ENCOMIENDA early 1500s to1549. Corregidor y Encomendero disputan las ganancias. ENCOMIENDA 15211549. Trusteeship that allowed trustee and his first -born son to receive tribute payments and unrestricted personal services from a stipulated number of Indians living in a stipulated number of villages. This provided the basis for amassing wealth through indian labor. High numbers of indigenous peoples died of diseases reducing greatly the population that could provide the required tribute and labor. The native population of Peru declined from 1.3 million in 1570, to 600,000 in 1620. In Meso-America the circumstances were no different. The population of Indians went from 25.3 million in 1519, to a scant 1 million in 1605. INDIGENOUS POPULATION AT CONQUEST of MESOAMERICA (MEXICO AND CENTRAL AMERICA) 1519 1532 1548 1568 1580 1595 1605 1650 25.2 million 16.8 million 6.3 million 2.7 million 1.9 million 1.4 million 1.1 million 1.5 million The Repartimiento System With the decline of the native population the structure and pattern of labor distribution changed. By the 1540s the Spanish introduced a new way of distributing labor: allotments of labor were made not by a royal grant (for life) as it was the case with the encomienda, instead employers competed with one another in order to pay the colonial regime for the labor force. This system was called the repartimiento. Under it, Indian labor was placed under royal control. This was a case of paid forced labor (the encomienda had been unpaid forced labor. Under the new system: a) the indigenous population was paid a salary, usually higher than anything done before. b) royal authorities determined the working conditions -- including the number of hours and the type of work. A small proportion of adult men from each Indian town would be assigned each year for a period of time, between a week and a month, to a Spanish employer. The workers were supposed to be paid a standard wage. Repartimiento lasted from 1550 until 1632, and was then replaced with wage labor and the hacienda system. It continued much longer in Guatemala and El Salvador. Under the mita, some three million Quechua Indians were compelled to work in the mines. Hundreds of thousands died there, of disease, from accidents, and at the brutal hand of their masters. Peasants fled as best they could, abandoning the land, but many were forced into reducciones, concentration areas where they could be counted and conscripted. Although some historians differ over the absolute numbers, most agree that, the course of the mita (1575-1825), the native population of the Andes declined by eighty percent... African Slaves take the place of indigenous slaves by late sixteenth century Although some slaves came with Cortes on his 1519 voyage, Africans were first brought to New Spain in the late 16th century to fill the void left by the decline of the indigenous population. The peak of slave importation was during the mining boom of 1580-1635. A lot of Spanish immigrants arrived during this time as well. Slavery of indigenous people was discouraged after 1560 so most slaves were African during the Colonial period. Spaniards and criollos (those born in New Spain) often used slaves as servants, overseers of Indian labor and mistresses and concubines for merchants and officials. Slavery The wholesale ownership of human beings as a commodity to be used for their labor. Spanish slavery differed from indigenous slavery where slaves could own property, other slaves, and their offspring were not slaves. Between 4,000 -8,000 slaves imported into Mexico. The majority went to the Caribbean islands and the Brazil. A total of 3 million African slaves were brought to the "new world," primarily to work in sugar plantations. Wage Labor WAGE LABOR--Selling of individual labor as a commodity for a specific wage. No obligations on the part of the employer for social welfare or other benefits--simply paying a wage. By early 1600s, free labor and debt labor were common practices. Debt Servitude the former tienda de raya of Guaracha's hacienda in the village of San Antonio Guaracha, Mexico (near Guadalajara) DEBT SERVITUDE or DEBT LABOR-Entrapment of laborers in a web of debts for their purchases of basic necessities. These were the first steps in setting up tiendas de raya (company stores), where people purchased basic necessities at extremely inflated prices and then were indebted with interest. Company stores were often the only place the people working in mines and in textile industries could purchase goods. Debt servitude can also involve the loaning of money and its repayment at extremely high interest rates through labor. Such debtor systems are often called enganches or "hooks." People got into debt were never capable of working off. Haciendas Hacienda Guaracha, unrestored The hacienda system was built on the appropriation of indigenous village lands to create a system of debt peonage and share cropping (workers turn over a percentage of the crop to the land owner). Haciendas were large landed estates held by Spaniards and Creoles in which indigenous populations lived on the land or nearby. The hacendados organized their estates to function as self-contained units, incorporated agrarian activities, artisanry, commerce, and even small factories. Besides wage laborers they used tenants, sharecroppers, and peasants from neighboring Indian communities. In many cases the owners of the hacienda, the hacendados, had tremendous power over people who worked their lands, often acting as local lords. Plantations These were large farms geared to exports, often using foreign capital and slave labor (the first slaves were brought from Africa in 1538). They were mainly in areas where the indigenous population was soon wiped out. The first great plantation crop was sugar in northern Brazil, coastal Peru, parts of Colombia and the Caribbean. On the plantations, African slaves worked in gangs, often in the most brutal conditions , watched over by armed guards. An average plantation had between 80-100 slaves. Plantation owners were business men motivated by profit, and their farms were usually both efficient and inhumane. Limpieza de Sangre Originally used to refer to the genealogical purity of Christians— purity of blood of Jews, Muslims, and heretics—limpieza de sangre was used as a weapon of exclusion to eliminate those with “stains” in their ancestry from holding important clerical and political office and as we for entry into universities, religious and military orders, and certain guilds Blended with the Mediterranean concept of honor, limpieza de sangre was imported into New Spain. The social value held for clean and honorable lineages was maintained by endogamous marriage and legitimate birth Women and racial purity Since it was primarily women who could introduce “unclean blood” into a lineage, reproducing purity of blood required guarding the chastity of married women and premarital virginity Controlling women’s sexuality before and after marriage became as much a matter of purity as it was of honor. Changes in indigenous communities in the 1500 and early 1600s B. Spaniards initially set up a system of indirect rule in which they invested those who had been of the noble class in indigenous societies more privileges. Within Indian communities, members of nobility were exempted from tribute payments and often served as caciques or bosses, collecting tribute for the Spanish. They were allowed to dress like the Spanish and own and ride horses. They moved into local government and in many cases exploited their own people to maintain some individual privilege. C. Below the nobility were non-noble indigenous people who were given the position of conquered labor. They had a separate legal status as minor and wards of the crown. D. As the population became more mixed with the arrival of more Spaniards, more born in New Spain, and the addition of slaves,, mixed group populations called mulattos (b/W) zambos (indian/bl)_ and mestizos were grouped at the bottom of the social hierarchy and considered fit for unskilled labor. E. By the end of the 16th century a lot of the population didn't fit into the hierarchy. As the indigenous population decreased, the castas, people of mixed descent began to move into rural society. Caste System A strict caste system emerged in New Spain in which perceived physical difference became linked to social rank and prestige By 1549, no mulattos, mestizos or persons born out of wedlock could have Indians laboring for them in encomienda. Mestizo became synonymous with “illegitimate.” Castas as hierarchy By the 1600s, purity of blood statutes of certain institutions added mestizos and mulattos to categories considered impure castes. As time passed, “the mixed bloods,” steadily increased their numbers, despite efforts to control the sexuality of elite women and to encourage racial purity. The sistema de castas was a hierarchical ordering of different groups based on their percentage of Spanish blood. At the top of this system were those of “pure” Spanish blood followed b a descending order of racial categories. Initially the Spaniards recognized six basic racial divisions based on appearances (white, mestizo, pardo, mulatto, negro, natural/indio), but this expanded to an elaborate system by the second half of the 17th century when mestizos and mulattos occupied a clear numerical presence. Racial Caste System 1. Español – India = Mestizo 2. Español – Mestiza = Castizo 3. Castizo – Española = Español 4. Español – Negra = Mulata 5. Español – Mulata = Morisco 6. Español – Morisca = Alvino 7. Español – Alvina = Torna atrás 8. Indio – Negra = Lobo 9. Lobo – Negra = Chino (3/4 Negro, ¼ Indio) 10. Chino – India = Cambujo (5/8 Indio, 3/8 Negro) 11. Indio – Cambujo = Tente en el aire (13/16 Indio, 3/16 Negro) 12. Tente en el aire – Mulata = Alvarasada (13/32 Indio, 11/32 Negro, 8/332 Españo 13. Alvarasado – India = Barsino (45/64 Indio, 11/64 Negro, 8/64 Español) 14. Barsino – India = Campamulata (109/128 Indio, 11/128 Negro, 8/128 Español) 15. Indio – Mestiza = Coyote From heirs to laborers The change in laws related to a shift in interest from producing heirs to producing laborers. Because of the decline in indigenous population, there was a need for a subordinated population to supplement the tribute labor of Indians. Indian communities in the seventeenth and early to mideighteenth century were also looking for ways to add laborers to their communities Linking “race” to social status and occupation Legal and social limitation restricted the mobility of mestizos. Social status became linked to occupation in 1600s. Peninsular Spaniards...............bureaucrats and merchants Creoles............................large landowners Mestizos...........................artisans, shopkeepers, Mulattos............................urban manual laborers Indians............................rural peasants. Casta system, gender, and class 1718-Crown regulation required parental approval of unions to avoid "unequal marriage." but mestizos came to dominate. Result was different sexual standards for men and women, but also for different kinds of women according to their perceived race and place in the caste system Changes in indigenous societies In the 1700s, indigenous identities underwent changes. There was a breakdown in the barriers between nobles and commoners and proletarianization--loss of land, happened to many Indians. This happened sooner in some areas than others, with places like the Tierra Caliente in Guerrero experiencing competition for land later in the 1700s. Inca Noble woman The status system was built on “moving towards white.” Cartagena, Colombia--description of Spanish official, 1772 ""Between the Mulatto and the Negro there is an intermediate race, which they call Sambos owing their origin to a mixture between one of these and with an Indian or among themselves. Between the Tercerones (white and Mulato, followed by Quaterones, white and a terceron) and the Mulattoes, the Quaterones and the Tercerones are those called Tente en el Aire, suspended in the air because they neither advance or recede. Children whose parents are a Quarteron or a Quinteron and a Mulatto or Terceron are Salto atras, retrogrades because, instead of advancing towards Whites, they have gone backwards towards the Negro race." Changes in race categories and population growth in Mexico “Indians”: 2.5 million in 1803, 4.6 million in 1930 “Whites” 1.2 million in 1803, 2.4 million in 1930 “Mestizos”: 2.4 million in 1803, 9.0 million in 1930