea estates (orthodox and CTC) and BLFs (CTC) • Import of tea for re-export: Vietnam, Kenya, Nepal, Indonesia • Average unit import price: 50 Rs/kg (34.23 Rs/kg Vietnamese tea) – Average unit price, auction centres: price 66 Rs per kg Department of Geography & Geology Quality differentiation and sourcing strategies by BLF • Dual processing lines (coarse and fine leaf) - 1 to 4 different qualities • BLFs with own tea gardens – supplement with green leaf sourced from small tea growers • Price differential at the auction centre between very fine quality and standard quality of 20-30 Rs/kg ($0,66) • Sourcing strategy: • Re-definition of quality standard (two/three leaves and a bud) and price incentives • Scaled down purchasing through agents, focus on fewer growers and purchase from Quality Tea procurement and Service Centres run by women’s self help groups • However, most of the BLFs focused on volume, not quality Department of Geography & Geology Small tea growers’ conformity to quality requirements? • Tea production highly labour-intensive: • Fine leaf standard (two leaves and a bud) – plucking rounds should be maintained at around 10 days requires more labour at the same time as the cost of labour increases during the peak season • Lack of sufficient price premium attached to higher quality leaf: • Fine leaf: 20-25 kg per day • Sub-standard/standard leaf: 40 kg per day • Return - fine leaf: 200-250 Rs per working day Return on standard: 320 Rs per working day • Green leaf prices are characterised by intraseasonal variations Focus on quantity instead of quality during peak season Department of Geography & Geology Concluding remarks 1) A tendency to move away from spot market transactions to other forms of vertical coordination between producers and processors in order to ensure a sufficient supply of high(er) quality teas (branded tea manufacturers, tea estates, blenders and the interface between BLFs and small growers) – quality requirements in different markets 2) The ‘tea market’ is highly segmented. Differences in unit prices between markets and market segments, but there is always a market – even for poor quality tea 3) Improvement in quality management practices by small tea growers is of great importance • Major constraints: high labour supervision and monitoring costs and a market system which rewards quantity of output and tolerates deficiencies in output quality Department of Geography & Geology Critical issues that require further analysis: • Emerging markets in Asia and the Middle East may introduce new export opportunities - but it is uncertain whether these markets offer higher returns compared with existing markets (small tea growers and BLFs) reward structures of conforming to different quality requirements in different markets need to be analysed. • Farm-level costs and benefits of conforming to different quality grades and how these relate to farm scale and marketing channel need to be invested based on an analysis of the small tea grower survey Countries Other countries Australia Pakistan Japan Kenya Sri Lanka Singapore Afghanistan Turkey ARE Saudi Arabia Iraq Iran UAE Canada USA Poland Ireland Germany Netherlands United Kingdom Other CIS Uzbekistan Ukraine Kazakhstan Russia Rs per kg Department of Geography & Geology Unit export prices (selected countries), 2006 Unit export prices (Rs per kg), 2006 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Countries Other countries Australia Pakistan Japan Kenya Sri Lanka Singapore Afghanistan Turkey ARE Saudi Arabia Iraq Iran UAE Canada USA Poland Ireland Germany Netherlands United Kingdom Other CIS Uzbekistan Ukraine Kazakhstan Russia Million kg Department of Geography & Geology Export of Tea, 2006 Export of tea from India (million kg), 2006 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Department of Geography & Geology Department of Geography & Geology Department of Geography & Geology Department of Geography & Geology Department of Geography & Geology Institutional – regulatory framework Tea board of India: • Launched ‘Quality Upgradation Programme’ (2000) – subsidies • CTC / Orthodox tea • Upgrading of processing methods (BLFs) • Improvement in husbandry practices • Tea Marketing Control Order (2001) – sale of tea through any marketing channel • Liberalisation – duty free import of tea (re-export) Department of Geography & Geology Auction prices, 1995-2006 Auction prices (US cents/kg), 1995-2006 250 US cents/kg 200 South India 150 North India 100 Sri Lanka Kenya 50 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Year Department of Geography & Geology Department of Geography & Geology Quality of tea and quality standards (cont.) • Tea available at the consumer levels in blended form or defined by geographical indicator (pure Assam, Darjeeling) • Private quality standards set by blending companies / tea manufacturers (though compliance to (voluntary and mandatory) quality and food safety procedures is important • Blending according to specific domestic/regional preferences ‘quality by design’ and information on quality embedded in brands (OECD countries) • A blend consist of different grades, quality attributes and methods of processing • High degree of inter-substitution and flexibility in blending formulas Department of Geography & Geology What defines the quality of tea and quality standards • The quality of tea is made in the field and only preserved in the factory (two leaves and a bud) • Quality differentiated according to grade, processing methods and quality attributes • Auction and private sale: Tea is sold on the garden mark and grade – prices vary considerably between grades. ‘ Department of Geography & Geology Main objectives of the project How quality standards in different end-markets affect terms and conditions for market access for developing countries’ tea products. • To examine the scope and nature of salient quality standards in European and Developing Asian markets and how quality is financial rewarded in these markets • To analyse the distributional effects of conformity to quality standards amongst developing countries and different groups of actors within a country • To identify what national and local institutional conditions are important in achieving improved conformity with quality standards Department of Geography & Geology Exporting countries Major tea exporting countries 400 350 Sri Lanka 300 Kenya Million kg China 250 India 200 Vietnam Indonesia 150 Argentina 100 Malawi Tanzania 50 Zimbabwe 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 Year 2004 2005 2006 Others Department of Geography & Geology Import – major regions Import of tea (regions) 2500 EU 2000 Other West Europe Million kg East Europe 1500 America West Asia Asia other than West 1000 North Africa Africa other than North 500 Oceania 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 Year 2004 2005 Department of Geography & Geology CTC and Orthodox tea – average unit prices 60 50 Rs/kg 40 CTC 30 Orthodox 20 10 0 2001 2002 2004 2003 Year 2005 2006 Department of Geography & Geology Intra-seasonal variation in prices Green leaf prices (BLF) 10 9 8 Rs per kg 7 6 Standard leaf 5 Fine leaf 4 3 2 1 0 Jan Feb March April May June July Months Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Department of Geography & Geology Total quantity sold at auctions and total production (million kgs) in South India, 1991-2006 250 Cochin Coonoor 150 Coimbatore 100 Total quantity sold at auctions 50 Total production, South India Year 20 05 20 03 20 01 19 99 19 97 19 95 19 93 0 19 91 Million kgs 200