Lecture 2 - continued
The publicistic style
Includes:
the style of newspaper and magazine articles,
essays,
oratorical speech
the style of radio and TV commentaries.
Oral + written form
Aim: to convince + to cause to accept
The publicistic style
Peculiarities:
logical argumentation + emotional appeal =
(scientific prose and belle-lettres style).
the emotional appeal – the use of words with emotive meaning + the use of stylistic devices (not fresh or genuine!)
the form of a monologue,
the coherent and logical syntactical structure
careful paragraphing, extended system of connectives
a great number of literary and bookish words.
The aim:
interpret the news
comment on the events of the day
convince [the reader that …]
Vocabulary:
terms (political, economic, etc.);
newspaper clichés;
emotionally coloured vocabulary;
stylistic devices.
Essays
short literary articles on philosophical, aesthetic or literary subject;
never go deep;
individual (often in 1 st person);
very popular in the 18 th cent.:
the principal literary form,
written on important topics of the day,
often criticizing the short-comings of the political and social system in England.
Essays
Features:
brevity of expression;
the use of 1 st person singular, personal approach;
the use of emotionally coloured words;
the use of epigram, paradoxes, aphorisms.
Oratorical Speech
Includes :
parliamentary discourse,
speeches at Congress,
sermons,
orations,
speeches on solemn public occasions.
Aim – to convince the audience and evoke an immediate desired reaction.
Oratorical speech
Features of the oral speech:
the use of direct address (My Lords! Mr. Chairman!
Ladies and Gentlemen!);
the use of contractions (I’ll, don’t);
the use of pronouns I and we;
the use of colloquial words and phrases,
the use of alliteration.
Oratorical speech
The speaker wants:
to keep up the interest of the audience and hold it in suspense, consequently:
emotionally coloured words;
lexical and syntactical TRITE stylistic devices;
repetition;
allusions (to contemporary or historical events, to well-known people, to literary characters, mythology and the Bible; used to draw the historical parallels and to confirm the statement).
Oratorical speech
Syntactical features –
the sentences are long, can contain many dependent clauses and parenthetical clauses;
the use of gradations: Such a claim was all a part, a trick, a trap to provide the Republican party with a scapegoat at that time;
antithesis, rhetorical questions, exclamatory sentences, suspense:
We fought Lexington to free ourselves.
We fought Gettysburg to free others.
(antithesis, parallelism, repetition)
Oratorical speech
Rhetorical questions
draw the attention of the audience
and break the monotony of a series of declarative sentences,
have a strong emotive colouring (the speaker strives to call for a sympathetic reaction on the part of the listeners);
fulfill the function of a statement, not a ?
Non-rhetorical Q. are also effective.
The publicistic style
Summary
The use of direct address and 1 st person pronouns.
A rather wide use of connectives.
The abundant use of expressive and emotive words.
The use of tropes, especially sustained metaphors and similes.
The use of traditional set expressions and clichés.
The use of colloquial vocabulary.
The colloquial style -
informal speech of everyday conversation.
The 1 st problem – classification: can it be regarded as a functional style?
- I.R. Halperin (functional styles belong only to the written variety of the literary language)
+ I.V. Arnold, Y.M. Skrebnev, V.A. Maltsev
The colloquial style
literary colloquial ( литературно-разговорный ) ; unceremonious ( фамильярно-разговорный ) ; popular speech/ common parlance ( просторечье ).
- our everyday means of communication.
Peculiarities
social phrases: greetings, words of parting; introductions and wishes; congratulations, requests, thanks, apologies, assent and dissent, hesitation el.;
the formulae of direct address:
a) socially oriented: Sir, Madam, first name, Professor …
b) bearing personal emotiveness: endearments, abusive.
Peculiarities
2. Vocabulary. The word-stock falls into 3 layers:
the literary; the neutral; the colloquial.
(kid – infant, daddy – parent)
Colloquial words are always more emotionally coloured.
cock-and-bull – long, complicated story, cliff-hanger – prolonged tense situation, from A to Z – thoroughly.
Thematically colloquial lexical units are more anthropocentric
(monkey – mischievous child; splinter – splitting headache).
Peculiarities
3. Simple verbs: phrasal verbs are mostly used instead of their literary synonyms:
to get out – retire;
to stand up to – support.
The one-syllabled verbs, such as:
do, put, take, come, go, get, turn, run, fall, etc., produce an enormous multiplicity of meanings.
4. Simple sentences prevail .
Peculiarities
5. Combination of compression and redundancy
Compression – realized in:
Shortened forms of modal and auxiliary verbs;
Omission of words (elliptical sentences: Been travelling?);
Clipped words;
Words of broad semantics (thing, stuff, matter);
Simplicity of syntactical constructions;
The use of monosyllabic words.
Peculiarities
So-called time-fillers or senseless expressions like
“You know…”, “Well”;
In pleonastic use of personal pronouns (Don’t you
forget it);
In the senseless repetition of words and phrases;
The use of double negative (Don’t bring no money; Ain’t
nobody’s business).
Professor Skrebnev:
Colloquial style = oral speech? But: lectures or a student’s answer > to bookish forms.
Colloquial speech = “dialogue”? But: the dialogue of an Amb. with a foreign secretary.
Lingual intercourse in coll. style is immediate.
Emotive character of everyday speech? But: poetry even more emotiveness.
“Consituation” (the situation is common to each of its participants)
A limited set of ready-made stereotyped formulas.
Prof. Skrebnev: 2 tendencies
Explication + implication - on different levels of the language
Phonetics:
The main feature is general carelessness and indistinctness of articulation. The expectancy factor makes indistinct speech comprehensible.
Explication: a loud voice, emphatic articulation (shown graphically in italics, dividing into syllables, etc.)
Prof. Skrebnev: 2 tendencies
Morphology.
Implication: dropping of morphemes (eg. real good,
pretty far, he don’t know).
Explication - in analytical morphology:
The use of emphatic forms (e.g. continuous – I’m thinking, I’m
being uneasy; Do come!)
The use of multiple negation;
The use of double subject;
The use of double demonstrative pronouns (eg. Is this here
that watch?)
The use of inclusive doubling (I will kill you dead)
Prof. Skrebnev: 2 tendencies
Syntax:
Common word combinations perform the function of imperative sentences
Tea. For two. Out here.
Non-interrogative sentences perform the function of interrogative.
You’re going? Sugar, Dr.Trent?
The use of pseudo-interrogative sentences:
Why don’t you sit down? Can you pass the salt?
Prof. Maltsev: word creation
Changes in the meaning:
metaphor: paralytic – helplessly drunk; peach – adult (slang); metonymy: wig – judge; antonomasia: Othello; hyperbole: smash hit show.
Changes in form:
Compounding and blending (hasbeen, block-head, brunch);
Affixation (keener – inquis. person; oldster, kiddo, fatso)
Shortening / acronyms, back clipping, back formation, front clipping, middle clipping (e.g. maths, exams, lab, sci-fi)
Informal grammar
the noun – the use of double genitive; the use of plural forms:
A good friend of my husband’s; I’m friends with him. He has
brains; the article can be omitted, but it can be used with proper names:
the Johnsons; He’s married to a Miss Brown; He bought a
Picasso; I don’t claim to be a Caruso; Here again was Tom,
the Tom…; the pronoun: objective forms
Jack was four year older than me. You’re the only person. – Me?
We are mad, you and me; Told who? You know who I mean.
Informal grammar
The adjective: typical is the use of absolute superlatives
She has the longest straightest legs; a more older man; the most
carelessest man; the bestest man;
The adverb – the use of adjectives instead of adverbs
Don’t talk so loud!;
The verb: the continuous forms instead of the indefinite - more emotional and personal
How are you feeling? Oh, how the stars were shining!; the verb will is a simple mark as futurity, while shall denotes obligation; the use of forms with low colloquial or vulgar, illiterate connotations
ain’t, gotcha, wanna.
The use of elliptical constructions
(Pass.: the airport. – Dr.: ok. );
Functional words are clipped ( ‘d, ‘s )
Leaving out the S or the functional verb or both:
Can’t afford to buy it. // Don’t worry. Only makes your hair gray. // Nice talking to you. // Oh, being sarcastic.
The book I’m reading; he says he has no appetite; it’s a good thing he did; the thing is it gets so awfully hot in here .