UNCLASSIFIED
Joint Basing Impact to Navy
W. RICK McKUTCHIN
CNIC, HQ N80
Regional Support Joaella Lane, NDW
JUNE 2010
UNCLASSIFIED
4/8/2015 10:16 AM
Released on 7 May 2010 by VADM Vitale
11
Joint Basing (JB) Impact - BLUF
• BRAC 2005 includes 12 JB sites – 7 involve Navy installations
- Navy designated as “Lead” at 4 sites
• Overall Navy Impact
- Net gain of 2,745 bldgs (17.8M SF valued at $8.3B)
- Net gain of 1,559 civilian employees
- Net gain of $265M in work requirements; $20.7M unfunded (see below)
• OSD mandated COLS for JBs higher than Navy COLs
- OSD directed that JBs be “fully funded” to meet OSD COLS
- $20.7M/yr above program-of-record required meet COLS (Navy share)
• 5 to 8% increase over program-of-record
- FMB directed CNIC to absorb shortfalls in FY10/11 & readdress in POM-12
• OSD requires Joint Bases to report quarterly performance on COLS
- Performance against 274 COLS assessed using the Cost and Performance Visibility
Framework (CPVF) tool
- Joint Bases must report COLS performance data quarterly and financial data annually
4/8/2015 10:16 AM
22
CNIC JB Region Overview
CNR NDW
CNR HAWAII
• Anacostia /Bolling AFB
• Pearl Harbor – Hickam
• NAF Wash./Andrews AFB
CNR MID-ATLANTIC
• NAVAIRENGSTA Lakehurst
• JEB Little Creek/Ft Story, VA
CJR MARIANAS
• Guam – Andersen AFB
CNR SOUTHEAST
• NAVWPNSTA Charleston
• Navy as Supporting Command is the BOS Provider (e.g. Host)
• Navy as Supported Command receives BOS Services (e.g. Tenant)
4/8/2015 10:16 AM
33
Joint Basing Impact to Navy
Joint Base (JB) –
Navy Lead or
Installation Equity
Square Footage
Before
Joint Region
Marianas – Andersen
(Navy Lead)
8.2M
JEB Little Creek –
Fort Story
(Navy Lead)
6.3M
JB Pearl Harbor –
Hickam
(Navy Lead)
39.6M
JB Anacostia –
Bolling
(Navy Lead)
15.3M
14.9M
NET
6.7M
Before
After
NET
$10.3B
$15.8B
$5.5B
No. of buildings
Before
1,723
No. of Personnel
After
NET
Before
3,414
1.691 285 Navy Mil
425 Civ
7.5M
1.2M
$2.01B
$2.33B
$320M
875
1,159
284 8 Navy Mil
666 Civ
44.7M
5.1M
$15.3B
$19.4B
$4.1B
3,176
3,934
758 361 Navy Mil
2,069 Civ
28.5M
13.2M
$441M
$2.5B
$2.06B
262
1,004
742 22 Navy Mil
420 Civ
JB Andrews – Naval
Air Facility Wash
(Air Force Lead)
680K
JB McGuire – Ft Dix –
NAS Lakehurst
(Air Force Lead)
2.9M
JB Charleston –
NWS Charleston
(Air Force Lead)
4.8M
TOTAL
After
Plant Replacement
Value (PRV)
0
-680K
$228M
0
-$228M
24
0
-24 5 Navy Mil
15 Civ
0
-2.9M
$1.32B
0 -$1.32B
233
0
-233 127 Navy Mil
370 Civ
0
-4.8M
$2.1B
0
-$2.1B
473
0
-473 55 Navy Mil
613 Civ
77.8M
95.6M
17.8M
$31.7B
$40.03B
$8.3B
6,766
9,511
2,745 863 Navy Mil
4,578 Civ
After *
285 Navv Mil
742 Oth Svc Mil
1,066 Civ
8 Navy Mil
10 Oth Svc Mil
732 Civ
361 Navy Mil
606 Oth Svc Mil
3,252 Civ
22 Navy Mil
285 Oth Svc Mil
1,087 Civ
5 Navy Mil
1,209 Oth Svc Mil
0 Civ
127 Navy Mil
1,020 Oth Svc Mil
0 Civ
55 Navy Mil
845 Oth Svc Mil
0 Civ
863 Navy Mil
6,137 Civ
Shortfall
to meet
Joint
COLs
TOA
NET
Before
After
Net
$170M
$315M
$149M
$4.1M
$80M
$101M
$23M
$1.5M
$384M
$525M
$146M
$5.2M
$46M
$104M
$62M
$4.0M
$8M
$0
-$8M
$0
$31M
-$2.4M
-$33M
$2.4M
$76M
-$3.5M
-$80M
$3.5M
$795M
$1.04B
$244M
$20.7M
641 Civ
66 Civ
1,183 Civ
667 Civ
-15 Civ
-370 Civ
-613 Civ
1,559 Civ
* MILPERS performing installation management (IM) do not “transfer”; they become embedded IM workforce
4/8/2015 10:16 AM
44
Navy Challenges
• Breaking the Regionalization model for Navy
Installations
- PSD Model different from other services
- Financial Management models different (region vice installation)
• NSPS Conversions
• NMCI conversion with Navy CAC cards
4/8/2015 10:16 AM
55
Future of Joint Basing
• Up front costs to implement with potential future
savings
- Cost savings anticipated not realized to date
- Efficiencies should be realized over time as contracts
are combined, work force in “overhead” functions are
optimized and right-sized
• Transparency and uniformity of base operating
support.
4/8/2015 10:16 AM
66
JB - Summary
• Joint Basing = a priority for DUSD(I&E)
- Stepping stone to CDIS (Common Delivery of Installation
Support) and joint installation management
• Additional Navy BOS FY10/11 Impact: +$20M
- FMB: CNIC must absorb in FY10/11, readdress in POM 12
• We have to make adjustments as JB’s are different
- JBs “immune” from Service - directed budget cuts or efficiencies
- Joint Bases must report COLS performance data quarterly and
financial data annually
• No Joint Base is standard – each unique with Service
‘equities’
4/8/2015 10:16 AM
77