Reproductive Outcome Following Resection of Uterine Septum : A Retrospective Study Gundabattula S, Marakani L, Yanamandra N, Dasari S, Joseph E, Nirmalan P Hyderabad, India Website : www.fernandezhospital.com Introduction Prevalence of uterine malformation : 4.3% Septate uterus – mean incidence : 35% – Infertility – First and Second trimester loss Aim To evaluate the reproductive outcome of septal resection in women with – Infertility – Prior pregnancy losses Methods Retrospective study 2003 – 2010 Data retrieved via electronic database as well as manually through case records 124 women identified – 74 women (59.7%) – incomplete septum – 50 (40.3%) – complete septum Procedure Under general anaesthesia Septoplasty was performed – 26 Fr Resectoscope (Karl Storz) with a cutting monopolar electrode – Versapoint Hysteroscopy system (Gynaecare Versapoint) Septum was divided in upward direction until both tubal ostia were visualised in same plane Results Total no. of women : 124 Mean age : 27 years Indication – Prior pregnancy losses 52 – Primary infertility (1 – 17 years) 43 – Secondary infertility 21 – Incidental finding 08 Total 124 Lost follow up 40 Data available 84 Conceived 63 Total pregnancies 98 Lost to follow up 6 Outcome known 92 Laparoscopy Not performed 24 - Laparotomy x 1 - Caesarean section x 1 Performed 100 First and Second Trimester Miscarriage 1st 2nd trimester trimester Take home baby Preresection 169(%) Post resection 92(%) 102 (60.4) 18 (21.1) 55 (32.5) 13 (15.2) 3 (1.8) 56 (60.8) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 92.89 60.86 Pre resection 36.3 1.8 Post resection Infertility Outcome Pregnancy rate 59.3% Miscarriage 39.1% Live birth rate 52.2% 70 60 59.3 52.2 50 40 39 Pregnancy rate 30 Miscarriage 20 Live birth rate 10 0 Post resection Pre-resection Post resection (169) (92) p Value No. of pregnancies 169 92 1st trimester miscarriage 102 (60%) 18 (19%) p< 0.001 2nd trimester miscarriage 55 (32%) 13 (14%) p= 0.002 Term pregnancy IUFD /NND Live birth Take home baby Pre Post resection resection 92 (%) 169 (%) 2 50 (1.2) (54.34) 7 3 (5.3) (3.6) 7 57 (4.1) (61.9) 3 56 (1.8) (60.8) p Value p< 0.001 p= 0.75 p< 0.001 p< 0.001 Cervical cerclage – 41 (33%) Type – McDonald – Shirodkar – Abdominal 35 02 04 Indication – Prophylactic – Clinically short – Rescue 37 (4 were abdominal) 03 01 Cervical Cerclage Post-resection cervical cerclage was done in 33% women Over three fourths of pregnancies that had cerclage carried pregnancy to term Study No. of Patients Iry Infertility (%) Miscarriage +/IIry infertilty (%) Preg Rate Misc Rate Live Birth Preg Rate Misc Rate Live Birth Ayas 2011 181 44 17 42 77 15 67 Nouri 2010 64 75 25 50 68 19 49 Selvaraj 2010 26 32 33 6 86 33 67 Mollo 2009 44 39 4.5 34 - - - Saygili-Yilmaz 2002 361 25 16 75 75 16 75 124 59 39 52 85 33 64 Fernandez Hospital Discussion Inadequate septal vascularization Abnormal placentation In-coordinated contractility of septum Summary This study demonstrates: – Reduction in miscarriage rates – Enhances pregnancy rate in those with infertility – Increases ‘take-home baby’ rate in those with previous miscarriages and infertility Conclusion Metroplasty: – Significant improvement in reproductive performance – Outcome of patients with miscarriages is better than those with primary infertility Thank You